AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerNCT05837598

Adapting the Tumor Board Model for Mental Illness and Cancer

A study testing Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor Board in people with Cancer and Severe Major Depression, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study examines the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual tumor board for cancer and mental illness for patients with serious mental illness and a new cancer diagnosis. The study also examines the impact on patient care, psychiatric symptoms, and clinician self-efficacy in managing this population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer, Severe Major Depression, Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor Board
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
31 May 2023to 31 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Verbal fluency in English
  • SMI (schizophrenia spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder with either prior psychiatric hospitalization, history of suicide attempt/suicidal ideation, Medicaid insurance, and/or comorbid alcohol or opioid use disorder) confirmed by diagnostic evaluation of study psychiatrist
  • New invasive stage I-IV breast, lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or head and neck cancer (highly suspected or confirmed according to documentation by the oncologist or pathology)
  • Oncology consultation at or referral to a MGH Danvers within the past 8 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Have cognitive impairment severe enough to interfere with completing brief study assessments or providing informed consent and does not have a guardian who can provide consent
  • Recurrence of same cancer type
  • Do not have verbal fluency in English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Kelly Irwin, MD, MPH contact

617-643-4453

kirwin1@partners.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Mass General/North Shore Center for Outpatient Care

    Danvers, Massachusetts, 01923

    Elizabeth P Walsh, MD, EWALSH20@MGH.HARVARD.EDU

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Adapting the Tumor Board Model for Mental Illness and Cancer: A Single Arm Pilot Trial

This study examines the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual tumor board for cancer and mental illness for patients with serious mental illness and a new cancer diagnosis. The study also examines the impact on patient care, psychiatric symptoms, and clinician self-efficacy in managing this population.

Read the detailed description

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) experience increased cancer mortality because of inequities in cancer care. Access to mental health and cancer care remains inadequate. Virtual tumor boards have been associated with higher rates of patients receiving guideline-concordant cancer care, but these tumor boards have not been adapted for cancer and mental illness. A virtual cancer and mental health tumor board intervention has potential to increase access to psycho-oncology and oncology expertise, facilitate clinician communication, and may address barriers to cancer and mental health care. The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual tumor board for cancer and mental illness for our target population for patients and clinicians. We will also explore changes in cancer care, psychiatric symptoms, and clinician self-efficacy in managing this population. This study is a single-arm pilot (n = 30) based at a cancer center affiliate and the surrounding community. The intervention includes proactive identification using a registry, bi-monthly virtual equity tumor board focused on cancer and mental health using HIPAA-compliant videoconference that uses co-learning, assessment of barriers to cancer care, strengths, and goals of care, creating plans that identify who is responsible for next steps and patient communication, and relaying recommendations to patients and the treating oncology team.

Being tested
Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor Board
Keywords
Cancer Care, Major Depression and Cancer, Schizophrenia and Cancer, Bipolar disorder and Cancer, Lung Cancer, Breast Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Genitourinary Cancer, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression, Health equity, Mental disorders
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Depressive Disorder, Major, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Lung Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor BoardBehavioural

    The Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor Board intervention aims to increase access to psycho-oncology and oncology expertise, facilitate clinician communication, build understanding of the person's needs and strengths, and address barriers to care. Strategies include a proactive assessment of illness understanding, psychiatric history, and barriers to care followed by development of an integrated cancer and mental health treatment plan during the tumor board session that is framed in terms of patient values and addresses barriers to accessing psycho-oncology and specialty oncology expertise. These recommendations will be shared with treating oncologists, documented in the medical record, and shared with the patient. Patients will receive a transition phone call at 12 weeks.

Study groups in NCT05837598
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tumor Board ArmExperimentalThis intervention has three parts: Part 1: Proactive identification and assessment of patient needs, values, psychiatric symptoms, and illness understanding Part 2: Virtual tumor board discussion o Bring together expertise in mental illness and cancer, the interdisciplinary team will co-design an integrated cancer and mental health treatment plan. Key strategies include: addressing resource-related barriers to care, framing next steps in terms of patient values, and identifying action steps to address barriers to psycho-oncology/specialty oncology expertise Part 3: Closed Loop Communication o Tumor board recommendations shared with treating oncologist, documented in medical record, and shared with patient. Team tracks steps taken to address barriers to care and follows up with patient at 12 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor Board

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient enrollment assessed by consent rate.

    The investigators will evaluate program feasibility through patient enrollment by examining consent rates (60% of eligible patients consent).

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Patient trial completion assessed by number of patients who complete study assessments and trial procedures.

    The investigators will evaluate trial completion assessed by number of patients who complete study assessments and trial procedures (75% of patient participants have baseline targeted assessment, have tumor board recommendations communicated with them, and complete 12-week assessment of psychiatric symptoms and barriers to cancer care).

    Measured: 12 weeks from study enrollment

  3. Patient satisfaction assessed by patient feedback questionnaire.

    The investigators will evaluate program acceptability through patient intervention satisfaction by a patient feedback questionnaire (exit interview surveys with participating patients regarding the usefulness of the intervention) at 12 weeks.

    Measured: 12 weeks from study enrollment

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Volume of tumor board session attendance by tumor board participants.

    The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by tracking volume of tumor board session attendance (feasibility defined as participants attending 80% of sessions when patients/clients discussed).

    Measured: 24 weeks from study enrollment

  2. Tumor board participant satisfaction assessed by tumor board participant feedback questionnaire.

    The investigators will evaluate program acceptability by examining participant intervention satisfaction (feedback questionnaire at end of study period regarding the acceptability and helpfulness of the virtual tumor board model).

    Measured: 24 weeks from study enrollment

  3. Number of participants contributing to multi-disciplinary representation at tumor board sessions.

    The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by examining the amount of multi-disciplinary representation at tumor board sessions (>70% of sessions include representation from oncology/cancer center affiliate, community mental health, and psycho-oncology).

    Measured: 24 weeks from study enrollment

  4. Percentage of tumor board participants participating in tumor board session.

    The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by tracking percentage of tumor board participants participating in tumor board sessions (80% of participants complete intra-session feedback questionnaire).

    Measured: 24 weeks from study enrollment

  5. Percentage of tumor board participants completing study questionnaires.

    The investigators will evaluate program feasibility by examining completion of study measures (70% of participants complete 12-week- and 24-week measures).

    Measured: 24 weeks from study enrollment

  6. Tumor board participant satisfaction assessed by in-session feedback questionnaire.

    The investigators will evaluate program acceptability by examining participant intervention satisfaction (in-session feedback questionnaire regarding the acceptability and helpfulness of the virtual tumor board model).

    Measured: 24 weeks from study enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2023
  2. Study start31 May 2023
  3. Primary completion31 May 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05837598
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-593
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
21 Feb 2023
Last updated
3 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual Cancer and Mental Health Tumor Board in people with Cancer and Severe Major Depression, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kelly Irwin, MD, MPH (617-643-4453, kirwin1@partners.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient enrollment assessed by consent rate. (time frame: At baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in