AzTrials
AzTrials

SarcomasTOSSNCT05827458

An Adequate Cost Effective Follow Up Protocol For Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

An observational study of Sarcomas, run by Tata Memorial Hospital at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors, accounting for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies. The majority of bone and soft tissue sarcomas occur in the extremities. After treatment of the primary tumor, 40 % to 60% of the patients will develop local or distant recurrent disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Sarcomas
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
Jan 2006to Jan 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: 500 PATIENTS OVERALL. 250 PATIENTS ON INTENSIVE GROUP 250 PATIENTS ON COST EFFECTIVE GROUP

Who may be able to join

  • Patients operated for primary or recurrent extremity bone \& soft tissue sarcomas.(both limb salvage and amputations)
  • Non Metastatic at presentation.
  • Patients reliable for follow-up.

Who cannot join

  • Non-extremity sarcomas.
  • Metastatic at presentation
  • Patients unreliable for follow up.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Tata Memorial Hospital

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: An Adequate Cost Effective Follow Up Protocol For Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas: - A Prospective Randomized Trial

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors, accounting for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies. The majority of bone and soft tissue sarcomas occur in the extremities. After treatment of the primary tumor, 40 % to 60% of the patients will develop local or distant recurrent disease. The ultimate determinant of survival in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas is the development of distant metastasis. Modern multimodality therapy has improved patient survival; hence follow-up surveillance strategies are becoming increasingly important with significant clinical and fiscal implications. However, the ideal postoperative protocol vis a vis frequency and appropriate screening modalities for these uncommon neoplasms remains ill-defined. Although guidelines have been proposed for follow-up of patients , there is a paucity of data in medical literature on the effectiveness of these recommendations. A prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of follow up strategies in picking up disease recurrence and their role in influencing overall survival would go a long way in answering some of these questions.

Read the detailed description

Follow up studies are performed for a variety of reasons. The detection of a recurrence of the index lesion is the foundation of surveillance. Detection of other medical conditions is a secondary benefit. Psychologically , follow up testing can serve as a source of reassurance. Whether an increased frequency of follow up and the use of various expensive imaging modalities for screening and early detection of recurrence actually results in improving overall survival of patients with extremity bone and soft tissue sarcomas is a question that remains as yet unanswered. Currently followed post operative surveillance regimes are empirical and vary widely from centre to centre. Allocation of limited health funding should be guided by evidence based recommendations rather than empirical beliefs. An ideal surveillance regime should meet the criteria of easy implementation, accuracy and cost effectiveness.

This study attempts to outline guidelines regarding the role of follow up vis a vis frequency and the use of various imaging modalities for early detection of recurrence in improving overall survival of patients with extremity bone and soft tissue sarcomas . In a vast country like India where patients often travel thousands of kilometers in their search for quality medical care the frequency of routine follow up visits is as important as studying the role of expensive screening modalities while drawing up guidelines for cost effective follow up strategies. Though it is well accepted that in bone and soft tissue sarcomas the majority of recurrences either local or distant would occur in the first two years there has been no study to gauge the effectiveness of an intensive three monthly follow up during this initial "risk" period in improving overall survival . We have therefore further attempted to stratify the patients in both arms into Group A and Group B. Compared to Group A patients, Group B patients would have two less follow up visits per year in the initial two years of follow up. This could help to further reduce both the cost and loss of working man hours in these patients.

Correlation between local failure and the development of metastatic disease remains controversial. Though Lewis et al have suggested that there is strong association of local recurrence with the development of subsequent metastasis and tumor mortality, various prospective randomized trials have failed to show that better local control improves survival.

Though an MRI is advantageous in the initial evaluation of STS its utility in the diagnosis of patients with recurrent lesions, including its comparison with physical examination alone has yet to be documented. Distortion of the anatomy and fibrosis because of prior surgery and radiotherapy makes interpretation of post operative images difficult. In a series of 150 patients from the Rosewall Park Cancer Institute almost all the local recurrences were detected on physical examination and 86% of these were deemed resectable .Does an MRI actually help in the accurate early detection of local recurrence and if so does this early detection and subsequent intervention impact on overall survival? Its use has to be assessed critically with regard to cost effectiveness and efficacy.

Patients with extremity bone and soft tissue sarcomas are more likely to have distant metastasis as their initial site of recurrence . Pulmonary metastasis comprises most of these distant failures. The benefit of detection of recurrence depends on the availability of therapeutic interventions that can prolong survival. The occurrence rate of isolated pulmonary metastasis is in the range of 20% to 40% and there is a potential to salvage these patients. Though Huth et al felt that the impact of resection of pulmonary metastasis on improving survival of patients with soft tissue sarcoma was minimal a retrospective study by Geel et al recommended surgical excision of lung metastasis in order to improve survival. CT scanning of the chest is known to be more sensitive than CXR in detecting lung lesions but its specificity in detecting metastatic lesions is lower. The role of CT scanning in the surveillance of metastatic disease is therefore not clear. Whooley et al do not recommend CT scanning of the chest as a surveillance technique because of the high accuracy of CXR in recurrence detection in their series .

There is enough evidence in literature from other solid tumor types i.e. breast cancer, colorectal cancer and melanoma that challenges the usefulness of multiple follow up imaging tests in terms of efficacy , cost effectiveness and survival benefit .Whether the same surmise holds true for extremity soft tissue sarcoma is a matter of debate. Kane states that for soft tissue sarcomas, patient education and follow up visits with thorough history and physical examination will detect the vast majority of recurrent disease . Goel in his article on "Costs of follow-up after potentially curative treatment for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma" states that several guidelines have been proposed for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma patient follow-up. Literature has yet to reflect the consensus these guidelines suggest and he stresses the need for clinical trials to identify an optimal surveillance strategy, one balancing gains in survival, quality of life, costs, and societal willingness to expend resources .

A prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of follow up strategies and their role in influencing overall survival could help in outlining a rational, accurate, easily applicable, cost effective surveillance regime.

Conditions
Sarcomas
Keywords
bone tumor, soft tissue tumor, cancer
Medical subject headings
Sarcoma, Bone Neoplasms, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05827458
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
I AINTENSIVE 3 MONTHS Appropriate local imaging including ultrasound for soft-tissue sarcomas at three-month follow-up A CT scan of the chest was done on a six-monthly basis. CXR at the intervening three-month follow-up.
I BINTENSIVE 6 MONTHS Appropriate local imaging including ultrasound for soft-tissue sarcomas at six month follow-up A CT scan of the chest was done on a six-monthly basis
II ACOST EFFECTIVE 3 MONTHS Appropriate local imaging including ultrasound for soft-tissue sarcomas at three-month follow-up with CXR
II BCOST EFFECTIVE 6 MONTHS Appropriate local imaging including ultrasound for soft-tissue sarcomas at six month follow-up with CXR

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival

    Patient survival

    Measured: 10 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Disease free survival

    Local or distant recurrence

    Measured: 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Apr 2023
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionJun 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05827458
Sponsor's protocol ID
TMH BST-216
Acronym
TOSS
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
12 Feb 2013
Last updated
25 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Cipriano CA, Jang E, Tyler W. Sarcoma Surveillance: A Review of Current Evidence and Guidelines. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb 15;28(4):145-156. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00002.

    PubMed 31651565
  • Chiesa AM, Spinnato P, Miceli M, Facchini G. Radiologic Assessment of Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases: State of the Art and Recent Advances. Cells. 2021 Mar 4;10(3):553. doi: 10.3390/cells10030553.

    PubMed 33806513
  • Heinemann M, Ranft A, Langer T, Jurgens H, Kreyer J, Vieth V, Schafers M, Weckesser M, Simon T, Hassenpflug W, Corbacioglu S, Bielack S, Mayer-Steinacker R, Kuhne T, van den Berg H, Gelderblom H, Bauer S, Stegger L, Dirksen U. Recurrence of Ewing sarcoma: Is detection by imaging follow-up protocol associated with survival advantage? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Jul;65(7):e27011. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27011. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

    PubMed 29480574

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Sarcomas, run by Tata Memorial Hospital at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival (time frame: 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05827458, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in