AzTrials
AzTrials

Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer and N1b StatusFADONCT05804682

Fascial Versus Standard Neck Dissection in Patients With N1b Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

An observational study of Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer and N1b Status, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Optimal surgical technique for neck dissection (LND) in thyroid carcinoma remains a subject of debate. Fascial ND (FND) implies the removal of the superficial and middle layers of the deep cervical fascia en bloc with lymph-nodes containing fibro-fatty tissue (levels IIa-Vb and VI-VII for cN1b patients). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Fascial Neck Dissection and Standard Neck Dissection
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
195 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Jan 2018to 31 Jan 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients that were operated for N1b papillary thyroid cancer in the Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy between 2018 and 2021. All patients eligible for inclusion were screened for eligibility in a systematic fashion both from the records of our center in the Eurocrine registry and from our center's internal prospective de-identified database concerning thyroid cancer.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who met all the following criteria were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective evaluation:
  • Male or female patients, living or deceased, aged 18 years or older at the time of operation
  • Unilateral (left/right) or bilateral lateral neck dissection along with central neck dissection
  • Patients with papillary cancer, pN1b. This excludes patients with other types of thyroid cancer (e.g., medullary, follicular, and anaplastic);
  • Patients that underwent central and/or lateral neck dissection as a primary intervention. This excludes patients with any previous operation for thyroid disease involving any type of lymph node dissection.
  • Exclusion criteria: patient's age < 18 years, patients that underwent previous neck dissection of any type and patients who refused or were unable to provide adequate follow up data.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

    Rome, 00168

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Fascial Versus Standard Neck Dissection in Patients With N1b Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: a 4-year Analysis of Outcomes.

Optimal surgical technique for neck dissection (LND) in thyroid carcinoma remains a subject of debate. Fascial ND (FND) implies the removal of the superficial and middle layers of the deep cervical fascia en bloc with lymph-nodes containing fibro-fatty tissue (levels IIa-Vb and VI-VII for cN1b patients). This retrospective cohort study was designed to compare FND with standard, non-fascial, selective ND (SND).

Read the detailed description

In thyroid cancer patients, lymph node dissection includes a comprehensive removal of all the target nodal basins: anterior cervical compartment (level VI) and the superior mediastinal nodes that can be reached via cervical incision (level VII) in CND, and levels IIa-Vb in LND. Clearance of those levels without including the enveloping fasciae in the specimen is referred to hereafter as Standard Neck Dissection (SND), as it is the most common technique applied for thyroid tumors. In Fascial Neck Dissection, the comprehensive clearance of the target basins is achieved by following the planes of coalescence of the cervical fascial layers. Those are avascular and enable the removal of the target nodes en bloc with their investing fascial layers.

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcomes between fascial and standard approach in N1b PTC patients that underwent surgery for N1b papillary thyroid cancer. The primary objective was to achieve a significantly higher nodal yield by applying the fascial neck dissection technique and reduce rates of early loco-regional recurrence. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of short and long-term post-operative complications and the cosmetic result.

Being tested
Fascial Neck Dissection, Standard Neck Dissection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fascial Neck DissectionProcedure or surgery

    Central and lateral neck dissection with the fascial technique

  • Standard Neck DissectionProcedure or surgery

    Central and lateral neck dissection with the standard technique

Study groups in NCT05804682
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients that underwent fascial dissection for N1b papillary thyroid cancerNot described
Receives: Procedure: Fascial Neck Dissection
Patients that underwent ftandard dissection for N1b papillary thyroid cancerNot described
Receives: Procedure: Standard Neck Dissection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Early loco-regional recurrence

    Locoregional recurrence within 1 year from operation

    Measured: Interventions 2018-2021, Final follow up January 2023

  2. Harvested lymph nodes

    Total and positive lymph node yields for central and lateral compartments

    Measured: Interventions 2018-2021, Final follow up January 2023

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Early and late complications

    Measured: Interventions 2018-2021, Final follow up January 2023

  2. Voice and swallowing score comparisons

    Measured: Interventions 2018-2021, Final follow up January 2023

  3. Cosmetic outcome

    Measured: Interventions 2018-2021, Final follow up January 2023

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
195 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05804682
Sponsor's protocol ID
4818
Acronym
FADO
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
27 Mar 2023
Last updated
7 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Only after individual contact by researchers of the field

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer and N1b Status, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Early loco-regional recurrence (time frame: Interventions 2018-2021, Final follow up January 2023). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in