HCVICONE2NCT05794646
Community Intervention to Eliminate HCV Among People Who Use Drugs.
A study testing Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2 in people with HCV and Substance Use Disorders, run by ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of this interventional study is twofold with the evaluation of the feasibility and potential usefulness of an implementation strategy, and the efficiency of a community-based model of mass screening and immediate treatment of hepatitis C among People Who Use Drugs (PWUD) in three major cities in mainland… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HCV, Substance Use Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,400 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2023to 30 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years;
- Person who uses drugs, defined as:
- Reported psychoactive substance use and
- Positive urine test for at least one of the following: heroin, amphetamines, cocaine, MDMA (methylenedioxymethamphetamine), ecstasy, or misused opioid medications (methadone, buprenorphine or opiates used for a reason other than its original prescription (effects seeking) or used in a way that does not comply with its marketing authorisation (injected, snorted, taken multiple times beyond the prescribed dosage)) ;
- Informed and signed consent
Who cannot join
- Inability to understand the study;
- Being under guardianship, curatorship or mandate of future protection;
- Person participating in another research study with an exclusion period still in progress at the time of pre-inclusion.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
France3 sites
Lyon
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69000
Marseille
Marseille, PACA, 13000
Paris
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75000
About this study
Official title: Community Intervention to Eliminate HCV Among People Who Use Drugs. Implementation Study in the Cities of Paris, Marseille, Lyon and Fort-de-France, France.
The goal of this interventional study is twofold with the evaluation of the feasibility and potential usefulness of an implementation strategy, and the efficiency of a community-based model of mass screening and immediate treatment of hepatitis C among People Who Use Drugs (PWUD) in three major cities in mainland France (Paris, Lyon and Marseille) and in one overseas city (Fort-de-France). The investigators will also describe the psychological and infectious comorbidities of drug users, determine the stages of the HCV (Hepatitis C Virus), HBV (Hepatitis B Virus), HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) care cascade, and analyze the factors associated with HCV treatment failure. A qualitative study will investigate the acceptability of the RDS model.
Participants will be screened in an out of bound research center and receive appropriate treatment for infectious, addictological and psychiatric troubles. They will receive coupons to give to their peers for them to participate in the study.
Researchers will also compare the acceptability of referral to psychiatric care directly at the research site (intervention group) with that of referral directly to a city facility (control group).
Read the detailed description
Current state of knowledge:
In France, the prevalence of chronic hepatitis C in the general population was 0.3% in 2015. However, this prevalence is much higher in certain population subgroups. Thus PWUD are a population at risk of HCV infection (risky behaviors, sharing injection equipment).
In order to achieve the goal of eliminating hepatitis C by 2025 in France, three types of actions must be taken: developing off-premises screening strategies, improving access to treatment, and improving prevention. These actions correspond to micro-elimination practices.
Although there are many possible sites of care for PWUD, many PWUD do not attend the prevention and care system.
Despite the advent of new direct antiviral agents (DAAs) that cure infection in more than 95% of cases and the indication to treat all PWUDs, access to HCV treatment in this at-risk group remains low. Better control of HCV infection in high-risk groups such as PWUD would, beyond the individual benefit, greatly reduce the dynamics of the epidemic.
The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the PWUD population, especially the most precarious, is high, with at least one characterized psychiatric disorder observed in 50% to 80% of situations. The existence of unrecognized and untreated psychiatric disorders in these subjects is a factor of lesser access to somatic care, in particular to HCV care. Therefore, optimizing access to HCV care in the PWUD population requires the identification and appropriate management of psychiatric pathologies in these individuals.
Research Hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that the Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) recruitment technique and the community-based approach can be implemented in large urban areas and legally allow for psychiatric support, often necessary in this vulnerable population.
This study will also make it possible to estimate the size of the different populations of drug users in 4 large cities in France, one of which is overseas, in which the local specificities in terms of drug use but also of comorbidities will have to be studied (Capture/recapture).
In addition, the use of this recruitment technique coupled with the involvement of peers, will make it possible to define the different drug uses in the user population in the major cities of metropolitan France and in Fort-de-France. This information obtained from a population of hidden users is important and complementary to the results of the studies carried out in center for taking care of addiction problems (CSAPA) and support centres for the reduction of drug-related harms (CAARUD), by the ANRS (The French agency for AIDS and viral hepatitis research) 14059s Coquelicot study.
Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that the multicentric implementation of this screening and treatment strategy will be facilitated by the use of a toolkit. This toolkit "ICONE" has been developed by the investigating team of the ANRS 95050 ICONE study.
Finally, the investigators hypothesize that the proposal to initiate psychiatric follow-up at the site of the RDS will have an effect on the insertion into city mental health care in the months following the RDS in PWUD with psychiatric comorbidities.
Principal objective:
The main objective is twofold with the evaluation of the feasibility and potential usefulness of an implementation strategy, and the efficiency of a community-based model of mass screening and immediate treatment of hepatitis C among PWUD in Paris, Marseille, Lyon and Fort-de-France.
Secondary objectives:
- Estimate the size of the PWUD population in the 4 cities;
- Determine the prevalence of chronic HCV infection in the PWUD population in the 4 cities;
- Estimate the steps in the retrospective HCV care cascade (positive HCV Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT), known HCV status, previously initiated antiviral therapy, undetectable viral load) ;
- Determine the factors associated with hepatitis C treatment failure: defined as a detectable viral load 12 weeks after the end of treatment;
- Estimate the cost of our intervention for one PWUD screened and one PWUD cured of hepatitis C;
- Estimate the prevalence of HIV infection among PWUDs in the 4 cities;
- Estimate the steps in the retrospective care cascade of HIV infection (known HIV status, previously initiated antiviral treatment, undetectable viral load);
- Estimate the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B among PWUD in the 4 cities;
- Estimate the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (Syphilis, Gonorrhoea, Chlamydia) among PWUD in Fort-de-France;
- Describe the most frequent psychological comorbidities in the PWUD population in the 4 cities;
- Evaluate the effectiveness of peer-supported referral to infectious (HIV, HCV, HBV at all sites and STIs only in Fort-de-France), psychiatric and addictive care;
- To compare the acceptability of referral to psychiatric care directly at the research site (intervention group) with that of referral directly to a city facility (control group).
All of these objectives will be analyzed specifically in the sub-population of crack cocaine users.
Qualitative study objectives Evaluate the acceptability of the RDS model and the relevance of an implementation strategy.
Methodology:
Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2, allowing to evaluate simultaneously the effectiveness of the model on clinical criteria of access to psychiatric, addictological and infectious diseases care, and its feasibility by measuring the levers and potential obstacles to its implementation.
For the qualitative part, the investigators will conduct 15 interviews per site, i.e. 60 semi-structured interviews with the PWUDs who participated in the RDS. The researchers will organize 1 focus group with the stakeholders of each site before and after the implementation of the RDS.
Intervention:
Recruitment of PWUDs will be done through an RDS method. Ten to fifteen "seeds" will be selected per city for their diversity and social network. They will be invited to the research site (temporary community care facility), participate in all study procedures, and then receive 2-3 coupons to recruit eligible peers. Participants will receive HCV/HIV/HBV screening, on-site HCV RNA testing, liver fibrosis measurement, rapid antiviral (HCV) treatment initiation, treatment monitoring, and risk and harm reduction tools related to their risky practices. Participants with an HIV and/or HBV positive RDT will be referred to infectious disease services and the referral will be assessed. An assessment of psychological disorders will be carried out by i) Quick Screening Tool (QST) questionnaire asked to all participants; ii) MINI questionnaire for participants with positive QST. In case of a positive MINI, psychiatric consultations will be offered on site (Paris and Fort-de-France) or participants will be referred to structures offering psychiatric care (Lyon, Marseille). The effectiveness of referral to psychiatric care between the two interventions will be compared. All RDS participants will be referred to permanent addiction facilities and this referral will be evaluated. Peers will be present at this unique facility and will accompany participants throughout their HCV treatment. A capture/recapture study, nested within the RDS, will provide a reliable estimate of the PWUD population in the Paris arrondissements covered by the RDS and the cities of Marseille, Lyon and Fort-de-France. The qualitative study will take place at all sites. Individual interviews for a total of 60 participants will be conducted, as well as focus groups with stakeholders in each site.
Statistical methods:
Categorical variables will be described in terms of numbers and percentages with their associated 95% confidence intervals calculated using the exact method. Comparisons will be carried out by Chi² or Fisher's exact tests. Continuous variables will be described in terms of numbers, median, range and interquartile range or mean, standard deviation, standard deviation of the mean and confidence interval. Comparisons will be carried out using Mann-Whitney or Student's t tests depending on the distribution of the variable. The estimation of the size of the drug user populations will use the method recommended by the WHO (World Health Organization) with the Lincoln-Peterson estimator. Missing data will be taken into account by adopting the most penalizing approach. Logistic regression models will be used to search for factors associated with treatment failure. Multivariate logistic regression models will be employed to compare the success of psychiatric referral between the two groups.
Anticipated schedule:
Expected start date of the research (opening of RDS): September 2023 Duration of inclusions: 3 or 4 months per site (not necessarily over the same period) Duration of participation per participant: 1 day to 9 months Total expected duration of research: 24 months Anticipated end date of the trial/research: September 2025
Timeline for follow-up of participants in the research:
Participants with HCV RNA positive at RDS will be followed until SVR12 from treatment initiation. Visits at S4, end of treatment and SVR12.
- Conditions
- HCV, Substance Use Disorders
- Being tested
- Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2
- Keywords
- Hepatitis C Virus, mental health, RDS, peers, Test and Treat, People who use drugs
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders, Hepatitis C, Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2Other
Diagnosis of hepatitis C; Assessment of hepatic fibrosis; Treatment of hepatitis C; Assessment of psychological disorders and treatment or referral.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Other | Community-based intervention with screening and treatment initiation for HCV elimination among PWUD Receives: Other: Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of HCV cured PWUD participants (SVR12) among those with a positive HCV viral load at baseline
Number of HCV cured PWUD participants, defined as SVR12, i.e. undetectable HCV RNA viral load in a veinous sample measured by quantitative PCR (polymerase chain reaction) 12 weeks after the end of the antiviral treatment; divided by the number of participants with a positive HCV viral load in a veinous sample at baseline.
Measured: 12 weeks after the end of the 2 to 3 months HCV treatment
Acceptability and relevance of the RDS and implementation strategy : a qualitative study
The investigators will use a socio-anthropological method to target the PWUD participating in the RDS as well as the workers in the places where the RDS will have started.
In each study city, 15 semi-structured interviews will be conducted with PWUD who participated in the RDS. Participants who are not followed up in outreach structures will be over-represented to delve deeper into the pathways of these individuals.
Two focus groups in each city will be carried-out (one before the implementation of the RDS and one at the end of the study), in order to collect their feelings on the use and relevance of the toolkit for the implementation of the RDS.
The interviews and focus groups will be conducted using an interview grid that will be constructed to meet the objectives of the study. This grid will guide the investigators around different main themes: people's backgrounds, role of the facilitators, perception of RDS (understanding, acceptability, strengths and weaknesses).
Measured: From before the RDS implementation until the end of the study, up to 2 years
Secondary outcomes (22)
Number of PWUD in the arrondissements of Paris (neighborhoods involved in seed distribution), and the cities of Lyon, Marseille and Fort-de-France
Estimated Number of PWUD in the arrondissements of Paris (neighborhoods involved in seed distribution), and the cities of Lyon, Marseille and Fort-de-France
Measured: At the end of the RDS
Proportion of participants with positive HCV RNA among all participants
Number of participants with a positive HCV RNA divided by the number of participants
Measured: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants with a positive HCV RDT
Number of participants with a positive HCV RDT
Measured: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants with known HCV status
Number of participants with known HCV status (declarative) among participants with a positive HCV RDT
Measured: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants who were treated for HCV
Number of participants who were treated for HCV (self-reported) among participants with known HCV status
Measured: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants with known chronic hepatitis C status and undetectable HCV RNA
Number of participants with known chronic hepatitis C status and undetectable HCV RNA among participants who were treated for HCV
Measured: At baseline
HCV treatment failure defined as detectable viral load 12 weeks after HCV treatment completion
HCV treatment failure defined as detectable HCV RNA viral load measured in a veinous sample by quantitative PCR 12 weeks after the end of the antiviral treatment
Measured: 12 weeks after the end of the 2 to 3 months HCV treatment
Cost of the intervention per screened participant
All costs of the intervention divided by the number of participants screened
Measured: Through study completion, an expected time frame of 2 years
Cost of the intervention per participant cured of hepatitis C
All costs of the intervention divided by the number of participants cured of hepatitis C
Measured: Through study completion, an expected time frame of 2 years
Proportion of participants with a positive HIV RDT among participants
Number of participants with a positive HIV RDT divided by the number of participants
Measured: At baseline
HIV care cascade assessment at inclusion : participants with known HIV status
Number of participants with known HIV status
Measured: At baseline
HIV care cascade assessment at inclusion : HIV-positive participants on antiretroviral therapy
Number of HIV-positive participants on antiretroviral therapy among participants with known HIV status
Measured: At baseline
HIV care cascade assessment at inclusion : participants on effective antiretroviral therapy
Number of participants on effective antiretroviral therapy (HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml) among HIV-positive participants on antiretroviral therapy
Measured: At baseline
Proportion of participants with detectable HBsAg
Number of participants with detectable HBsAg divided by the number of participants
Measured: At baseline
Proportion of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive PCR for gonorrhea
Number of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive PCR for gonorrhea divided by the number of participants in Fort-de-France
Measured: At baseline
Proportion of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive PCR for chlamydia
Number of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive PCR for chlamydia divided by the number of participants in Fort-de-France
Measured: At baseline
Proportion of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive test for syphilis
Number of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive test for syphilis divided by the number of participants in Fort-de-France
Measured: At baseline
Prevalence of psychological pathologies
Prevalence of psychological pathologies diagnosed by the MINI questionnaire (nurse trained beforehand notably on the psychosis module) with the use of 3 modules: Major depressive episode, psychotic disorders and suicidal risk following the positive QST questionnaire
Measured: At baseline
Success of infectious diseases referral
Proportion of participants referred to an infectious diseases structure who went to their consultation
Measured: At 6 months
Success of addictological referral
Proportion of participants referred to an addictological structure who went to their consultation
Measured: At 6 months
Success of psychiatric referral at 3 months
Proportion of participants referred to a psychiatric structure in the city who went to their consultation
Measured: At 3 months
Success of psychiatric referral at 6 months
Proportion of participants referred to a psychiatric structure in the city who went to their consultation
Measured: At 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2023
- Study start2 Oct 2023
- Primary completion16 May 2025
- Study completion30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HCVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This type 2 hybrid 'effectiveness-implementation' study makes it possible to simultaneously evaluate the efficiency of the model on clinical criteria of HCV cure, and its feasibility by measuring the potential obstacles and the relevance of its implementation.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hélène Donnadieu, PhD, Principal investigator, PCCEI
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05794646
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ANRS 0336s ICONE 2
- Acronym
- ICONE2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All collected individual participant data
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Community Intervention to Eliminate HCV Among People Who Use Drugs. Implementation Study in the Cities of Paris, Marseille, Lyon and Fort-de-France, France.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05794646
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICONE2 / ANRS 0336s ICONE 2
- Conditions
- HCV, Substance Use Disorders
- Keywords
- Hepatitis C Virus, mental health, RDS, peers, Test and Treat, People who use drugs
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3,400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesOther government
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this interventional study is twofold with the evaluation of the feasibility and potential usefulness of an implementation strategy, and the efficiency of a community-based model of mass screening and immediate treatment of hepatitis C among People Who Use Drugs (PWUD) in three major cities in mainland France (Paris, Lyon and Marseille) and in one overseas city (Fort-de-France). The investigators will also describe the psychological and infectious comorbidities of drug users, determine the stages of the HCV (Hepatitis C Virus), HBV (Hepatitis B Virus), HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) care cascade, and analyze the factors associated with HCV treatment failure. A qualitative study will investigate the acceptability of the RDS model.
Participants will be screened in an out of bound research center and receive appropriate treatment for infectious, addictological and psychiatric troubles. They will receive coupons to give to their peers for them to participate in the study.
Researchers will also compare the acceptability of referral to psychiatric care directly at the research site (intervention group) with that of referral directly to a city facility (control group).
Detailed description
Current state of knowledge:
In France, the prevalence of chronic hepatitis C in the general population was 0.3% in 2015. However, this prevalence is much higher in certain population subgroups. Thus PWUD are a population at risk of HCV infection (risky behaviors, sharing injection equipment).
In order to achieve the goal of eliminating hepatitis C by 2025 in France, three types of actions must be taken: developing off-premises screening strategies, improving access to treatment, and improving prevention. These actions correspond to micro-elimination practices.
Although there are many possible sites of care for PWUD, many PWUD do not attend the prevention and care system.
Despite the advent of new direct antiviral agents (DAAs) that cure infection in more than 95% of cases and the indication to treat all PWUDs, access to HCV treatment in this at-risk group remains low. Better control of HCV infection in high-risk groups such as PWUD would, beyond the individual benefit, greatly reduce the dynamics of the epidemic.
The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the PWUD population, especially the most precarious, is high, with at least one characterized psychiatric disorder observed in 50% to 80% of situations. The existence of unrecognized and untreated psychiatric disorders in these subjects is a factor of lesser access to somatic care, in particular to HCV care. Therefore, optimizing access to HCV care in the PWUD population requires the identification and appropriate management of psychiatric pathologies in these individuals.
Research Hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that the Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) recruitment technique and the community-based approach can be implemented in large urban areas and legally allow for psychiatric support, often necessary in this vulnerable population.
This study will also make it possible to estimate the size of the different populations of drug users in 4 large cities in France, one of which is overseas, in which the local specificities in terms of drug use but also of comorbidities will have to be studied (Capture/recapture).
In addition, the use of this recruitment technique coupled with the involvement of peers, will make it possible to define the different drug uses in the user population in the major cities of metropolitan France and in Fort-de-France. This information obtained from a population of hidden users is important and complementary to the results of the studies carried out in center for taking care of addiction problems (CSAPA) and support centres for the reduction of drug-related harms (CAARUD), by the ANRS (The French agency for AIDS and viral hepatitis research) 14059s Coquelicot study.
Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that the multicentric implementation of this screening and treatment strategy will be facilitated by the use of a toolkit. This toolkit "ICONE" has been developed by the investigating team of the ANRS 95050 ICONE study.
Finally, the investigators hypothesize that the proposal to initiate psychiatric follow-up at the site of the RDS will have an effect on the insertion into city mental health care in the months following the RDS in PWUD with psychiatric comorbidities.
Principal objective:
The main objective is twofold with the evaluation of the feasibility and potential usefulness of an implementation strategy, and the efficiency of a community-based model of mass screening and immediate treatment of hepatitis C among PWUD in Paris, Marseille, Lyon and Fort-de-France.
Secondary objectives:
- Estimate the size of the PWUD population in the 4 cities;
- Determine the prevalence of chronic HCV infection in the PWUD population in the 4 cities;
- Estimate the steps in the retrospective HCV care cascade (positive HCV Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT), known HCV status, previously initiated antiviral therapy, undetectable viral load) ;
- Determine the factors associated with hepatitis C treatment failure: defined as a detectable viral load 12 weeks after the end of treatment;
- Estimate the cost of our intervention for one PWUD screened and one PWUD cured of hepatitis C;
- Estimate the prevalence of HIV infection among PWUDs in the 4 cities;
- Estimate the steps in the retrospective care cascade of HIV infection (known HIV status, previously initiated antiviral treatment, undetectable viral load);
- Estimate the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B among PWUD in the 4 cities;
- Estimate the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (Syphilis, Gonorrhoea, Chlamydia) among PWUD in Fort-de-France;
- Describe the most frequent psychological comorbidities in the PWUD population in the 4 cities;
- Evaluate the effectiveness of peer-supported referral to infectious (HIV, HCV, HBV at all sites and STIs only in Fort-de-France), psychiatric and addictive care;
- To compare the acceptability of referral to psychiatric care directly at the research site (intervention group) with that of referral directly to a city facility (control group).
All of these objectives will be analyzed specifically in the sub-population of crack cocaine users.
Qualitative study objectives Evaluate the acceptability of the RDS model and the relevance of an implementation strategy.
Methodology:
Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2, allowing to evaluate simultaneously the effectiveness of the model on clinical criteria of access to psychiatric, addictological and infectious diseases care, and its feasibility by measuring the levers and potential obstacles to its implementation.
For the qualitative part, the investigators will conduct 15 interviews per site, i.e. 60 semi-structured interviews with the PWUDs who participated in the RDS. The researchers will organize 1 focus group with the stakeholders of each site before and after the implementation of the RDS.
Intervention:
Recruitment of PWUDs will be done through an RDS method. Ten to fifteen "seeds" will be selected per city for their diversity and social network. They will be invited to the research site (temporary community care facility), participate in all study procedures, and then receive 2-3 coupons to recruit eligible peers. Participants will receive HCV/HIV/HBV screening, on-site HCV RNA testing, liver fibrosis measurement, rapid antiviral (HCV) treatment initiation, treatment monitoring, and risk and harm reduction tools related to their risky practices. Participants with an HIV and/or HBV positive RDT will be referred to infectious disease services and the referral will be assessed. An assessment of psychological disorders will be carried out by i) Quick Screening Tool (QST) questionnaire asked to all participants; ii) MINI questionnaire for participants with positive QST. In case of a positive MINI, psychiatric consultations will be offered on site (Paris and Fort-de-France) or participants will be referred to structures offering psychiatric care (Lyon, Marseille). The effectiveness of referral to psychiatric care between the two interventions will be compared. All RDS participants will be referred to permanent addiction facilities and this referral will be evaluated. Peers will be present at this unique facility and will accompany participants throughout their HCV treatment. A capture/recapture study, nested within the RDS, will provide a reliable estimate of the PWUD population in the Paris arrondissements covered by the RDS and the cities of Marseille, Lyon and Fort-de-France. The qualitative study will take place at all sites. Individual interviews for a total of 60 participants will be conducted, as well as focus groups with stakeholders in each site.
Statistical methods:
Categorical variables will be described in terms of numbers and percentages with their associated 95% confidence intervals calculated using the exact method. Comparisons will be carried out by Chi² or Fisher's exact tests. Continuous variables will be described in terms of numbers, median, range and interquartile range or mean, standard deviation, standard deviation of the mean and confidence interval. Comparisons will be carried out using Mann-Whitney or Student's t tests depending on the distribution of the variable. The estimation of the size of the drug user populations will use the method recommended by the WHO (World Health Organization) with the Lincoln-Peterson estimator. Missing data will be taken into account by adopting the most penalizing approach. Logistic regression models will be used to search for factors associated with treatment failure. Multivariate logistic regression models will be employed to compare the success of psychiatric referral between the two groups.
Anticipated schedule:
Expected start date of the research (opening of RDS): September 2023 Duration of inclusions: 3 or 4 months per site (not necessarily over the same period) Duration of participation per participant: 1 day to 9 months Total expected duration of research: 24 months Anticipated end date of the trial/research: September 2025
Timeline for follow-up of participants in the research:
Participants with HCV RNA positive at RDS will be followed until SVR12 from treatment initiation. Visits at S4, end of treatment and SVR12.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This type 2 hybrid 'effectiveness-implementation' study makes it possible to simultaneously evaluate the efficiency of the model on clinical criteria of HCV cure, and its feasibility by measuring the potential obstacles and the relevance of its implementation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Other | Other: Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2Community-based intervention with screening and treatment initiation for HCV elimination among PWUD |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age > 18 years;
- Person who uses drugs, defined as:
- Reported psychoactive substance use and
- Positive urine test for at least one of the following: heroin, amphetamines, cocaine, MDMA (methylenedioxymethamphetamine), ecstasy, or misused opioid medications (methadone, buprenorphine or opiates used for a reason other than its original prescription (effects seeking) or used in a way that does not comply with its marketing authorisation (injected, snorted, taken multiple times beyond the prescribed dosage)) ;
- Informed and signed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Inability to understand the study;
- Being under guardianship, curatorship or mandate of future protection;
- Person participating in another research study with an exclusion period still in progress at the time of pre-inclusion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2Diagnosis of hepatitis C; Assessment of hepatic fibrosis; Treatment of hepatitis C; Assessment of psychological disorders and treatment or referral. | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Percentage of HCV cured PWUD participants (SVR12) among those with a positive HCV viral load at baseline
Time frame: 12 weeks after the end of the 2 to 3 months HCV treatment
Number of HCV cured PWUD participants, defined as SVR12, i.e. undetectable HCV RNA viral load in a veinous sample measured by quantitative PCR (polymerase chain reaction) 12 weeks after the end of the antiviral treatment; divided by the number of participants with a positive HCV viral load in a veinous sample at baseline.
Acceptability and relevance of the RDS and implementation strategy : a qualitative study
Time frame: From before the RDS implementation until the end of the study, up to 2 years
The investigators will use a socio-anthropological method to target the PWUD participating in the RDS as well as the workers in the places where the RDS will have started. In each study city, 15 semi-structured interviews will be conducted with PWUD who participated in the RDS. Participants who are not followed up in outreach structures will be over-represented to delve deeper into the pathways of these individuals. Two focus groups in each city will be carried-out (one before the implementation of the RDS and one at the end of the study), in order to collect their feelings on the use and relevance of the toolkit for the implementation of the RDS. The interviews and focus groups will be conducted using an interview grid that will be constructed to meet the objectives of the study. This grid will guide the investigators around different main themes: people's backgrounds, role of the facilitators, perception of RDS (understanding, acceptability, strengths and weaknesses).
22 secondary outcomes
Number of PWUD in the arrondissements of Paris (neighborhoods involved in seed distribution), and the cities of Lyon, Marseille and Fort-de-France
Time frame: At the end of the RDS
Proportion of participants with positive HCV RNA among all participants
Time frame: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants with a positive HCV RDT
Time frame: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants with known HCV status
Time frame: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants who were treated for HCV
Time frame: At baseline
Assessment of HCV cascade of care at inclusion : participants with known chronic hepatitis C status and undetectable HCV RNA
Time frame: At baseline
HCV treatment failure defined as detectable viral load 12 weeks after HCV treatment completion
Time frame: 12 weeks after the end of the 2 to 3 months HCV treatment
Cost of the intervention per screened participant
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected time frame of 2 years
Cost of the intervention per participant cured of hepatitis C
Time frame: Through study completion, an expected time frame of 2 years
Proportion of participants with a positive HIV RDT among participants
Time frame: At baseline
HIV care cascade assessment at inclusion : participants with known HIV status
Time frame: At baseline
HIV care cascade assessment at inclusion : HIV-positive participants on antiretroviral therapy
Time frame: At baseline
HIV care cascade assessment at inclusion : participants on effective antiretroviral therapy
Time frame: At baseline
Proportion of participants with detectable HBsAg
Time frame: At baseline
Proportion of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive PCR for gonorrhea
Time frame: At baseline
Proportion of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive PCR for chlamydia
Time frame: At baseline
Proportion of participants in Fort-de-France with a positive test for syphilis
Time frame: At baseline
Prevalence of psychological pathologies
Time frame: At baseline
Success of infectious diseases referral
Time frame: At 6 months
Success of addictological referral
Time frame: At 6 months
Success of psychiatric referral at 3 months
Time frame: At 3 months
Success of psychiatric referral at 6 months
Time frame: At 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All collected individual participant data
Related trials for HCV
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Not yet recruiting
HIV/STI/HCV Testing and Overdose Prevention Among Survivors of Sex Trafficking
HIV Testing, STI
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elimination of Hepatitis C Virus Among Users of Substances
Hepatitis C in Substance Users
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for CLIA-Waived Use
HCV Infection
Not yet recruiting
Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for Point-of-Care Use in Individuals at Risk for HCV Infection or Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of HCV Infection
HCV Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hélène Donnadieu, PhD principal investigator
PCCEI
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hybrid effectiveness-implementation study type 2 in people with HCV and Substance Use Disorders, run by ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in France, Martinique. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of HCV cured PWUD participants (SVR12) among those with a positive HCV viral load at baseline (time frame: 12 weeks after the end of the 2 to 3 months HCV treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2025.