End-Stage Kidney DiseaseNCT05828823
Incremental Hemodialysis: The TwoPlus Trial
A study testing Hemodialysis twice weekly and Hemodialysis thrice weekly in people with End-Stage Kidney Disease, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 10 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study is to prospectively compare clinical effectiveness between clinically- matched incremental hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis in patients with incident kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis and residual kidney function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End-Stage Kidney Disease
- What is being tested?
- Hemodialysis twice weekly and Hemodialysis thrice weekly
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 350 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Feb 2024to Jan 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Incident kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis (KDRD) started on maintenance, in-center hemodialysis (HD), or anticipated to be started on maintenance, in-center HD within the next 12 weeks
- Has received ≤36 sessions of intermittent HD (i.e., on HD for ≤12 weeks) at the time patient is approached for potential study participation
- Residual Kidney Function Inclusion Criteria:
- Kidney urea clearance ≥ 2.0 mL/min
- Urine volume# of ≥500 mL/24 h
Who cannot join
- Pre-HD serum K ≥5.8 mEq/L, Na ≤125 mEq/L, or bicarbonate level ≤17 mEq/L
- Requirement or anticipated requirement of high-volume ultrafiltration
- Unable or unwilling to follow the study protocol for any reason
- Known pregnancy or planning to attempt to become pregnant or lactating women
- Estimated survival or dialysis modality change or center transfer <6 months
- Caregiver Eligibility Criteria:
Show all 13Show fewer
- be at least 18 years old
- be the main caregiver (at patient's choice)
- be a close relative of the patient (spouse, child, sibling, parent, grandchild)
- have no known psychiatric and neurologic disorders (through direct inquiry from the person)
- not be a member of the medical or healthcare team
- not be the caregiver for another patient with chronic illness
- not have experienced severe life events within prior 3 months of enrollment (through direct inquiry from the person)
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Ben Bagwell contact
10 sites in 1 country
United States10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Recruiting
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Vandana Dua Niyyar, vniyyar@emory.edu
Vandana Dua Niyyar
- Recruiting
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUSM)
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
Gautam Samir, MD
- Recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Sagar Nigwekar, 617-726-5050, SNIGWEKAR@mgh.harvard.edu
Sagar Nigwekar
- Recruiting
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Jennifer Flythe, MD
- Recruiting
University of Virginia (UVA)
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22904
Emaad Abdel-Rahman, MD
- Recruiting
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Neville Dossabhoy, MD, 601-984-5670, ndossabhoy@umc.edu
Neville Dossabhoy, MD
- Recruiting
University of Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Alaa Awad, MD, Alaa.Awad@jax.ufl.edu
Alaa Awad
- Recruiting
Renal Research Institute (RRI)
New York, New York, 10065
Rasha Hussein, MD, 212-331-1710, rasha.hussein@rriny.com
Rasha Hussein, MD
- Recruiting
Northwell Health
Queens, New York, 11427
Steven Fishbane, 516-465-8200, Sfishbane@northwell.edu
Steven Fishbane
- Recruiting
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Mariana Murea, MD
About this study
Official title: Comparative Effectiveness of an Individualized Model of Hemodialysis Versus Conventional Hemodialysis
This study is to prospectively compare clinical effectiveness between clinically- matched incremental hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis in patients with incident kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis and residual kidney function.
The study will enroll 350 patients on chronic hemodialysis and 140 caregivers of enrolled patients. Patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either incremental start hemodialysis or conventional hemodialysis. Caregivers will be followed along with patients for an average period of 2 years post randomization.
Read the detailed description
This study will analyze the effects of differentiated care with individualized hemodialysis on patient health related quality of life, fatigue, employment, and caregiver burden in patients with Kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis (KDRD) and appreciable kidney function.
This study will compare the outcomes in survival, hospitalization, preservation of the kidney function and quality of life between hemodialysis tailored to each patient needs (incremental) and conventional hemodialysis.
- Conditions
- End-Stage Kidney Disease
- Being tested
- Hemodialysis twice weekly, Hemodialysis thrice weekly
- Keywords
- Hemodialysis, Clinically-Matched Incremental Hemodialysis
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hemodialysis twice weeklyDevice
Frequency and duration of hemodialysis is tailored to the patient. Adjuvant pharmacotherapy is prescribed to maintain volume, electrolyte and acid-base homeostasis ( e.g., diuretics, sodium bicarbonate and potassium binding patiromer)
Hemodialysis thrice weeklyOther
Conventional hemodialysis regimen
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clinically-matched Incremental Hemodialysis ( CMIHD) | Experimental | Randomized group to have hemodialysis prescription tailored based on residual kidney function and clinical manifestations starting at twice weekly. Receives: Device: Hemodialysis twice weekly |
| Conventional Hemodialysis (CHD) | Active comparator | Randomized group to conventional three times a week hemodialysis. Receives: Other: Hemodialysis thrice weekly |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Clinical events of safety
composite of all-cause Emergency Department visits, hospitalizations, or death
Measured: year 2
Secondary outcomes (11)
EuroQOL-5D-5L scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Compare the effects of CMIHD and CHD - The descriptive system covers 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with 5 levels of severity in each dimension (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to perform or extreme problems - Values are anchored at 1 (full health) and 0 (a state as bad as being dead) as required by their use in economic evaluation. Values less than 0 represent health states regarded as worse than a state that is as bad as being dead.
Measured: year 2
Trail Making Test B scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Patient participants' cognitive function will be assessed using change in Trail Making Test B score - The Trail Making Test measures your visual attention, mental flexibility, processing speed, and motor speed based on how quickly and accurately you connect dots in ascending order (either numerically or with alternating numbers and letters). The test can be used to diagnose dementia and other cognitive disorders - Higher scores indicate a higher degree of cognitive impairment
Measured: Baseline and months 6, 12, 18, & 24
Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
SONG-HD Fatigue score - The SONG-HD Fatigue measure consists of three items that assess (1) the effect of fatigue on life participation, (2) tiredness, and (3) level of energy. These dimensions are assessed on a four-point Likert scale indicating increasing severity, ranging from zero (not at all) to three (severely). Higher scores meaning higher severity
Measured: Baseline and months 6, 12, 18, & 24
Time to recover from hemodialysis (HD) Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Patient-reported functional status and fatigue will be assessed using Time to recover from HD
Measured: Baseline and monthly up to 2 years
Caregiver burden Zarit Caregiver Burden Scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Caregiver burden will be assessed using the Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale - The ZBI consists of 22 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) with the sum of scores ranging between 0-88. 9. Higher scores indicate greater burden. A score of 17 or more was considered high burden.
Measured: Baseline, months 6, 12, 18, & 24
Change in urine output
Urine collections will be analyzed at the lab used by the dialysis center
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, and Year 2
Change in kidney urea clearance (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Urine collections will be analyzed at the lab used by the dialysis center
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, and Year 2
Change in kidney creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Urine collections will be analyzed at the lab used by the dialysis center
Measured: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, and Year 2
Hospital free days per 100 patient-days
The duration of hospital-free days will be determined for each patient and calculated in the whole cohort per 100 patient-days. It is anticipated an array of hospitalization events for each participant, ranging from no hospitalization to frequent hospitalizations per study period. All periods of hospitalization, per each participant, will be analyzed. A period of hospitalization will be computed from date of hospital admission to the date of discharge. Hospital-free days may include one or more discrete time segments of non-hospitalization between periods hospitalization. The total hospital-free days per patient participant will be calculated as total study days - hospitalization days. Hospital-free days will be normalized per 100 patient-days.
Measured: year 2
Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale
Patients will rate the degree of interference caused by HD treatments on the following domains: health, diet, work, active and passive recreation, financial situation, relationship with spouse, sex life, family and other social relations, self-expression/self- improvement, religious expression, and community/civic involvement. Individual item ratings and the sum across ratings will be recorded. The total scale has a range of 13 (minimum intrusiveness) to 91 (extreme intrusiveness).
Measured: Assessed at baseline and monthly up to 2 years
Employment status
The employment status for patients and caregivers will be assessed through surveys.
Measured: Baseline and months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Apr 2023
- Study start26 Feb 2024
- Primary completionJul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for End-Stage Kidney DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Wake Forest University Health SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a randomized parallel-group type 1 hybrid study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mariana Murea, MD, Principal investigator, Wake Forest Health SciencesPeter Kotanko, Principal investigator, Renal Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05828823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00092986
- Other IDs
- CER-2022C1-26300
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Available upon investigator request
Publications
Gautam SC, Awad AS, Niyyar VD, Flythe JE, Abdel-Rahman EM, Raimann JG, Woldemichael JA, Sheikh HI, Gaurav R, Kotanko P, Yang X, Gencerliler N, Divers J, Murea M. Patient monitoring in a pragmatic, multicenter trial of incremental hemodialysis: early experience from the TwoPlus randomized controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2025 Dec 9;27(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04659-2.
PubMed 41366335Murea M, Foley KL, Gautam SC, Flythe JE, Raimann JG, Abdel-Rahman E, Awad AS, Niyyar VD, Kovach C, Roberts GV, Jefferson NM, Conway PT, Rosales LM, Woldemichael J, Sheikh HI, Raman G, Huml AM, Knicely DH, Hasan I, Makadia B, Lea J, Daugirdas JT, Gencerliler N, Divers J, Kotanko P; TwoPlus Research Consortium; Nwaozuru UC. Protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised clinical trial of incremental-start versus conventional haemodialysis: the TwoPlus study. BMJ Open. 2025 Nov 28;15(11):e094392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094392.
PubMed 41314824Murea M, Raimann JG, Divers J, Maute H, Kovach C, Abdel-Rahman EM, Awad AS, Flythe JE, Gautam SC, Niyyar VD, Roberts GV, Jefferson NM, Shahidul I, Nwaozuru U, Foley KL, Trembath EJ, Rosales ML, Fletcher AJ, Hiba SI, Huml A, Knicely DH, Hasan I, Makadia B, Gaurav R, Lea J, Conway PT, Daugirdas JT, Kotanko P; Two Plus Research Consortium. Comparative effectiveness of an individualized model of hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the TwoPlus trial). Trials. 2024 Jun 28;25(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08281-9.
PubMed 38943204
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Effectiveness of an Individualized Model of Hemodialysis Versus Conventional Hemodialysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05828823
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00092986
- Conditions
- End-Stage Kidney Disease
- Keywords
- Hemodialysis, Clinically-Matched Incremental Hemodialysis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Study start
- 26 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to prospectively compare clinical effectiveness between clinically- matched incremental hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis in patients with incident kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis and residual kidney function.
The study will enroll 350 patients on chronic hemodialysis and 140 caregivers of enrolled patients. Patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to either incremental start hemodialysis or conventional hemodialysis. Caregivers will be followed along with patients for an average period of 2 years post randomization.
Detailed description
This study will analyze the effects of differentiated care with individualized hemodialysis on patient health related quality of life, fatigue, employment, and caregiver burden in patients with Kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis (KDRD) and appreciable kidney function.
This study will compare the outcomes in survival, hospitalization, preservation of the kidney function and quality of life between hemodialysis tailored to each patient needs (incremental) and conventional hemodialysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a randomized parallel-group type 1 hybrid study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clinically-matched Incremental Hemodialysis ( CMIHD) | Experimental | Device: Hemodialysis twice weeklyRandomized group to have hemodialysis prescription tailored based on residual kidney function and clinical manifestations starting at twice weekly. |
| Conventional Hemodialysis (CHD) | Active comparator | Other: Hemodialysis thrice weeklyRandomized group to conventional three times a week hemodialysis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Clinical Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Incident kidney dysfunction requiring dialysis (KDRD) started on maintenance, in-center hemodialysis (HD), or anticipated to be started on maintenance, in-center HD within the next 12 weeks
- Has received ≤36 sessions of intermittent HD (i.e., on HD for ≤12 weeks) at the time patient is approached for potential study participation
- Kidney urea clearance ≥ 2.0 mL/min
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Pre-HD serum K ≥5.8 mEq/L, Na ≤125 mEq/L, or bicarbonate level ≤17 mEq/L
- Requirement or anticipated requirement of high-volume ultrafiltration
- Unable or unwilling to follow the study protocol for any reason
- Known pregnancy or planning to attempt to become pregnant or lactating women
- Estimated survival or dialysis modality change or center transfer <6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hemodialysis twice weeklyFrequency and duration of hemodialysis is tailored to the patient. Adjuvant pharmacotherapy is prescribed to maintain volume, electrolyte and acid-base homeostasis ( e.g., diuretics, sodium bicarbonate and potassium binding patiromer) | Device | Clinically-matched Incremental Hemodialysis ( CMIHD) |
| Hemodialysis thrice weeklyConventional hemodialysis regimen | Other | Conventional Hemodialysis (CHD) |
Primary outcome
Number of Clinical events of safety
Time frame: year 2
composite of all-cause Emergency Department visits, hospitalizations, or death
11 secondary outcomes
EuroQOL-5D-5L scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Time frame: year 2
Trail Making Test B scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Time frame: Baseline and months 6, 12, 18, & 24
Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Time frame: Baseline and months 6, 12, 18, & 24
Time to recover from hemodialysis (HD) Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Time frame: Baseline and monthly up to 2 years
Caregiver burden Zarit Caregiver Burden Scores Health-related quality of life Health-related quality of life and residual kidney function
Time frame: Baseline, months 6, 12, 18, & 24
Change in urine output
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, and Year 2
Change in kidney urea clearance (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, and Year 2
Change in kidney creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21, and Year 2
Hospital free days per 100 patient-days
Time frame: year 2
Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and monthly up to 2 years
Employment status
Time frame: Baseline and months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41366335Gautam SC, Awad AS, Niyyar VD, Flythe JE, Abdel-Rahman EM, Raimann JG, Woldemichael JA, Sheikh HI, Gaurav R, Kotanko P, Yang X, Gencerliler N, Divers J, Murea M. Patient monitoring in a pragmatic, multicenter trial of incremental hemodialysis: early experience from the TwoPlus randomized controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2025 Dec 9;27(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04659-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41314824Murea M, Foley KL, Gautam SC, Flythe JE, Raimann JG, Abdel-Rahman E, Awad AS, Niyyar VD, Kovach C, Roberts GV, Jefferson NM, Conway PT, Rosales LM, Woldemichael J, Sheikh HI, Raman G, Huml AM, Knicely DH, Hasan I, Makadia B, Lea J, Daugirdas JT, Gencerliler N, Divers J, Kotanko P; TwoPlus Research Consortium; Nwaozuru UC. Protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised clinical trial of incremental-start versus conventional haemodialysis: the TwoPlus study. BMJ Open. 2025 Nov 28;15(11):e094392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094392.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38943204Murea M, Raimann JG, Divers J, Maute H, Kovach C, Abdel-Rahman EM, Awad AS, Flythe JE, Gautam SC, Niyyar VD, Roberts GV, Jefferson NM, Shahidul I, Nwaozuru U, Foley KL, Trembath EJ, Rosales ML, Fletcher AJ, Hiba SI, Huml A, Knicely DH, Hasan I, Makadia B, Gaurav R, Lea J, Conway PT, Daugirdas JT, Kotanko P; Two Plus Research Consortium. Comparative effectiveness of an individualized model of hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the TwoPlus trial). Trials. 2024 Jun 28;25(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08281-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Available upon investigator request
Related trials for End-Stage Kidney Disease
Recruiting
Dry Weight Reduction Intervention Via Extra Ultrafiltration
Fluid Accumulation, Blood Pressure Management
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Management of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients
Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA), ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease)
Not yet recruiting
Cycling During Dialysis: A Feasibility and Safety Study
Hemodialysis, Kidney Disease, End-Stage
Recruiting
Maturation of Arteriovenous Fistula With Automated Sonography Assessments Trial
Diabetes, End Stage Renal Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Empagliflozin in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and End Stage Renal Disease
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ben Bagwell contact
Mariana Murea, MD principal investigator
Wake Forest Health Sciences
Peter Kotanko principal investigator
Renal Research Institute
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hemodialysis twice weekly and Hemodialysis thrice weekly in people with End-Stage Kidney Disease, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 10 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Brenda Burciu (336-716-8671, Brindusa.Burciu@advocatehealth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Clinical events of safety (time frame: year 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05828823, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 2 Nov 2026.