AzTrials
AzTrials

Concussion, BrainRSiCCNCT05825027

Risk Stratification in Children With Concussion

An observational study of Concussion, Brain and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project will measure concussion symptoms, biological markers, and academic and social factors across the first year postconcussion to develop a model that enables early identification of and symptom management for children at higher risk for persistent postconcussive symptoms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 11 to 17 years
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 May 2023to 28 Feb 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 11 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Subjects will be recruited from concussion clinics in the Raleigh-Durham metro area of North Carolina.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with concussion that occurred within the past 7 days
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13-15
  • English speaking

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
  • Polytrauma
  • Nontraumatic brain injury
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Karin Reuter-Rice, PhD contact

919-681-7647

karin.reuter-rice@duke.edu

Amanda Fitterer, MPH contact

amanda.fitterer@duke.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Duke University Health System

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

    Clinical Research Coordinator

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Risk Stratification Model for Health and Academic Outcomes in Children With Concussion Based on Novel Symptom Trajectory Typologies

This project will measure concussion symptoms, biological markers, and academic and social factors across the first year postconcussion to develop a model that enables early identification of and symptom management for children at higher risk for persistent postconcussive symptoms. Findings will provide novel insights into the longer-term effects of concussion on children's physical, psychological, and social well-being and support the development of personalized healthcare and school-based plans to reduce disparities in children's ability to return-to-learn and -play and improve postconcussion quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Concussions occur at an alarming rate among U.S. schoolchildren, with one in five children experiencing a concussion by age 16. The number of children visiting emergency departments for concussions annually has increased by 50% over the past decade, with an estimated cost to the healthcare system of $1 billion/year. Compared to adults, children experience longer and more severe postconcussive symptoms (PCS). Severity and duration of PCS, however, vary considerably among children, complicating clinical care and return to learn and play. Persistent PCS including physical, emotional, and cognitive symptoms, result in increased school absenteeism, social isolation, and psychological distress. Early PCS diagnosis and access to evidence-based return-to-health and -school interventions are strongly linked to positive health and academic outcomes. Yet models to identify children at high risk for persistent PCS are lacking. PCS have been linked to inflammatory processes occurring within the injured brain. Preliminary evidence suggests that fatigue, another symptom likely contributing to poor outcomes, is also a biological byproduct of pediatric concussions. Importantly, even though 73% of children report continuous fatigue after concussion, this symptom is rarely studied along with other PCS. Prior research has focused on the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and PCS severity but has not examined this relationship longitudinally. Acute symptom severity alone, however, is a poor prognostic of clinical outcomes in concussed children. Symptom severity immediately postinjury does not explain why at least 25% of children still experience PCS after 1 year or why even children who may appear asymptomatic still report academic and social challenges months after concussion. To identify which children are at high risk for persistent PCS and poor health, academic, and social outcomes, research tracking PCS trajectories and describing school-based impacts across the entire first year postinjury is critically needed. This proposal will 1) define novel PCS trajectory typologies in a racially/ethnically diverse population of 500 children with concussion (11-17 years, near equal distribution by sex), 2) identify associations between these typologies and patterns of inflammatory biomarkers, 3) develop a risk stratification model to identify children at risk for persistent PCS; and 4) gain unique insights and describe PCS impact, including fatigue, on longer-term academic and social outcomes. We will be the first to use NIH's symptom science model and patient-reported outcomes to explore the patterns of fatigue and other physical, cognitive, psychological, emotional and academic responses to concussion in children over a full year. Our model will enable clinicians and educators to identify children most at risk for poor long-term health, social, and academic outcomes after concussion. This work is critical to meeting our long-term goal of developing personalized concussion symptom management strategies to improve outcomes and reduce disparities in the health and quality of life of children.

Medical subject headings
Brain Concussion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in concussion symptom burden and severity as measured by the Post Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS)

    The PCSS consists of 22 questions that relate to post-concussive symptoms. Survey-takers are asked to rate each symptom according to a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0-6. Higher scores indicate a higher severity of post-concussive symptoms. The greatest possible score is 132 and the lowest possible score is 0.

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  2. Change in post concussion fatigue burden and severity as measured by the PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v2.0 - Fatigue

    The PROMIS Pediatric Fatigue item bank consists of 25 self-report items which measure fatigue symptoms in children aged 8-17 years. Items are ranked on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Almost Always). Raw scores are converted to T-scores using scoring tables. A T-score of 50 is the average for the United States general population. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For negatively-worded concepts like fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse greater degree of fatigue than average. By comparison, a fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better lesser degree of fatigue than average.

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  3. Change in degree of involvement with one's peers in usual social roles, activities and responsibilities as measured by the Neuro-QoL Item Bank v1.0 - Pediatric Social Relations - Interaction with Peers

    This instrument consists of 8 self-report items focused on patient-reported involvement with peers in usual social roles, activities, and responsibilities. Items are rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1 (Never Interacting) to 5 (Always Interacting). Raw scores are converted to T-scores using conversion tables, with a T-score of 50 as the mean. A higher Neuro-QoL T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts this measure, a T-score of 40 is one SD worse less interaction with peers than average. By comparison, a fatigue T-score of 60 is one SD better more interaction with peers than average.

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  4. Change in perceived difficulties in everyday cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, concentration, processing speed and organization skill as measured by the Neuro-QoL Item Bank v2.0 - Pediatric Cognitive Function

    This instrument consists of 8 self-report items focused on patient-reported difficulties with basic cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, concentration, processing speed, and organization skill. Items are rated on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Raw scores are converted to T-scores using conversion tables, with a T-score of 50 as the mean. A higher Neuro-QoL T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For cognitive function, a T-score of 40 is one SD less difficulty than average. By comparison, a T-score of 60 is one SD more difficulty than average .

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  5. Change in academic needs of a student following concussion as measured by the Concussion Learning Assessment & School Survey, 3rd Edition (CLASS-3)

    This measure consists of four scale scores (General Academic Concern, Academic Problems, School Stresses, and Academic Subjects) and a cumulative score is generated for each of the 4 scales [0-3 - General Academic Concern (1 item, total score range 0-3), Academic Problems (14 items, total score range 0-42), School Stresses (6 items, total score range 0-6); 0-4 - Academic Subjects (4 items, total score range 0-16)], which in sum can be considered as a clinical measure to assess and monitor the academic needs of a student following concussion. Higher scores correlate with greater difficulty with academic needs.

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  6. Salivary Interferon Gamma

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  7. Salivary Interleukin-1 Beta

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  8. Salivary Interleukin-6

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  9. Salivary Interleukin-8

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  10. Salivary Interleukin-10

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  11. Salivary TNF-Alpha

    Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokine associated with post concussive symptoms

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  12. Pubertal status

    Salivary DHEA concentration

    The high levels of DHEA that are secreted beginning in mid-childhood (~8 years of age) serve as a marker of adrenarche (puberty). DHEA level rises before external physical changes of puberty become obvious. Levels of DHEA in saliva have been shown to be a reliable index of blood levels in children and adolescents and are not dependent on time of day. DHEA age/sex-based reference ranges will be used to determine pubertal maturation. The assay results range from 10.2 pg/mL to 1000 pg/mL with higher levels correlating with later Tanner stages of puberty.

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury

  13. Presence of genetic variants in genes that code for inflammatory cytokines

    Inflammatory genetic variants involved in brain injury and in fatigue in the following genes:

    APOE, IGSF3, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, MAPT, TNF-α, TNFAIP1, TNFAIP8

    Measured: Within 7 days of injury

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2023
  2. Study start23 May 2023
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05825027
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00111606
Other IDs
R01NS129617
Acronym
RSiCC
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
10 Apr 2023
Last updated
8 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Reuter-Rice K, Fitterer AN, Duquette P, Yang Q, Palipana AK, Laskowitz D, Garrett ME, Fletcher M, Smith J, Makor L, Grant G, Ramsey K, Bloom OJ, Ashley-Koch AE. A study protocol for risk stratification in children with concussion (RSiCC): Theoretical framework, design, and methods. PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0306399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306399. eCollection 2024.

    PubMed 39024215

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Concussion, Brain and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Karin Reuter-Rice, PhD (919-681-7647, karin.reuter-rice@duke.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in concussion symptom burden and severity as measured by the Post Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) (time frame: Within 7 days of injury, 30 days post injury, 90 days post injury, 180 days post injury, 270 days post injury and 360 days post injury). The study lists 13 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05825027, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in