Dental ImplantNCT05843981
Comparison KS Versus TS
A study testing Implant placement TS III and Implant placement ks in people with Dental Implant and Dental Implant-Abutment Design, run by Università degli Studi di Sassari at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different implant systems with different implant-abutment connection: Osstem TS III (control group) versus Osstem KS (study group). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implant, Dental Implant-Abutment Design
- What is being tested?
- Implant placement TS III and Implant placement ks
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2024to 31 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any partially edentulous patient with partial edentulism, requiring at least two dental implant-supported rehabilitations, being 18 years or older, and able to sign an informed consent. Implant sites must allow the placement of two implants of at least 4 (premolars) or 4.5 (molars) mm of diameter and 8.5 mm of length. Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes/day); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes/day). In case of post-extractive sites, they must have been healing for at least 3 months before being treated in the study. Implants can be adjacent.
Who cannot join
- General contraindications to implant surgery.
- Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.
- Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.
- Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
- Patients with untreated periodontitis.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Previous guided bone reconstruction at the intended implant sites.
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
- Pregnancy or nursing.
- Substance abuser.
- Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
- Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for implant placement.
- Patients with infection and or inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.
- Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol cannot be properly adhered to.
- Patients referred only for implant placement and cannot be followed ant the treating centre.
- Patients unable to be followed for 5 years.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site
Marco Tallarico
Sassari, 07100
Dario Melodia, Dr, 3331226618, dariomld1@gmail.com
Marco Tallarico, Prof, 3280758769, me@studiomarcotallarico.it
About this study
Official title: The Use of an Innovative, Thickened and Lasting Implant Comparing KS Versus TS Implants for Prosthetic Rehabilitations
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different implant systems with different implant-abutment connection: Osstem TS III (control group) versus Osstem KS (study group).
- Conditions
- Dental Implant, Dental Implant-Abutment Design
- Being tested
- Implant placement TS III, Implant placement ks
- Keywords
- Dental Implant-Abutment Design, KS dental implant, Implant-abutment connection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implant placement TS IIIDevice
Also called Dental prosthesis delivery
Implant placement in subjects who have lost at least two teeth and need a prosthetic implant rehabilitation with TSIII Implant. . After osseointegration, dental implants will receive definitive prosthesis.
Implant placement ksDevice
Also called Dental prosthesis delivery
Implant placement in subjects who have lost at least two teeth and need a prosthetic implant rehabilitation with KS Implant. After osseointegration, dental implants will receive definitive prosthesis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ks dental implant | Experimental | Innovative dental implant with lasting, internal conical connection of 15° and strengthened implant walls. Receives: Device: Implant placement ks |
| TSIII dental implant | Active comparator | Standard dental implant with internal conical connection of 11°. Receives: Device: Implant placement TS III |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants with implant failure
Defined as implant mobility and/or any infection dictating implant removal, and/or implant fracture and/or any other mechanical complication rendering the implant unusable. The stability of each individual implant will be measured by the local blinded outcome assessors manually tightening the screws with a torque of 30 Ncm at abutment connection at initial loading. At 1,3 and 5 years after loading, individual implants will be manually tested for stability. Once the single crowns will be screwed, their stability will be assessed by rocking the crown with the handles of two dental instruments.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Number of Participants with prosthesis failure
Whether it will not be possible to place the prosthesis because of implant failure or a prosthesis that has to be remade for any reason.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Number of complications
Technical (fracture of the framework and/or the veneering material, screw loosening, etc.) and/or biologic (pain, swelling, suppuration, peri-implantitis, etc.) complications will be considered.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Rate of peri-implant marginal bone level changes
Peri-implant marginal bone level changes will be assessed on periapical radiographs took with the paralleling technique at implant placement, at initial loading, 1,3 and 5 years after loading. Ideally digital radiographs should be taken, otherwise radiographs on conventional films will be scanned into TIFF format with a 600 dpi resolution, and stored in a personal computer. Peri-implant marginal bone levels will be measured using the Scion Image (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD, USA) software. The software will be calibrated for every single image using the known distance of the first two consecutive threads. Measurements of the mesial and distal bone crest level adjacent to each implant will be made to the nearest 0.01 mm. Reference points for the linear measurements will be: the coronal margin of the implant collar and the most coronal point of bone-to-implant contact. Bone levels will be measured.
Measured: At 1,3 and 5 years
Valuation of patient satisfaction
Patients will answer the following questions (separately for each implant):
- Are you satisfied with the function of your implant-supported prostheses? Possible answers: yes absolutely, yes partly, not sure, not really, absolutely not.
- Are you satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of your implant-supported prostheses? Possible answers: yes absolutely, yes partly, not sure, not really, absolutely not.
- Would you undergo the same therapy again? Possible answers: "yes" or "no".
Measured: At 1,3 and 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2023
- Study start1 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental ImplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Split-mouth
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Università degli Studi di Sassari
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Melodia, Dario, M.D., Pisano, Milena, M.D., Dr. Aurea Lumbau, Meloni, Silvio Mario, M.D., Baldoni, Edoardo, M.D.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marco Tallarico, Università degli Studi di Sassari
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05843981
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UNISS_PHD_Osstem_1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 24 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of an Innovative, Thickened and Lasting Implant Comparing KS Versus TS Implants for Prosthetic Rehabilitations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05843981
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UNISS_PHD_Osstem_1
- Conditions
- Dental Implant, Dental Implant-Abutment Design
- Keywords
- Dental Implant-Abutment Design, KS dental implant, Implant-abutment connection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Università degli Studi di SassariUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Melodia, Dario, M.D., Pisano, Milena, M.D., Dr. Aurea Lumbau, Meloni, Silvio Mario, M.D., Baldoni, Edoardo, M.D.
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different implant systems with different implant-abutment connection: Osstem TS III (control group) versus Osstem KS (study group).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Split-mouth
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ks dental implant | Experimental | Device: Implant placement ksInnovative dental implant with lasting, internal conical connection of 15° and strengthened implant walls. |
| TSIII dental implant | Active comparator | Device: Implant placement TS IIIStandard dental implant with internal conical connection of 11°. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any partially edentulous patient with partial edentulism, requiring at least two dental implant-supported rehabilitations, being 18 years or older, and able to sign an informed consent. Implant sites must allow the placement of two implants of at least 4 (premolars) or 4.5 (molars) mm of diameter and 8.5 mm of length. Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes/day); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes/day). In case of post-extractive sites, they must have been healing for at least 3 months before being treated in the study. Implants can be adjacent.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- General contraindications to implant surgery.
- Patients irradiated in the head and neck area.
- Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients.
- Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
- Patients with untreated periodontitis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placement TS IIIAlso: Dental prosthesis deliveryImplant placement in subjects who have lost at least two teeth and need a prosthetic implant rehabilitation with TSIII Implant. . After osseointegration, dental implants will receive definitive prosthesis. | Device | TSIII dental implant |
| Implant placement ksAlso: Dental prosthesis deliveryImplant placement in subjects who have lost at least two teeth and need a prosthetic implant rehabilitation with KS Implant. After osseointegration, dental implants will receive definitive prosthesis. | Device | Ks dental implant |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants with implant failure
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Defined as implant mobility and/or any infection dictating implant removal, and/or implant fracture and/or any other mechanical complication rendering the implant unusable. The stability of each individual implant will be measured by the local blinded outcome assessors manually tightening the screws with a torque of 30 Ncm at abutment connection at initial loading. At 1,3 and 5 years after loading, individual implants will be manually tested for stability. Once the single crowns will be screwed, their stability will be assessed by rocking the crown with the handles of two dental instruments.
Number of Participants with prosthesis failure
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Whether it will not be possible to place the prosthesis because of implant failure or a prosthesis that has to be remade for any reason.
Number of complications
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Technical (fracture of the framework and/or the veneering material, screw loosening, etc.) and/or biologic (pain, swelling, suppuration, peri-implantitis, etc.) complications will be considered.
2 secondary outcomes
Rate of peri-implant marginal bone level changes
Time frame: At 1,3 and 5 years
Valuation of patient satisfaction
Time frame: At 1,3 and 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dental Implant
Recruiting
Home-Use Dual-Light Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis in Full-Arch Implant Prostheses
Peri Implant Mucositis, Dental Implant Rehabilitation
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Effect of Povidone Iodine on the Dental Implant Internal Surface Microbiome
Dental Implant
Enrolling by invitation
Investigation of the Effect of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin Placed in Tooth Extraction Sockets on Bone Formation
Tooth Loss, Dental Implant Failed
RecruitingObservational study
Movement of Dental Implants During Osseointegration
Dental Implants, Osseointegration
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Lactoferrin Nanohydrogel for Soft And Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability in Immediate Implant Placement
Dental Implant, Wound Healing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implant placement TS III and Implant placement ks in people with Dental Implant and Dental Implant-Abutment Design, run by Università degli Studi di Sassari at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants with implant failure (time frame: Up to 5 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.