AzTrials
AzTrials

GlaucomaNCT05797350

Paul Glaucoma Implant Versus Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in Childhood Glaucoma

A study testing Glaucoma Drainage Device in people with Glaucoma, run by Al Watany Eye Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Paul glaucoma implant and Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory childhood glaucoma patients Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 0 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Glaucoma
What is being tested?
Glaucoma Drainage Device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Sep 2022to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 0 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Childhood glaucoma patients (whether primary or secondary) including Juvenile open angle glaucoma if the age at the time of surgery was ≤18 years.
  • The included patients are those with refractory glaucoma who require a tube to control their intraocular pressure.

Who cannot join

  • Any patient with incomplete data or has a follow-up less than 1 year will be excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mohamed ElBaharwy contact

+201144777100

momaryo@hotmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Maadi eye subspeciality center

    Cairo

    Mohamed om yousif, MD,FRCS, 01001682091, momaryo@hotmail.com

    Eman sa muhammed, MD,FRCS, 01007421427, nana_samir_11@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Paul glaucoma implant and Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory childhood glaucoma patients

Read the detailed description

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at Al Watany Eye Hospital in Egypt. Patients with refractory primary or secondary childhood glaucoma who glaucoma specialist has decided to perform a tube implant to control their intraocular pressure are randomized to receive either Paul or Ahmed glaucoma drainage devices.

Patients will be followed up for at least one year during which the following data are collected.

Age, sex, laterality, preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure and glaucoma medications at 1,3,6, 9, and 12 months visits. Any intraoperative or postoperative complications will be recorded

Conditions
Glaucoma
Being tested
Glaucoma Drainage Device
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Glaucoma Drainage DeviceDevice

    Both the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) are types of glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) used to lower intraocular pressure in patients with refractory glaucoma. Devices will be implanted during a surgical procedure and work by diverting excess fluid from the eye to an external drainage tube, allowing the fluid to drain away from the eye and be absorbed into the surrounding tissue. This will help to lower the pressure inside the eye, which is important for preventing vision loss and other complications associated with glaucoma.

Study groups in NCT05797350
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paul Glaucoma ImplantActive comparatorThe Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) will be used as an active comparator group to compare its effectiveness and safety with the Ahmed glaucoma valve in the treatment of childhood glaucoma. The PGI works by diverting excess fluid from the eye to a plate placed under the conjunctiva, which allows the fluid to drain away from the eye and be absorbed. This helps to lower the pressure inside the eye, which is important for preventing vision loss and other complications associated with glaucoma. The PGI has a smaller internal and external tube diameter than the Ahmed glaucoma valve, which reduces the contact area between the tube and the corneal endothelium. This theoretically reduces the rate of endothelial cell loss, which can be a complication of GDDs. Additionally, the extraocular portion of the PGI is smaller, which may reduce the long-term risk of tube erosion and exposure. The smaller lumen may theoretically reduce the risk of postoperative hypotony as well.
Receives: Device: Glaucoma Drainage Device
Ahmed Glaucoma valveActive comparatorThe Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) arm of the study is the active comparator group and is intended to be directly compared to the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) in treating childhood glaucoma. The AGV is a type of glaucoma drainage device that is designed to lower intraocular pressure in patients with refractory glaucoma. It is made of a rigid plastic material and consists of a small drainage tube that is inserted into the eye and a valve mechanism that helps regulate the flow of aqueous humor from the eye to the external drainage tube. The AGV is implanted during a surgical procedure, and its design allows it to be placed in a variety of locations in the eye. The valve mechanism helps to regulate the flow of aqueous humor, and the device is designed to be long-lasting with a low risk of complications. The AGV is a well-established treatment option for patients with refractory glaucoma and has been used for many years in clinical practice.
Receives: Device: Glaucoma Drainage Device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. IOP Reduction

    More than 20% change from baseline without development of vision threatening complications

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Glaucoma Medication Alterations

    Assessment of changes in number of medications for IOP reduction after procedure (i.e., did patients have a reduction or gain in use of medications to reduce their IOP after the procedure?)

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Post-operative complications

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05797350
Sponsor's protocol ID
AlWatanyEyeH
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
12 Mar 2023
Last updated
4 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Elhusseiny AM, Khaled OM, Chauhan MZ, Sayed MS, Shaarawy T. Initial Results of the Paul Ahmed Comparison (PAC) Study in Refractory Childhood Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;271:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.024. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

    PubMed 39510370

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Glaucoma Drainage Device in people with Glaucoma, run by Al Watany Eye Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mohamed ElBaharwy (+201144777100, momaryo@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

IOP Reduction (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05797350, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in