Pain, PostoperativeNCT05837013
Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
A study testing Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) and General anesthesia (GA) in people with Pain, Postoperative and Postoperative Complications, run by Konya City Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the most frequently applied method is laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Complications, Inguinal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) and General anesthesia (GA)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Sep 2023to 15 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with inguinal hernias.
- Over 18 years old
Who cannot join
- Younger than 18 years
- Those who have had previous abdominal surgery,
- Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias,
- Recurrent hernias,
- Coagulopathies,
- Patients with musculoskeletal deformity,
Show all 10Show fewer
- Those with chronic pain,
- Those who use drugs that affect the central nervous system daily,
- Those with a body mass index (BMI) over 40 kg/m2,
- Patients with contraindications to the recommended anesthetic technique.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
University of Health Science Van Training and Research Hospital
Van
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TEP) Performed Under Blocked Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia: Prospective Randomized Study
Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the most frequently applied method is laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). In general, this surgery is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in many centers. However, in cases where general anesthesia is inconvenient, local or other anesthesia methods are preferred.
It has been stated in many studies in the literature that this surgery can be performed with methods other than general anesthesia. In a study of 480 patients, one of which was Sinha et al., it was shown that this surgical procedure was successfully performed under spinal anesthesia (SA).
Read more
In a prospective randomized study by Dönmez et al., patients who underwent TEP under general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia were compared. It has been reported that TEP repair can be performed safely under SA and that SA is associated with less postoperative pain, better recovery, and better patient satisfaction than GA.2 In a retrospective study by Yıldırım et al. It has been shown that there is significantly less need for analgesics and better patient satisfaction.
There are also many meta-analyses made on this subject in the literature. Compared with GA in these, SA was associated with a longer operative time, and postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting were less in SA. However, the risk of urinary retention in SA was significantly increased. It was observed that there was no significant difference in surgical complications such as seroma and wound infection.
Despite all these studies, until now, there is no clear consensus on which anesthesia should be used.
The aim of the study is to show the effect of both the surgical method and the anesthesia method on the patient during surgery and in the early postoperative period in inguinal hernia
Read the detailed description
Patients who underwent laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair and open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) with the diagnosis of inguinal hernia will be divided into 2 groups. General anesthesia (GA) will be applied to the 1st group, and ileoinguinal (II) and ileohypogastric (IH) nerve block together with spinal anesthesia (SA) to the 2nd group.
- Being tested
- Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block), General anesthesia (GA)
- Keywords
- spinal anesthesia, inguinal Hernia, general anesthesia, laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Complications, Hernia, Inguinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block)Procedure or surgery
Spinal Anesthesia and Nerve Block: No premedication will be applied. Spinal anesthesia will be administered to the patients in this group in the sitting position with a 27G Quincke needle (15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine) to be entered through the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interval. If hypotension develops, it will be corrected with a crystalloid infusion and ephedrine. These patients will be administered intravenous sedation with increasing doses of midazolam to provide adequate sedation. According to Hadzic, II and IH nerve block will be performed by applying 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine 2 cm above and 2 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine.
General anesthesia (GA)Procedure or surgery
General anesthesia: No premedication will be applied. In the waiting room, 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution will be infused IV in 30 minutes. In Group I, 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl IV will be given for induction; 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will then be used to provide the muscle relaxation needed for intubation. After intubation, the tidal volume will be set to 6-8 mL/kg and the respiratory frequency PetCO2 32-36 mmHg in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode. Anesthesia will continue to be provided with sevoflurane (1.5%-2%), oxygen-air mixture (FiO 2 = 0.4) and repeated doses of rocuronium (0.015 mg/kg). At the end of the surgery, neostigmine (2-2.5 mg) and atropine (1 mg) will be given IV to antagonize the residual neuromuscular block.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| General anesthesia (GA) and TEP Group | Experimental | General anesthesia: No premedication will be applied. In the waiting room, 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution will be infused IV in 30 minutes. In Group I, 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl IV will be given for induction; 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will then be used to provide the muscle relaxation needed for intubation. After intubation, the tidal volume will be set to 6-8 mL/kg and the respiratory frequency PetCO2 32-36 mmHg in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode. Anesthesia will continue to be provided with sevoflurane (1.5%-2%), oxygen-air mixture (FiO 2 = 0.4) and repeated doses of rocuronium (0.015 mg/kg). At the end of the surgery, neostigmine (2-2.5 mg) and atropine (1 mg) will be given IV to antagonize the residual neuromuscular block. Receives: Procedure: General anesthesia (GA) |
| Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) (SA) and TEP Group | Active comparator | Spinal Anesthesia and Nerve Block: No premedication will be applied. Spinal anesthesia will be administered to the patients in this group in the sitting position with a 27G Quincke needle (15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine) to be entered through the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interval. If hypotension develops, it will be corrected with a crystalloid infusion and ephedrine. These patients will be administered intravenous sedation with increasing doses of midazolam to provide adequate sedation. According to Hadzic, II and IH nerve block will be performed by applying 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine 2 cm above and 2 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. Receives: Procedure: Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) |
| General anesthesia (GA) and open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) | Experimental | General anesthesia: No premedication will be applied. In the waiting room, 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution will be infused IV in 30 minutes. In Group I, 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl IV will be given for induction; 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will then be used to provide the muscle relaxation needed for intubation. After intubation, the tidal volume will be set to 6-8 mL/kg and the respiratory frequency PetCO2 32-36 mmHg in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode. Anesthesia will continue to be provided with sevoflurane (1.5%-2%), oxygen-air mixture (FiO 2 = 0.4) and repeated doses of rocuronium (0.015 mg/kg). At the end of the surgery, neostigmine (2-2.5 mg) and atropine (1 mg) will be given IV to antagonize the residual neuromuscular block. Receives: Procedure: General anesthesia (GA) |
| Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) (SA) open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) | Active comparator | Spinal Anesthesia and Nerve Block: No premedication will be applied. Spinal anesthesia will be administered to the patients in this group in the sitting position with a 27G Quincke needle (15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine) to be entered through the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interval. If hypotension develops, it will be corrected with a crystalloid infusion and ephedrine. These patients will be administered intravenous sedation with increasing doses of midazolam to provide adequate sedation. According to Hadzic, II and IH nerve block will be performed by applying 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine 2 cm above and 2 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. Receives: Procedure: Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative pain
It will be measured using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patient will be asked to choose between the number 1 with the least pain and the number 10 with the most pain. The lowest score on this scale is 1, and the highest score is 10.
Measured: Postoperative 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Adverse postoperative events
headache, nausea/vomiting, anxiety, abdominal discomfort and urinary retention
Measured: Postoperative 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2023
- Study start20 Sep 2023
- Primary completion30 Jan 2024
- Study completion15 Feb 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain, PostoperativeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Konya City Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Van Training and Research Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş, Konya City Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05837013
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 33333333
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sinha R, Gurwara AK, Gupta SC. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a study of 480 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Oct;18(5):673-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0219.
PubMed 18803509Donmez T, Erdem VM, Sunamak O, Erdem DA, Avaroglu HI. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair under spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia: a randomized prospective study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Oct 27;12:1599-1608. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S117891. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27822053Yildirim D, Hut A, Uzman S, Kocakusak A, Demiryas S, Cakir M, Tatar C. Spinal anesthesia is safe in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. A retrospective clinical trial. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Dec;12(4):417-427. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.72325. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
PubMed 29362658Li L, Pang Y, Wang Y, Li Q, Meng X. Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 10;20(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00980-5.
PubMed 32156258Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Mobarak S, Bhattacharya P, Mobarak D, Satyadas T. Meta-Analysis of Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug;30(4):371-380. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000783.
PubMed 32217883
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TEP) Performed Under Blocked Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia: Prospective Randomized Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05837013
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 33333333
- Keywords
- spinal anesthesia, inguinal Hernia, general anesthesia, laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Konya City HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Van Training and Research Hospital
- Study start
- 20 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the most frequently applied method is laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). In general, this surgery is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in many centers. However, in cases where general anesthesia is inconvenient, local or other anesthesia methods are preferred.
It has been stated in many studies in the literature that this surgery can be performed with methods other than general anesthesia. In a study of 480 patients, one of which was Sinha et al., it was shown that this surgical procedure was successfully performed under spinal anesthesia (SA).
In a prospective randomized study by Dönmez et al., patients who underwent TEP under general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia were compared. It has been reported that TEP repair can be performed safely under SA and that SA is associated with less postoperative pain, better recovery, and better patient satisfaction than GA.2 In a retrospective study by Yıldırım et al. It has been shown that there is significantly less need for analgesics and better patient satisfaction.
There are also many meta-analyses made on this subject in the literature. Compared with GA in these, SA was associated with a longer operative time, and postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting were less in SA. However, the risk of urinary retention in SA was significantly increased. It was observed that there was no significant difference in surgical complications such as seroma and wound infection.
Despite all these studies, until now, there is no clear consensus on which anesthesia should be used.
The aim of the study is to show the effect of both the surgical method and the anesthesia method on the patient during surgery and in the early postoperative period in inguinal hernia
Detailed description
Patients who underwent laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair and open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) with the diagnosis of inguinal hernia will be divided into 2 groups. General anesthesia (GA) will be applied to the 1st group, and ileoinguinal (II) and ileohypogastric (IH) nerve block together with spinal anesthesia (SA) to the 2nd group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| General anesthesia (GA) and TEP Group | Experimental | Procedure: General anesthesia (GA)General anesthesia: No premedication will be applied. In the waiting room, 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution will be infused IV in 30 minutes. In Group I, 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl IV will be given for induction; 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will then be used to provide the muscle relaxation needed for intubation. After intubation, the tidal volume will be set to 6-8 mL/kg and the respiratory frequency PetCO2 32-36 mmHg in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode. Anesthesia will continue to be provided with sevoflurane (1.5%-2%), oxygen-air mixture (FiO 2 = 0.4) and repeated doses of rocuronium (0.015 mg/kg). At the end of the surgery, neostigmine (2-2.5 mg) and atropine (1 mg) will be given IV to antagonize the residual neuromuscular block. |
| Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) (SA) and TEP Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block)Spinal Anesthesia and Nerve Block: No premedication will be applied. Spinal anesthesia will be administered to the patients in this group in the sitting position with a 27G Quincke needle (15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine) to be entered through the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interval. If hypotension develops, it will be corrected with a crystalloid infusion and ephedrine. These patients will be administered intravenous sedation with increasing doses of midazolam to provide adequate sedation. According to Hadzic, II and IH nerve block will be performed by applying 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine 2 cm above and 2 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. |
| General anesthesia (GA) and open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) | Experimental | Procedure: General anesthesia (GA)General anesthesia: No premedication will be applied. In the waiting room, 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution will be infused IV in 30 minutes. In Group I, 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl IV will be given for induction; 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will then be used to provide the muscle relaxation needed for intubation. After intubation, the tidal volume will be set to 6-8 mL/kg and the respiratory frequency PetCO2 32-36 mmHg in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode. Anesthesia will continue to be provided with sevoflurane (1.5%-2%), oxygen-air mixture (FiO 2 = 0.4) and repeated doses of rocuronium (0.015 mg/kg). At the end of the surgery, neostigmine (2-2.5 mg) and atropine (1 mg) will be given IV to antagonize the residual neuromuscular block. |
| Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) (SA) open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) | Active comparator | Procedure: Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block)Spinal Anesthesia and Nerve Block: No premedication will be applied. Spinal anesthesia will be administered to the patients in this group in the sitting position with a 27G Quincke needle (15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine) to be entered through the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interval. If hypotension develops, it will be corrected with a crystalloid infusion and ephedrine. These patients will be administered intravenous sedation with increasing doses of midazolam to provide adequate sedation. According to Hadzic, II and IH nerve block will be performed by applying 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine 2 cm above and 2 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with inguinal hernias.
- Over 18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Younger than 18 years
- Those who have had previous abdominal surgery,
- Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias,
- Recurrent hernias,
- Coagulopathies,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block)Spinal Anesthesia and Nerve Block: No premedication will be applied. Spinal anesthesia will be administered to the patients in this group in the sitting position with a 27G Quincke needle (15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine) to be entered through the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interval. If hypotension develops, it will be corrected with a crystalloid infusion and ephedrine. These patients will be administered intravenous sedation with increasing doses of midazolam to provide adequate sedation. According to Hadzic, II and IH nerve block will be performed by applying 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine 2 cm above and 2 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. | Procedure or surgery | Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) (SA) and TEP Group, Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) (SA) open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) |
| General anesthesia (GA)General anesthesia: No premedication will be applied. In the waiting room, 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution will be infused IV in 30 minutes. In Group I, 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl IV will be given for induction; 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will then be used to provide the muscle relaxation needed for intubation. After intubation, the tidal volume will be set to 6-8 mL/kg and the respiratory frequency PetCO2 32-36 mmHg in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode. Anesthesia will continue to be provided with sevoflurane (1.5%-2%), oxygen-air mixture (FiO 2 = 0.4) and repeated doses of rocuronium (0.015 mg/kg). At the end of the surgery, neostigmine (2-2.5 mg) and atropine (1 mg) will be given IV to antagonize the residual neuromuscular block. | Procedure or surgery | General anesthesia (GA) and TEP Group, General anesthesia (GA) and open surgical procedure (Lichtenstein) |
Primary outcome
Postoperative pain
Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours
It will be measured using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patient will be asked to choose between the number 1 with the least pain and the number 10 with the most pain. The lowest score on this scale is 1, and the highest score is 10.
1 secondary outcome
Adverse postoperative events
Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 18803509Sinha R, Gurwara AK, Gupta SC. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a study of 480 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Oct;18(5):673-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0219.
- Background: PubMed 27822053Donmez T, Erdem VM, Sunamak O, Erdem DA, Avaroglu HI. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair under spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia: a randomized prospective study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Oct 27;12:1599-1608. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S117891. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 29362658Yildirim D, Hut A, Uzman S, Kocakusak A, Demiryas S, Cakir M, Tatar C. Spinal anesthesia is safe in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. A retrospective clinical trial. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Dec;12(4):417-427. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.72325. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 32156258Li L, Pang Y, Wang Y, Li Q, Meng X. Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 10;20(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00980-5.
- Background: PubMed 32217883Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Mobarak S, Bhattacharya P, Mobarak D, Satyadas T. Meta-Analysis of Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug;30(4):371-380. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000783.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
PRP-Assisted Regenerative Endodontics Versus Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Mature Necrotic Teeth
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant in Combined Costoclavicular Block and Suprascapular Block Versus Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopy
Not yet recruiting
Nerve Block of the Vastus Medialis and Anterior Obturator Branch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With DIDT Graft
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Submucosal Cryotherapy and Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment in Maxillary Molars
Pulpitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block) and General anesthesia (GA) in people with Pain, Postoperative and Postoperative Complications, run by Konya City Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative pain (time frame: Postoperative 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05837013, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2024.