AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative Pain, AcuteNCT05796583

Pulsed Shortwave Therapy for Postoperative Analgesia

A study testing Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment in people with Postoperative Pain, Acute, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy is a possible method of pain control involving the application of electromagnetic energy (also termed pulsed electromagnetic fields). Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices have been in clinical use for over 70 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain, Acute
What is being tested?
Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Apr 2023to 20 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • concurrent use of an implanted pulse generator (e.g., cardiac pacemaker)
  • pregnancy
  • incarceration
  • chronic opioid/tramadol use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
  • neuro-muscular deficit of the surgical area/limb
  • a planned postoperative perineural local anesthetic infusion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California, San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92103

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postoperative and Post-Amputation Analgesia: A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study

Pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy is a possible method of pain control involving the application of electromagnetic energy (also termed pulsed electromagnetic fields). Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices have been in clinical use for over 70 years. For decades, available devices consisted of a large signal generator and bulky coil applicator that were not portable and produced significant electromagnetic interference, making them impractical for common use. However, small, lightweight, relatively inexpensive, noninvasive, Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices that function for 8 days are now available to treat acute and chronic pain, decrease inflammation and edema, and hasten wound healing and bone regeneration. Therefore, it has the potential to concurrently improve analgesia and decrease or even negate opioid requirements, only without the limitations of opioids and peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of treating acute postoperative pain with nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy, optimize the study protocol, and estimate the treatment effect.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study will be a randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm, human participants study with two primary aims:

Specific Aim 1: To determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for subsequent clinical trials that will compare the addition of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy to usual and customary analgesia following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.

Specific Aim 2: To estimate the treatment effect of adding nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy to usual and customary analgesia on pain and opioid consumption following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.

Hypothesis 1 (primary): Nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy decreases pain in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.

Hypothesis 2: Nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy decreases opioid use in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.

This will be a single-center (University of California San Diego), randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm human subjects study.

Enrollment. Participants will be consenting adults undergoing various surgical procedures usually resulting in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible presurgical patients. If an individual desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current University of California San Diego Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent form. The study population of interest includes adult women and men of all races, ethnicity, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status.

Procedures. Following written, informed consent, we will record baseline anthropometric information (age, sex, height, weight, amputation details and current pain levels). Participants will receive any standard peripheral nerve block(s) administered using bupivacaine or ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine (standard at University of California San Diego) prior to undergoing their surgical procedure per standard of care.

Treatment Group Assignment. Each participant will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: Active or Sham treatment. Randomization will be stratified by surgical procedure in block sizes of 2. The computer-generated randomization lists will be created by the University of California San Diego Investigational Drug Service in a 1:1 treatment group ratio. An Investigational Drug Service pharmacist will provide the investigators with the appropriate device. Upon completion of data collection for a specific subgroup (e.g., total knee and hip arthroplasty; cholecystectomy), the pharmacist will provide the investigators with a masked list of the treatment groups (e.g., "Treatment A" and "Treatment B"), and the active/sham lists only following analysis for that subgroup, resulting in a triple-masked study (investigators, participants, statistician).

Study intervention. The pulsed shortwave device will be affixed over the primary wound area(s) using tape and activated prior to recovery room discharge. The optimal location to treat phantom pain is currently unknown and will partially informed by the results of this study, and patients will be encouraged to move the devices to a new anatomic location until relief is optimized.

Supplemental analgesics. In addition to the pulsed shortwave device, participants will receive standard-of-care supplemental analgesics. Therefore, all patients of this study-regardless of the treatment arm they are randomized to-will continue to receive current usual and customary analgesia: all will receive the same combination of supplemental analgesics they would regardless of study participation. Participants (and their caretakers) will be provided with verbal and written instructions, and the telephone and pager numbers of an investigator available during business hours throughout the treatment period. Participants cannot shower or submerge the device, as advised by the manufacturer; but will be allowed to remove it to bathe, and subsequently replace the device following bathing.

Participants will be discharged with their pulsed shortwave device in situ and a prescription for immediate-release oral opioid, preferably oxycodone 5 mg tablets, taken for breakthrough pain (surgeons occasionally prefer a different type of opioids such as hydrocodone, which is why we analyze the data using oral oxycodone equivalents). The pulsed shortwave devices will be removed by participants at home following Day 8 when the battery is exhausted. Removing the devices encompasses tape removal and discarding (these are disposable, single-use devices).

Outcome measurements (end points). We have selected outcome measures that have established reliability and validity, with minimal inter-rater discordance, and are recommended for pain-related clinical trials by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement. All data collection will be through standard UCSD EPIC notes and patient interviews in-person during hospitalization or via a telephone call for outpatients. Postoperatively, surgical endpoints will be recorded such as surgical duration. All pain scores will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain).

Statistical plan and sample size estimation. there will be a total of 70 surgical participants, and these patients will be analyzed separately from Phase I surgical and amputation patients. Sample size calculations are based upon the hypothesis that pulsed electromagnetic field therapy decreases pain in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures. The primary outcome calculated as follows: for each participant all of the "average" and "worst" daily pain scores collected within the first 7 postoperative days will be summed. We will use these summed scores from participants having cholecystectomy (n=30), and hip and knee arthroplasty (n=40) to estimate a probable sample size.

We will consider a 33% reduction in pain scores to be the minimal clinically important difference [Farrar et al. J Pain Symptom Management 2003; 25: 406-11]. Based on values from patients receiving sham in an (as-of-yet) unpublished pilot study, we anticipate the sham group to have an anticipated mean (SD) of 23.9 (12.3). Assuming a two-sided type I error protection of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, approximately 25 patients in each group are required (ClinCalc.com, accessed 2/23/23). To allow for a higher degree of variability than anticipated we will enroll a total of 70 participants: cholecystectomy (n=30), and hip and knee arthroplasty (n=40).

Continuous, normally-distributed data will be reported as mean ± standard deviation. Nonparametric continuous or categorical data will be reported as median [10th-90th percentiles] or precents, as appropriate. Comparisons of independent samples will be performed using Student's t-test for parametric continuous variables or Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric or categorical variables. The Chi Square test and Fisher's Exact test will be used for differences in proportions, as appropriate. P<0.05 will be considered statistically significant for the primary outcome. Results of comparisons in secondary outcomes will be interpreted as suggestive, requiring confirmation in a future trial before considering them as definitive.

Being tested
Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment, Sham Treatment
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active Pulsed Shortwave TreatmentDevice

    Also called non thermal, pulsed shortwave (radio frequency) therapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields therapy

    Application of 8 days of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy with Endonovo Therapeutics SofPulse

  • Sham TreatmentDevice

    Also called Placebo treatment

    Application of 8 days of a nonfunctional sham device

Study groups in NCT05796583
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment with SofPulseActive comparatorApplication of 8 days of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy with Endonovo Therapeutics SofPulse
Receives: Device: Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment
Sham TreatmentSham comparatorApplication of 8 days of sham device
Receives: Device: Sham Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The primary outcome calculated as follows: for each participant all of the "average" and "worst" daily pain scores collected within the first 7 postoperative days will be summed: specifically on Days 1, 2, 3, and 7, resulting in a scale of 0-80.

    Measured: First postoperative week

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 1

  2. AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 2

  3. AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 3

  4. AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  5. AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  6. AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 180

  7. Median AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the mean value of daily average pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale.

    Measured: Median value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  8. Median WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the median value of daily worst pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale.

    Measured: Median value of the worst daily pain measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  9. WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 1

  10. WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 2

  11. WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 3

  12. WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  13. WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  14. WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 180

  15. LEAST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  16. LEAST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  17. CURRENT Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  18. CURRENT Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale

    The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  19. Total OPIOID Consumption for Postoperative Days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

    Cumulative opioid consumption queried on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents).

    Measured: Cumulative opioid consumption queried on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  20. Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

    Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)

    Measured: postoperative day 1

  21. Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

    Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)

    Measured: postoperative day 2

  22. Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

    Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)

    Measured: postoperative day 3

  23. Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

    Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  24. Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

    Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  25. Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)

    Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)

    Measured: postoperative day 180

  26. Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)

    The Brief pain Inventory short form interference sub scale is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain and its impact on physical and emotional functioning which includes 7 questions involving physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale [0=no interference;10=complete interference]: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life. The final scale is from 0 (no interference) to 70 (maximum interference).

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  27. Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)

    The Brief pain Inventory short form interference sub scale is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain and its impact on physical and emotional functioning which includes 7 questions involving physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale [0=no interference;10=complete interference]: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life. The final scale is from 0 (no interference) to 70 (maximum interference).

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  28. Awakenings Due to Pain

    The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain

    Measured: postoperative day 1

  29. Awakenings Due to Pain

    The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain

    Measured: postoperative day 2

  30. Awakenings Due to Pain

    The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain

    Measured: postoperative day 3

  31. Awakenings Due to Pain

    The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  32. Awakenings Due to Pain

    The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  33. Hospitalization Duration Measured in Days

    Day relative to the day of surgery that patient was discharged from the hospital (e.g., same day is postoperative day 0, while the day following surgery is postoperative day 1)

    Measured: First postoperative week

  34. Surgical Duration

    The time from surgical start to surgical stop measured in minutes

    Measured: intraoperative (within the operating room)

  35. Device Location Changes

    If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact

    Measured: postoperative day 1

  36. Device Location Changes

    If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact

    Measured: postoperative day 2

  37. Device Location Changes

    If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact

    Measured: postoperative day 3

  38. Device Location Changes

    If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact

    Measured: postoperative day 7

  39. Device Location Changes

    If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact

    Measured: postoperative day 14

  40. Passive Joint Flexion

    The number of degrees the patient can flex their knee or hip (for these procedures only; cholecystectomy excluded)

    Measured: postoperative day 14

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Apr 2023
  2. Study start4 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion2 May 2024
  4. Study completion20 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel Assignment: Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm Human Subjects Clinical Trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05796583
Sponsor's protocol ID
PSWT SofPulse
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
20 Mar 2023
Last updated
17 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Said ET, Ball ST, Sandler BJ, Broderick RC, Gonzales FB, Lau NJ, Schaar A, Abdullah B. Pulsed Shortwave (Radiofrequency) Therapy With a Noninvasive, Wearable, Disposable Device: A Randomized, Participant- and Assessor-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study. Neuromodulation. 2025 Jun;28(4):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.008. Epub 2025 Feb 20.

    PubMed 39985539

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment in people with Postoperative Pain, Acute, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale (time frame: First postoperative week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05796583, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in