Postoperative Pain, AcuteNCT05796583
Pulsed Shortwave Therapy for Postoperative Analgesia
A study testing Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment in people with Postoperative Pain, Acute, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy is a possible method of pain control involving the application of electromagnetic energy (also termed pulsed electromagnetic fields). Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices have been in clinical use for over 70 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Apr 2023to 20 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- concurrent use of an implanted pulse generator (e.g., cardiac pacemaker)
- pregnancy
- incarceration
- chronic opioid/tramadol use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
- neuro-muscular deficit of the surgical area/limb
- a planned postoperative perineural local anesthetic infusion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103
About this study
Official title: Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postoperative and Post-Amputation Analgesia: A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
Pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy is a possible method of pain control involving the application of electromagnetic energy (also termed pulsed electromagnetic fields). Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices have been in clinical use for over 70 years. For decades, available devices consisted of a large signal generator and bulky coil applicator that were not portable and produced significant electromagnetic interference, making them impractical for common use. However, small, lightweight, relatively inexpensive, noninvasive, Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices that function for 8 days are now available to treat acute and chronic pain, decrease inflammation and edema, and hasten wound healing and bone regeneration. Therefore, it has the potential to concurrently improve analgesia and decrease or even negate opioid requirements, only without the limitations of opioids and peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of treating acute postoperative pain with nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy, optimize the study protocol, and estimate the treatment effect.
Read the detailed description
The proposed study will be a randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm, human participants study with two primary aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for subsequent clinical trials that will compare the addition of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy to usual and customary analgesia following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Specific Aim 2: To estimate the treatment effect of adding nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy to usual and customary analgesia on pain and opioid consumption following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Hypothesis 1 (primary): Nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy decreases pain in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Hypothesis 2: Nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy decreases opioid use in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
This will be a single-center (University of California San Diego), randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm human subjects study.
Enrollment. Participants will be consenting adults undergoing various surgical procedures usually resulting in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible presurgical patients. If an individual desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current University of California San Diego Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent form. The study population of interest includes adult women and men of all races, ethnicity, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status.
Procedures. Following written, informed consent, we will record baseline anthropometric information (age, sex, height, weight, amputation details and current pain levels). Participants will receive any standard peripheral nerve block(s) administered using bupivacaine or ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine (standard at University of California San Diego) prior to undergoing their surgical procedure per standard of care.
Treatment Group Assignment. Each participant will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: Active or Sham treatment. Randomization will be stratified by surgical procedure in block sizes of 2. The computer-generated randomization lists will be created by the University of California San Diego Investigational Drug Service in a 1:1 treatment group ratio. An Investigational Drug Service pharmacist will provide the investigators with the appropriate device. Upon completion of data collection for a specific subgroup (e.g., total knee and hip arthroplasty; cholecystectomy), the pharmacist will provide the investigators with a masked list of the treatment groups (e.g., "Treatment A" and "Treatment B"), and the active/sham lists only following analysis for that subgroup, resulting in a triple-masked study (investigators, participants, statistician).
Study intervention. The pulsed shortwave device will be affixed over the primary wound area(s) using tape and activated prior to recovery room discharge. The optimal location to treat phantom pain is currently unknown and will partially informed by the results of this study, and patients will be encouraged to move the devices to a new anatomic location until relief is optimized.
Supplemental analgesics. In addition to the pulsed shortwave device, participants will receive standard-of-care supplemental analgesics. Therefore, all patients of this study-regardless of the treatment arm they are randomized to-will continue to receive current usual and customary analgesia: all will receive the same combination of supplemental analgesics they would regardless of study participation. Participants (and their caretakers) will be provided with verbal and written instructions, and the telephone and pager numbers of an investigator available during business hours throughout the treatment period. Participants cannot shower or submerge the device, as advised by the manufacturer; but will be allowed to remove it to bathe, and subsequently replace the device following bathing.
Participants will be discharged with their pulsed shortwave device in situ and a prescription for immediate-release oral opioid, preferably oxycodone 5 mg tablets, taken for breakthrough pain (surgeons occasionally prefer a different type of opioids such as hydrocodone, which is why we analyze the data using oral oxycodone equivalents). The pulsed shortwave devices will be removed by participants at home following Day 8 when the battery is exhausted. Removing the devices encompasses tape removal and discarding (these are disposable, single-use devices).
Outcome measurements (end points). We have selected outcome measures that have established reliability and validity, with minimal inter-rater discordance, and are recommended for pain-related clinical trials by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement. All data collection will be through standard UCSD EPIC notes and patient interviews in-person during hospitalization or via a telephone call for outpatients. Postoperatively, surgical endpoints will be recorded such as surgical duration. All pain scores will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain).
Statistical plan and sample size estimation. there will be a total of 70 surgical participants, and these patients will be analyzed separately from Phase I surgical and amputation patients. Sample size calculations are based upon the hypothesis that pulsed electromagnetic field therapy decreases pain in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures. The primary outcome calculated as follows: for each participant all of the "average" and "worst" daily pain scores collected within the first 7 postoperative days will be summed. We will use these summed scores from participants having cholecystectomy (n=30), and hip and knee arthroplasty (n=40) to estimate a probable sample size.
We will consider a 33% reduction in pain scores to be the minimal clinically important difference [Farrar et al. J Pain Symptom Management 2003; 25: 406-11]. Based on values from patients receiving sham in an (as-of-yet) unpublished pilot study, we anticipate the sham group to have an anticipated mean (SD) of 23.9 (12.3). Assuming a two-sided type I error protection of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, approximately 25 patients in each group are required (ClinCalc.com, accessed 2/23/23). To allow for a higher degree of variability than anticipated we will enroll a total of 70 participants: cholecystectomy (n=30), and hip and knee arthroplasty (n=40).
Continuous, normally-distributed data will be reported as mean ± standard deviation. Nonparametric continuous or categorical data will be reported as median [10th-90th percentiles] or precents, as appropriate. Comparisons of independent samples will be performed using Student's t-test for parametric continuous variables or Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric or categorical variables. The Chi Square test and Fisher's Exact test will be used for differences in proportions, as appropriate. P<0.05 will be considered statistically significant for the primary outcome. Results of comparisons in secondary outcomes will be interpreted as suggestive, requiring confirmation in a future trial before considering them as definitive.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Acute
- Being tested
- Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment, Sham Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active Pulsed Shortwave TreatmentDevice
Also called non thermal, pulsed shortwave (radio frequency) therapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields therapy
Application of 8 days of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy with Endonovo Therapeutics SofPulse
Sham TreatmentDevice
Also called Placebo treatment
Application of 8 days of a nonfunctional sham device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment with SofPulse | Active comparator | Application of 8 days of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy with Endonovo Therapeutics SofPulse Receives: Device: Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment |
| Sham Treatment | Sham comparator | Application of 8 days of sham device Receives: Device: Sham Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The primary outcome calculated as follows: for each participant all of the "average" and "worst" daily pain scores collected within the first 7 postoperative days will be summed: specifically on Days 1, 2, 3, and 7, resulting in a scale of 0-80.
Measured: First postoperative week
Secondary outcomes (40)
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 1
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 2
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 3
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 7
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 14
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 180
Median AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the mean value of daily average pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale.
Measured: Median value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7
Median WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The outcome will the median value of daily worst pain scores measured with the Numeric Rating Scale.
Measured: Median value of the worst daily pain measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 1
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 2
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 3
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 7
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 14
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 180
LEAST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 7
LEAST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 14
CURRENT Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 7
CURRENT Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 14
Total OPIOID Consumption for Postoperative Days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Cumulative opioid consumption queried on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents).
Measured: Cumulative opioid consumption queried on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Measured: postoperative day 1
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Measured: postoperative day 2
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Measured: postoperative day 3
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Measured: postoperative day 7
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Measured: postoperative day 14
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Opioid consumption of the previous 24 hours (measured in oral oxycodone equivalents)
Measured: postoperative day 180
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)
The Brief pain Inventory short form interference sub scale is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain and its impact on physical and emotional functioning which includes 7 questions involving physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale [0=no interference;10=complete interference]: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life. The final scale is from 0 (no interference) to 70 (maximum interference).
Measured: postoperative day 7
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)
The Brief pain Inventory short form interference sub scale is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain and its impact on physical and emotional functioning which includes 7 questions involving physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale [0=no interference;10=complete interference]: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life. The final scale is from 0 (no interference) to 70 (maximum interference).
Measured: postoperative day 14
Awakenings Due to Pain
The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain
Measured: postoperative day 1
Awakenings Due to Pain
The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain
Measured: postoperative day 2
Awakenings Due to Pain
The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain
Measured: postoperative day 3
Awakenings Due to Pain
The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain
Measured: postoperative day 7
Awakenings Due to Pain
The number of times the participant awoke the previous night due to pain
Measured: postoperative day 14
Hospitalization Duration Measured in Days
Day relative to the day of surgery that patient was discharged from the hospital (e.g., same day is postoperative day 0, while the day following surgery is postoperative day 1)
Measured: First postoperative week
Surgical Duration
The time from surgical start to surgical stop measured in minutes
Measured: intraoperative (within the operating room)
Device Location Changes
If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact
Measured: postoperative day 1
Device Location Changes
If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact
Measured: postoperative day 2
Device Location Changes
If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact
Measured: postoperative day 3
Device Location Changes
If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact
Measured: postoperative day 7
Device Location Changes
If a patient moves the anatomic location of one or both of the intervention devices (and where the device is moved to) since the last phone contact
Measured: postoperative day 14
Passive Joint Flexion
The number of degrees the patient can flex their knee or hip (for these procedures only; cholecystectomy excluded)
Measured: postoperative day 14
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2023
- Study start4 Apr 2023
- Primary completion2 May 2024
- Study completion20 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative Pain, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment: Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm Human Subjects Clinical Trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05796583
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PSWT SofPulse
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Said ET, Ball ST, Sandler BJ, Broderick RC, Gonzales FB, Lau NJ, Schaar A, Abdullah B. Pulsed Shortwave (Radiofrequency) Therapy With a Noninvasive, Wearable, Disposable Device: A Randomized, Participant- and Assessor-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study. Neuromodulation. 2025 Jun;28(4):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.008. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
PubMed 39985539
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postoperative and Post-Amputation Analgesia: A Randomized, Participant- and Observer-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05796583
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PSWT SofPulse
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Acute
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San DiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy is a possible method of pain control involving the application of electromagnetic energy (also termed pulsed electromagnetic fields). Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices have been in clinical use for over 70 years. For decades, available devices consisted of a large signal generator and bulky coil applicator that were not portable and produced significant electromagnetic interference, making them impractical for common use. However, small, lightweight, relatively inexpensive, noninvasive, Food and Drug Administration-cleared devices that function for 8 days are now available to treat acute and chronic pain, decrease inflammation and edema, and hasten wound healing and bone regeneration. Therefore, it has the potential to concurrently improve analgesia and decrease or even negate opioid requirements, only without the limitations of opioids and peripheral nerve blocks. The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of treating acute postoperative pain with nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy, optimize the study protocol, and estimate the treatment effect.
Detailed description
The proposed study will be a randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm, human participants study with two primary aims:
Specific Aim 1: To determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for subsequent clinical trials that will compare the addition of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy to usual and customary analgesia following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Specific Aim 2: To estimate the treatment effect of adding nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy to usual and customary analgesia on pain and opioid consumption following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Hypothesis 1 (primary): Nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy decreases pain in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
Hypothesis 2: Nonthermal, pulsed shortwave therapy decreases opioid use in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures.
This will be a single-center (University of California San Diego), randomized, participant- and observer-masked, sham-controlled, parallel-arm human subjects study.
Enrollment. Participants will be consenting adults undergoing various surgical procedures usually resulting in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible presurgical patients. If an individual desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained using a current University of California San Diego Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent form. The study population of interest includes adult women and men of all races, ethnicity, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status.
Procedures. Following written, informed consent, we will record baseline anthropometric information (age, sex, height, weight, amputation details and current pain levels). Participants will receive any standard peripheral nerve block(s) administered using bupivacaine or ropivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine (standard at University of California San Diego) prior to undergoing their surgical procedure per standard of care.
Treatment Group Assignment. Each participant will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: Active or Sham treatment. Randomization will be stratified by surgical procedure in block sizes of 2. The computer-generated randomization lists will be created by the University of California San Diego Investigational Drug Service in a 1:1 treatment group ratio. An Investigational Drug Service pharmacist will provide the investigators with the appropriate device. Upon completion of data collection for a specific subgroup (e.g., total knee and hip arthroplasty; cholecystectomy), the pharmacist will provide the investigators with a masked list of the treatment groups (e.g., "Treatment A" and "Treatment B"), and the active/sham lists only following analysis for that subgroup, resulting in a triple-masked study (investigators, participants, statistician).
Study intervention. The pulsed shortwave device will be affixed over the primary wound area(s) using tape and activated prior to recovery room discharge. The optimal location to treat phantom pain is currently unknown and will partially informed by the results of this study, and patients will be encouraged to move the devices to a new anatomic location until relief is optimized.
Supplemental analgesics. In addition to the pulsed shortwave device, participants will receive standard-of-care supplemental analgesics. Therefore, all patients of this study-regardless of the treatment arm they are randomized to-will continue to receive current usual and customary analgesia: all will receive the same combination of supplemental analgesics they would regardless of study participation. Participants (and their caretakers) will be provided with verbal and written instructions, and the telephone and pager numbers of an investigator available during business hours throughout the treatment period. Participants cannot shower or submerge the device, as advised by the manufacturer; but will be allowed to remove it to bathe, and subsequently replace the device following bathing.
Participants will be discharged with their pulsed shortwave device in situ and a prescription for immediate-release oral opioid, preferably oxycodone 5 mg tablets, taken for breakthrough pain (surgeons occasionally prefer a different type of opioids such as hydrocodone, which is why we analyze the data using oral oxycodone equivalents). The pulsed shortwave devices will be removed by participants at home following Day 8 when the battery is exhausted. Removing the devices encompasses tape removal and discarding (these are disposable, single-use devices).
Outcome measurements (end points). We have selected outcome measures that have established reliability and validity, with minimal inter-rater discordance, and are recommended for pain-related clinical trials by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement. All data collection will be through standard UCSD EPIC notes and patient interviews in-person during hospitalization or via a telephone call for outpatients. Postoperatively, surgical endpoints will be recorded such as surgical duration. All pain scores will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain).
Statistical plan and sample size estimation. there will be a total of 70 surgical participants, and these patients will be analyzed separately from Phase I surgical and amputation patients. Sample size calculations are based upon the hypothesis that pulsed electromagnetic field therapy decreases pain in the 7 days following moderate-to-severely painful surgical procedures. The primary outcome calculated as follows: for each participant all of the "average" and "worst" daily pain scores collected within the first 7 postoperative days will be summed. We will use these summed scores from participants having cholecystectomy (n=30), and hip and knee arthroplasty (n=40) to estimate a probable sample size.
We will consider a 33% reduction in pain scores to be the minimal clinically important difference [Farrar et al. J Pain Symptom Management 2003; 25: 406-11]. Based on values from patients receiving sham in an (as-of-yet) unpublished pilot study, we anticipate the sham group to have an anticipated mean (SD) of 23.9 (12.3). Assuming a two-sided type I error protection of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, approximately 25 patients in each group are required (ClinCalc.com, accessed 2/23/23). To allow for a higher degree of variability than anticipated we will enroll a total of 70 participants: cholecystectomy (n=30), and hip and knee arthroplasty (n=40).
Continuous, normally-distributed data will be reported as mean ± standard deviation. Nonparametric continuous or categorical data will be reported as median [10th-90th percentiles] or precents, as appropriate. Comparisons of independent samples will be performed using Student's t-test for parametric continuous variables or Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric or categorical variables. The Chi Square test and Fisher's Exact test will be used for differences in proportions, as appropriate. P<0.05 will be considered statistically significant for the primary outcome. Results of comparisons in secondary outcomes will be interpreted as suggestive, requiring confirmation in a future trial before considering them as definitive.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment: Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm Human Subjects Clinical Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment with SofPulse | Active comparator | Device: Active Pulsed Shortwave TreatmentApplication of 8 days of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy with Endonovo Therapeutics SofPulse |
| Sham Treatment | Sham comparator | Device: Sham TreatmentApplication of 8 days of sham device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- concurrent use of an implanted pulse generator (e.g., cardiac pacemaker)
- pregnancy
- incarceration
- chronic opioid/tramadol use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
- neuro-muscular deficit of the surgical area/limb
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active Pulsed Shortwave TreatmentAlso: non thermal, pulsed shortwave (radio frequency) therapy, pulsed electromagnetic fields therapyApplication of 8 days of nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy with Endonovo Therapeutics SofPulse | Device | Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment with SofPulse |
| Sham TreatmentAlso: Placebo treatmentApplication of 8 days of a nonfunctional sham device | Device | Sham Treatment |
Primary outcome
Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: First postoperative week
The numeric rating scale is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain scale. The primary outcome calculated as follows: for each participant all of the "average" and "worst" daily pain scores collected within the first 7 postoperative days will be summed: specifically on Days 1, 2, 3, and 7, resulting in a scale of 0-80.
40 secondary outcomes
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 1
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 2
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 3
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 7
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 14
AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 180
Median AVERAGE Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Median value of the average daily pain measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7
Median WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Median value of the worst daily pain measured on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 1
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 2
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 3
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 7
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 14
WORST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 180
LEAST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 7
LEAST Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 14
CURRENT Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 7
CURRENT Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: postoperative day 14
Total OPIOID Consumption for Postoperative Days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: Cumulative opioid consumption queried on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: postoperative day 1
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: postoperative day 2
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: postoperative day 3
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: postoperative day 7
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: postoperative day 14
Opioid Consumption of the Previous 24 Hours (Measured in Oral Oxycodone Equivalents)
Time frame: postoperative day 180
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)
Time frame: postoperative day 7
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Subscale)
Time frame: postoperative day 14
Awakenings Due to Pain
Time frame: postoperative day 1
Awakenings Due to Pain
Time frame: postoperative day 2
Awakenings Due to Pain
Time frame: postoperative day 3
Awakenings Due to Pain
Time frame: postoperative day 7
Awakenings Due to Pain
Time frame: postoperative day 14
Hospitalization Duration Measured in Days
Time frame: First postoperative week
Surgical Duration
Time frame: intraoperative (within the operating room)
Device Location Changes
Time frame: postoperative day 1
Device Location Changes
Time frame: postoperative day 2
Device Location Changes
Time frame: postoperative day 3
Device Location Changes
Time frame: postoperative day 7
Device Location Changes
Time frame: postoperative day 14
Passive Joint Flexion
Time frame: postoperative day 14
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39985539Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ 4th, Said ET, Ball ST, Sandler BJ, Broderick RC, Gonzales FB, Lau NJ, Schaar A, Abdullah B. Pulsed Shortwave (Radiofrequency) Therapy With a Noninvasive, Wearable, Disposable Device: A Randomized, Participant- and Assessor-Masked, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study. Neuromodulation. 2025 Jun;28(4):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2025.01.008. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Apical Healing After Root Canal (re)Treatment With Laser-activated Irrigation Versus Sonic or no Activation
Apical Periodontitis, Post Operative Pain, Acute
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of CYT-1010 in Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Acute Pain After Third Molar Extraction
Acute Postoperative Pain, Dental Pain
Not yet recruiting
Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Suzetrigine (Journavx) as Multimodal Therapy for Pain Management in Adults Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fracture
Hip Fractures (ICD-10 72.01-72.2), Post Operative Analgesia
Recruiting
Rectus Sheath Catheters Following Midline Laparotomy
Acute Abdomen, Ileus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active Pulsed Shortwave Treatment in people with Postoperative Pain, Acute, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Measured With the Numeric Rating Scale (time frame: First postoperative week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05796583, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2025.