Stress Urinary IncontinenceNCT05842005
Mesh-Reduced Sling For Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence, Efficacy and Durability Trial
A study testing Mesh-reduced Sling in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this pilot study is to report the safety and efficacy of a suture-suspended mesh-reduced sling for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture-based surgical technique for improving SUI symptoms… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 100 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Mesh-reduced Sling
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 100 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Symptomatic stress urinary incontinence
Who cannot join
- Women of childbearing age (0-45 years)
- Previous stress urinary incontinence surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
NorthShore University Health System
Skokie, Illinois, 60076
Henry Chill, MD, 224-251-2374, HChill@northshore.org
Henry Chill, MD
About this study
The goal of this pilot study is to report the safety and efficacy of a suture-suspended mesh-reduced sling for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture-based surgical technique for improving SUI symptoms
- investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture-based surgical technique on key urethral support defects observed with 3D ultrasound Participants will consent to participate following which they will complete pre-operative assessments according to our routine clinical pathway. The participant will then undergo surgery and will be followed up to 12 months post-operatively via symptom assessment and pelvic exam.
Read the detailed description
Women presenting to our tertiary urogynecology clinic with stress urinary incontinence symptoms based on their answers to PFDI-20 questionnaire and deciding to proceed with surgical treatment of SUI will be invited to participate in this study. Baseline screening will include our standard clinical pathway, which includes symptom review and standard questionnaires, standard vaginal and, urodynamic study and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound. If clinical and ultrasound imaging findings are consistent with SUI in setting of normal urethral closure pressure but lack of urethral support that is state of the art indication for mid-urethral sling procedure, patients will be offered this mesh-reduced mini-sling mesh-reduced sling for treating their condition.
For patients expressing interest, the study procedures and consent will be reviewed during this office visit. Consent will be signed at the following pre-op visit. This study will involve no additional pre-operative tests or questionnaires, beyond our routine clinical pathway for women presenting with SUI with or without pelvic prolapse.
Surgical method Patients participating in this study will undergo standard preoperative and peri-operative care, and anesthetic and pain management care, identical than that which occurs for any pelvic reconstructive surgery within our division. Coexisting pelvic prolapse repairs such as cystocele and rectocele repair, with or without hysterectomy, will be performed per routine.
For treating SUI, the dissection will be completely identical to mid-urethral sling. The difference will be instead of passing the mesh through the tunnels on each side of urethra and exiting through rectus fascia, the investigators will use a ¾ x ⅜ inch polypropylene mesh and place it under the mid urethral. This mesh will be suspended by two suspending permanent sutures on each side to the pubic rami periosteum. At this point sutures will be tied down and the vaginal skin closed with a 2-0 vicryl suture.
Postoperative care This procedure entails no additional or specific post-operative activity limitations or care in comparison to the existing baseline pelvic organ prolapse surgeries. The investigators anticipate that all patients will be discharged from the hospital consistent with normal patterns, either on the same day of surgery or after a brief hospital stay, depending on the meeting of postoperative milestones and discharge criteria.
Follow up Patients will return to the office for postoperative visits at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 12 months after surgery. During the 2-month and 12 month follow-up visits, a vaginal exam and pelvic floor ultrasound will be performed to evaluate healing and urethral motion.
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Being tested
- Mesh-reduced Sling
- Keywords
- Mesh-reduced sling, Safety, Efficacy, Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mesh-reduced SlingDevice
In this proposed study, the investigators aim to evaluate the role of using a ¾ x ⅜ inch cm polypropylene mesh suspended by sutures as a mesh-reduced solution for SUI.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mesh-reduced Sling | Experimental | Mesh-reduced sling will improve stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms in women with SUI and normal urethral closure pressure at 2 months and 12 months after surgery. Receives: Device: Mesh-reduced Sling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PFDI-20 score
Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) score indicating SUI symptom severity. Higher values indicate greater distress or worse outcome. The sub-scales score ranges from 0 to 100. The summary score ranges from 0 to 300.
Measured: 12 months post-op
Secondary outcomes (3)
Complication measured by distal urethral swing angle
Investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture based surgical technique on key urethral support defects observed with 3D ultrasound.
This will be measured by distal urethral swing angle during Valsalva measured via pelvic ultrasound.
Measured: 12 months post-op
Complication measured by proximal urethral swing angle
Investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture based surgical technique on key urethral support defects observed with 3D ultrasound.
This will be measured by proximal urethral swing angle during Valsalva measured via pelvic ultrasound.
Measured: 12 months post-op
Complication measured by early and remote post-operative complications
Investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture based surgical technique on key urethral support defects observed with 3D ultrasound.
This will be measured by early and remote postoperative complications.
Measured: 12 months post-op
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stress Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This study is designed as a prospective case series. Our hypothesis is that the mesh-reduced sling will improve stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms in women with SUI and normal urethral closure pressure at 2 months and 12 months after surgery.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Henry Chill, Endeavor Health
- Investigators
- Henry Chill, MD, Principal investigator, Endeavor Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05842005
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EH22-464
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 3 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data will be shared with other investigators listed in the study within NorthShore University Health System.
Publications
Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1;(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
PubMed 26130017Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. Epub 2010 May 17.
PubMed 20479459Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, Albo M, Rickey L, Norton P, Wai C, Kraus SR, Sirls LT, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Chang RP, Richter HE. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
PubMed 25158274Nolfi AL, Brown BN, Liang R, Palcsey SL, Bonidie MJ, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):206.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
PubMed 27094962Frenkl TL, Rackley RR, Vasavada SP, Goldman HB. Management of iatrogenic foreign bodies of the bladder and urethra following pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):491-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.20558.
PubMed 18537142Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, Chai TC, Dandreo KJ, Lloyd KL, Lowder JL, Sirls LT, Lemack GE, Arisco AM, Xu Y, Kusek JW; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):498.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
PubMed 21925636Baracat F, Mitre AI, Kanashiro H, Montellato NI. Endoscopic treatment of vesical and urethral perforations after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2005 Oct;60(5):397-400. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322005000500008. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
PubMed 16254676Giri SK, Drumm J, Flood HD. Endoscopic holmium laser excision of intravesical tension-free vaginal tape and polypropylene suture after anti-incontinence procedures. J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1306-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173926.04596.55.
PubMed 16145408Molden SM, Lucente VR. New minimally invasive slings: TVT Secur. Curr Urol Rep. 2008 Sep;9(5):358-61. doi: 10.1007/s11934-008-0062-8.
PubMed 18702918Palma P, Riccetto C, Bronzatto E, Castro R, Altuna S. What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 May;25(5):637-43. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
PubMed 24170223Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1993 Sep;105(3):781-90. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90896-k.
PubMed 8359649Talley NJ, Fleming KC, Evans JM, O'Keefe EA, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Constipation in an elderly community: a study of prevalence and potential risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jan;91(1):19-25.
PubMed 8561137Riss S, Stift A. Surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome - is there an ideal technique. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):1-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.1.
PubMed 25574075Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E, Holubar SD, Gaertner W, Feingold DL, Steele SR. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Nov;60(11):1121-1131. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000889. No abstract available.
PubMed 28991074
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mesh-Reduced Sling For Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence, Efficacy and Durability Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05842005
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EH22-464
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Keywords
- Mesh-reduced sling, Safety, Efficacy, Treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this pilot study is to report the safety and efficacy of a suture-suspended mesh-reduced sling for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture-based surgical technique for improving SUI symptoms
- investigate the efficacy of this mesh-reduced suture-based surgical technique on key urethral support defects observed with 3D ultrasound Participants will consent to participate following which they will complete pre-operative assessments according to our routine clinical pathway. The participant will then undergo surgery and will be followed up to 12 months post-operatively via symptom assessment and pelvic exam.
Detailed description
Women presenting to our tertiary urogynecology clinic with stress urinary incontinence symptoms based on their answers to PFDI-20 questionnaire and deciding to proceed with surgical treatment of SUI will be invited to participate in this study. Baseline screening will include our standard clinical pathway, which includes symptom review and standard questionnaires, standard vaginal and, urodynamic study and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound. If clinical and ultrasound imaging findings are consistent with SUI in setting of normal urethral closure pressure but lack of urethral support that is state of the art indication for mid-urethral sling procedure, patients will be offered this mesh-reduced mini-sling mesh-reduced sling for treating their condition.
For patients expressing interest, the study procedures and consent will be reviewed during this office visit. Consent will be signed at the following pre-op visit. This study will involve no additional pre-operative tests or questionnaires, beyond our routine clinical pathway for women presenting with SUI with or without pelvic prolapse.
Surgical method Patients participating in this study will undergo standard preoperative and peri-operative care, and anesthetic and pain management care, identical than that which occurs for any pelvic reconstructive surgery within our division. Coexisting pelvic prolapse repairs such as cystocele and rectocele repair, with or without hysterectomy, will be performed per routine.
For treating SUI, the dissection will be completely identical to mid-urethral sling. The difference will be instead of passing the mesh through the tunnels on each side of urethra and exiting through rectus fascia, the investigators will use a ¾ x ⅜ inch polypropylene mesh and place it under the mid urethral. This mesh will be suspended by two suspending permanent sutures on each side to the pubic rami periosteum. At this point sutures will be tied down and the vaginal skin closed with a 2-0 vicryl suture.
Postoperative care This procedure entails no additional or specific post-operative activity limitations or care in comparison to the existing baseline pelvic organ prolapse surgeries. The investigators anticipate that all patients will be discharged from the hospital consistent with normal patterns, either on the same day of surgery or after a brief hospital stay, depending on the meeting of postoperative milestones and discharge criteria.
Follow up Patients will return to the office for postoperative visits at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 12 months after surgery. During the 2-month and 12 month follow-up visits, a vaginal exam and pelvic floor ultrasound will be performed to evaluate healing and urethral motion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This study is designed as a prospective case series. Our hypothesis is that the mesh-reduced sling will improve stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms in women with SUI and normal urethral closure pressure at 2 months and 12 months after surgery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mesh-reduced Sling | Experimental | Device: Mesh-reduced SlingMesh-reduced sling will improve stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms in women with SUI and normal urethral closure pressure at 2 months and 12 months after surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 100 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Symptomatic stress urinary incontinence
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women of childbearing age (0-45 years)
- Previous stress urinary incontinence surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mesh-reduced SlingIn this proposed study, the investigators aim to evaluate the role of using a ¾ x ⅜ inch cm polypropylene mesh suspended by sutures as a mesh-reduced solution for SUI. | Device | Mesh-reduced Sling |
Primary outcome
PFDI-20 score
Time frame: 12 months post-op
Pelvic Floor Disability Index (PFDI-20) score indicating SUI symptom severity. Higher values indicate greater distress or worse outcome. The sub-scales score ranges from 0 to 100. The summary score ranges from 0 to 300.
3 secondary outcomes
Complication measured by distal urethral swing angle
Time frame: 12 months post-op
Complication measured by proximal urethral swing angle
Time frame: 12 months post-op
Complication measured by early and remote post-operative complications
Time frame: 12 months post-op
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 26130017Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1;(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 20479459Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, Kraus SR, Chai TC, Lemack GE, Dandreo KJ, Varner RE, Menefee S, Ghetti C, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Khandwala S, Rozanski TA, Johnson H, Schaffer J, Stoddard AM, Holley RL, Nager CW, Moalli P, Mueller E, Arisco AM, Corton M, Tennstedt S, Chang TD, Gormley EA, Litman HJ; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. Epub 2010 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 25158274Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, Albo M, Rickey L, Norton P, Wai C, Kraus SR, Sirls LT, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Chang RP, Richter HE. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
- Background: PubMed 27094962Nolfi AL, Brown BN, Liang R, Palcsey SL, Bonidie MJ, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA. Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):206.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 18537142Frenkl TL, Rackley RR, Vasavada SP, Goldman HB. Management of iatrogenic foreign bodies of the bladder and urethra following pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):491-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.20558.
- Background: PubMed 21925636Brubaker L, Norton PA, Albo ME, Chai TC, Dandreo KJ, Lloyd KL, Lowder JL, Sirls LT, Lemack GE, Arisco AM, Xu Y, Kusek JW; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Adverse events over two years after retropubic or transobturator midurethral sling surgery: findings from the Trial of Midurethral Slings (TOMUS) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):498.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 16254676Baracat F, Mitre AI, Kanashiro H, Montellato NI. Endoscopic treatment of vesical and urethral perforations after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2005 Oct;60(5):397-400. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322005000500008. Epub 2005 Oct 24.
- Background: PubMed 16145408Giri SK, Drumm J, Flood HD. Endoscopic holmium laser excision of intravesical tension-free vaginal tape and polypropylene suture after anti-incontinence procedures. J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1306-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173926.04596.55.
- Background: PubMed 18702918Molden SM, Lucente VR. New minimally invasive slings: TVT Secur. Curr Urol Rep. 2008 Sep;9(5):358-61. doi: 10.1007/s11934-008-0062-8.
- Background: PubMed 24170223Palma P, Riccetto C, Bronzatto E, Castro R, Altuna S. What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 May;25(5):637-43. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 8359649Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1993 Sep;105(3):781-90. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90896-k.
- Background: PubMed 8561137Talley NJ, Fleming KC, Evans JM, O'Keefe EA, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Constipation in an elderly community: a study of prevalence and potential risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jan;91(1):19-25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data will be shared with other investigators listed in the study within NorthShore University Health System.
Related trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron in Female Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence Who Have Obesity or Overweight
Urinary Incontinence,Stress
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Return to Physical Activity After Retropublic Transvaginal Sling and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse
RecruitingPhase 1
Allogeneic Use of Expanded Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Adipose Tissue (HC106), Female Urinary Incontinence Women Over 50 Years Old
Urinary Incontinence Stress
Recruiting
The Application of Somatosensory Interactive Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Men Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Prostate Cancer (Post Prostatectomy)
RecruitingObservational study
Standardized 4D Transperineal Ultrasound Assessment of Urethrovesical Junction Mobility After Vaginal Laser Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Urinary Incontinence , Stress, Laser Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Henry Chill, MD principal investigator
Endeavor Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mesh-reduced Sling in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Henry Chill, MD ((224)-251-2374, HChill@northshore.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PFDI-20 score (time frame: 12 months post-op). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05842005, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2023.