AzTrials
AzTrials

LymphomaNCT05813132

BeEAM Versus CEM in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

A study testing BEAM Protocol and CEM protocol in people with Lymphoma, run by Rehab Werida at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The proposed research aims to compare between BeEAM standard regimen and CEM as conditioning regimen in lymphoma patients in safety profile\& toxicity, infections (Febrile neutropenia) during transplant, time to engraftment (recovery not neutropenic), Length of stay at hospital, time to relapse, and other… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Lymphoma
What is being tested?
BEAM Protocol and CEM protocol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
58 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
11 Nov 2022to 30 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Patients with lymphoma relapsed/refractory (RR) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with all subtypes. 2. Treat with conventional dose salvage regimens 3. Remission status before HSCT is complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR).
  • 4. Age>18 years. 5. Gender male and female. 6. CD34+ count cells <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW. Exclusion Criteria
  • Remission status before HSCT is non remission (NR) or progressive disease (PD).
  • CD34+ count cells <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW
  • CNS lymphoma or solid tumor not included in population.
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Any Psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factor that interfere with patient adherence to medications.
  • History of allergy to any medications in both protocol

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • International Medical Center (IMC) Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Versus CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The proposed research aims to compare between BeEAM standard regimen and CEM as conditioning regimen in lymphoma patients in safety profile\& toxicity, infections (Febrile neutropenia) during transplant, time to engraftment (recovery not neutropenic), Length of stay at hospital, time to relapse, and other complications.

Read the detailed description
  1. All patients' history will be confirmed diagnosis of lymphoma subtype under microscope to When an abnormal cell called a Reed-Sternberg cell is present, the lymphoma is classified as Hodgkin if not so it is NHL Which has another subtype by phenotyping.
  2. All patient will be confirmed in CR or PR before transplant was assessed by 18-FDG PET-CT imaging.
  3. All patients will be mobilized by using G-CSF agent (filgrastim)
  • plerixafor
  1. Check cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34+) count as Hematopoietic stem cell (HSCs) graft is mainly determined by the number of CD34+ cells present. the minimal number of CD34+ cells for an autologous transplant (Cutoff point) is <2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg BW. Stem cell collection with target yield of 2-5 x 106 CD34 cells/kg (preferred) (13)
  2. Collect HSCs from the patient prior to receipt of high-dose chemotherapy by Leukapheresis through central line on one or two sessions.
  3. According to protocol of chemotherapy if BeEAM protocol, cells put in the final product includes 5-10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a cryoprotectant and 0.05-0.25" mL of ACD-A stabilizer solution per ml of transplant. Freezing at a controlled rate of 1-2"°C per minute if CME protocol cells will be mix with ACD and freezing (fresh cells).
  4. All enrolled patients (50) will be randomly assigned into two equal arms: Arm A : will receive BeEAM regimen : Bendamustine on day
  • 7 and -6 dose of 160-200 mg/m2/day IV in a 2-h infusion, Etoposide 150-200 mg/m2/day BID infusion on 30 min with 500 ml NaCl 0.9% on days -5 to -2, cytarabine 200 mg/m2/d IV BID in a 30-min infusion with 500 ml NaCl 0.9% on days -5 to -2, and melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV in a single 1-h 500 ml infusion with 0.9% NaCl on day -1(12) Arm B: will receive CME regimen: Carboplatin 25m/kg for day-2 and -1 in a 1hr infusion, Melphalan 140mg/m2 for day-2 and -1 in a 30 min infusion, Etoposide 30m/kg for day-2 and -1 in 2-3 hr.
  1. All patients received granulocyte - colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 5 ug/kg BW. starting from day +4 after AHSCT until absolute neutrophil count reached 1.5 × 109/l for two consecutive days. All patients received antiviral (oral acyclovir), antifungal (Oral fluconazole), and antibacterial (oral levofloxacin) prophylaxis. Since the start of conditioning until patient not neutropenic (Count reached 0.5 × 109/l), hyperuricemia prophylaxis was given (Oral allopurinol 100 mg TID), hepatic veno-occlusive disease prophylaxis enoxaparin sc daily until platelet > 25000/mm3 and ursodeoxycholic acid. transfusion of platelets or red blood cells was given when platelet count was lower than 20 × 109/l or hemoglobin level was lower than 80 g/l, respectively.
  2. Monitoring for any possible side effects:
  3. Statistical tests appropriate to the study design will be conducted to evaluate the significance of the results.
Conditions
Lymphoma
Being tested
BEAM Protocol, CEM protocol
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BEAM ProtocolDrug

    Also called (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan

    BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan)

  • CEM protocolDrug

    Also called (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)

    CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)

Study groups in NCT05813132
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BeEAM RegimenActive comparatorBeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan)
Receives: Drug: BEAM Protocol
CEM RegimenActive comparatorCEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)
Receives: Drug: CEM protocol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of Side Effects.

    Side effects of treatment

    Measured: 3 month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Concentration of CD34+

    CD34+

    Measured: Three Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2023
  2. Study start11 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
58 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05813132
Sponsor's protocol ID
BeEAM versus CEM in lymphoma
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
16 Mar 2023
Last updated
5 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Velasquez WS, Cabanillas F, Salvador P, McLaughlin P, Fridrik M, Tucker S, Jagannath S, Hagemeister FB, Redman JR, Swan F, et al. Effective salvage therapy for lymphoma with cisplatin in combination with high-dose Ara-C and dexamethasone (DHAP). Blood. 1988 Jan;71(1):117-22.

    PubMed 3334893
  • Frankiewicz A, Sadus-Wojciechowska M, Najda J, Czerw T, Mendrek W, Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka M, Soska K, Ociepa M, Holowiecki J, Giebel S. Comparable safety profile of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) as conditioning before autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22(2):113-117. doi: 10.5114/wo.2018.77046. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

    PubMed 30150889
  • Eltelbanei MA, El-Bassiouny NA, Abdalla MS, Khalaf M, Werida RH. Clinical and safety outcomes of BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) versus CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) in lymphoma patients as a conditioning regimen before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12694-9.

    PubMed 39134959

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing BEAM Protocol and CEM protocol in people with Lymphoma, run by Rehab Werida at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of Side Effects. (time frame: 3 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05813132, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in