Brain Injury Traumatic SevereNCT05833568
Five-day 20-minute 10-Hz tACS in Patients With a Disorder of Consciousness
A study testing Active Transcranial alternative current stimulation in people with Brain Injury Traumatic Severe and Disorder of Consciousness, run by Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal.
Trial summary
This study first aims to validate the feasibility of a multimodal 5-day 20-minute tACS protocol in subacute brain-injured patients with a disorder of consciousness during their ICU stay, and conduct a clinical pilot study (validation phase). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Injury Traumatic Severe, Disorder of Consciousness, Brain Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Active Transcranial alternative current stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 138 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2023to Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults ≥ 18 years old; Glasgow Coma Scale score remaining ≤ 12 following a minimum of 24 hours after the withdrawal of continuous sedation (if applicable).
- The included brain injury etiologies for the Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome(UWS) or Minimally Conscious State (MCS) are traumatic and non-traumatic (e.g., traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage).
Who cannot join
- Focal brain lesion(s) in the occipital and parietal lobes located at stimulation site
- Pre-existing severe neurological conditions/disorders involving cognitive deficits such as neurodegenerative diseases (ALS, dementia, Parkinson's), hereditary conditions (e.g. Huntington's Chorea), CNS disorders (previous moderate-severe CBT)
- History of epilepsy (patient with a seizure episode in response to non-exclusive active tACS intervention)
- Aneurysm clip(s), subdural brain electrodes, metallic brain, an implant, implantable neurostimulator
- Craniectomy with no bone flap
- Cervical collar limiting access to the occipital region
- Participation in a current (or previous) study that may have a confounding effect, as assessed by the research team.
- To facilitate recruitment, upon medical consent family members of patients who present inclusion criteria before meeting the protocol activation criteria will be approached by the research team to get informed consent. The study will be activated once the medical team confirms clinical stability and withdrawal of continuous sedation for a minimum of 24 hours. The study protocol will not be activated if there is: Constant and intense agitation at the time of study activation, the presence of invasive neurological monitoring (ICP and/or PbtO2), GCS > 12 after 24 hours of continuous sedation.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Beatrice Pelletier-De Koninck, MSc contact
About this study
Official title: Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of a 10-Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation to Modulate Brain Activity in Brain-injured Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
This study first aims to validate the feasibility of a multimodal 5-day 20-minute tACS protocol in subacute brain-injured patients with a disorder of consciousness during their ICU stay, and conduct a clinical pilot study (validation phase). Upon completion of this validation phase and according to obtained results, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare the effects of the 5-day active 10Hz-tACS protocol with a 5-day sham-tACS protocol on brain dynamics modulation. This study will also compare intervention conditions on recovery of consciousness, cognition and function using short-term and long-term measurements.
Read the detailed description
Background: After a severe brain injury, a significant number of patients remain in a state of altered consciousness and the outcome remains difficult to prognosticate. There is a lack of evidence-based therapeutic interventions available for patients with disorders of consciousness; some evidence has been gathered for non-invasive brain stimulation, but these have targeted chronic patients. The objective of the validation phase will be to evaluate the differential feasibility parameters of conducting a 5-day tACS stimulation protocol in the ICU and the quality of data collection according to the various measurement modalities, to establish requirements to be used in a larger-scale study. This phase will also implicate a clinical pilot to confirm and assess the effect size of the primary outcome and sample size requirements for a clinical trial. Following completion, a clinical trial will be conducted to evaluate short-term and long-term neurophysiological effects of an optimized, multi-session tACS intervention in subacute brain-injured patients on their consciousness and functional recovery (as measured by complementary behavioural/functional scales), related brain oscillations and network dynamics.
Validation phase: In addition to conducting the following methods and design protocol, these measures will be acquired during the validation phase to assess the feasibility of this single-site study.
Recruitment rate and retention: Estimated number of patients in this condition in this ICU per year, estimated patient survival rates, number of eligible patients over a 12-month recruitment period; percentage of patients recruited, attrition, presence of competitive studies, etiologies and compliance of the families through experimental protocol and longitudinal assessment (12-month period).
Site demographics: Personnel's availabilities, Availability/accessibility of study coordinators, technicians, doctors and nurses; competency of the experimental team to conduct the experimental protocol.
Site infrastructure: Material storage (biological samples (centrifuge, freezer), Material obtention (Lidocaine obtention and renewal; EEG equipment), Data storage (clinically secure on-site servers).
Investigators' team requirements: Personnel requirements and the number of personnel required for the protocol's conductance.
Assessing the investigator's readiness in terms of standard care (eligibility decisions according to clinical profiles ), targeted study population and population recruited, and familiarity with the use of tools and technology.
Acceptability within the clinical care team's ecosystem: document pitfalls, difficulties and requirements to facilitate the clinical care team's adherence Quality of data collection: quality of EEG signal data in different clinical settings across main acquisition hospital sites; percentage of data acquisition completion; encountered data acquisition obstacles; assessment the estimated acquisition time for each measure and actual measuring times.
Methods/design:
The investigators will recruit brain-injured patients traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies (e.g., traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage). Twelve patients will be recruited for the validation phase. The sample size estimation for the clinical trial based on a Student's t-test is 138 (2 groups of 69 patients) to reach a power of 80% to detect a statistically significant difference in the amplitude of alpha activity between active and sham groups, assuming a dropout/death rate of 20% and a significance level of 5%. These parameters are calculated according to a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial comparing a 4-week tDCS protocol on patients with disorders of consciousness. The main outcome was a behavioral assessment, whereas this study's main outcome is neurophysiological, which is more sensitive to detect modulation effects. Additionally, this estimate will be readjusted according to the clinical pilot's results.
The study protocol will be activated once the medical team states clinical stability for the patients and withdrawal of continuous sedation has surpassed a minimum of 24 hours, without recovery of responsiveness.
Patients will participate in 7 consecutive experimental days including :
Day 0: Baseline measurements: Blood samples ( pharmacological agents dosage, the plasma expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and isolation of exosomes derived from neurons (EDNs), astrocytes (EDAs) and microglia (EDMs)), Behavioral outcomes (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score) will be additionally measured for Unresponsive Wakefulness patients), pupillometry (photo motor reflex), and actigraph installation.
Days 1 to 5 (the following sequential procedure):
CRS-R/FOUR/GCS Pupillometry (PLR) 5-minute resting-state EEG 20-minute tACS/sham 5-minute resting-state EEG Pupillometry (PLR) CRS-R
5-minute resting-state 60-minute post-tACS condition/sham condition
5-minute resting-state 120-minute post-tACS condition/sham condition
Day 6:
CRS-R Pupillometry (PLR) 5-minute resting-state EEG
Day 7: After an interval of one-week post-5-day tACS/sham protocol, the following measurements will be acquired: CRS-R, Pupillometry (photo motor reflex), and 5-minute resting-state EEG. The actigraph will be withdrawn the during this same session.
At 3,6 and 12 months post-tACS, phone assessments will be conducted to measure long-term functional recovery using the following tools: Glasgow Outcome Scale- Extended, Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure and Burden Scale for Family Caregivers.
- Being tested
- Active Transcranial alternative current stimulation, SHAM Transcranial alternative current stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Consciousness Disorders, Brain Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active Transcranial alternative current stimulationDevice
GTEN 200 (Magstim-EGI, OREGON, USA). The current will be administered via an amplifier connected to an EEG system of 128-Channel Geodesic Sensor Net (Magstim-EGI, Oregon, USA) with sponge-based electrode nets.
tACS stimulation will be applied for 20 minutes for 5 consecutive days via a bilateral electrode montage of 5 electrodes per hemisphere over parieto-occipital cortical sites. Specific stimulation electrodes for both conditions will be: [right hemisphere: E83, E90, E96, E84, E91] and for the [left hemisphere: E58, E65, E70, E66, E59]. The intensity of the applied alternative current (AC) will be a maximum of 1 mA peak-to-peak. The stimulation frequency will be adjusted to 10 Hz (median value of the alpha frequency band) for the tACS condition.
SHAM Transcranial alternative current stimulationDevice
GTEN 200 (Magstim-EGI, OREGON, USA). The current will be administered via an amplifier connected to an EEG system of 128-Channel Geodesic Sensor Net (Magstim-EGI, Oregon, USA) with sponge-based electrode nets.
SHAM stimulation will be applied for a 2-minute ramp-up, then the current will stop for 20 minutes, followed by a 2-minute ramp-down. This will be applied for 5 consecutive days via a bilateral electrode montage of 5 electrodes per hemisphere over parieto-occipital cortical sites. Specific stimulation electrodes for both conditions will be: [right hemisphere: E83, E90, E96, E84, E91] and for the [left hemisphere: E58, E65, E70, E66, E59]. The intensity of the applied alternative current (AC) will be a maximum of 1 mA peak-to-peak. The stimulation frequency will be adjusted to 10 Hz (median value of the alpha frequency band) for the ramp-up and down in the SHAM conditions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Hz tACS Stimulation Group | Active comparator | tACS stimulation will be delivered over to parieto-occipital sites using only 2-minute ramp up and down and a continuous 20-minute 10 Hz sinusoidal current administered. The stimulation electrode montage will be identical for both conditions. Receives: Device: Active Transcranial alternative current stimulation |
| Sham Stimulation Group | Sham comparator | Sham stimulation will be delivered over to parieto-occipital sites using only 2-minute ramp up and down, without any sinusoidal current administered for 20 minutes. The stimulation electrode montage will be identical for both conditions. Receives: Device: SHAM Transcranial alternative current stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Single-site recruitment rates
Quantify the frequency of recruitment in the entire study's protocol for the specific population in the Intensive Care Unit.
Measured: 1 year
Retention rates
Assess completion and participation in the entire study's from participants and their caregivers; for the intervention protocol as well as for longitudinal measures over time [3,6,12 months]
Measured: over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol and at 3, 6 and 12 month time points
Change in EEG spectral power of the alpha band activity
EEG measures cortical electrical activity. Increase in the alpha band spectral power after the end of the 5-day 20-minute 10 Hz tACS intervention would indicate the specificity of the modulation's effect.
Measured: It will be measured over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol
Change in Functional Connectivity based on EEG signal
Examine changes in the statistical relationship between specific electrophysiological signal parameters in time.
Measured: It will be measured over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol
Secondary outcomes (1)
Changes in Coma Recovery Scale Revised (CRS-R) score throughout the protocol.
The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is a standardized neurobehavioural assessment of consciousness. It contains 23 items hierarchically presented and divided into 6 sub-scales (auditory, visual, motor, oro-motor/verbal, communication and arousal). The score is based on the presence or absence of behaviours in response to sensory stimulations. The best-observed response in each sub-scale is used to differentiate between the level of consciousness [Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome patients (UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS- and MCS +) and emergence (EMCS)]. The diagnosis is obtained from the quality of observed behaviours (e.g., the ability of visual tracking means that the patient is minimally conscious). The total score ranges between 0 and 23. Baseline measures [Day 0], daily measures [Day 1 to 5: Pre and post-tACS/sham] and up to a week after the protocol [Day 6: 24-hour after the 5-day protocol (post-24) and a week post the 5-day protocol (Day 7)].
Measured: It will be measured over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Apr 2023
- Study startSep 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain Injury Traumatic SevereStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Louis De Beaumont, Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05833568
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-2279
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Martens G, Lejeune N, O'Brien AT, Fregni F, Martial C, Wannez S, Laureys S, Thibaut A. Randomized controlled trial of home-based 4-week tDCS in chronic minimally conscious state. Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):982-990. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 May 2.
PubMed 29759943De Koninck BP, Brazeau D, Deshaies AA, Briand MM, Maschke C, Williams V, Arbour C, Williamson D, Duclos C, Bernard F, Blain-Moraes S, De Beaumont L. Modulation of brain activity in brain-injured patients with a disorder of consciousness in intensive care with repeated 10-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e078281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078281.
PubMed 38991682
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of a 10-Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation to Modulate Brain Activity in Brain-injured Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05833568
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021-2279
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 138 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de MontrealUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Study start
- Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study first aims to validate the feasibility of a multimodal 5-day 20-minute tACS protocol in subacute brain-injured patients with a disorder of consciousness during their ICU stay, and conduct a clinical pilot study (validation phase). Upon completion of this validation phase and according to obtained results, a randomized clinical trial will be conducted to compare the effects of the 5-day active 10Hz-tACS protocol with a 5-day sham-tACS protocol on brain dynamics modulation. This study will also compare intervention conditions on recovery of consciousness, cognition and function using short-term and long-term measurements.
Detailed description
Background: After a severe brain injury, a significant number of patients remain in a state of altered consciousness and the outcome remains difficult to prognosticate. There is a lack of evidence-based therapeutic interventions available for patients with disorders of consciousness; some evidence has been gathered for non-invasive brain stimulation, but these have targeted chronic patients. The objective of the validation phase will be to evaluate the differential feasibility parameters of conducting a 5-day tACS stimulation protocol in the ICU and the quality of data collection according to the various measurement modalities, to establish requirements to be used in a larger-scale study. This phase will also implicate a clinical pilot to confirm and assess the effect size of the primary outcome and sample size requirements for a clinical trial. Following completion, a clinical trial will be conducted to evaluate short-term and long-term neurophysiological effects of an optimized, multi-session tACS intervention in subacute brain-injured patients on their consciousness and functional recovery (as measured by complementary behavioural/functional scales), related brain oscillations and network dynamics.
Validation phase: In addition to conducting the following methods and design protocol, these measures will be acquired during the validation phase to assess the feasibility of this single-site study.
Recruitment rate and retention: Estimated number of patients in this condition in this ICU per year, estimated patient survival rates, number of eligible patients over a 12-month recruitment period; percentage of patients recruited, attrition, presence of competitive studies, etiologies and compliance of the families through experimental protocol and longitudinal assessment (12-month period).
Site demographics: Personnel's availabilities, Availability/accessibility of study coordinators, technicians, doctors and nurses; competency of the experimental team to conduct the experimental protocol.
Site infrastructure: Material storage (biological samples (centrifuge, freezer), Material obtention (Lidocaine obtention and renewal; EEG equipment), Data storage (clinically secure on-site servers).
Investigators' team requirements: Personnel requirements and the number of personnel required for the protocol's conductance.
Assessing the investigator's readiness in terms of standard care (eligibility decisions according to clinical profiles ), targeted study population and population recruited, and familiarity with the use of tools and technology.
Acceptability within the clinical care team's ecosystem: document pitfalls, difficulties and requirements to facilitate the clinical care team's adherence Quality of data collection: quality of EEG signal data in different clinical settings across main acquisition hospital sites; percentage of data acquisition completion; encountered data acquisition obstacles; assessment the estimated acquisition time for each measure and actual measuring times.
Methods/design:
The investigators will recruit brain-injured patients traumatic and non-traumatic etiologies (e.g., traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage). Twelve patients will be recruited for the validation phase. The sample size estimation for the clinical trial based on a Student's t-test is 138 (2 groups of 69 patients) to reach a power of 80% to detect a statistically significant difference in the amplitude of alpha activity between active and sham groups, assuming a dropout/death rate of 20% and a significance level of 5%. These parameters are calculated according to a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial comparing a 4-week tDCS protocol on patients with disorders of consciousness. The main outcome was a behavioral assessment, whereas this study's main outcome is neurophysiological, which is more sensitive to detect modulation effects. Additionally, this estimate will be readjusted according to the clinical pilot's results.
The study protocol will be activated once the medical team states clinical stability for the patients and withdrawal of continuous sedation has surpassed a minimum of 24 hours, without recovery of responsiveness.
Patients will participate in 7 consecutive experimental days including :
Day 0: Baseline measurements: Blood samples ( pharmacological agents dosage, the plasma expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and isolation of exosomes derived from neurons (EDNs), astrocytes (EDAs) and microglia (EDMs)), Behavioral outcomes (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score) will be additionally measured for Unresponsive Wakefulness patients), pupillometry (photo motor reflex), and actigraph installation.
Days 1 to 5 (the following sequential procedure):
CRS-R/FOUR/GCS Pupillometry (PLR) 5-minute resting-state EEG 20-minute tACS/sham 5-minute resting-state EEG Pupillometry (PLR) CRS-R
5-minute resting-state 60-minute post-tACS condition/sham condition
5-minute resting-state 120-minute post-tACS condition/sham condition
Day 6:
CRS-R Pupillometry (PLR) 5-minute resting-state EEG
Day 7: After an interval of one-week post-5-day tACS/sham protocol, the following measurements will be acquired: CRS-R, Pupillometry (photo motor reflex), and 5-minute resting-state EEG. The actigraph will be withdrawn the during this same session.
At 3,6 and 12 months post-tACS, phone assessments will be conducted to measure long-term functional recovery using the following tools: Glasgow Outcome Scale- Extended, Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure and Burden Scale for Family Caregivers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Hz tACS Stimulation Group | Active comparator | Device: Active Transcranial alternative current stimulationtACS stimulation will be delivered over to parieto-occipital sites using only 2-minute ramp up and down and a continuous 20-minute 10 Hz sinusoidal current administered. The stimulation electrode montage will be identical for both conditions. |
| Sham Stimulation Group | Sham comparator | Device: SHAM Transcranial alternative current stimulationSham stimulation will be delivered over to parieto-occipital sites using only 2-minute ramp up and down, without any sinusoidal current administered for 20 minutes. The stimulation electrode montage will be identical for both conditions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults ≥ 18 years old; Glasgow Coma Scale score remaining ≤ 12 following a minimum of 24 hours after the withdrawal of continuous sedation (if applicable).
- The included brain injury etiologies for the Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome(UWS) or Minimally Conscious State (MCS) are traumatic and non-traumatic (e.g., traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Focal brain lesion(s) in the occipital and parietal lobes located at stimulation site
- Pre-existing severe neurological conditions/disorders involving cognitive deficits such as neurodegenerative diseases (ALS, dementia, Parkinson's), hereditary conditions (e.g. Huntington's Chorea), CNS disorders (previous moderate-severe CBT)
- History of epilepsy (patient with a seizure episode in response to non-exclusive active tACS intervention)
- Aneurysm clip(s), subdural brain electrodes, metallic brain, an implant, implantable neurostimulator
- Craniectomy with no bone flap
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active Transcranial alternative current stimulationGTEN 200 (Magstim-EGI, OREGON, USA). The current will be administered via an amplifier connected to an EEG system of 128-Channel Geodesic Sensor Net (Magstim-EGI, Oregon, USA) with sponge-based electrode nets. tACS stimulation will be applied for 20 minutes for 5 consecutive days via a bilateral electrode montage of 5 electrodes per hemisphere over parieto-occipital cortical sites. Specific stimulation electrodes for both conditions will be: [right hemisphere: E83, E90, E96, E84, E91] and for the [left hemisphere: E58, E65, E70, E66, E59]. The intensity of the applied alternative current (AC) will be a maximum of 1 mA peak-to-peak. The stimulation frequency will be adjusted to 10 Hz (median value of the alpha frequency band) for the tACS condition. | Device | 10-Hz tACS Stimulation Group |
| SHAM Transcranial alternative current stimulationGTEN 200 (Magstim-EGI, OREGON, USA). The current will be administered via an amplifier connected to an EEG system of 128-Channel Geodesic Sensor Net (Magstim-EGI, Oregon, USA) with sponge-based electrode nets. SHAM stimulation will be applied for a 2-minute ramp-up, then the current will stop for 20 minutes, followed by a 2-minute ramp-down. This will be applied for 5 consecutive days via a bilateral electrode montage of 5 electrodes per hemisphere over parieto-occipital cortical sites. Specific stimulation electrodes for both conditions will be: [right hemisphere: E83, E90, E96, E84, E91] and for the [left hemisphere: E58, E65, E70, E66, E59]. The intensity of the applied alternative current (AC) will be a maximum of 1 mA peak-to-peak. The stimulation frequency will be adjusted to 10 Hz (median value of the alpha frequency band) for the ramp-up and down in the SHAM conditions. | Device | Sham Stimulation Group |
Primary outcome
Single-site recruitment rates
Time frame: 1 year
Quantify the frequency of recruitment in the entire study's protocol for the specific population in the Intensive Care Unit.
Retention rates
Time frame: over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol and at 3, 6 and 12 month time points
Assess completion and participation in the entire study's from participants and their caregivers; for the intervention protocol as well as for longitudinal measures over time [3,6,12 months]
Change in EEG spectral power of the alpha band activity
Time frame: It will be measured over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol
EEG measures cortical electrical activity. Increase in the alpha band spectral power after the end of the 5-day 20-minute 10 Hz tACS intervention would indicate the specificity of the modulation's effect.
Change in Functional Connectivity based on EEG signal
Time frame: It will be measured over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol
Examine changes in the statistical relationship between specific electrophysiological signal parameters in time.
1 secondary outcome
Changes in Coma Recovery Scale Revised (CRS-R) score throughout the protocol.
Time frame: It will be measured over the 2-week course of the experimental protocol
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29759943Martens G, Lejeune N, O'Brien AT, Fregni F, Martial C, Wannez S, Laureys S, Thibaut A. Randomized controlled trial of home-based 4-week tDCS in chronic minimally conscious state. Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):982-990. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 May 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38991682De Koninck BP, Brazeau D, Deshaies AA, Briand MM, Maschke C, Williams V, Arbour C, Williamson D, Duclos C, Bernard F, Blain-Moraes S, De Beaumont L. Modulation of brain activity in brain-injured patients with a disorder of consciousness in intensive care with repeated 10-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e078281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078281.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Brain Injury Traumatic Severe
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Valproic AcId for Traumatic BRAin INjury Trial
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Cortical Spreading Depolarization After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Predict Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Blood NfL and Functional Outcomes After Moderate-to-Severe TBI
Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Systemic Nature of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Beatrice Pelletier-De Koninck, MSc contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active Transcranial alternative current stimulation in people with Brain Injury Traumatic Severe and Disorder of Consciousness, run by Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Louis De Beaumont, PhD (514-338-2222 ext. 5833263, louis.de.beaumont@umontreal.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Single-site recruitment rates (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05833568, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2023.