AzTrials
AzTrials

Colonic PolypNCT05836064

GastroBot: Artificial Intelligence Applied to Bowel Preparation

A study testing GastroBot and Conventional explanation in people with Colonic Polyp and Colonic Neoplasms, run by Institute of Gastroenterology and Advance Endoscopy at 1 site in Argentina.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is estimated that about 20% of colonoscopies have inadequate preparation. (5) This is associated with lengthy procedures and less detection of adenomas, reduces the screening intervals, and increases the costs and risks of complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Colonic Polyp, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Disease
What is being tested?
GastroBot and Conventional explanation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
388 participants
Where
1 siteArgentina
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 28 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age under 18 and over 80 years old.
  • Who agrees to participate in the study and can understand and provide written informed consent.
  • Any colonoscopy indication: colorectal neoplasia screening, surveillance of colon pre-existing diseases, or diagnostic approach in symptomatic patients.
  • Smartphone owners (any device) and WhatsApp users, independence of local or international mobile phone provider.

Who cannot join

  • Scheduled colonoscopies with any therapeutic approach will be categorically excluded if it does not have a cecal intubation indication.
  • Patients with difficulty understanding instructions for bowel preparation or not being able to use WhatsApp.
  • History of diabetes mellitus with insulin therapy, heart disease, kidney, liver, or severe metabolic disorder.
  • Phenprocoumon therapy or severe uncontrolled coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Prior history of colon resection, ileostomy, or colostomy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Miguel Puga-Tejada, MD MSc contact

+5491165003311

miguel.puga01@hotmail.com

Argentina1 site
  • Institute of Gastroenterology and Advanced Endoscopy (IGEA)

    Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, 8000

Other trials in Argentina

About this study

Official title: GastroBot: a New Artificial Intelligence-developed Software Bot to Improve Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy Quality

It is estimated that about 20% of colonoscopies have inadequate preparation. (5) This is associated with lengthy procedures and less detection of adenomas, reduces the screening intervals, and increases the costs and risks of complications. Several strategies have been proposed to improve the quality of bowel preparation. Mobile healthcare Apps have been developed to increase adherence to bowel preparation agents, improving the quality of bowel preparation. However, adherence to mobile healthcare Apps is also a quality criterion and a pending problem to solve with this new technology.

GastroBot is a new technology based on artificial intelligence that allows, through a software bot, to carry out a personalized follow-up of the patient's bowel cleansing, advising the patient to overcome contingencies that arise with the preparation, which in other circumstances could lead to the failure of it. The primary aim of this study is to determine the improvement in bowel preparation after GastroBot assistance compared with the traditional explanation. As a secondary aim, this study also pursues to determine adenoma and polyp detection rates (ADR and PDR, respectively), bowel preparation agents' tolerance, and GastroBot functionality.

Read the detailed description

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent tumor, the most frequent gastrointestinal tumor, and the second cause of cancer-related death. (1) In more than 80-90% of cases, CRC has a precursor lesion, an adenomatous polyp or adenoma, slowly progressing towards CRC. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard in its prevention since it allows the detection and treatment of its initial form. (2) Considering this, several colonoscopy quality indicators have been described, such as cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, and adenoma/polyp detection rate (ADR); the last is the most important indicator correlating with CRC risk. (3)

Therefore, focusing on improving the ADR is mandatory to reduce the incidence of CRC. Many techniques have been described for this purpose, like improving endoscopists' education and training, split-dosing bowel preparations, withdrawal time >9 minutes and right colon second view, high-definition white light endoscopy, Endocuff vision, G-EYE scope or Artificial Intelligence. (2, 4) However, all these techniques have in common the need for optimal visualization of the intestinal mucosa, which depends on bowel cleansing. (3,4)

Problem It is estimated that about 20% of colonoscopies have inadequate preparation. (5) This is associated with lengthy procedures and less detection of adenomas, reduces the screening intervals, and increases the costs and risks of complications. This causes frustration for the patient and physician with medico-legal conflicts. (6) The ideal cleansing method must be safe, well-tolerated, and effective. However, none of the current options fulfills these characteristics. The main cause of inappropriate cleansing (80% of cases) is a failure to adequately follow preparation instructions and mostly because of intolerance to the oral solution. (7,8)

Several strategies have been proposed to improve the quality of bowel preparation. As in other fields, mobile healthcare Apps have been developed to increase adherence to bowel preparation agents, improving quality bowel preparation. However, adherence to mobile healthcare Apps is also a quality criterion and a pending problem to solve with this new technology. Also, as with any mobile App, mobile healthcare Apps must be compatible with specific devices. GastroBot is a new technology based on artificial intelligence that allows, through a software bot, to carry out a personalized follow-up of the patient's bowel cleansing, advising the patient to overcome contingencies that arise with the preparation, which in other circumstances could lead to the failure of it.

Aim The primary aim of this study is to determine the improvement in bowel preparation after GastroBot assistance compared with the traditional explanation. As a secondary aim, this study also pursues to determine adenoma and polyp detection rates (ADR and PDR, respectively), bowel preparation agents' tolerance, and GastroBot functionality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design Study type. The following is a cross-section simple-blind and single-center controlled randomized trial. Two groups will be established: the GastroBot-assisted bowel preparation (GB-group) and the conventional-assisted bowel preparation (C-group) group.

Setting. It will be performed in consecutive patients with bowel preparation agents indication before undergoing a colonoscopy with cecal intubation at the Instituto de Gastroenterología y Endoscopía de Avanzada (IGEA), Hospital de la Asociación Médica (HAM) "Dr. Felipe Glasman" Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires province, Argentina. The study protocol and consent form have been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. Patients will sign an informed consent.

Intervention A clinical coordinator will be responsible for patients' randomization. Patients from both study groups will receive the same type of preparation with polyethylene glycol in split dose, establishing the intake time according to three-time segments (8-11 am, 11-2 pm, 2-4 pm). The C-group will receive the instructions in writing without prior personalized advice. The GB group will receive the instructions through the WhatsApp application, guided by the software bot with multiple and personalized alternative instructions according to results. The endoscopist will perform the endoscopy by assessing primary and secondary endpoints, blinded to the patient's study group.

Sample size Considering the proportion of insufficient BBPS (<6) among the App-group (7.7%) vs. controls (16.9%) described by Walter B et al. (2021), a sample size of 194 cases per study group was estimated to determine a two-sided difference on BBPS between GB-group vs. C-group with an 80% statistical power.

Statistical analysis Baseline characteristics will be compared between the case and control group using Chi-square o Fisher test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U or Student's t-test for continuous variables. A P value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All the statistical analysis will be performed using the latest version of the statistical program R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria).

Limitations The protocol will be performed in only one center and by six endoscopists. It is a simple blind study. The patients will know they are using (or not) a novel instrument to increase bowel preparation quality.

Being tested
GastroBot, Conventional explanation
Keywords
bowel preparation, colonoscopy quality
Medical subject headings
Colonic Polyps, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GastroBotDevice

    An artificial intelligence-developed and WhatsApp-based software bot. It will send the instructions to the patient through the WhatsApp application, guided by the software bot with multiple and personalized alternative instructions according to results.

  • Conventional explanationOther

    Patients will receive in writing detailed explanation about bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol

Study groups in NCT05836064
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GastroBot-assisted bowel preparation group (GB-group)ExperimentalAdult patients with no surgical high-risk comorbidities and colonoscopy indications for screening, surveillance, or diagnosis who are undergoing a colonoscopy. GastroBot assisted with the polyethylene glycol bowel preparation: patients will receive the instructions through the WhatsApp application, being guided by the software bot with multiple and personalized alternative instructions according to results.
Receives: Device: GastroBot
Conventional-assisted bowel preparation group (C-group).ExperimentalAdult patients with no surgical high-risk comorbidities and colonoscopy indications for screening, surveillance, or diagnosis who are undergoing a colonoscopy. The patients received bowel polyethylene glycol bowel preparation instructions in writing without prior personalized advice.
Receives: Other: Conventional explanation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Colonoscopy cleansing in terms of Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS)

    Visual assessment of colonoscopy cleansing per colonic part (left, transverse, right), based on BBPS scale.

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. Re-scheduled colonoscopy

    If bowel preparation was enough unsatisfactory to re-scheduled colonoscopy.

    Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Colonoscopy entrance time

    Time since colonoscopy beginning to cecal visualization.

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. Adenoma and polyp detection

    Visualization of any adenoma or polyp during colonoscopy

    Measured: 1 hour

  3. Bowel preparation agent's tolerance

    Any adverse event related to polyethylene glycol intake

    Measured: 1 hour

  4. GastroBot functionality

    Patient's qualification of his/her interaction with GastroBot, in accordance with the Mobile App Rating Survey scale (MARS). Due that GastroBot is not a proper App, only MARS functionality questions will be given to the patient, an only patients from the GB group.

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The following is a cross-section simple-blind and single-center controlled randomized trial. Two groups will be established: the GastroBot-assisted bowel preparation (GB-group) and the conventional-assisted bowel preparation (C-group) group. Patients from both study groups will receive the same type of preparation with polyethylene glycol in split dose, establishing the intake time according to three-time segments (8-11 am, 11-2 pm, 2-4 pm).
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
388 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05836064
Sponsor's protocol ID
IGEA01-2023
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
18 Apr 2023
Last updated
24 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gubbiotti A, Spadaccini M, Badalamenti M, Hassan C, Repici A. Key factors for improving adenoma detection rate. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;16(9):819-833. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2128761. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

    PubMed 36151898
  • Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG 2nd, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Dec 2. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25480100
  • Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, Jovani M, Chandrasekar VT, Antonelli G, Yu H, Areia M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bhandari P, Sharma P, Rex DK, Rosch T, Wallace M, Repici A. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

    PubMed 32598963
  • Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jun;96(6):1797-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x.

    PubMed 11419832
  • Aganiants EK. [Changes in the impulse activity of cerebral cortex neurons upon inhalation of ether in different concentrations]. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1968 Sep;66(9):45-8. No abstract available. Russian.

    PubMed 5758907
  • Jansen SV, Goedhard JG, Winkens B, van Deursen CT. Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;23(10):897-902. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834a3444.

    PubMed 21900786
  • Juluri R, Eckert G, Imperiale TF. Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 14;11:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-38.

    PubMed 21492418
  • Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, Spada C, Benamouzig R, Bisschops R, Bretthauer M, Dekker E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ferlitsch M, Fuccio L, Awadie H, Gralnek I, Jover R, Kaminski MF, Pellise M, Triantafyllou K, Vanella G, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Frazzoni L, Van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):775-794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

    PubMed 31295746
  • Walter B, Frank R, Ludwig L, Dikopoulos N, Mayr M, Neu B, Mayer B, Hann A, Meier B, Caca K, Seufferlein T, Meining A. Smartphone Application to Reinforce Education Increases High-Quality Preparation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopies in a Randomized Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;19(2):331-338.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.051. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

    PubMed 32240835

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing GastroBot and Conventional explanation in people with Colonic Polyp and Colonic Neoplasms, run by Institute of Gastroenterology and Advance Endoscopy at 1 site in Argentina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Miguel Puga-Tejada, MD MSc (+5491165003311, miguel.puga01@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Colonoscopy cleansing in terms of Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS) (time frame: 1 hour). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05836064, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in