AzTrials
AzTrials

Overweight, Obesity and Other HyperalimentationIFEBONCT05804019

Nutritional and Physical Activities for Overweight and Obese Older Adults

A study testing Nutritional and physical interventions in people with Overweight, Obesity and Other Hyperalimentation, run by University College Absalon at 6 sites in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This cluster randomized trial aims to test nutritional and physical activity interventions in older adults in nursing homes. The overall research question are: o What are the effects of nutritional and physical activity interventions on muscle function and quality of life in older adults with overweight and obesity?… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 110 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Nutritional and physical interventions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
93 participants
Where
6 sitesDenmark
Study dates
1 Mar 2023to 30 Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Living at the nursing homes in Odsherred City
  • Informed consent form signed after receiving oral and written information
  • Read, speak and understand Danish

Who cannot join

  • Terminal ill

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

Denmark6 sites
  • Bobjerg Nursing Home

    Asnæs, Region Sjælland, 4550

  • Grevinge Nusing Home

    Grevinge, Region Sjælland, 4571

  • Solvognen Nursing home

    Højby, Region Sjælland, 4573

  • Bakkegården Nursing home

    Hørve, Region Sjælland, 4534

  • Grønnegården Nursing home

    Nykøbing Sjælland, Region Sjælland, 4500

  • Præstevænget Nursing Home

    Nykøbing Sjælland, Region Sjælland, 4500

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Interventions Focusing on Nutrition and Physical Activities for Overweight and Obese Older Adults in Nursing Homes "IFEBO"

This cluster randomized trial aims to test nutritional and physical activity interventions in older adults in nursing homes. The overall research question are:

  • What are the effects of nutritional and physical activity interventions on muscle function and quality of life in older adults with overweight and obesity? Participants' data on body composition, physical function, and diseases will be collected. Furthermore, participants will be interviewed for a questionnaire on quality of life and nutritional intake.

Researchers will compare three intervention nursing homes with three control nursing homes to see if nutrition and physical interventions have on physical function and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Background: The aging population is increasing both globally and nationally in Denmark. Concurrent with the generally rapidly increasing incidence of being overweight, a large number of older people risk facing several health problems associated with being overweight and obesity (Ow/O). Aging related to malnutrition or undernutrition has received a lot of attention. However, overnutrition described as Ow/O is also classified as a nutritional disorder or a nutrition-related condition, in the same term as malnutrition.

Today, all older adults in Danish nursing homes are offered an enriched diet type for malnourished older adults, focused on energy-dense snacks and a high-fat percentage. This is not necessarily an appropriate diet, but it is unknown which nutritional interventions are effective in maintaining/ improving physical functioning, independence, and quality of life. One of the concerns is that many older adults with Ow/O may have a loss of muscle mass, which can worsen with weight loss if this is not taken into account in the nutritional intervention. There is therefore a clear need to develop targeted interventions for older adults with Ow/O that can maintain or improve physical functioning and quality of life.

However, a literature review of interventions within the last 10 years shows that none of the interventions are aimed at healthy older adults ≥ 65 years with a BMI≥ 25kg/m2 and good physical functioning. Instead, interventions targeted older adults with Ow/O with either low physical functioning or chronic diseases. These interventions show that older adults can lose weight, but without significant positive effects on functioning and quality of life. The interventions in the studies contain complex nutrition and exercise interventions, and the differences in the intervention descriptions and target groups make it difficult to compare and point to safe and effective interventions. In addition, the studies show that there is no difference between whether the nutrition intervention applies to weight loss or weight maintenance interventions.

However, the above literature review has confirmed that there are older people with Ow/O, especially those with both low physical function and chronic disease, who may benefit from a nutritional intervention, which has led to a proposed approach. The characterization according to the screening model will be performed in sub-study 1 (a cross-sectional study) and adapted to be easy to use in a community health care setting.

In this trial, based on a descriptive pre-study, the project, in collaboration with the older adults, the care staff, and the project participants, developed and tested nutritional interventions that can improve muscle function and quality of life of the target group.

Purpose: The overall purpose is to investigate how muscle function and care-related quality of life can be maintained or improved through nutrition and physical activity interventions in older adults in nursing homes.

Study design and methods:

This cluster randomized controlled intervention study will be performed at six nursing homes in "Odsherred" City, Denmark. Participants and care staff from nursing homes will contribute to the design of this study protocol.

Sample size calculation:

Initially, the power calculation is performed by individual randomization based on the 30-second chair stand test. The starting point is six nursing homes are involved in the study. Approximately 40-50 residents are living in each location and assumable half of them want to participate in the project (n=20). A desired detectable change of 1.3, a P-value <0.05, and a power of 80%. The study has two arms (Usual care group (control) and nutritional and physical interventions group (intervention)) and the standardized difference in the nursing homes incl. intra cluster correlation, SD diff, nursing center = 0.42.

SD (diff., nursing center) =(SD (diff.,person))/√n, SD diff, person ≈1.87 If SD is 1.87 or less, the power will be at least 80% or greater. If there are more than 20 people per nursing home power will increase and if there are fewer than 20 people power will decrease.

Approximately 100 participants will be included and cluster randomized to either 12 months of collaborating developing (6 months) and testing (additional 6 months) nutritional and physical activity intervention (intervention group) or 12 months of usual care (control group). A simple random sample without replacement will be selected using the lottery method by statistical software (R).

Effects from the intervention will be examined by mixed methods that include both quantitative and qualitative data, as well as action research that focuses on creating development and change in collaboration with participants and care staff at the nursing homes.

Recruitment of participants and informed consent:

Recruitment of project participants takes place from "Odsherred" city's six nursing homes. The first step in recruitment takes place by the principal investigator orally and in writing informing the nursing homes, care staff, relatives, nursing home councils, and the residents of the nursing homes about the project's purpose, content, and course. In the next step, (oral information) the principal investigator, the care staff, and relatives talk to the residents. Participant information (written information) is provided. The written information contains a description of the project, its purpose, method, and possible consequences associated with the participant's participation.

In the trial, no serious adverse events or minor risks are expected. No biological materials are collected. A nurse at each of the nursing homes is included in the project and will be present during all data collection periods. The nurses will be involved immediately if any health issues or concerns about health issues should arise. This project meets the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki II, as well as the guidelines of the Regional Ethics Committee (EMN-2021-07672 ) and the University of Copenhagen Ethical Committee (504-0316/22-5000).

Participants have the opportunity to withdraw consent at any time during the project. If there are measurements, eg performance tests, which the participants do not want to participate in, available data is collected from the journaling system without participation in all measurements.

Data on participants who withdraw will be documented. Participants receive no fee or other benefits. Collection, storage, and processing of empirical data are done with the Danish Data Protection Agency's instructions for handling confidential information in research work of an empirical nature.

Nutritional and physical intervention:

The intervention is developed with a focus on nutritional needs and physical activities.

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model is used to redefine issues and relevant actions together with residents, care staff, nursing home management, and relatives. The intervention will be developed based on new knowledge from a descriptive pre-study, previous studies, practical experiences, the participant's experiences and wishes as well as the staff's experiences and wishes. In collaboration they will form an implementation catalog, from here, the nursing homes can select a relevant number of components, which will be tested and implemented in practice.

The development and implementation duration is 6 months and the PDSA model is repeated three times at two-month intervals to strengthen and qualify the intervention. The PDSA model is known to the city's staff in advance and is additionally used in connection to continuing education. In addition, everyday physical activities that contribute to maintaining/improving physical function are included, based on the potentials that are uncovered in the descriptive pre-study.

The development and implementation period was followed by testing the effects of the intervention components and 12 months follow-up data collection was performed.

Data collection:

Data are collected at baseline, after 6, and 12 months.

The primary outcome is sustained or improved muscle function, but other outcomes including the "Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit" (ASCOT) questionnaire, calf circumference, and nutritional risk using the Eating Validation Scheme (EVS) were also collected.

The data analysis takes into account that not all participants are included in all measurements.

Statistical analysis:

The analysis includes all data after randomization, regardless of non-compliance or lack of results.

The effect of measures and intervention is assessed using an analysis of covariates adjusted for potential confounders (sex and age), which will be used to compare the variables between groups.

The Fisher Xact Test or chi-square test will be used to compare groups of older adults with overnutrition in terms of body composition, muscle function, non-communicable disease, and nutritional risk.

Data on recruitment and participants' feasibility and compliance in relation to intervention will be assessed by descriptive and comparative analysis.

A statistical software program for scientific research "R" will be used for statistical analysis.

Being tested
Nutritional and physical interventions
Keywords
Geriatric, Overnutrition, Physical function, Quality of Life
Medical subject headings
Overweight, Obesity, Overnutrition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nutritional and physical interventionsBehavioural

    The intervention is developed with a focus on nutritional needs and physical activities. The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model is used to redefine issues and relevant actions together with residents, relatives, care staff, and nursing home management. The intervention will be developed based on new knowledge from sub-study 1, previous studies, practical experiences, the participant's experiences and wishes as well as the staff's experiences and wishes. Together they will form an implementation catalog, from here, the intervention nursing homes can select a relevant number of components, which will be tested and implemented in practice. The implementation duration is 6 months and the PDSA model is repeated at two-month intervals to strengthen and qualify the intervention. The PDSA model is known to the city's staff in advance and is additionally used in connection to continuing education. The Usual Care Group will continue the usual care.

Study groups in NCT05804019
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual Care Group (Control)No interventionApproximately 100 participants will be included and cluster randomized by nursing home (n= 3) to either 12 months of nutritional and physical intervention or 12 months of usual care (control). Usual Care Group will receive the usual care at the control nursing homes (n=3)
Nutritional and Physical Intervention Group (Intervention Group)ExperimentalApproximately 100 participants will be included and cluster randomized by nursing home (n= 3) to either 12 months of nutritional and physical intervention or 12 months of usual care (control). The Nutritional and Physical Intervention Group will receive nutritional and physical interventions collaboratively defined by residents, relatives, care staff, and nursing home management during the PDSA workshops.
Receives: Behavioral: Nutritional and physical interventions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hand Grip Strength (HGS)

    Muscle function assessed by HGS in kilograms as a unit. To measure HGS, the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) was followed using a "Jamar Smart Hand Dynamometer". Three measurements on each hand will be completed, when participants were sitting upright and with the arm at a 90-degree angle.

    The test was performed by the principal researcher and trained clinical dietician students.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Change in Hand Grip Strength (HGS)

    Muscle function assessed by HGS in kilograms as a unit. To measure HGS, the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) was followed using a ¨"Jamar Smart Hand Dynamometer". Three measurements on each hand will be completed, when participants were sitting upright and with the arm at a 90-degree angle.

    The test was performed by the principal researcher and trained clinical dietician students.

    Measured: 6 months follow-up

  3. Change in Hand Grip Strength (HGS)

    Muscle function assessed by HGS in kilograms as a unit. To measure HGS, the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) was followed using a ¨"Jamar Smart Hand Dynamometer". Three measurements on each hand will be completed, when participants were sitting upright and with the arm at a 90-degree angle.

    The test was performed by the principal researcher and trained clinical dietician students.

    Measured: 12 months follow-up

  4. Chair Stand Test (CST) - 30 Second

    Muscle function assessed by CST. The test requires the participant to stand up and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds according to Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The participants are seated in a standard chair with their feet shoulder length apart and one foot in front of the other, doing as many stands as possible within 30 seconds. The unit is the number of full stands performed.

    Trained clinical dietician students and primary researcher will perform all tests

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Change in Chair Stand Test (CST) - 30 Second

    Muscle function assessed by CST. The test requires the participant to stand up and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds according to Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The participants are seated in a standard chair with their feet shoulder length apart and one foot in front of the other, doing as many stands as possible within 30 seconds. The unit is the number of full stands performed.

    Trained clinical dietician students and primary researcher will perform all tests

    Measured: 6 months follow-up

  6. Change in Chair Stand Test (CST) - 30 Second

    Muscle function assessed by CST. The test requires the participant to stand up and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds according to Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The participants are seated in a standard chair with their feet shoulder length apart and one foot in front of the other, doing as many stands as possible within 30 seconds. The unit is the number of full stands performed.

    Trained clinical dietician students and primary researcher will perform all tests

    Measured: 12 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Quality of Life by Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT)

    Quality of life will be assessed by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) questionnaire performed as an interview. The interview was performed by the principal researcher and trained clinical dietician students. The questionnaire ask the participants to give their own subjective evaluation of their experience for each of the eight domains including; Control over daily life, Personal cleanliness and comfort, Meals and nutrition, Safety, Social participation, Activities/occupation, Home cleanliness and comfort, and Dignity and respect.

    These subjective measures relate directly to the participant's capabilities i.e. the extent to which their experienced physical and physiological environment allows the participants to choose their own situations. The satisfaction was scaled from 'Very satisfied', 'Quite satisfied', 'Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied', to 'Quite or very dissatisfied' and 'Don't know'

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Change in Quality of Life by Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT)

    Quality of life will be assessed by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) questionnaire performed as an interview. The interview was performed by the principal researcher and trained clinical dietician students. The questionnaire ask the participants to give their own subjective evaluation of their experience for each of the eight domains including; Control over daily life, Personal cleanliness and comfort, Meals and nutrition, Safety, Social participation, Activities/occupation, Home cleanliness and comfort, and Dignity and respect.

    These subjective measures relate directly to the participant's capabilities i.e. the extent to which their experienced physical and physiological environment allows the participants to choose their own situations.The satisfaction was scaled from 'Very satisfied', 'Quite satisfied', 'Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied', to 'Quite or very dissatisfied' and 'Don't know'

    Measured: 6 months follow-up

  3. Change in Quality of Life by Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT)

    Quality of life will be assessed by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) questionnaire performed as an interview. The interview was performed by the principal researcher and trained clinical dietician students. The questionnaire ask the participants to give their own subjective evaluation of their experience for each of the eight domains including; Control over daily life, Personal cleanliness and comfort, Meals and nutrition, Safety, Social participation, Activities/occupation, Home cleanliness and comfort, and Dignity and respect.

    These subjective measures relate directly to the participant's capabilities i.e. the extent to which their experienced physical and physiological environment allows the participants to choose their own situations.The satisfaction was scaled from 'Very satisfied', 'Quite satisfied', 'Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied', to 'Quite or very dissatisfied' and 'Don't know'

    Measured: 12 months follow-up

  4. Weight in kilograms

    Weight is measured on a calibrated chair scale in the morning before breakfast. Participants are not wearing shoes and are dressed in light clothing. The units are in kilograms (kg).

    Changes in weight are assessed together with changes in Body Mass Index calculated by kg divided by height (m)^2

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Change in weight in kilograms

    Weight is measured on a calibrated chair scale in the morning before breakfast. Participants are not wearing shoes and are dressed in light clothing. The units are in kilograms (kg).

    Changes in weight are assessed together with changes in Body Mass Index calculated by kg divided by height (m)^2

    Measured: 6 months follow-up

  6. Change in weight in kilograms

    Weight is measured on a calibrated chair scale in the morning before breakfast. Participants are not wearing shoes and are dressed in light clothing. The units are in kilograms (kg).

    Changes in weight are assessed together with changes in Body Mass Index calculated by kg divided by height (m)^2

    Measured: 12 months follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2023
  2. Study start1 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two arms (Nutritional and Physical Activity Intervention Group and Usual Care Group). Approximately 100 participants will be included and cluster randomized by the nursing home to either 6 months of nutritional and physical interventions or 6 months of usual care (control).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
93 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05804019
Sponsor's protocol ID
IFEBO
Other IDs
1155-00001B, 2022-03 Tenna Christoffersen
Acronym
IFEBO
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
1 Mar 2023
Last updated
12 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: After study is finished, no data will be shared

Publications

  • Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, Lloyd-Sherlock P, Epping-Jordan JE, Peeters GMEEG, Mahanani WR, Thiyagarajan JA, Chatterji S. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2145-2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

    PubMed 26520231
  • DiMilia PR, Mittman AC, Batsis JA. Benefit-to-Risk Balance of Weight Loss Interventions in Older Adults with Obesity. Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 4;19(11):114. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1249-8.

    PubMed 31686230
  • Haywood CJ, Prendergast LA, Purcell K, Le Fevre L, Lim WK, Galea M, Proietto J. Very Low Calorie Diets for Weight Loss in Obese Older Adults-A Randomized Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Dec 12;73(1):59-65. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx012.

    PubMed 28329121
  • Bouchonville MF, Villareal DT. Sarcopenic obesity: how do we treat it? Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013 Oct;20(5):412-9. doi: 10.1097/01.med.0000433071.11466.7f.

    PubMed 23974769
  • Locher JL, Goldsby TU, Goss AM, Kilgore ML, Gower B, Ard JD. Calorie restriction in overweight older adults: Do benefits exceed potential risks? Exp Gerontol. 2016 Dec 15;86:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

    PubMed 26994938
  • Goisser S, Kemmler W, Porzel S, Volkert D, Sieber CC, Bollheimer LC, Freiberger E. Sarcopenic obesity and complex interventions with nutrition and exercise in community-dwelling older persons--a narrative review. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Aug 6;10:1267-82. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S82454. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26346071
  • Ard JD, Cook M, Rushing J, Frain A, Beavers K, Miller G, Miller ME, Nicklas B. Impact on weight and physical function of intensive medical weight loss in older adults with stage II and III obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Sep;24(9):1861-6. doi: 10.1002/oby.21569. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

    PubMed 27430587
  • Ard JD, Gower B, Hunter G, Ritchie CS, Roth DL, Goss A, Wingo BC, Bodner EV, Brown CJ, Bryan D, Buys DR, Haas MC, Keita AD, Flagg LA, Williams CP, Locher JL. Effects of Calorie Restriction in Obese Older Adults: The CROSSROADS Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Dec 12;73(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw237.

    PubMed 28003374
  • Beavers KM, Nesbit BA, Kiel JR, Sheedy JL, Arterburn LM, Collins AE, Ford SA, Henderson RM, Coleman CD, Beavers DP. Effect of an Energy-Restricted, Nutritionally Complete, Higher Protein Meal Plan on Body Composition and Mobility in Older Adults With Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 May 16;74(6):929-935. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly146.

    PubMed 30629126
  • Frimel TN, Sinacore DR, Villareal DT. Exercise attenuates the weight-loss-induced reduction in muscle mass in frail obese older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7):1213-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31816a85ce.

    PubMed 18580399
  • Kelly KR, Haus JM, Solomon TP, Patrick-Melin AJ, Cook M, Rocco M, Barkoukis H, Kirwan JP. A low-glycemic index diet and exercise intervention reduces TNF(alpha) in isolated mononuclear cells of older, obese adults. J Nutr. 2011 Jun;141(6):1089-94. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.139964. Epub 2011 Apr 27.

    PubMed 21525252
  • Muscariello E, Nasti G, Siervo M, Di Maro M, Lapi D, D'Addio G, Colantuoni A. Dietary protein intake in sarcopenic obese older women. Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Feb 5;11:133-40. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S96017. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 26917955
  • Nicklas BJ, Brinkley TE, Houston DK, Lyles MF, Hugenschmidt CE, Beavers KM, Leng X. Effects of Caloric Restriction on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Fatigue, and Disability Responses to Aerobic Exercise in Older Adults With Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jun 18;74(7):1084-1090. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly159.

    PubMed 29982294
  • Waters DL, Vawter R, Qualls C, Chode S, Armamento-Villareal R, Villareal DT. Long-term maintenance of weight loss after lifestyle intervention in frail, obese older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013 Jan;17(1):3-7. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0421-5.

    PubMed 23299370
  • Villareal DT, Shah K, Banks MR, Sinacore DR, Klein S. Effect of weight loss and exercise therapy on bone metabolism and mass in obese older adults: a one-year randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jun;93(6):2181-7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1473. Epub 2008 Mar 25.

    PubMed 18364384

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nutritional and physical interventions in people with Overweight, Obesity and Other Hyperalimentation, run by University College Absalon at 6 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hand Grip Strength (HGS) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05804019, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in