Study of Interference Between Oral Anticoagulants and Heparin During Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) or Left Atrial Tachycardia (GAD) by Catheter.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder worldwide and is a major public health problem due to its increased morbidity and overall mortality, particularly related to stroke and heart failure. Catheter ablation is the most effective method for maintaining sinus rhythm and is currently recommended after failure of antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with symptomatic AF.

Spontaneous Atrial Left Tachycardia (ALT) is rarer, but is a common consequence after an initial procedure of persistent AF removal. The removal of AF, like that of ALT, is performed in the left atrium and is therefore associated with a major thromboembolic risk. The anticoagulation problems are the same for all ablations in the left atrium. Catheter ablation in the left atrium is usually performed in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that are increasingly used. In France, these are rivaroxaban and apixaban which are direct and selective inhibitors of factor Xa and dabigatran which directly and selectively inhibits free or clot-bound thrombin (factor IIa). DOACs are easier to use than VKAs and do not require regular biological monitoring either at initiation or in the follow-up of treatment. Based on current evidence from the AF literature, DOACs are comparable to VKAs with a lower risk of major bleeding.

Catheter ablation of AF or ALT exposes the patient to a hemorrhagic risk (hemopericardium for example) and especially thrombotic in intra-procedure ranging from 0.9 to 5%. Different mechanisms could be involved in this per-procedural prothrombotic situation: (1) activation of the contact phase by the ablation equipment, (2) lesion of the left atrial endothelium and release of pro-thrombotic cytokines from damaged cells, inflammatory reaction induced by the passage of transseptal sheaths (3) modification of blood flow after conversion to sinus rhythm. These different phenomena lead to the activation of coagulation. Conversely, excessive per-procedural anticoagulation exposes to a risk of bleeding. The management of patients under VKA is well codified and validated. In contrast, DOA treatment management is based solely on extrapolation of VKA data. Only a few observational studies have been performed in patients treated with DOAC but with a low thrombotic risk. Studies in those at high thrombotic risk are even rarer.

Our observational study proposes to compare at different times (pre-procedure, intra-procedure and post-procedure admission) the interference of DOACs on the determination of Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) in patients admitted for AF or catheter ALT removal in 25 patients treated with rivaroxaban, 25 patients treated with apixaban, and 25 patients treated with dabigatran, compared to 25 patients treated with VKA.

1. in pre-procedure during the relay by UFH, we will determine the specific anti-Xa activity of UFH independently of AOD by neutralizing in vitro the anti-Xa activity of AOD by filtration.
2. In per-procedure we will determine in these same patients the amount of UFH necessary to obtain a coagulation time measured by the satisfactory activating clotting time (ACT) (≥ 300 sec) to start the procedure. Anti-Xa activity will be performed in parallel to determine whether a correlation can be established between ACT and the specific anti-Xa activity of UFH or residual AOD.
3. We will look for a relationship between the occurrence of hemorrhagic and / or thrombotic events and the concentrations of DOAC and / or UFH in pre- and post-procedure. Patients on VKA with standardized management procedures will be the control group.

This study will determine whether a dose modification of UFH should be considered based on the level of DOAC in the area of the disease.