Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsNCT05830474
Effect of Continuous Intra-airway Monitoring Under Visible Double-lumen Bronchial Catheter on Postoperative Complications of Lung Surgery
A study testing Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgey in people with Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, run by Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
Trial summary
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after thoracic surgery is as high as 30-50% [1-6], which is the main cause of postoperative morbidity, death and prolonged hospital stay. Optimization of risk factors in PPCs procedures is the focus of current research. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
- What is being tested?
- Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgey
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 376 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 May 2023to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. Age 18-80 years, BMI 18.5-28 kg/m2, male or female
- 2. Patients who are to undergo unilateral thoracoscopic resection of more than three lung segments or lobectomies
- 3. Patients who can be extubated with 35# and 37# double-lumen bronchial catheters after pre-anesthetic evaluation
- 4. Subjects voluntarily sign the informed consent form for this trial.
- 5. Patients or their caregivers are able to fill out the survey form and can correctly understand and cooperate with the postoperative rehabilitation instructions of the medical staff.
- 6. Patients have SPO2 ≥ 96% when inhaling air preoperatively
Who cannot join
- 1. Patients with limited ability to cooperate with the study, such as the presence of cognitive dysfunction, mental illness, speech impairment or severe visual impairment or hearing impairment
- 2.ASA ≥IV
- 3. difficult airway, abnormal tracheal development, main airway stenosis, tumor, tracheoesophageal fistula
- 4. Complex sleeve pneumonectomy, unilateral total pneumonectomy, bilateral lung surgery
- 5. Preoperative anemia, Hb≤100g/L
- 6. Serum albumin ≤ 35g/L
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Continuous Intra-airway Monitoring Under Visible Double-lumen Bronchial Catheter on Postoperative Complications of Lung Surgery (a Prospective, Single-center, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study)
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after thoracic surgery is as high as 30-50% [1-6], which is the main cause of postoperative morbidity, death and prolonged hospital stay. Optimization of risk factors in PPCs procedures is the focus of current research. Double lumen bronchial tube (DLT) is a commonly used lung isolation method for adult patients. It has the advantages of good lung isolation effect, sufficient exposure of the surgical field and easy to attract secretions in the airway. However, there are still some deficiencies in clinical precise positioning, long-term continuous detection during operation, early detection of catheter displacement and other emergencies. Continuous intra-airway monitoring is the main advantage of visual double-lumen bronchial catheter. It can quickly and easily determine the position of the catheter and quickly adjust the displacement, and timely and effectively clean up the secretion in the airway, which is conducive to the analysis and treatment of intraoperative hypoxemia. Whether these potential advantages can reduce the incidence of PPCs deserves our in-depth discussion. The research group randomly divided the patients who were scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer in the Union Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University into the test group (lung isolation with visible double-lumen bronchial catheter, continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention) and the control group: (Pulmonary isolation was performed with visual double-lumen bronchial catheter, and only intra-airway video was performed without monitoring. The effect of continuous intra-airway monitoring under visual double-lumen bronchial catheter on postoperative complications of lung surgery was evaluated by Melbourne evaluation scale.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
- Being tested
- Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgey
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgeyProcedure or surgery
Continuous monitoring was performed by visual double lumen bronchial catheter. Once sputum or blood gushing into the tracheal carina was found in the distal bronchus on the surgical side, the above secretions were sucked out with a sputum suction tube under video monitoring until the removal was complete
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test group (group T) | Experimental | lung isolation was performed with visual double-lumen bronchial catheter, andcontinuous airway monitoring and intervention were performed Receives: Procedure: Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgey |
| Control group (group C) | No intervention | lung isolation was performed with visual double-lumen bronchial catheter, and only intra-airway video was performed without monitoring |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of pulmonary complications
Evaluation of the incidence of pulmonary complications three days after surgery by the Melbourne Assessment Scale Melbourne Group Scale(Minimum value 0 points ;Max 8 points
- Oral temperature > 38°C;
- White blood cell count > 11.2×10^12/L or use respiratory antibiotics (except prophylactic antibiotics);
- Pneumonia or pulmonary infection diagnosed by the treating doctor;
- Chest X-ray examination suggested atelectasis or consolidation;
- Purulent sputum (yellow/green) with characteristics different from those before operation;
- Sputum microbiological examination was positive;
- Oxygen saturation of finger pulse < 90% under suction condition;
- Readmission or ICU stay > 36h due to respiratory problems
If 4 or more of the above 8 items are satisfied, the subject is considered to have developed pulmonary complications.
Measured: 3 days after operation
Secondary outcomes (7)
Double lumen tube displacement
The number of times that fiberoptic bronchoscopy should be used to check or adjust the position during the operation, the rate of displacement, the degree of displacement, the number and time of operation suspension due to the adjustment of the position of double-lumen tube, etc Position adjustment assisted by fiberoptic(Check only unadjusted available at the back □ mark ×)
□NO : 1stTime:|__|__|min|__|__|second;□ 2stTime:|__|__|min|__|__|second:□ 3stTime:|__|__|min|__|__|second:□
□YES: 1stTime:|__|__|min|__|__|second;□ 2stTime:|__|__|min|__|__|second:□ 3stTime:|__|__|min|__|__|second:□
Measured: during the operation
Intubation effectiveness
Time taken for successful intubation and positioning (time from laryngoscope exposure to successful positioning of double lumen bronchial tube), success rate of first intubation and positioning, and probability of using fiber bronchoscopy for positioning
- Number of intubation times:|__| Times
- Time taken for successful intubation positioning:|__|__| Minutes|__|__| seconds
- Whether fiber bronchoscopy is used for positioning: □ No □ Yes
Measured: during the operation
Hypoxemia during operation
Intraoperative SPO2<90%
□ Yes □ No
- st time:|__|__| Minutes|__|___| Seconds;
- nd time:|__|__| Minutes|__|___| Seconds;
- rd time:|__|__| Minutes|__|___| Seconds;
Measured: during the operation
Intraoperative carbon dioxide accumulation
PaCO2>45mmHg:□ No □ Yes: Duration|__|__| Minutes|__|__| Seconds;
Measured: during the operation
Incidence of tracheal intubation complications
Incidence of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, etc.
Measured: three days after operation
Lung atrophy quality
Lung atrophy quality during the operation(The condition is judged by the thoracic surgeon)
口Excellent visual field exposure, complete collapse of lung 口Medium The lungs are basically collapsed, but there's still residual air 口Poor Partial collapse or even non-collapse of the lung requires surgical intervention to expose the visual field
Measured: during the operation
Effectiveness of sputum suction
- Postoperative video review: The suction rate during intraoperative sputum suction: □ 80%-100%; □ 50-80%; □ 0-50%;
- After tracheal extubation, take photos to compare the secretion at the end of the bronchus:
- None
- Yes: □ Small amount (secretions adhering to the wall less than 2cm); □ Moderate amount (secretion adhering to the wall 2-4cm); □ Large amount (secretions sticking to the wall exceeding 4cm)
Measured: Postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2023
- Study start15 May 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fujian Medical University Union HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05830474
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022YF060-01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Continuous Intra-airway Monitoring Under Visible Double-lumen Bronchial Catheter on Postoperative Complications of Lung Surgery (a Prospective, Single-center, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05830474
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022YF060-01
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fujian Medical University Union HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after thoracic surgery is as high as 30-50% [1-6], which is the main cause of postoperative morbidity, death and prolonged hospital stay. Optimization of risk factors in PPCs procedures is the focus of current research. Double lumen bronchial tube (DLT) is a commonly used lung isolation method for adult patients. It has the advantages of good lung isolation effect, sufficient exposure of the surgical field and easy to attract secretions in the airway. However, there are still some deficiencies in clinical precise positioning, long-term continuous detection during operation, early detection of catheter displacement and other emergencies. Continuous intra-airway monitoring is the main advantage of visual double-lumen bronchial catheter. It can quickly and easily determine the position of the catheter and quickly adjust the displacement, and timely and effectively clean up the secretion in the airway, which is conducive to the analysis and treatment of intraoperative hypoxemia. Whether these potential advantages can reduce the incidence of PPCs deserves our in-depth discussion. The research group randomly divided the patients who were scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer in the Union Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University into the test group (lung isolation with visible double-lumen bronchial catheter, continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention) and the control group: (Pulmonary isolation was performed with visual double-lumen bronchial catheter, and only intra-airway video was performed without monitoring. The effect of continuous intra-airway monitoring under visual double-lumen bronchial catheter on postoperative complications of lung surgery was evaluated by Melbourne evaluation scale.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test group (group T) | Experimental | Procedure: Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgeylung isolation was performed with visual double-lumen bronchial catheter, andcontinuous airway monitoring and intervention were performed |
| Control group (group C) | No intervention | –lung isolation was performed with visual double-lumen bronchial catheter, and only intra-airway video was performed without monitoring |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 1. Age 18-80 years, BMI 18.5-28 kg/m2, male or female
- 2. Patients who are to undergo unilateral thoracoscopic resection of more than three lung segments or lobectomies
- 3. Patients who can be extubated with 35# and 37# double-lumen bronchial catheters after pre-anesthetic evaluation
- 4. Subjects voluntarily sign the informed consent form for this trial.
- 5. Patients or their caregivers are able to fill out the survey form and can correctly understand and cooperate with the postoperative rehabilitation instructions of the medical staff.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 1. Patients with limited ability to cooperate with the study, such as the presence of cognitive dysfunction, mental illness, speech impairment or severe visual impairment or hearing impairment
- 2.ASA ≥IV
- 3. difficult airway, abnormal tracheal development, main airway stenosis, tumor, tracheoesophageal fistula
- 4. Complex sleeve pneumonectomy, unilateral total pneumonectomy, bilateral lung surgery
- 5. Preoperative anemia, Hb≤100g/L
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgeyContinuous monitoring was performed by visual double lumen bronchial catheter. Once sputum or blood gushing into the tracheal carina was found in the distal bronchus on the surgical side, the above secretions were sucked out with a sputum suction tube under video monitoring until the removal was complete | Procedure or surgery | Test group (group T) |
Primary outcome
Incidence of pulmonary complications
Time frame: 3 days after operation
Evaluation of the incidence of pulmonary complications three days after surgery by the Melbourne Assessment Scale Melbourne Group Scale(Minimum value 0 points ;Max 8 points 1. Oral temperature > 38°C; 2. White blood cell count > 11.2×10^12/L or use respiratory antibiotics (except prophylactic antibiotics); 3. Pneumonia or pulmonary infection diagnosed by the treating doctor; 4. Chest X-ray examination suggested atelectasis or consolidation; 5. Purulent sputum (yellow/green) with characteristics different from those before operation; 6. Sputum microbiological examination was positive; 7. Oxygen saturation of finger pulse < 90% under suction condition; 8. Readmission or ICU stay > 36h due to respiratory problems If 4 or more of the above 8 items are satisfied, the subject is considered to have developed pulmonary complications.
7 secondary outcomes
Double lumen tube displacement
Time frame: during the operation
Intubation effectiveness
Time frame: during the operation
Hypoxemia during operation
Time frame: during the operation
Intraoperative carbon dioxide accumulation
Time frame: during the operation
Incidence of tracheal intubation complications
Time frame: three days after operation
Lung atrophy quality
Time frame: during the operation
Effectiveness of sputum suction
Time frame: Postoperative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
Not yet recruiting
Individualized Inspired Oxygen Fraction Titration During Lung Surgery (iOXY-LUNG)
Postoperative Complications
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Effect of Single Lung Ventilation Duration and Intraoperative Brain Oxygenation on Cognitive Function and Postoperative Pain in Geriatric Patients
Thoracic Anesthesia, Geriatric Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diaphragm Ultrasound and Neuromuscular Monitoring for Predicting Early Respiratory Events After Extubation
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Diaphragm Dysfunction
Recruiting
Uncovering the Mechanism of Pain Relief by Peripheral Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation
Post-Surgical Pain, Chronic, Post-traumatic Pain, Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Low-Dose Norepinephrine With Conservative Fluid Therapy in Hepatobiliary Surgery
Postoperative Complications, Pulmonary Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous intra-airway monitoring and intervention during surgey in people with Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, run by Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ye Chen, Master (13906916355, 1211020165@fjmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of pulmonary complications (time frame: 3 days after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2023.