Economic ProblemsNCT05811988
Cost Assessment of Videolaryngoscopy Compared to Direct Laryncoscopy in a Large Academic Center
An observational study of Economic Problems, run by Adam Thaler at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Cost, both direct and indirect, assessment of videolaryngoscopy, specifically the McGrath, compared to direct laryncoscopy in a large academic center. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Economic Problems
- How many people
- 66,987 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2022to 15 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults
Data were obtained on all endotracheal intubations where the Anesthesiology service was assigned to staff a surgical case requiring tracheal intubation during general anesthesia. Data were also obtained for tracheal intubations outside the operating room (ICUs, Trauma, patient wards) when Anesthesiology personnel were requested which did not include the Emergency Department
Electronic patients' medical records spanning a two-year period (July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
About this study
Cost, both direct and indirect, assessment of videolaryngoscopy, specifically the McGrath, compared to direct laryncoscopy in a large academic center.
- Conditions
- Economic Problems
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Laryngoscopy | Not described | |
| Video Laryngoscopy | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cost comparison
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2023
- Study start31 Mar 2022
- Primary completion15 Jun 2022
- Study completion15 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Economic ProblemsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 66,987 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Adam Thaler
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05811988
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VL vs DL cost
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Plan to publish
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cost Assessment of Videolaryngoscopy Compared to Direct Laryncoscopy in a Large Academic Center
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05811988
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VL vs DL cost
- Conditions
- Economic Problems
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66,987 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Adam ThalerUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cost, both direct and indirect, assessment of videolaryngoscopy, specifically the McGrath, compared to direct laryncoscopy in a large academic center.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Laryngoscopy | – | – |
| Video Laryngoscopy | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Cost comparison
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Plan to publish
Related trials for Economic Problems
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Recovery Legal Care Trial
Firearm Injury, Injury Traumatic
Active, not recruiting
Recovery Legal Care Pilot
Firearm Injury, Economic Problems
Active, not recruiting
The IGNITE Study on Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods
Financial Stress, Economic Problems
Active, not recruiting
Clinic-Based Financial Coaching and Family Health and Development
Economic Problems, Development, Child
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Economic Problems, run by Adam Thaler at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cost comparison (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2023.