Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD)RAPDNCT05799066
Measuring Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect
A study testing Swinging Light test and Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD) in people with Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD), run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this prospective reliability study is to test the effectiveness of a commercially available, off-the-shelf virtual reality head-mounted display (VR HMD) and machine learning (ML) algorithms in detecting Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) in a group of subjects with known RAPD and another group with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD)
- What is being tested?
- Swinging Light test and Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 May 2023to 6 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 - 85
- 60 patients with known RAPD.
- 60 patients with no known RAPD
- May be diagnosed with a vision disorder such as glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, unilateral or asymmetrical disease of the retina or other degenerative ocular diseases
- Referred to study by treating eye doctor
- Volunteered to participate in study
- UTMB clinic patients
- Not belonging to an identified vulnerable population
Who cannot join
- Younger than 18; older than 85 years of age
- Not a UTMB clinic patient
- Belonging to an identified vulnerable population
- Participants with discomfort using glasses
- Experience discomfort using VR HMD device
- Participants with history of congenital pupil defects, traumatic pupils
Show all 9Show fewer
- Those whose pupils were dilated during the standard of care examination deemed by treating eye doctor not to be eligible to participate in study
- Participants who do not follow study directions and/or safety procedures given by investigators or lab assistants
- Participants who do not speak English to prevent a communication error during the informed consent process
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555
About this study
Official title: A Mechanism for Measurement of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) Using Machine Learning
The goal of this prospective reliability study is to test the effectiveness of a commercially available, off-the-shelf virtual reality head-mounted display (VR HMD) and machine learning (ML) algorithms in detecting Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) in a group of subjects with known RAPD and another group with no known RAPD.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does the use of the VR HMD and ML to replace the standard of care swinging flashlight test provide a more reliable and objective pupil measurement to detect RAPD?
- Can RAPD be detected by the VR HMD and ML algorithms at an earlier stage than the standard of care swinging light test?
Participants will be asked to undergo the standard of care swinging flashlight test, have their pupils manually measured, then have the test repeated using the VR HMD and ML.
Researchers will compare the measurements taken manually, following the standard of care swinging light test and those recorded by the VR HMD and ML to help answer the above questions.
Read the detailed description
Purpose of the Study/Objectives
The objective of this reliability study is to successfully develop a mechanism for diagnostics of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) using pupil measurement values and pathologic response. The diagnostics of this test will later be compared with the traditional swinging flashlight test results. The physiological basis of the study is that the reaction of the pupils in the right and left eyes are linked. When a bright light is shone into one eye, it will lead to an equal constriction of both pupils. When the light source is removed from the eye, the pupils will enlarge equally.
Our hypothesis is difference between pupil measurement values of two eyes when the light source moves from one eye to the other is an indicator of RAPD. This reliability study is to use a commercially-available, off-the-shelf virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display (HMD) and machine learning (ML) algorithms to detect RAPD at an earlier stage with small differences in pupil measurement values. The RAPD is a critically important sign in patients with unexplained visual loss because it is an objective finding of afferent pupillary dysfunction. The research question is if the proposed use of VR and ML to replace the swinging flashlight test provides a more reliable and objective pupil measurement to detect RAPD.
Background
A relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) is a critically important ophthalmologic examination finding that defines a defect (lesion) in the pupil pathway on the afferent side. A RAPD is relative to the fellow eye and occurs because of the bilateral and equal innervation of the pupils in normal individuals. The RAPD manifests as a difference in pupillary light reaction between the two eyes. The test requires two eyes but only one working pupil.
In a normal patient without afferent pupillary disease, shining a light in either eye will produce constriction of both eyes equally. In the case of an afferent pupillary pathway lesion, the light response is tested individually in each eye and then the light swings between the two eyes to detect RAPD. The normal pupillary response is characterized by equal constriction of the pupils in both eyes when the light stimulus is applied to each eye individually and no dilation or pupillary escape when the light swings from the one eye to the fellow eye. The pathologic response that characterizes the RAPD includes the following: (1) the light reaction causes pupil constriction in both eyes when the light shines in the normal eye, and (2) dilatation of the pupils in both eyes when the light stimulus is rapidly transferred from the normal eye to the pathologic eye.
Study Design
The study design is a reliability study evaluating the performance of the HTC Vive Pro Eye, to detect RAPD. The HTC Vive Pro Eye (product name) is not an experimental device. It is a consumer-grade VR HMD available as an off-the-shelf VR Headset. To validate the ability of the VR HMD to detect RAPD in patients, a reliability study will be performed by using the device on patients with known RAPD and patients without RAPD. Participants will undergo manual pupil measurement in the eye clinic via penlight for direct and swinging light test reflexes. Patients then will undergo the VR HMD eye measurements as discussed previously.
The anticipated total number of participants for this study is 120 patients aged 18 to 85, consisting of 60 participants in the control group (no known RAPD) and 60 participants in the experimental group (known RAPD). Both groups will undergo the traditional swinging flashlight test and testing with the VR HMD.
Medical Records will be used to obtain ocular imaging, pupil measurements, past medical history and past ocular history. Demographic information will be obtained through a self-reporting survey for age, gender and ethnicity. Data will be acquired by using the VR HMD. The protocol presents light through the VR HMD displays to each eye individually and will use participants' pupil diameters via its integrated eye tracking cameras to collect information about pupillary reflex deficit. Data from visual function tests such as visual acuity, visual field, chromatic sensitivity, etiology of RAPD etc. will be taken from the EPIC (product name) electronic medical record (EMR) to compare with current study findings.
This research will include records of participants' voices or images. Video of the pupils of the participant and their gaze location may be recorded via VR device for research purpose. Audio, video or photographs may be recorded for publication purposes. Subject identity will be removed from the audio, video and photographs. Informed Consent Form will ask the subject for their permission to be photographed or audio/video recorded.
Principal Investigator (PI) and researchers will ensure that all study personnel are informed about the research plan and their research-related duties by routine meetings, regular communication via email and phone. All researchers will take the human subject protection training sanctioned by the university via Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) Program training.
A counterbalanced repeated measures experimental design will be used to compare participant performance in two conditions: using traditional swinging flashlight test versus using pupil measurement head-mounted display. The independent variable in the study will be modes (2 conditions) and the measured dependent variables (1 condition) will be RAPD.
Study Intervention
The study intervention that is being evaluated is whether virtual reality testing through a VR HMD device can adequately diagnose RAPD.
Each participant will undergo the standard of care swinging flashlight test to diagnose RAPD by their treating ophthalmologist, an IRB approved study team member, at their regular clinic visit, prior to participation in the study. If the patient elects to participate in the study, participates in the consent process and signs the Informed Consent Form, he or she will undergo a repeat of the standard of care swinging flashlight test, then participant will undergo testing with the VR HMD. Data on each participant's pupil sizes in both light and dark simulations is measured and coded. The VR HMD pupil measurement device is a consumer-grade virtual reality headset available as an off-the-shelf gaming product. The risk of using the device is minimal and no greater than the standard of care swinging flashlight test. The device uses illumination of less than 90 cd/m2 which is below and in accordance with the typical flashlight exposure of 100 cd/m2. There is therefore no disproportionate increase in risk. The device's maximum illumination is well below the threshold which would be of potential risk of harm. Risk of loss of private health information (PHI) is minimized by the manner with which the data will be stored.
At the acquisition time, subjects will be assigned a study identification number. That number will be recorded on a subject identity master key, along with the subject's medical record number (MRN). Once the subject identity master key has been created and stored separately from study data in a password protected file on the University of Texas Medical Branch's (UTMB's) secure server behind a firewall. All identifying information will then be removed from the subject's data. The deidentified data will then be stored in a secure folder on the UTMB secure server behind a firewall and that of the collaborating site (University of Nevada, Reno) computer behind a firewall.
The total testing should take approximately 10-30 minutes. After each participant has their standard of care ophthalmology visit with their treating ophthalmologist, an Institutional Review Board- (IRB-) approved study team member, consent will be obtained by an IRB-approved study team member, who has been properly trained and designated by the PI to obtain consent. If the patient consents, they will undergo a repeat of the swinging light test and their pupil measurements recorded manually. Then the subject will undergo testing with the VR HMD during which the device will take pupillary measurements lasting approximately five minutes. No follow-up appointments for research purposes are necessary.
Subjects will be recruited from the UTMB eye clinic. Subjects' participation is limited to one visit. Study enrollment is anticipated to take six months. The duration of the study is estimated to be two years.
- Conditions
- Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD)
- Being tested
- Swinging Light test, Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD)
- Keywords
- Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD), Pupil measurements, Swinging flashlight test, Pen light test, Virtual reality head mounted display (VR HMD), Visual loss, Vision loss, Afferent pupillary dysfunction, Pupillary light reaction, HTC Vive Pro Eye
- Medical subject headings
- Pupil Disorders, Vision Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Swinging Light testDiagnostic test
Also called Pen Light test
The swinging light or pen light test with manual pupil measurements is the standard of care test for RAPD. This test consists of a light being shone in one eye for 3 to 4 seconds then shown in the other eye for 3 to 4 seconds, repeating 2 to 3 times. Pupils are measured manually immediately after the light test. Measurements are recorded in patient's medical record.
Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD)Diagnostic test
A light is shone from within the VR HMD, pupillary measurements are taken and recorded by the machine learning (ML) algorithm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Known RAPD | Experimental | Participants with known RAPD will be administered the standard of care swinging light test and pupil measurements taken manually, then administered the light test using the VR HMD and ML. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Swinging Light test; Diagnostic Test: Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD) |
| No Known RAPD | Experimental | Participants with no known RAPD will be administered the standard of care swinging light test and pupil measurements taken manually, then administered the light test using the VR HMD and ML. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Swinging Light test; Diagnostic Test: Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pupillary measurements
Measure of pupil size in each eye, measured manually or via machine learning algorithms
Measured: Immediately following the swinging light test or VR HMD light test
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2023
- Study start4 May 2023
- Primary completion6 Mar 2026
- Study completion6 Mar 2026
Why it stopped: The study was terminated early for administrative reasons.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Group 1 will consist of individuals with known RAPD Group 2 will consist of individuals with no known RAPD
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nevada, Reno
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kevin H Merkley, MD, MBA, Principal investigator, University of Texas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05799066
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23-0023
- Acronym
- RAPD
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 3 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vejdani MD., Al-Zubidi N. Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect. Eyewiki 2020. https://eyewiki.org/Relative_Afferent_Pupillary_Defect
Simakurthy S, Stokkermans TJ, Tripathy K. Marcus Gunn Pupil. 2026 Apr 30. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557675/
PubMed 32491607
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Mechanism for Measurement of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) Using Machine Learning
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05799066
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RAPD / 23-0023
- Conditions
- Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD)
- Keywords
- Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD), Pupil measurements, Swinging flashlight test, Pen light test, Virtual reality head mounted display (VR HMD), Visual loss, Vision loss, Afferent pupillary dysfunction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was terminated early for administrative reasons.
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Nevada, Reno
- Study start
- 4 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this prospective reliability study is to test the effectiveness of a commercially available, off-the-shelf virtual reality head-mounted display (VR HMD) and machine learning (ML) algorithms in detecting Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) in a group of subjects with known RAPD and another group with no known RAPD.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the use of the VR HMD and ML to replace the standard of care swinging flashlight test provide a more reliable and objective pupil measurement to detect RAPD?
- Can RAPD be detected by the VR HMD and ML algorithms at an earlier stage than the standard of care swinging light test?
Participants will be asked to undergo the standard of care swinging flashlight test, have their pupils manually measured, then have the test repeated using the VR HMD and ML.
Researchers will compare the measurements taken manually, following the standard of care swinging light test and those recorded by the VR HMD and ML to help answer the above questions.
Detailed description
Purpose of the Study/Objectives
The objective of this reliability study is to successfully develop a mechanism for diagnostics of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) using pupil measurement values and pathologic response. The diagnostics of this test will later be compared with the traditional swinging flashlight test results. The physiological basis of the study is that the reaction of the pupils in the right and left eyes are linked. When a bright light is shone into one eye, it will lead to an equal constriction of both pupils. When the light source is removed from the eye, the pupils will enlarge equally.
Our hypothesis is difference between pupil measurement values of two eyes when the light source moves from one eye to the other is an indicator of RAPD. This reliability study is to use a commercially-available, off-the-shelf virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display (HMD) and machine learning (ML) algorithms to detect RAPD at an earlier stage with small differences in pupil measurement values. The RAPD is a critically important sign in patients with unexplained visual loss because it is an objective finding of afferent pupillary dysfunction. The research question is if the proposed use of VR and ML to replace the swinging flashlight test provides a more reliable and objective pupil measurement to detect RAPD.
Background
A relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) is a critically important ophthalmologic examination finding that defines a defect (lesion) in the pupil pathway on the afferent side. A RAPD is relative to the fellow eye and occurs because of the bilateral and equal innervation of the pupils in normal individuals. The RAPD manifests as a difference in pupillary light reaction between the two eyes. The test requires two eyes but only one working pupil.
In a normal patient without afferent pupillary disease, shining a light in either eye will produce constriction of both eyes equally. In the case of an afferent pupillary pathway lesion, the light response is tested individually in each eye and then the light swings between the two eyes to detect RAPD. The normal pupillary response is characterized by equal constriction of the pupils in both eyes when the light stimulus is applied to each eye individually and no dilation or pupillary escape when the light swings from the one eye to the fellow eye. The pathologic response that characterizes the RAPD includes the following: (1) the light reaction causes pupil constriction in both eyes when the light shines in the normal eye, and (2) dilatation of the pupils in both eyes when the light stimulus is rapidly transferred from the normal eye to the pathologic eye.
Study Design
The study design is a reliability study evaluating the performance of the HTC Vive Pro Eye, to detect RAPD. The HTC Vive Pro Eye (product name) is not an experimental device. It is a consumer-grade VR HMD available as an off-the-shelf VR Headset. To validate the ability of the VR HMD to detect RAPD in patients, a reliability study will be performed by using the device on patients with known RAPD and patients without RAPD. Participants will undergo manual pupil measurement in the eye clinic via penlight for direct and swinging light test reflexes. Patients then will undergo the VR HMD eye measurements as discussed previously.
The anticipated total number of participants for this study is 120 patients aged 18 to 85, consisting of 60 participants in the control group (no known RAPD) and 60 participants in the experimental group (known RAPD). Both groups will undergo the traditional swinging flashlight test and testing with the VR HMD.
Medical Records will be used to obtain ocular imaging, pupil measurements, past medical history and past ocular history. Demographic information will be obtained through a self-reporting survey for age, gender and ethnicity. Data will be acquired by using the VR HMD. The protocol presents light through the VR HMD displays to each eye individually and will use participants' pupil diameters via its integrated eye tracking cameras to collect information about pupillary reflex deficit. Data from visual function tests such as visual acuity, visual field, chromatic sensitivity, etiology of RAPD etc. will be taken from the EPIC (product name) electronic medical record (EMR) to compare with current study findings.
This research will include records of participants' voices or images. Video of the pupils of the participant and their gaze location may be recorded via VR device for research purpose. Audio, video or photographs may be recorded for publication purposes. Subject identity will be removed from the audio, video and photographs. Informed Consent Form will ask the subject for their permission to be photographed or audio/video recorded.
Principal Investigator (PI) and researchers will ensure that all study personnel are informed about the research plan and their research-related duties by routine meetings, regular communication via email and phone. All researchers will take the human subject protection training sanctioned by the university via Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) Program training.
A counterbalanced repeated measures experimental design will be used to compare participant performance in two conditions: using traditional swinging flashlight test versus using pupil measurement head-mounted display. The independent variable in the study will be modes (2 conditions) and the measured dependent variables (1 condition) will be RAPD.
Study Intervention
The study intervention that is being evaluated is whether virtual reality testing through a VR HMD device can adequately diagnose RAPD.
Each participant will undergo the standard of care swinging flashlight test to diagnose RAPD by their treating ophthalmologist, an IRB approved study team member, at their regular clinic visit, prior to participation in the study. If the patient elects to participate in the study, participates in the consent process and signs the Informed Consent Form, he or she will undergo a repeat of the standard of care swinging flashlight test, then participant will undergo testing with the VR HMD. Data on each participant's pupil sizes in both light and dark simulations is measured and coded. The VR HMD pupil measurement device is a consumer-grade virtual reality headset available as an off-the-shelf gaming product. The risk of using the device is minimal and no greater than the standard of care swinging flashlight test. The device uses illumination of less than 90 cd/m2 which is below and in accordance with the typical flashlight exposure of 100 cd/m2. There is therefore no disproportionate increase in risk. The device's maximum illumination is well below the threshold which would be of potential risk of harm. Risk of loss of private health information (PHI) is minimized by the manner with which the data will be stored.
At the acquisition time, subjects will be assigned a study identification number. That number will be recorded on a subject identity master key, along with the subject's medical record number (MRN). Once the subject identity master key has been created and stored separately from study data in a password protected file on the University of Texas Medical Branch's (UTMB's) secure server behind a firewall. All identifying information will then be removed from the subject's data. The deidentified data will then be stored in a secure folder on the UTMB secure server behind a firewall and that of the collaborating site (University of Nevada, Reno) computer behind a firewall.
The total testing should take approximately 10-30 minutes. After each participant has their standard of care ophthalmology visit with their treating ophthalmologist, an Institutional Review Board- (IRB-) approved study team member, consent will be obtained by an IRB-approved study team member, who has been properly trained and designated by the PI to obtain consent. If the patient consents, they will undergo a repeat of the swinging light test and their pupil measurements recorded manually. Then the subject will undergo testing with the VR HMD during which the device will take pupillary measurements lasting approximately five minutes. No follow-up appointments for research purposes are necessary.
Subjects will be recruited from the UTMB eye clinic. Subjects' participation is limited to one visit. Study enrollment is anticipated to take six months. The duration of the study is estimated to be two years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Group 1 will consist of individuals with known RAPD Group 2 will consist of individuals with no known RAPD
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Known RAPD | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Swinging Light test, Diagnostic Test: Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD)Participants with known RAPD will be administered the standard of care swinging light test and pupil measurements taken manually, then administered the light test using the VR HMD and ML. |
| No Known RAPD | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Swinging Light test, Diagnostic Test: Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD)Participants with no known RAPD will be administered the standard of care swinging light test and pupil measurements taken manually, then administered the light test using the VR HMD and ML. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 18 - 85
- 60 patients with known RAPD.
- 60 patients with no known RAPD
- May be diagnosed with a vision disorder such as glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, unilateral or asymmetrical disease of the retina or other degenerative ocular diseases
- Referred to study by treating eye doctor
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Younger than 18; older than 85 years of age
- Not a UTMB clinic patient
- Belonging to an identified vulnerable population
- Participants with discomfort using glasses
- Experience discomfort using VR HMD device
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Swinging Light testAlso: Pen Light testThe swinging light or pen light test with manual pupil measurements is the standard of care test for RAPD. This test consists of a light being shone in one eye for 3 to 4 seconds then shown in the other eye for 3 to 4 seconds, repeating 2 to 3 times. Pupils are measured manually immediately after the light test. Measurements are recorded in patient's medical record. | Diagnostic test | Known RAPD, No Known RAPD |
| Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD)A light is shone from within the VR HMD, pupillary measurements are taken and recorded by the machine learning (ML) algorithm. | Diagnostic test | Known RAPD, No Known RAPD |
Primary outcome
Pupillary measurements
Time frame: Immediately following the swinging light test or VR HMD light test
Measure of pupil size in each eye, measured manually or via machine learning algorithms
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was terminated early for administrative reasons.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jun 2026.
- BackgroundVejdani MD., Al-Zubidi N. Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect. Eyewiki 2020. https://eyewiki.org/Relative_Afferent_Pupillary_Defect
- Background: PubMed 32491607Simakurthy S, Stokkermans TJ, Tripathy K. Marcus Gunn Pupil. 2026 Apr 30. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557675/
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin H Merkley, MD, MBA principal investigator
University of Texas
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Swinging Light test and Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display (VR HMD) in people with Relative Afferent Pupil Defect (RAPD), run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was terminated early for administrative reasons.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pupillary measurements (time frame: Immediately following the swinging light test or VR HMD light test). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05799066, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2026.