HypertensioniHEART-SANCT05846503
iHEART-SA Intervention Study
A study testing 1. Quality and info management system in people with Hypertension and HIV, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
Using qualitative data during the formative phase the IHEART-SA research study filled deficiencies in knowledge regarding: 1) what barriers exist to integrating hypertension care within the HIV care setting in South Africa and, 2) how a hypertension care intervention can be adapted to effectively and sustainably… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, HIV
- What is being tested?
- 1. Quality and info management system
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4,378 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2023to 31 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthcare workers:
- Adult >18 years men and women working in clinical roles at the selected clinics
- Provide informed consent (only those participating in the qualitative components)
- Patients:
- Adults >18 years living with HIV and hypertension
- Enrolled in the study clinic
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients:
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Planning to relocate or change service providers/clinics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Integrating HIV and hEART Health in South Africa Intervention Study
Using qualitative data during the formative phase the IHEART-SA research study filled deficiencies in knowledge regarding: 1) what barriers exist to integrating hypertension care within the HIV care setting in South Africa and, 2) how a hypertension care intervention can be adapted to effectively and sustainably function in this care setting. These data have been used to design a context-relevant intervention package for implementation in the next phase of effectiveness-implementation testing, answering the research question: How does an intervention aimed at enhancing hypertension diagnosis and management in people living with HIV improve the delivery of guideline-recommended care in primary healthcare clinics in Gauteng, South Africa, and hypertension control among patients?
The study will use an effectiveness-implementation study design. This design allows for the testing of strategies to promote integration of proven interventions in real-world practice (i.e., implementation strategies), while simultaneously assessing clinical effectiveness (i.e., patient level outcomes). For this the study will use a randomized cluster stepped-wedge study design where nine clinics (grouped in clusters of three) will be assigned to a time at which they initiate the intervention.
Read the detailed description
Investigational interventions:
Implementation facilitation of improved hypertension screening and management in the HIV care setting through the iHEART-SA intervention model comprising:
- Information management system
- Task shifting
- Audit and feedback
- Healthcare worker education and training
- Patient education and support
Study design:
Cluster randomized stepped wedge effectiveness-implementation type 2 hybrid
Study objectives:
- Assess the short- and long-term effects of an implementation strategy (i.e., healthcare worker intervention) on the adoption and implementation of hypertension screening and treatment among healthcare workers
- Assess the short- and long-term effects of a clinical intervention (i.e., patient-level intervention) on patient blood pressure control among patients living with HIV and hypertension
Duration of participation: 27 months Study duration: 37 months
Intervention audience:
- Healthcare workers (nurses and doctors)
- Adult patients living with HIV from the 9 primary healthcare clinics
- Conditions
- Hypertension, HIV
- Being tested
- 1. Quality and info management system
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
1. Quality and info management systemBehavioural
Also called 2. Case review meetings, 3. Patient health education and support, 4. Task shifting, 5. HCW education and training
- The intervention package prioritizes information and quality management with a focus on HTN screening, diagnosis, and treatment. From the point-of-care, flow charts placed in the patient file will ensure that vitals are performed in accordance with national guidelines.
- The care coordinator will present data to clinic staff in multi-disciplinary meetings, providing an opportunity for programmatic feedback and discussion.
- Patients will be encouraged to complete the vital signs measurements at each clinic visit. They will be provided with their BP readings and given info about what their reading means. They will be issued with pocket sized color coded booklets providing info on the measurement and what to do to control their BP.
- Task shifting: A care coordinator will be the champion of the intervention package for the clinic.
- All staff will receive apt training on how to use the patient flow chart, info management system and how to respond to abnormal BP values.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Other | Cluster of clinics receiving the five investigational interventions Receives: Behavioral: 1. Quality and info management system |
| Control | No intervention | Standard of care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Healthcare worker
Difference in percentage of patient visits with recorded BP measurement between intervention and control clinics
Measured: 24 months
Patient
Difference in mean systolic BP between the intervention and control conditions
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Healthcare worker implementation
% of healthcare workers who implement the iHEART-SA package as intended at month 12 and month 24
Measured: 24 months
Healthcare worker adoption
Participation rate and representativeness of healthcare workers who adopt the BP screening and treatment model
Measured: 24 months
Healthcare worker maintenance - BP measurement
% of patients who had a BP measurement done at every clinic visit
Measured: 12 months
Healthcare worker satisfaction
% of healthcare workers who are satisfied with all components of the intervention
Measured: 24 months
Healthcare worker costing
Costs of each intervention components will be recorded as healthcare worker time, material costs, and healthcare/monitoring equipment
Measured: 27 months
Patient adoption
Participation rate and representativeness of eligible patients who consent to chart review
Measured: 24 months
Patient satisfaction
% of patients who are satisfied with all components of the intervention
Measured: 24 months
Healthcare worker maintenance - BP management
% of patients who had an elevate BP managed at every visit post intervention
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2023
- Study start1 Jun 2023
- Primary completion31 May 2025
- Study completion31 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Randomized cluster stepped-wedge study design where clinics will be assigned to a time at which they initiate the intervention. There are nine clinics which have been classification (low, medium and high) according to their volume. One clinic from each classification has been randomized to a cluster such that there are three clusters each with a low, medium and high volume clinic.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4,378 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Emory University, Massachusetts General Hospital, UMC Utrecht
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Professor Francois Venter, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
- Investigators
- Willem DF Venter, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Ezintsha, University of the Witwatersrand
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05846503
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- iHEART-SA IS
- Acronym
- iHEART-SA
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gala P, Mugala A, Hickey MD, Ordonez CE, Gimbel S, Galaviz KI, Lalla-Edward ST, Kiggundu JB, Henry DA, Mogaetsho GE, Aifah A, Katahoire A, Semitala F, Hirschhorn LR. Models for Integrated HIV-Hypertension Care: Comparative Analysis of Six Integration Approaches from Implementation Research Projects Across Africa. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2026 Jun 17:rs.3.rs-9464167. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9464167/v1.
PubMed 42370263Galaviz KI, Patel SA, Siedner MJ, Goss CW, Gumede SB, Johnson LC, Ordonez CE, Laxy M, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Heine M, Masterson M, Mody A, Venter WDF, Marconi VC, Ali MK, Lalla-Edward ST. Integrating hypertension detection and management in HIV care in South Africa: protocol for a stepped-wedged cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 14;5(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00640-6.
PubMed 39402688
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Integrating HIV and hEART Health in South Africa Intervention Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05846503
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iHEART-SA / iHEART-SA IS
- Conditions
- Hypertension, HIV
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4,378 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witwatersrand, South AfricaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Emory University, Massachusetts General Hospital, UMC Utrecht
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Using qualitative data during the formative phase the IHEART-SA research study filled deficiencies in knowledge regarding: 1) what barriers exist to integrating hypertension care within the HIV care setting in South Africa and, 2) how a hypertension care intervention can be adapted to effectively and sustainably function in this care setting. These data have been used to design a context-relevant intervention package for implementation in the next phase of effectiveness-implementation testing, answering the research question: How does an intervention aimed at enhancing hypertension diagnosis and management in people living with HIV improve the delivery of guideline-recommended care in primary healthcare clinics in Gauteng, South Africa, and hypertension control among patients?
The study will use an effectiveness-implementation study design. This design allows for the testing of strategies to promote integration of proven interventions in real-world practice (i.e., implementation strategies), while simultaneously assessing clinical effectiveness (i.e., patient level outcomes). For this the study will use a randomized cluster stepped-wedge study design where nine clinics (grouped in clusters of three) will be assigned to a time at which they initiate the intervention.
Detailed description
Investigational interventions:
Implementation facilitation of improved hypertension screening and management in the HIV care setting through the iHEART-SA intervention model comprising:
- Information management system
- Task shifting
- Audit and feedback
- Healthcare worker education and training
- Patient education and support
Study design:
Cluster randomized stepped wedge effectiveness-implementation type 2 hybrid
Study objectives:
- Assess the short- and long-term effects of an implementation strategy (i.e., healthcare worker intervention) on the adoption and implementation of hypertension screening and treatment among healthcare workers
- Assess the short- and long-term effects of a clinical intervention (i.e., patient-level intervention) on patient blood pressure control among patients living with HIV and hypertension
Duration of participation: 27 months Study duration: 37 months
Intervention audience:
- Healthcare workers (nurses and doctors)
- Adult patients living with HIV from the 9 primary healthcare clinics
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized cluster stepped-wedge study design where clinics will be assigned to a time at which they initiate the intervention. There are nine clinics which have been classification (low, medium and high) according to their volume. One clinic from each classification has been randomized to a cluster such that there are three clusters each with a low, medium and high volume clinic.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Other | Behavioral: 1. Quality and info management systemCluster of clinics receiving the five investigational interventions |
| Control | No intervention | –Standard of care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Adult >18 years men and women working in clinical roles at the selected clinics
- Provide informed consent (only those participating in the qualitative components)
- Adults >18 years living with HIV and hypertension
- Enrolled in the study clinic
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Planning to relocate or change service providers/clinics
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Quality and info management systemAlso: 2. Case review meetings, 3. Patient health education and support, 4. Task shifting, 5. HCW education and training1. The intervention package prioritizes information and quality management with a focus on HTN screening, diagnosis, and treatment. From the point-of-care, flow charts placed in the patient file will ensure that vitals are performed in accordance with national guidelines. 2. The care coordinator will present data to clinic staff in multi-disciplinary meetings, providing an opportunity for programmatic feedback and discussion. 3. Patients will be encouraged to complete the vital signs measurements at each clinic visit. They will be provided with their BP readings and given info about what their reading means. They will be issued with pocket sized color coded booklets providing info on the measurement and what to do to control their BP. 4. Task shifting: A care coordinator will be the champion of the intervention package for the clinic. 5. All staff will receive apt training on how to use the patient flow chart, info management system and how to respond to abnormal BP values. | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Healthcare worker
Time frame: 24 months
Difference in percentage of patient visits with recorded BP measurement between intervention and control clinics
Patient
Time frame: 12 months
Difference in mean systolic BP between the intervention and control conditions
8 secondary outcomes
Healthcare worker implementation
Time frame: 24 months
Healthcare worker adoption
Time frame: 24 months
Healthcare worker maintenance - BP measurement
Time frame: 12 months
Healthcare worker satisfaction
Time frame: 24 months
Healthcare worker costing
Time frame: 27 months
Patient adoption
Time frame: 24 months
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 24 months
Healthcare worker maintenance - BP management
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42370263Gala P, Mugala A, Hickey MD, Ordonez CE, Gimbel S, Galaviz KI, Lalla-Edward ST, Kiggundu JB, Henry DA, Mogaetsho GE, Aifah A, Katahoire A, Semitala F, Hirschhorn LR. Models for Integrated HIV-Hypertension Care: Comparative Analysis of Six Integration Approaches from Implementation Research Projects Across Africa. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2026 Jun 17:rs.3.rs-9464167. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9464167/v1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39402688Galaviz KI, Patel SA, Siedner MJ, Goss CW, Gumede SB, Johnson LC, Ordonez CE, Laxy M, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Heine M, Masterson M, Mody A, Venter WDF, Marconi VC, Ali MK, Lalla-Edward ST. Integrating hypertension detection and management in HIV care in South Africa: protocol for a stepped-wedged cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 14;5(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00640-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hypertension
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Intraarterial Therapies Plus Tislelizumab Plus Lenvatinib Versus Tislelizumab Plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (Icc)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Intra-Abdominal Pressure, Respiratory Mechanics, and Ventilator Liberation After Emergency Major Laparotomy
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension, Respiratory Mechanics
Enrolling by invitation
MTM2MTG Pilot Ancillary Study
Diet, Healthy, HbA1c
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension
Cystic Fibrosis, Immunologic Deficiency Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Lu-177-DOTATATE (Lutathera) in Therapy of Inoperable Pheochromocytoma/ Paraganglioma
Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Willem DF Venter, MD, PHD principal investigator
Ezintsha, University of the Witwatersrand
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 1. Quality and info management system in people with Hypertension and HIV, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Healthcare worker (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05846503, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025.