AzTrials
AzTrials

NeutropeniaNeutroUSENCT05852249

Investigation of the Usability of Neutrocheck Amongst Healthy Volunteers and Healthcare Professionals.

An observational study of Neutropenia and Neutropenia, Febrile, run by 52 North Health Ltd.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study proposes to assess the usability of the Neutrocheck device and test kit amongst healthy volunteers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Neutrocheck is a portable, single-use diagnostic test intended to aid the diagnosis of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis using a finger prick blood… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2023to Oct 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Community sample

Who may be able to join

  • Provide informed consent to participate
  • Age 18 years or over

Who cannot join

  • Known HIV or active Hep B or Hep C infection
  • Phobia of needles or blood
  • Currently undergoing immunosuppressive medical treatment or have received immunosuppressive treatment in the previous 3 months.

About this study

Official title: Neutrocheck Summative Usability Study

This study proposes to assess the usability of the Neutrocheck device and test kit amongst healthy volunteers and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Neutrocheck is a portable, single-use diagnostic test intended to aid the diagnosis of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis using a finger prick blood sample.

Read more

Neutropenia is when the number of infection-fighting neutrophil cells in the blood are lower than normal. It can be caused by treatments such as chemotherapy or by certain medical conditions. Neutropenic sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency that occurs when patients with neutropenia develop an infection. There is currently no way to test for neutropenic sepsis outside of hospitals. Neutrocheck is being developed for use as a self-test by patients at home alongside remote consultation with a HCP or at point-of-care by a HCP. This will allow rapid identification of patients requiring urgent intravenous antibiotics and medical assessment. In cases where Neutrocheck has eliminated the possibility of neutropenic sepsis, patients can avoid unnecessary and stressful hospital visits and valuable hospital resources will be saved.

Participants in this study will be invited to use the Neutrocheck test kit in a setting similar to a home environment to carry out a test, whilst being observed by a study moderator.

The Neutrocheck devices used in the study will be for investigational use only. This study will not be testing the accuracy of the Neutrocheck result, rather if Neutrocheck can be used safely and in a user-friendly way. Results will not be considered valid. Planned study duration is 2 months. This approach will enable us to complete the current phase of development and advance to a clinical validation study of Neutrocheck, assessing the diagnostic accuracy of Neutrocheck amongst users including those at risk of neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis.

Medical subject headings
Neutropenia, Febrile Neutropenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05852249
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paper instructionParticipants in this group will use paper instructions to use Neutrocheck.
App instructionParticipants in this group will use App instructions to use Neutrocheck.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Identification of use errors, close calls and use difficulties associated with selected hazard-related use scenarios and participant's perceived root causes of these.

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Administration of a questionnaire to assess the effectiveness of key information for safety.

    Participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of multiple choice questions related to key safety information for use of Neutrocheck. For example, this includes questions on storage of the device, expiry date and when to contact a healthcare professional. The data collected from the questionnaire will be summarised using descriptive statistics.

    Measured: 2 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Administration of a questionnaire to measure user satisfaction with the use of Neutorcheck

    Participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of interval questions related to user satisfaction following use of Neutrocheck. The data collected from the questionnaire will be summarised using descriptive statistics.

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Comparison of descriptive statistics for task completion rates, measured through observation, between two study groups, one using paper instructions and the other using app instructions.

    Fisher's exact test will be used to determine the statistical significance of the differences in mean values between the two groups. To perform this analysis, we will utilise a statistical software such as R.

    Measured: 2 months

  3. Comparison of user satisfaction, measured through a questionnaire, between two study groups: one group using paper instructions and the other using app instructions.

    Fisher's exact test will be used to determine the statistical significance of the differences in mean values of responses between the two study groups completing the questionnaire. To perform this analysis, we will utilise a statistical software such as R.

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2023
  2. Study startAug 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05852249
Sponsor's protocol ID
NeutroUSE
Acronym
NeutroUSE
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
19 Apr 2023
Last updated
13 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Neutropenia and Neutropenia, Febrile, run by 52 North Health Ltd.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Identification of use errors, close calls and use difficulties associated with selected hazard-related use scenarios and participant's perceived root causes of these. (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in