Mitochondrial Oxygenation MeasurementAIMED COMETNCT05841576
Anaesthetic Management Guided by COMET Measurements
A study testing COMET monitoring device in people with Mitochondrial Oxygenation Measurement and Surgical Site Infection, run by Rick Hulskes at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and healthcare costs. Perioperative low tissue oxygen tension is associated with a high risk of SSI. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Mitochondrial Oxygenation Measurement, Surgical Site Infection
- What is being tested?
- COMET monitoring device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2021to 26 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients are at least 18 years old
- Patients undergo elective open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery with an expected minimal total incision size of 5 cm
- Patients are able and willing to give written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Known photodermatoses of varying pathology and frequency
- Mitochondrial disease
- Porphyria
- Skin lesions on the upper arm which impede measurements
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or the 5-ALA medicated plaster material
- Emergency surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
- Reoperation for complications from recent surgery (within last three months)
- Participation in another study with interference with this study
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ
About this study
Official title: Anaesthetic Management Guided by Cellular Oxygen Metabolism Measurements in Abdominal Surgery: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and healthcare costs. Perioperative low tissue oxygen tension is associated with a high risk of SSI. Standard anaesthetic management guided by continuous monitoring of oxygen delivery with a non-invasive method of measuring mitochondrial oxygenation tension (mitoPO2) using the Cellular Oxygen METabolism (COMET) monitor may benefit the intraoperative oxygenation on the tissue level. This randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel-arm, patient-blinded trial aims to investigate if standard anaesthetic management guided by mitoPO2 monitoring results in higher tissue oxygen tension including patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Anaesthetists in the intervention group strive to a minimum mitoPO2 of 66 mmHg. Patients in the control group receive standard care. The primary outcome is the difference in means of the mean mitoPO2 during surgery.
- Being tested
- COMET monitoring device
- Keywords
- mitochondria, mitochondrial oxygenation, tissue oxygenation, microcirculation, surgical site infection, wound infection, abdominal surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection, Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
COMET monitoring deviceOther
Cellular Oxygen METabolism (COMET) mitochondrial oxygen tension monitoring device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| COMET monitoring device | Experimental | Anaesthetists for patients allocated to the intervention group were asked to strive and maintain the intraoperative mitoPO2 to the individualised preoperative baseline mitoPO2 with a minimum of 66 mmHg Receives: Other: COMET monitoring device |
| Control group | No intervention | Patients allocated to the control group were treated as per anaesthetist preference and followed our institution's conventional care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean mitoPO2 during abdominal surgery over time
Absolute difference between the means of the mean mitoPO2
Measured: during surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Surgical site infection
Surgical site infection rate according to the CDC definition [1].
Measured: 30 days follow-up
MitoPO2 above baseline
The percentage of surgery time that the intraoperative mitoPO2 is above baseline
Measured: during surgery
Exploration analysis of the correlation coefficients between the intraoperative mitoPO2 and the intraoperative monitoring measurement values
Calculation of the correlation coefficients between the intraoperative mitoPO2 values and the intraoperative values of each monitoring measurement. The measurement pairs are defined as measurements performed within the same time interval. The mean value is used if multiple measurements of the same type have been performed in that time interval. The outcomes are the pooled correlation coefficients of the correlation between the mitoPO2 and each monitoring measure. We going to examine the following monitoring measurements: non-invasive or arterial blood pressure in mmHg, plethysmographic variability index, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, temperature in Celsius, end-tidal oxygen in mmHg, end-tidal carbon dioxide in mmHg and amplitude frequency effect (pulse pressure and heart rate)).
Measured: during intraoperative anaesthetic procedure
The respective effect per intervention in mitoPO2 after notification in which mitoPO2 aids decision making on anaesthetic management
The potential effects of the anaesthetic interventions on the mitoPO2 values is assessed amongst patients from the intervention group. The anaesthetic interventions of interest are only those given to increase the mitoPO2 values. For all these interventions, we look for the difference between aggregated mitoPO2 values over a period before administering the anaesthetic intervention and aggregated mitoPO2 values over a period when the treatment is active. The lengths of the intervals, the time between intervals, and the type of aggregation are based on the observable patterns in the data. The time between intervals is at least the average time for the anaesthetic intervention to reach maximum plasma concentration; this duration may be longer because the effect could be delayed. If possible, we summarise the effect of the anaesthetic interventions by type and dose.
Measured: during intraoperative anaesthetic procedure
Effect when using the COMET in sequentially treated patients in mitoPO2 assessed with a mixed effects model
The relationship between the intervention number of patients from the interventions group sequentially treated by one anaesthetist and the mean intraoperative mitoPO2 value. The effect is defined as the average increase in mean intraoperative mitoPO2 when an anaesthetist treats a new patient from the intervention group.
Measured: during surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2023
- Study start22 Sep 2021
- Primary completion26 Nov 2022
- Study completion26 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mitochondrial Oxygenation MeasurementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel-arm, patient-blinded trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rick Hulskes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Photonics Healthcare B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Rick Hulskes, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- Investigators
- Markus W Hollmann, Professor, Principal investigator, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of AnaesthesiologyStijn W de Jonge, MD, Study director, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05841576
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL77186.018.21
- Other IDs
- NL9505
- Acronym
- AIMED COMET
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 3 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kabon B, Fleischmann E, Treschan T, Taguchi A, Kapral S, Kurz A. Thoracic epidural anesthesia increases tissue oxygenation during major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Dec;97(6):1812-1817. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000087040.48267.54.
PubMed 14633566Fleischmann E, Kugener A, Kabon B, Kimberger O, Herbst F, Kurz A. Laparoscopic surgery impairs tissue oxygen tension more than open surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Mar;94(3):362-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5569.
PubMed 17143850
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Anaesthetic Management Guided by Cellular Oxygen Metabolism Measurements in Abdominal Surgery: a Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05841576
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AIMED COMET / NL77186.018.21
- Keywords
- mitochondria, mitochondrial oxygenation, tissue oxygenation, microcirculation, surgical site infection, wound infection, abdominal surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rick HulskesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Photonics Healthcare B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and healthcare costs. Perioperative low tissue oxygen tension is associated with a high risk of SSI. Standard anaesthetic management guided by continuous monitoring of oxygen delivery with a non-invasive method of measuring mitochondrial oxygenation tension (mitoPO2) using the Cellular Oxygen METabolism (COMET) monitor may benefit the intraoperative oxygenation on the tissue level. This randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel-arm, patient-blinded trial aims to investigate if standard anaesthetic management guided by mitoPO2 monitoring results in higher tissue oxygen tension including patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Anaesthetists in the intervention group strive to a minimum mitoPO2 of 66 mmHg. Patients in the control group receive standard care. The primary outcome is the difference in means of the mean mitoPO2 during surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel-arm, patient-blinded trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| COMET monitoring device | Experimental | Other: COMET monitoring deviceAnaesthetists for patients allocated to the intervention group were asked to strive and maintain the intraoperative mitoPO2 to the individualised preoperative baseline mitoPO2 with a minimum of 66 mmHg |
| Control group | No intervention | –Patients allocated to the control group were treated as per anaesthetist preference and followed our institution's conventional care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients are at least 18 years old
- Patients undergo elective open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery with an expected minimal total incision size of 5 cm
- Patients are able and willing to give written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Known photodermatoses of varying pathology and frequency
- Mitochondrial disease
- Porphyria
- Skin lesions on the upper arm which impede measurements
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or the 5-ALA medicated plaster material
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| COMET monitoring deviceCellular Oxygen METabolism (COMET) mitochondrial oxygen tension monitoring device | Other | COMET monitoring device |
Primary outcome
Mean mitoPO2 during abdominal surgery over time
Time frame: during surgery
Absolute difference between the means of the mean mitoPO2
5 secondary outcomes
Surgical site infection
Time frame: 30 days follow-up
MitoPO2 above baseline
Time frame: during surgery
Exploration analysis of the correlation coefficients between the intraoperative mitoPO2 and the intraoperative monitoring measurement values
Time frame: during intraoperative anaesthetic procedure
The respective effect per intervention in mitoPO2 after notification in which mitoPO2 aids decision making on anaesthetic management
Time frame: during intraoperative anaesthetic procedure
Effect when using the COMET in sequentially treated patients in mitoPO2 assessed with a mixed effects model
Time frame: during surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 14633566Kabon B, Fleischmann E, Treschan T, Taguchi A, Kapral S, Kurz A. Thoracic epidural anesthesia increases tissue oxygenation during major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Dec;97(6):1812-1817. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000087040.48267.54.
- Results publication: PubMed 17143850Fleischmann E, Kugener A, Kabon B, Kimberger O, Herbst F, Kurz A. Laparoscopic surgery impairs tissue oxygen tension more than open surgery. Br J Surg. 2007 Mar;94(3):362-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5569.
- Reference 5. Hilderink B, et al. Mitochondrial oxygen tension in patients after cardiac surgery: preliminary results \[abstract\]. Madrid, Spain: In: European society of intensive medicine LIVES 40, 2022Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Markus W Hollmann, Professor principal investigator
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Anaesthesiology
Stijn W de Jonge, MD study director
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing COMET monitoring device in people with Mitochondrial Oxygenation Measurement and Surgical Site Infection, run by Rick Hulskes at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean mitoPO2 during abdominal surgery over time (time frame: during surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05841576, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2023.