Aortic Aneurysm, ThoracicARISEIINCT05800743
Evaluation of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft
A study testing GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device), GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) and Surgery in people with Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic and Pseudoaneurysm, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 41 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of ARISE II is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft device in the treatment of lesions involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Pseudoaneurysm, Aortic Dissection
- What is being tested?
- GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device), GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) and Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 370 participants
- Where
- 41 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Nov 2023to Jan 2034
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is/has:
- Ascending Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysm
- Fusiform aneurysm (≥50mm or documented growth rate >0.5cm/year)
- Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria)
- Pseudoaneurysms (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) Non-aneurysm
- Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (PAUs) (no diameter criteria)
Show all 64Show fewer
- Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria)
- Anatomic compatibility with ASG device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review.
- Treatment must be limited to the ascending aorta
- Lesion location is ≥2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostia
- Distal extent of the lesion is located ≥2cm proximal to the origin of the Brachiocephalic Artery (BCA)
- Proximal and distal landing zones must be ≥2cm in length
- Landing zones cannot be heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
- Landing zone diameter between 27mm - 48mm
- For patients with prior replacement of the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch by an endovascular or surgical graft, there must be at least ≥2 cm overlap of ASG device and previously implanted graft.
- Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria:
- ≥75 years of age
- Previous median sternotomy
- Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator and an experienced open ascending and/or aortic arch surgeon (e.g., cardiothoracic surgeon).
- Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
- Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach
- Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative
- Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up
- The patient is/has:
- Ascending and/or Arch Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device and meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysms
- Fusiform aneurysm (≥55 mm or documented growth rate >0.5cm/year)
- Saccular aneurysm (no diameter criteria)
- Pseudoaneurysms (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria) Non-aneurysms
- Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (no diameter criteria)
- Pseudoaneurysms, following open surgical repair of a Type A dissection (>30 days post-surgery, no diameter criteria)
- Chronic de novo (>90 days) Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment
- Chronic de novo aortic dissection with primary entry tear in the ascending aorta or arch
- Chronic de novo aortic dissection with primary entry tear in the descending thoracic aorta with retrograde involvement of the aortic arch and/or ascending aorta
- Residual aortic dissection following surgical repair of Type A aortic dissection requiring treatment (>30 days post-surgery)
- Anatomic compatibility with ASG device used in combination with the TBE Device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review.
- Proximal Aortic Landing Zone:
- Landing zone is native aorta or surgical graft
- Lesion location is ≥2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostia
- Proximal landing zone must be ≥2cm in the ascending aorta.
- Landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
- Landing zone diameter between 27mm - 48mm
- Acceptable proximal landing zone outer curvature length for the required device
- Branch Vessel Landing Zone:
- Length of ≥2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel
- Target branch vessel inner diameters of 11-18 mm
- Target branch vessel landing zone must be in native vessel that cannot be heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
- Distal Aortic Landing Zone:
- Outer curvature must be ≥2 cm proximal to the celiac artery
- Aortic inner diameters between 16-42 mm
- Landing zone in native aorta or previously implanted GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft (CTAG Device)
- Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria:
- ≥75 years of age
- Previous median sternotomy
- Documented identification of other subject-specific risk factors (e.g., medical history, active medical diagnosis) by a study investigator and an experienced open ascending and/or aortic arch surgeon (e.g., cardiothoracic surgeon).
- Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
- Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach
- Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative
- Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up
- Subjects who meet the following criteria will be followed:
- The aortic lesion involves the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch
- The subject is determined to be high-risk for open surgical repair per the protocol requirements
- The subject is at least 18 years of age
- The subject is willing to comply with the protocol requirements
- Open surgery to repair the aortic lesion the patient was screened for is intended to be performed at the investigational site responsible for initiating the screening process for the study
Who cannot join
- The patient is/has:
- De novo Type A dissection
- Requires immediate treatment
- Dissected great vessels requiring treatment
- Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post treatment
- Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment
Show all 53Show fewer
- Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or treatment for acute coronary syndrome requiring Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (DAPT) within 30 days prior to treatment
- Open chest surgical repair within 30 days prior to treatment
- Presence of Intramural Hematoma (IMH) in landing zones
- Prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position that precludes safe delivery of the ASG device
- Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater
- Previous endovascular repair with a non-Gore device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair
- Concomitant vascular disease requiring treatment that is not planned for index endovascular procedure
- Any stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to treatment
- Presence of protruding and/or irregular thrombus and/or atheroma in the ascending aorta or aortic arch or any other factors that could increase the risk of stroke based on imaging review
- Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome, EDS)
- Participation in investigational drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the sponsor
- Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
- Pregnant at time of procedure
- Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm
- Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication)
- Renal failure, defined as patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <30 (mL/min/1.73 m2) or currently requiring dialysis
- Life expectancy <12 months
- Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment
- Body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate fluoroscopic and CT visualization of the aorta
- The patient is/has:
- Acute and subacute de novo Type A dissection (defined as <90 days)
- Requires immediate treatment
- Dissected great vessels requiring treatment
- Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post treatment
- Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment
- Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or treatment for acute coronary syndrome requiring Dual Anti Platelet Therapy (DAPT) within 30 days prior to treatment.
- Open chest surgical repair within 30 days prior to treatment
- Presence of Intramural Hematoma (IMH) in landing zones
- Prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position that precludes safe delivery of the ASG device
- Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater.
- Previous endovascular repair with a non-Gore device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair
- Concomitant vascular disease requiring treatment that is not planned for index endovascular procedure
- Any stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to treatment
- Presence of protruding and/or irregular thrombus and/or atheroma in the ascending aorta or aortic arch or any other factors that could increase the risk of stroke based on imaging review
- Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan Syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, EDS)
- Participation in investigational drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the sponsor
- Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
- Pregnant at time of procedure
- Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm
- Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication)
- Renal failure, defined as patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <30 (mL/min/1.73 m2) or currently requiring dialysis
- Life expectancy <12 months
- Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment
- Body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate fluoroscopic and CT visualization of the aorta
- Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or known hypersensitivity to heparin or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or state
Trial locations and contacts
41 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
41 sites in 1 country
United States41 sites
University of Michigan Frankel Cardiovascular Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Colorado Hospital Authority
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons
Austin, Texas, 78756
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Atrium Health
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Northwestern University -Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Clinical Trials Unit
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Inova Fairfax Medical Campus
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
University of Florida - Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Corewell Health
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Hackensack UMC
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
MemorialCare Heart and Vascular Institute - Long Beach Medical Center
Long Beach, California, 90806
Keck Medical Center University of Southern California, HCC II
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
West Virginia University Medicine
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Intermountain Heart Institute
Murray, Utah, 84107
Sentara Mid Atlantic Cardiothoracic Surgeons
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19105
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
The Heart Hospital at Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Mayo Clinic - Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Washington University School of Medicine - St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford Hospital
Stanford, California, 94305
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, 10595
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of Lesions of the Ascending Aorta
The primary objective of ARISE II is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft device in the treatment of lesions involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch.
- Being tested
- GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device), GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device), Surgery
- Keywords
- Ascending Aorta, Pseudoaneurysm, Aortic Lesion, Endovascular Repair, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Aneurysm, False, Aortic Dissection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)Device
Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta
GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device)Device
Also called Revascularization Procedure
Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta/aortic arch
SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Open surgical repair of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ASG device only in Ascending Aorta | Experimental | Ascending Aortic Isolated Lesions, Pseudoaneurysms and Penetrating Aortic Ulcers in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG device alone. Receives: Device: GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device) |
| ASG + TBE | Experimental | Ascending Aorta/Aortic Arch Isolated Lesions and Chronic De Novo Dissections in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG and TBE devices. Receives: Device: GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) |
| Surgical Follow-up Cohort | Other | Open surgical repair of ascending aorta in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair Receives: Procedure: Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary effectiveness endpoint as measured by device technical success and absence of reintervention.
The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of the following events through one month post procedure: Device Technical Success and Absence of Reintervention.
Technical Success is defined as including:
- Successful access and delivery to the intended implantation site, and retrieval of the device delivery system, and;
- Accurate placement of the device at the intended implantation site, and
- Patency of the graft in absence of clinically significant device deformations (e.g., kinking, stent eversion, mal-deployment, misaligned deployment), and
Absence of reintervention is defined as: The absence of unanticipated additional procedures related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system
Measured: 30 Days
Primary Safety Endpoint as measured by a composite of the absence of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, and new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis.
The primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following events through 30 days post endovascular procedure:
- Aortic rupture
- Lesion-related mortality
- Disabling Stroke
- Permanent paraplegia
- Permanent paraparesis
- New onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis
Measured: 30 Days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Secondary endpoints as measured as a composite of procedural and treatment success.
Two secondary endpoints are planned for the study with no inferential analysis. Composite endpoint of procedural success elements measured at one month follow-up Composite endpoint of treatment success elements measured at all appropriate follow-up windows
Measured: 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Secondary endpoint as measured by Short Form-36® physical component summary (PCS)
Short Form-36® PCS measured at the one year follow-up visit with inferential analysis
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2023
- Study start28 Nov 2023
- Primary completionOct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2034 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Aortic Aneurysm, ThoracicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by W.L.Gore & AssociatesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 370 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & Associates
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric Roselli, MD, Principal investigator, The Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05800743
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ASG 22-02
- Acronym
- ARISEII
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 29 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of Lesions of the Ascending Aorta
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05800743
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARISEII / ASG 22-02
- Keywords
- Ascending Aorta, Pseudoaneurysm, Aortic Lesion, Endovascular Repair, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 370 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & AssociatesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2034 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of ARISE II is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft device in the treatment of lesions involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ASG device only in Ascending Aorta | Experimental | Device: GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)Ascending Aortic Isolated Lesions, Pseudoaneurysms and Penetrating Aortic Ulcers in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG device alone. |
| ASG + TBE | Experimental | Device: GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device)Ascending Aorta/Aortic Arch Isolated Lesions and Chronic De Novo Dissections in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair, treated with endovascular repair using the ASG and TBE devices. |
| Surgical Follow-up Cohort | Other | Procedure: SurgeryOpen surgical repair of ascending aorta in subjects at high-risk for surgical repair |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (64 listed)
- Ascending Aortic pathologies warranting surgical repair compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device meeting any of the following criteria: Aneurysm
- Anatomic compatibility with ASG device based on Gore Imaging Sciences review.
- Considered high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting any of the following criteria:
- Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
- Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach
Key exclusion criteria (53 listed)
- De novo Type A dissection
- Requires immediate treatment
- Dissected great vessels requiring treatment
- Anticipated need for coronary or aortic valve intervention within one year post treatment
- Any aortic valve repair or replacement including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or coronary artery intervention within 30 days prior to treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta | Device | ASG device only in Ascending Aorta |
| GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device)Also: Revascularization ProcedureEndovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta/aortic arch | Device | ASG + TBE |
| SurgeryOpen surgical repair of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch | Procedure or surgery | Surgical Follow-up Cohort |
Primary outcome
Primary effectiveness endpoint as measured by device technical success and absence of reintervention.
Time frame: 30 Days
The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of the following events through one month post procedure: Device Technical Success and Absence of Reintervention. Technical Success is defined as including: 1. Successful access and delivery to the intended implantation site, and retrieval of the device delivery system, and; 2. Accurate placement of the device at the intended implantation site, and 3. Patency of the graft in absence of clinically significant device deformations (e.g., kinking, stent eversion, mal-deployment, misaligned deployment), and Absence of reintervention is defined as: The absence of unanticipated additional procedures related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system
Primary Safety Endpoint as measured by a composite of the absence of aortic rupture, lesion-related mortality, disabling stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent paraparesis, and new onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis.
Time frame: 30 Days
The primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following events through 30 days post endovascular procedure: * Aortic rupture * Lesion-related mortality * Disabling Stroke * Permanent paraplegia * Permanent paraparesis * New onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis
2 secondary outcomes
Secondary endpoints as measured as a composite of procedural and treatment success.
Time frame: 30 Days, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Secondary endpoint as measured by Short Form-36® physical component summary (PCS)
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2026.
Related trials for Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
Recruiting
Treatment in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Surgery vs Surveillance
Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Enlargement, Ascending Aorta Aneurysm
Recruiting
GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Zone 0/1 Post-Approval Study
Aortic Arch Dissection, Aortic Arch Aneurysm
RecruitingPhase 4
Effect of Remimazolam Versus Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Thoracic or Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Repair
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Remimazolam on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuroinflammatory Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Aortic Arch Surgery
Aortic Aneurysm of the Proximal Arch, Aortic Aneurysms Arch
Enrolling by invitation
Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms, Dissecting, Aneurysm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Eric Roselli, MD principal investigator
The Cleveland Clinic
41 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device), GORE® Thoracic Aortic Graft Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE Device) and Surgery in people with Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic and Pseudoaneurysm, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 41 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 64 inclusion and 53 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 41 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary effectiveness endpoint as measured by device technical success and absence of reintervention. (time frame: 30 Days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.