AzTrials
AzTrials

Nutritional WastingNCT05825716

Ifaa Effectiveness Evaluation on Food Security and Nutrition

An observational study of Nutritional Wasting and Nutritional Stunting, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in Ethiopia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Ifaa Project is a USAID-funded Resilience and Food Security Activity (RFSA) that is being implemented by Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and partners in the East Hararghe Zone of the Oromia Region in Ethiopia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nutritional Wasting, Nutritional Stunting
What is being tested?
Ifaa Basic, Ifaa Enhanced and Ifaa Enhanced + Livelihoods
How many people
3,317 participants
Where
1 siteEthiopia
Study dates
21 May 2023to 5 Jul 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Study population: The overall goal of the Ifaa Project is to improve food security of vulnerable households in targeted PSNP communities, contributing to a sustained reduction in rural poverty. To achieve this goal, Ifaa will provide additional multi-sectoral interventions to benefit further 60,000 PSNP households in the Oromia region, which is Ethiopia's largest, most populous region and also one of its poorest. The study population is PSNP beneficiaries that are participating in the Ifaa Project.

Who may be able to join

  • Households are PSNP clients
  • Households are Ifaa Project beneficiaries that are planned participants in: 1) Savings and Internal Lending Communities (SILC) groups (Ifaa Basic); 2) SILC Groups AND Care Groups (Ifaa and Enhanced); or 3) SILC groups AND Care Groups AND a Livelihoods Pathway.
  • Households have a pregnant woman OR at least one child <36 months of age
  • Households have an adult member that is capable of giving informed consent and completing an interview

Who cannot join

  • Child-headed households (all members age 17yrs or less)
  • Individuals not mentally able to give informed consent and complete an interview

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ethiopia1 site
  • Seifu Tadesse

    Addis Ababa

Other trials in Ethiopia

About this study

Official title: Ifaa Effectiveness Evaluation: A Comparison of Multisectoral Food Security and Resilience Interventions in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia

The Ifaa Project is a USAID-funded Resilience and Food Security Activity (RFSA) that is being implemented by Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and partners in the East Hararghe Zone of the Oromia Region in Ethiopia. Ifaa targets households that are participating in the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) which is a social protection program administered by the Government of Ethiopia that provides food and cash assistance to vulnerable households. The Ifaa Project will deliver multi-sectoral programming in 241 kebeles (sub-districts) in nine woredas (districts) of East Hararghe Zone, however, intervention packages vary by location. The proposed effectiveness evaluation will quantify the impacts of three different intervention packages in terms of key project indicators in the areas of household food security, diet, and child nutrition.

Read the detailed description

The Ifaa Project will deliver multi-sectoral programming in 241 kebeles (sub-districts) in nine woredas (districts) of East Hararghe Zone, however, intervention packages vary by location. The three Ifaa intervention packages that will be delivered to PSNP beneficiaries based on the beneficiaries residence location include: 1) the Ifaa basic package; 2) enhanced package without livelihoods; and 3) enhanced package with livelihoods. The proposed effectiveness evaluation will quantify the impacts of three different intervention packages in terms of key project indicators in the areas of household food security, diet, and child nutrition. As the Ifaa consortium learning partner, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (JHSPH) has been requested to design an effectiveness evaluation of the different intervention packages to compare their outcomes among beneficiary households.

To align the evaluation with project aims, key project indicators are used as study outcome measures. The specific objectives of the evaluation are to quantify the impact of Ifaa interventions as follows:

  1. At the household level, Poor or Borderline Food Consumption Score (FCS)
  2. at the individual level, change in minimum dietary diversity among children <5 years A secondary objective is to examine Ifaa impacts on child nutrition indicators, including measures of both acute and chronic malnutrition.

A longitudinal cohort design will be used to compare the effectiveness of three Ifaa intervention packages among PSNP beneficiaries in Eastern Hararghe: 1) the Ifaa basic package; 2) enhanced package without livelihoods; and 3) enhanced package with livelihoods. Under this approach, the enrolled households will have either a pregnant woman or children <24 months of age. Households will be followed over a two-year period, with the baseline and endline survey conducted at a similar time in the calendar year to avoid seasonal changes in food security. The magnitude of change in key indicators over time will be assessed for each group; if needed, adjusted models will be used to account for baseline differences between groups.

Being tested
Ifaa Basic, Ifaa Enhanced, Ifaa Enhanced + Livelihoods

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ifaa BasicOther

    • PSNP Systems: (1) Provision of food aid commodities (wheat, oil, and pulse) per the PSNP transfer schedule for 3-6 months; 2) Food System Taskforce (FSTF) capacity building, and 3) private sector engagement
    • Health and Nutrition: 1) Government of Ethiopia (GoE) basic health extension program; 2) GoE supportive supervision coaching; 3) GoE-led community social behavior change (SBC) sessions; and 4) Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) Programming.
    • Water and Sanitation: 1) Water infrastructure development; 2) improved governance via water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) committees; and 3) water source monitoring.
    • Natural Resource Management: 1) Public works projects; 2) community training in planning and sustaining community assets; 3) Implementation of the environment and social management framework; 4) enhance participation of watershed committees
  • Ifaa EnhancedBehavioural

    • PSNP Systems: 1) establishment and training of Community Technical Coordinating Forum; 2) Case management capacity building; and 3) private sector construction of infrastructure
    • Health and Nutrition:1) the Care Group Model approach; 2) home garden promotion; 3) the nutrition budget calculator; and 4) labor and time-saving technologies.
    • Community-level interventions are 1) adolescent nutrition school clubs; 2) religious leader mobilization and training vulnerable groups; 3) audio toolkit against harmful traditional practice; 4) enhanced SBC tools for health/nutrition promotion; 5) additional health extension programs
    • Water and Sanitation: 1) Community Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene; 2) WASH systems assessments and strengthening; 3) Ensuring water quality and safety via routine monitoring; 4) Private sector engagement of WASH-related businesses;
  • Ifaa Enhanced + LivelihoodsOther

    • Additional resources provided to the groups, including 1) Engagement of Private Service Providers to enable access to sustainable credit and larger loans; 2) Financial Education using an expanded 'Smart Skills' curriculum focusing on savings, smart borrowing and effective financial management; and 3) Life Skills Training for Youth.
    • Additional supports include: 1) Seven Steps of Marketing Training; 2) Climate Smart Agriculture to reduce water needs and increase soil health and vegetation coverage; 3) Producers Groups and linkages to markets/suppliers/buyers; Selected financial institutions will be provided with a credit guarantee fund and capacity-building support to help facilitate loans. Private sector value chain assessment and financing. Additional private sector engagement and linkage facilitation.
Study groups in NCT05825716
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ifaa Basiccomparison group
Receives: Other: Ifaa Basic
Ifaa Enhancedintervention group 1
Receives: Behavioral: Ifaa Enhanced
Ifaa Enhanced + Livelihoodsintervention group 2
Receives: Other: Ifaa Enhanced + Livelihoods

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Poor or Borderline Food Consumption Score (%)

    The food consumption score (FCS) reflects the diversity and frequency of household food and nutritional intake consumed in the seven days preceding the survey and is an indicator used globally. The consumption frequency of eight food groups is assessed in the preceding 7 days, and weighted scores for each food group are summed to calculate the FCS; a higher FCS score indicates better food security. Household food security status is categorized using the following thresholds: 0-28 poor; 28.5-42 borderline; and >42 for acceptable.

    Measured: baseline, 2 years

  2. Change in minimum dietary diversity (%)

    The minimum dietary diversity (MDD) score is a population-level indicator to assess diet diversity as part of infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices. Data are gathered from a questionnaire administered to the child's caregiver, usually as part of the IYCF module. Respondents are asked to indicate whether or not the child consumed any food over the previous 24 hours from each of eight food groups. The seven food groups included in the questionnaire are: grains, legumes and nuts, dairy products, flesh foods, eggs, vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables, other fruits and vegetables.

    Measured: baseline, 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in the prevalence of stunting (%)

    Children will be measured for length (cm) among children 6 to 23 months of age. The length measures will be used to create indices of length-for-age (LAZ) z-score based on the World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standard. The prevalence of stunting (%) is defined as LAZ<-2.

    The prevalence of stunting (%) among children in the Ifaa enhanced intervention, Ifaa enhanced + livelihoods intervention versus. Ifaa basic group at endline (2 year) adjusting for the difference in the prevalence of stunting (%) at baseline between two areas.

    Measured: baseline, 2 years

  2. Change in the prevalence of wasting (%)

    Children will be measured for length (cm) and weight (kg) among children months. The length and weight measures will be used to create indices of weight-for-length (WLZ) z-score based on the WHO child growth standards.

    The prevalence of wasting (%) among children in the Ifaa enhanced intervention, Ifaa enhanced + livelihoods intervention versus. Ifaa basic group at endline (2 year) adjusting for the difference in the prevalence of stunting (%) at baseline between two areas.

    Measured: baseline, 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2023
  2. Study start21 May 2023
  3. Primary completion5 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion5 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
3,317 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05825716
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00023765
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
11 Apr 2023
Last updated
24 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nutritional Wasting and Nutritional Stunting, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 1 site in Ethiopia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ethiopia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Poor or Borderline Food Consumption Score (%) (time frame: baseline, 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in