Endotracheal intübationNCT05820542
Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes
An observational study of Endotracheal intübation, run by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to compare the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) with Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes compared to the direct epiglottis lifting method. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Endotracheal intübation
- What is being tested?
- miller laryngoscope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2022to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 85 patients 18-65 years both genders in all surgeries requiring intubation
Who may be able to join
- Those who agreed to participate in the study
- He will undergo elective surgery
- Endotracheal intubation required
- 18-65 years old
- ASA 1-2 risk
- Body mass index<30
- No risk of difficult intubation
Who cannot join
- Those who do not want to participate in the study,
- Allergic to study drugs,
- Pregnant women
- Those with a history of difficult intubation
- They will be applied rapid-serial intubation
- Emergency
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
Zonguldak, Kozlu, 67600
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes According to Direct Epiglottis Lifting Method
The aim of this study is to compare the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) with Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes compared to the direct epiglottis lifting method.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study is to compare the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) with Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes compared to the direct epiglottis lifting method.
- Conditions
- Endotracheal intübation
- Being tested
- miller laryngoscope, McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope
- Keywords
- percentage of glottic opening, laryngoscopy, direct epiglottis lifting method
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
miller laryngoscopeOther
The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) will be evaluated according to the method of lifting the epiglottis (direct imaging).
McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopeOther
The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) will be evaluated according to the method of lifting the epiglottis (direct imaging).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group M (n=42), Miller laryngoscope | The effect of direct epiglottis lifting method on the percentage of glottic patency in Miller and McGraht laryngoscopy. Receives: Other: miller laryngoscope | |
| Group V (n= 43), McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope | The effect of direct epiglottis lifting method on the percentage of glottic patency in Miller and McGraht laryngoscopy. Receives: Other: McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopes According to Direct Epiglottis Lifting Method
Comparison of Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopes According to Direct Epiglottis Lifting Method
Measured: during laryngoscopy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2023
- Study start1 Aug 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022
- Study completion31 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Endotracheal intübationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gamze Küçükosman, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05820542
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022/14
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes According to Direct Epiglottis Lifting Method
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05820542
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022/14
- Conditions
- Endotracheal intübation
- Keywords
- percentage of glottic opening, laryngoscopy, direct epiglottis lifting method
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to compare the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) with Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes compared to the direct epiglottis lifting method.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to compare the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) with Miller and McGrath MAC Videoingoscopes compared to the direct epiglottis lifting method.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group M (n=42), Miller laryngoscope | – | Other: miller laryngoscopeThe effect of direct epiglottis lifting method on the percentage of glottic patency in Miller and McGraht laryngoscopy. |
| Group V (n= 43), McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope | – | Other: McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopeThe effect of direct epiglottis lifting method on the percentage of glottic patency in Miller and McGraht laryngoscopy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 85 patients 18-65 years both genders in all surgeries requiring intubation
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Those who agreed to participate in the study
- He will undergo elective surgery
- Endotracheal intubation required
- 18-65 years old
- ASA 1-2 risk
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Those who do not want to participate in the study,
- Allergic to study drugs,
- Pregnant women
- Those with a history of difficult intubation
- They will be applied rapid-serial intubation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| miller laryngoscopeThe percentage of glottic opening (POGO) will be evaluated according to the method of lifting the epiglottis (direct imaging). | Other | Group M (n=42), Miller laryngoscope |
| McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopeThe percentage of glottic opening (POGO) will be evaluated according to the method of lifting the epiglottis (direct imaging). | Other | Group V (n= 43), McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope |
Primary outcome
Comparison of Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopes According to Direct Epiglottis Lifting Method
Time frame: during laryngoscopy
Comparison of Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopes According to Direct Epiglottis Lifting Method
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Endotracheal intübation, run by Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of Glottic Opening Percentage (POGO) With Miller and McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopes According to Direct Epiglottis Lifting Method (time frame: during laryngoscopy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2023.