AzTrials
AzTrials

Irreducible Atlantoaxial DislocationNCT05847270

Surgical Treatment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation

A study testing Anterior and posterior treatment strategy and Simple posterior approach treatment strategy in people with Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

At present, there is a lack of standardized, large-scale, and high-level evidence-based medicine research on the safety and effectiveness of treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).Based on this, the goal of this prospective randomized controlled study is to systematically investigate the optimal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation
What is being tested?
Anterior and posterior treatment strategy and Simple posterior approach treatment strategy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
11 Jul 2023to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible participants encompass individuals within the age range of 0 to 80 years, without regard to gender.
  • Patients who have received a diagnosis of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) based on preoperative imaging and skull traction evaluation, with a traction weight equivalent to 1/6 of their body weight following anesthesia. These patients are candidates for surgical intervention.
  • Participants who have provided informed consent either in person or through their legal representative (the principal).

Who cannot join

  • Individuals with concomitant medical conditions or diseases that significantly impact surgical treatment, such as malignant metastasis or infectious diseases, will be excluded from the study.
  • Critically ill patients, who are not suitable candidates for surgical intervention, will also be excluded.
  • Patients who actively decline to participate in this research project will not be included in the study cohort.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Shenglin Wang, MD contact

+86 13501380281

pkuwsl@126.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

    Shenglin Wang, MD, +86 13501380281, pkuwsl@126.com

    Shilin Xue, MD, +86 18518982712, shilinx_pku@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Study for Surgical Treatment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation

At present, there is a lack of standardized, large-scale, and high-level evidence-based medicine research on the safety and effectiveness of treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD).Based on this, the goal of this prospective randomized controlled study is to systematically investigate the optimal surgical approach (simple posterior approach and the combined anterior and posterior approach) for managing IAAD, providing insights into the most efficacious and safest course of action. And long-term follow-up will be conducted on patients to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different surgical methods, and to develop diagnostic and treatment standards for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

Read the detailed description

The choice of surgical strategies for treating irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) is still a controversial topic. Surgical approaches under consideration of IAAD encompass the simple posterior approach and the combined anterior and posterior approach. The former offers procedural simplicity but has inherent limitations in the extent of reduction. In contrast, the latter approach holds the potential for a more comprehensive and reliable release and reduction. However, it also presents an elevated risk of infection and surgical complexity. The choice between these two strategies remains a controversy. Based on this, the goal of this prospective randomized controlled study is to systematically investigate the optimal surgical approach for managing IAAD, providing insights into the most efficacious and safest course of action.

Six high-level centers for the treatment of IAAD participated in this randomized controlled study. After rigorous sample size analysis, we plan to recruit 260 IAAD patients into two distinct trial groups: the "Simple Posterior Surgery Group" and the "Combined Anterior and Posterior Surgery Group". By analysing the comprehensive radiological assessment, the systematic tracking of neurological function improvement, meticulous evaluation of specific adverse events and a 12 month post-surgery follow-up we will systematically investigate the optimal surgical approach for managing IAAD.

Besides, this research endeavor has received full ethical clearance from the Peking University Third Hospital (PUTH) Medical Science Research Ethics Committee (IRB00006761-M2023203). All enrolled participants will provide informed consent voluntarily.

Being tested
Anterior and posterior treatment strategy, Simple posterior approach treatment strategy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anterior and posterior treatment strategyProcedure or surgery

    Before surgery, a large weight traction of 1/6 body weight was used to determine the reversibility of atlantoaxial dislocation. After determining that it is difficult to restore the dislocation, a technique of anterior oral release and posterior fixation fusion was used for reduction, with sequential release of the longus colli and longus capitis, the anterior longitudinal ligament, the blitateral lateral mass joints, the contracted soft-tissue mass between the odotiod and the anterior C1 tubercle, and the peri-odontoid ligaments (i.e., the alar ligaments and the apical ligament), followed by posterior internal fixation and bone grafting was used between C1 and C2 lamina.

  • Simple posterior approach treatment strategyProcedure or surgery

    Preceding the surgical procedure, an assessment was conducted utilizing 1/6 weight traction to ascertain the reducibility of atlantoaxial dislocation. Upon confirmation of IAAD, the chosen approach involved the utilization of a specially designed spreader, tailored to the patient's atlanto-axial joint morphology. Upon entering the joint space, the spreaders were skillfully maneuvered to gently open the joint through rotational and prying actions. Subsequently, two cages, pre-filled with autogenous bone grafts, and designed with the appropriate angle and height, were meticulously placed between the Atlanto-axial joints via a posterior approach. This procedure facilitated direct distraction and reduction of the dislocated joint. In the final step of the surgical process, stabilization was achieved by securing the atlas and axis with screws and rods. This surgical approach was selected to address the unique challenges posed by IAAD, with the aim of achieving optimal patient outcomes.

Study groups in NCT05847270
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anterior and posterior treatment strategyExperimentalAnterior transoral release and reduction + posterior internal fixation and bone graft fusion
Receives: Procedure: Anterior and posterior treatment strategy
Simple Posterior Approach Treatment StrategyExperimentalposterior reduction and internal fixation
Receives: Procedure: Simple posterior approach treatment strategy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete Decompression Rate

    Effective spinal cord decompression on MRI, and the arachnoid space between the spinal cord and the odontoid process can reappear.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Bone Graft Fusion Rate

    Evaluation of the proportion of patients exhibiting successful bone fusion between the atlas and axis will be conducted through postoperative three-dimensional CT examinations of the cervical spine. The bone graft fusion rate will be determined by calculating the number of patients with evident fusion relative to the total number of patients enrolled.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Atlantoaxial Reduction Rate

    To gauge the effectiveness of the surgical interventions in achieving atlantoaxial reduction, postoperative CT scans of the head and neck will be conducted. Measurements will be taken of the distance between the odontoid process and key reference lines, including Chamberlain's line (CL), Wackenheim line (WL), McRae line (ML), and atlantodental interval (ADI). The reduction rate will be calculated by comparing the postoperative measurements to the preoperative values, expressed as a ratio.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Incidence of Adverse Events (12 Months After Surgery)

    The primary focus of evaluation is on the incidence of adverse events occurring within the 12-month post-surgery period. This metric is defined as the proportion of adverse events that manifest during the study's duration relative to the total number of patients enrolled. Adverse events encompass a range of critical factors, including but not limited to: Neurological deterioration, Incision infection, Vascular injury, Airway obstruction, Poor reduction, Unplanned readmission and re-surgery, Internal fixation failure, Fusion failure, Surgical-related lower cervical spine deformities.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Improvement Rate of Quality of Life (12 Months After Surgery)

    The quality of life for each patient will be assessed using the SF-12 Health Survey. The improvement rate in quality of life will be calculated based on the preoperative and postoperative differences in SF-12 scores. This indicator offers insights into the impact of surgical interventions on patients' overall well-being and quality of life, providing a vital perspective on treatment effectiveness.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Improvement of Neurological Function

    To assess the extent of neurological function improvement, patients' JOA scores one year after surgery will be compared with their preoperative scores. The JOA improvement rate will be calculated based on the cervical JOA score, employing the Hirabayashi method formula: JOA Improvement Rate = (Postoperative JOA Score - Preoperative JOA Score) / (17 - Preoperative JOA Score) * 100%

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2023
  2. Study start11 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05847270
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2023203
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
14 Apr 2023
Last updated
8 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anterior and posterior treatment strategy and Simple posterior approach treatment strategy in people with Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shenglin Wang, MD (+86 13501380281, pkuwsl@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete Decompression Rate (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in