AzTrials
AzTrials

Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsLIPPENCT05814614

Bladder Complaints in Parkinson's Disease Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises and Electrical Stimulation

A study testing pelvic physical therapy in people with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Parkinson Disease, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of pelvic physical therapy with different types of electrical stimulation(ES) for bladder complaints in people with Parkinson's disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
pelvic physical therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
25 Sep 2023to 1 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Parkinson's disease
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Self-reported LUTS
  • Stable Parkinson's medication for at least three months
  • Able and willing to independently read and fill in questionnaires in the Dutch language, sufficient understanding of Dutch language
  • Able to independently visit a pelvic physical therapy practice

Who cannot join

  • Patients with other neurological diseases
  • Surgery in the pelvic region in the last year
  • Cancer or cancer treatment in the pelvic region
  • Pregnancy
  • Current urinary tract infection
  • Pure stress urinary incontinence without urgency, frequency, nocturia
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Botox, PTNS or pelvic physical therapy in the last year
  • Sacral neuromodulator
  • Pacemaker and Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
  • Deep Brain stimulation (DBS)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Dorien Bennink, MSc contact

+31715299763

d.bennink@lumc.nl

Heidi Moossdorff, Dr contact

+31715299763

h.moossdorff@lumc.nl

Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Leiden Univesity Medical Center

    Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA

    Dorien Bennink, MSc, +31715299763, d.bennink@lumc.nl

    Heidi Moossdorff, Dr, +31715299763, h.moossdorff@lumc.nl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises and Electrical Stimulation, a Randomized Control Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of pelvic physical therapy with different types of electrical stimulation(ES) for bladder complaints in people with Parkinson's disease.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Read more

What is the effect of pelvic physical therapy with ES for bladder complaints in people with Parkinson's disease.

Secondary question:

What is the most effective type of ES on bladder complaints in people with Parkinson's disease.

Participants will be randomized into three groups. Two different kinds of ES and a sham group. Participants will receive eight session of pelvic physical therapy. Pelvic physical therapy consists of e.g. bladder training, pelvic floor muscle exercises and biofeedback.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common degenerative neurological disease in the elderly. PD is predominantly a movement disorder. In addition, PD is associated with non-motor and autonomic symptoms. Over 75% of PD patients, experience lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), one of the most common autonomic symptoms. LUTS consists of urgency, frequency and nocturia with or without urinary incontinence (UI). More than 60% of PD patients experience nocturia. LUTS have a negative impact on Quality of Life(QoL), increases the risk of falls are a barrier to exercise and may lead to early admission into care. Therefore, this potentially increases healthcare related costs. First treatment options for LUTS in the general population are conservative therapy and medication. Conservative therapy consists of e.g., behavioral advice, bladder training, pelvic floor muscle exercises provided by a pelvic physical therapist(PPT) and, electrical stimulation(ES). Knowledge of the effectiveness of conservative treatment options for LUTS in PD is limited. Although ES is used effectively in patients with LUTS, it has not yet been studied in PD patients. ES has hardly any side effects, but there is uncertainty about optimal ES parameters.

Objective: to study the effectiveness of pelvic physical therapy and ES in patients with PD suffering from LUTS.

Study design: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

Questionnaires are online, allowing participants to complete the questionnaires at home at a convenient time.

Participants may have direct benefits of participating in this study. Participants included in the study will have two additional visits to a research PPT that will last one hour each, at baseline and after treatment. During this visit, a digital pelvic floor muscle (PFM) assessment and an EMG measurement of the PFM will be performed. EMG measurement will be done with a small anal- or vaginal probe. No risks are associated with the use of this probe.

Participants will be referred to local PPT's close to the subjects home address for the treatment sessions.

Intervention: eight treatment sessions of 30 minutes pelvic physical therapy over a 10-week period. The intervention consists of bladder- and behavioral advice, pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME), urge suppression techniques, biofeedback and ES with an intra anal or intra vaginal probe. The group is divided into three groups. Group 1: ES with small pulse duration, group 2: ES with broad pulse duration, group 3: (control group) receiving sham ES.

No adverse events are expected since pelvic physical therapy and ES in LUTS is usual care in the general population in the Netherlands. Expected burden for the participants is very low.

Being tested
pelvic physical therapy
Keywords
Parkinson disease, Lower urinary tract symptoms, Electrical simulation, Pelvic floor muscle exercises, Bladder training, Biofeedback
Medical subject headings
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Parkinson Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pelvic physical therapyOther

    Pelvic floor muscle exercises, biofeedback, bladder training

Study groups in NCT05814614
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
electrical stimulation small phase durationActive comparatorphase duration 200 microseconds, frequency 20 Hertz, 20 minutes
Receives: Other: pelvic physical therapy
electrical stimulation broad pulse durationActive comparatorphase duration 1000 microseconds, frequency 8 Hertz, 20 minutes
Receives: Other: pelvic physical therapy
electrical stimulation inactive 100HzSham comparatorphase duration 200 microseconds, frequency 100 Hertz, 2 seconds active 20 seconds no output, 20 minutes
Receives: Other: pelvic physical therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    Questionnaire of bladder function and urination, of last month, validated for men and

    women, 6-point-scale; contains 8 items, 3 about storage of urine, 4 about urination and 1 of quality of life.

    Total score of 0-35, with a minimal important difference(MID) of 3, validated in the Netherlands (MID 5.2) A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms.

    The IPSS is the most prevalent patient-administered questionnaire used in urology.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short form (ICIQ-UI SF)

    The validated ICIQ-UI SF measures frequency, severity and, impact on QoL in men and women. The ICIQ-UI SF consists of 4 questions on: frequency or urinary incontinence, amount of leakage, overall impact of urinary incontinence, self-diagnostic item. The score ranges between 0-21. A higher score represents worse QoL.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks; at 24 weeks; at one year

  2. Change International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Lower Urinary Tract quality of life (ICIQ-LUTSqol)

    The validated ICIQ-LUTSqol measures QoL with particular reference to social effects.The ICIQ-LUTSqol consists of 20 questions. Total score ranges between 19-76 with greater values indicating increased impact on QoL. Bother scales are not incorporated in the overall score but indicate impact of individual symptoms for the patient.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks; at 24 weeks; at one year

  3. Change in 24 hour bladder diary, bladder volume

    24 hour bladder diary: change in mean of bladder volume. Normal bladder volume ranges between: 250-500ml.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

  4. Change in 24 hour bladder diary, frequency of micturition

    24 hour bladder diary, change in frequency of micturition. Number of micturition's in 24 hours. Normal frequency with fluid intake of 1.5-2 liters is 6-8 times in 24 hour.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

  5. Change in 24 hour bladder diary, urgency

    24 hour bladder diary change in urgency scale: patient perception of intensity of urgency

    scale(PPIUS). 0 No urgency I felt no need to empty my bladder, but did so for other reasons.

    1. Mild urgency I could postpone voiding as long as necessary, without fear of wetting myself.
    2. Moderate urgency I could postpone voiding for a short while, without fear of wetting myself.
    3. Severe urgency I could not postpone voiding, but had to rush to the toilet in order not to wet myself.
    4. Urge incontinence I leaked before arriving to the toilet.

    A higher score on the PPIUS implicates more severe urgency complaints.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

  6. Change in 24 hour bladder diary, urinary incontinence

    24 hour bladder diary change in urinary incontinence episodes. Number of urinary incontinence episodes in 24 hours.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks

  7. Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    Questionnaire of bladder function and urination, of last month, validated for men and women, 6-point-scale; contains 8 items, 3 about storage of urine, 4 about urination and 1 of quality of life.

    Total score of 0-35, with a minimal important difference(MID) of 3, validated in the Netherlands (MID 5.2).

    A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms.

    The IPSS is the most prevalent patient-administered questionnaire used in urology.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 24 weeks and at one year.

  8. Change in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Overactive Bladder Short form (ICIQ-OAB)

    The validated ICIQ-OAB evaluating overactive bladder and related impact on quality of life (QoL) and outcome of treatment in men and women, measure the impact of urinary frequency, urgency, urge incontinence and nocturia symptoms. It consist of 6 questions. The scores range from 0-16, overall score with greater values indicating increased symptom severity.

    Measured: Change from baseline at 12 weeks; at 24 weeks; at one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Apr 2023
  2. Study start25 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are assigned to three parallel arms for the duration of the study.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05814614
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL8301905822
Acronym
LIPPE
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
14 Dec 2022
Last updated
28 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication. Data will be made (publicly) accessible following funder's guidelines, LUMC data management guidelines and following policies for availability of data, material and methods from publishers when submitting our manuscripts.

Publications

  • McDonald C, Rees J, Winge K, Newton JL, Burn DJ. Bladder training for urinary tract symptoms in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2020 Mar 31;94(13):e1427-e1433. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008931. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

    PubMed 32054791
  • Sakakibara R, Panicker J, Finazzi-Agro E, Iacovelli V, Bruschini H; Parkinson's Disease Subcomittee, The Neurourology Promotion Committee in The International Continence Society. A guideline for the management of bladder dysfunction in Parkinson's disease and other gait disorders. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jun;35(5):551-63. doi: 10.1002/nau.22764. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

    PubMed 25810035
  • Balash Y, Peretz C, Leibovich G, Herman T, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. Falls in outpatients with Parkinson's disease: frequency, impact and identifying factors. J Neurol. 2005 Nov;252(11):1310-5. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0855-3. Epub 2005 May 18.

    PubMed 15895303

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing pelvic physical therapy in people with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Parkinson Disease, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dorien Bennink, MSc (+31715299763, d.bennink@lumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05814614, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in