Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2BraCE-DM2NCT05854433
Brain Structure and Clinical Endpoints in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2
An observational study of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 and Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Nearly two-third of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) report that impaired cognition is among the most disabling symptoms and deeply affects their quality of life. Yet, relatively little is known about how DM2 affects brain structure and cognitive function as brain imaging studies in DM2 are extremely… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2, Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1
- What is being tested?
- Non-interventional study
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Apr 2023to Jun 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Myotonic dystrophy is a rare disease with an estimated prevalence rate of 12.5/100,000 in both myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and DM2. There are no expected gender differences. Both men and women will be selected for this study.
DM 2 Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 30-65 years old
- Diagnosis of DM1 or DM2 is based on genetic testing and/or clinical criteria. If the diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, positive DM2 genetic testing is required in first-degree relatives
- Symptoms or clinical findings of proximal muscle weakness
- Ambulate independently (a cane or walking stick is permitted)
- Able to provide informed consent for participation in the study
DM1 Inclusion Criteria:
- Only individuals who are 30-65 years old will be eligible to participate for the full study protocol
- Diagnosis of adult-onset DM1 is based on genetic testing or clinical criteria. If the diagnosis is based on clinical criteria, positive DM1 genetic testing is required in first-degree relatives
- The onset of first symptoms must be between the 2nd and 4th decades of life
- Symptoms or clinical findings of distal muscle weakness and myotonia
- Ambulate independently (a cane or walking stick is permitted)
- Able to provide informed consent for participation in the study
DM 1 Exclusion Criteria:
- Congenital or juvenile-onset DM1 (onset of first symptom < 20-year-old)
- Individuals with a prior diagnosis of dementia, seizure, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, or other neurodegenerative diseases
- Individuals with active psychiatric illness or alcohol/substance abuse.
- On medications with substantial sedative or cognitive side effects unless the doses have been stable for at least 3 months before the study visit.
- Inability or unwillingness to give written informed consent.
DM 1 and 2 and Healthy Control (HC) Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals with a pacemaker, defibrillator, or metal implanted that is contraindicated for MRI
- Individuals who are claustrophobic
- Individuals with a prior diagnosis of dementia, seizure, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, or other neurodegenerative diseases
- Individuals with active psychiatric illness, alcohol or substance abuse, or dependence
- Individuals with a pacemaker, defibrillator, or metal implanted that is contraindicated for MRI
- Individuals who are claustrophobic
- Major medical illness which would prevent safe testing of MRI or motor function.
- On medications with substantial sedative or cognitive side effects unless the doses have been stable over the last 3 months before the study visit
- pregnancy
- Weight > 400 pounds as the participant could not be properly positioned on the MRI table
- Inability or unwillingness to give written informed consent
- For participants who undergo lumbar puncture procedure: Use of anti-platelet medications within 7 days, use of anticoagulants such as warfarin (Coumadin), history of a bleeding disorders, evidence of platelet count < 150,000 within the last 6 months, or have hardware (i.e., pins, screws, rods, etc.) in the lower back area
Healthy Control (HC) Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 30-65 years
- Ambulate independently
- Able to provide informed consent for participation in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: Brain Structure and Clinical Endpoints in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 (BraCE-DM2)
Nearly two-third of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) report that impaired cognition is among the most disabling symptoms and deeply affects their quality of life. Yet, relatively little is known about how DM2 affects brain structure and cognitive function as brain imaging studies in DM2 are extremely limited. This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of brain structure and function on cognitive and motor performance in patients with DM2 \& DM1 compared to healthy controls. All participants will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate brain structure and white matter integrity, a comprehensive battery of cognitive and motor measures, self-reported questionnaires, and blood collection for brain-based biomarker analysis. A subset of participants will undergo lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection for additional biomarker analysis and validation. This work is critical to inform the development of rigorous clinical trial designs and plan for a longitudinal study to evaluate MRI measures as imaging biomarkers of disease progression and therapeutic response in DM2 \& DM1.
Read the detailed description
Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), autosomal dominant muscular dystrophy, is characterized by late-onset proximal muscle weakness, myotonia, and multisystem features. Although muscle weakness is the key symptom, almost 70% of patients with DM2 report that impaired cognition is among the most disabling symptoms and affects their quality of life. This condition causes severe disability and impaired quality of life similar to those in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).Small literature describes cognitive deficits and cerebral white matter involvement in those with DM2, compared to controls. However, the mechanisms that lead to cognitive dysfunction are poorly understood.
As the momentum of therapeutic development is outpacing our understanding of the central nervous system (CNS) manifestations in myotonic dystrophy, there is an urgent need to identify measures of brain imaging, cognitive function, and biomarkers of CNS pathology that are disease-specific and clinically relevant, and establish relationships of these measures to inform future clinical trial designs in DM2. This study will carry out a comprehensive baseline characterization of 50 adults with DM2 and 50 age and gender-matched controls identified from clinical populations across the US and through the national myotonic dystrophy registry. A subset of DM1 cohort (n=20), aged over 40 years and without contraindications to MRI, will be invited to participate in the full study protocol similar to the DM2 group. All participants will undergo 3 Tesla (3T)-brain MRI to obtain voxel-based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences, a comprehensive Clinical Assessment Battery (CAB) of cognitive and motor measures, patient-reported outcomes, and blood collection for analysis of CNS biomarkers at their baseline visits. A subset of 20 participants will undergo lumbar punctures to collect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens for additional biomarker analysis and validation. Measures of MRI, CAB, and fluid biomarkers will be compared between DM2, DM1 and controls.
Relationships between MRI measures, cognitive and motor endpoints, and biofluid (plasma and CSF) biomarkers will be analyzed within the DM2 \& DM1 group. Validation of plasma and CSF biomarkers will also be determined.
- Being tested
- Non-interventional study
- Keywords
- myotonic dystrophy, muscular dystrophy, cognitive dysfunction, memory, brain, central nervous system, MRI, biomarkers, white matter, neurodegenerative diseases
- Medical subject headings
- Myotonic Dystrophy, Muscular Dystrophies, Cognitive Dysfunction, Neurodegenerative Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Non-interventional studyOther
No intervention will be administered as part of this study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 | Adults with myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study.
To be assessed at the baseline visit: Medical history and a focused neurological examination, brain MRI, a comprehensive Clinical Assessment Battery (CAB) of cognitive and motor measures, self-reported questionnaires, strength and motor function evaluation, and blood drawn for biomarker analysis.
A subset of the participants who agree to have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection for additional biomarker analysis will undergo lumbar puncture procedure. Receives: Other: Non-interventional study | |
| Controls | Healthy individuals who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria for healthy controls.
To be assessed at the baseline visit: Medical history and a focused neurological examination, brain MRI, a comprehensive Clinical Assessment Battery (CAB) of cognitive and motor measures, self-reported questionnaires, strength and motor function evaluation, and blood drawn for biomarker analysis.
A subset of the participants who agree to have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection for additional biomarker analysis will undergo lumbar puncture procedure. Receives: Other: Non-interventional study |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measures of voxel-based brain morphometry
Measures of brain volume will be expressed as a ratio (0 to 1) to intracranial volume to create proportional values of brain volume.
Measured: Baseline
Fractional Anisotropy (FA)
FA is an index of non-uniform movement of water molecules ranging from 0 to 1. Higher values of FA indicate healthy, dense, and well-organized white matter fibers. Lower values of FA indicate less healthy white matter track.
Measured: Baseline
Radial Diffusivity (RD)
The value of apparent water diffusion coefficient in the direction perpendicular to the axonal fibers. The higher RD value indicates high dispersion of water and poorly-organized white matter fibers.
Measured: Baseline
Axial Diffusivity (AD)
The value of apparent water diffusion coefficient in the direction lying along with the axonal fibers. The higher AD value indicates greater extracellular water content consecutively to the impaired white-matter fibers health, and to alterations of axonal water content
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (30)
NIH-Toolbox (TB) Cognitive Measures: Executive Function Domain Scores
Raw scores of Dimensional Card Sorting will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better executive function.
Measured: Baseline
NIH-TB: Executive Function/Attention Domain Scores
Raw scores of Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better attention and executive function.
Measured: Baseline
NIH-TB: Processing Speed Domain Scores
Raw scores of Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better processing speed.
Measured: Baseline
NIH-TB: Language Domain Scores
Raw scores of Oral Reading Recognition Test will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better language domain.
Measured: Baseline
NIH-TB: Working Memory Domain Scores
Raw scores of List Sorting Test will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better working memory.
Measured: Baseline
NIH-TB: Episodic Memory Domain Scores
Raw scores of Picture Sequence Memory Test will be compared between groups. The higher score, the better working memory.
Measured: Baseline
Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) for executive function domain
Scores of TMT - Part B is based on time to complete the test (seconds). The lower scores of TMT-B, the better executive function. For TMT-B, an average score is 75 seconds and a deficient score is greater than 273 seconds. Maximum score is 300 seconds (5 minutes).
Measured: Baseline
Digit Span Scores for attention domain
The Digit Span score is the length of the longest correctly repeated number sequence. Digit Span Score is an indication of intelligence among other tests. The average digit span for normal adults without error is seven plus or minus two (a span of 5 to 9 digits).
Measured: Baseline
Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) for processing speed.
Scores of TMT-Part A is based on time taken to complete the test (seconds). An average score for TMT-A is 29 seconds and a deficient score is greater than 78 seconds.
Measured: Baseline
Memory Domain Scores
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) scores will be compared between groups - Scoring: Different summary scores are derived from raw RAVLT scores. These include RAVLT Immediate (the sum of scores from 5 first trials, i.e., Trials 1 to 5), Learning (the score of Trial 5 minus the score of Trial 1), and Forgetting (the score of Trial 5 minus score of the delayed recall).
Measured: Baseline
Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Scores of COWA will count up the total number of words that the individual is able to produce within 60 seconds. A score of under 17 indicates concern, although some practitioners use 14 as a cutoff for abnormal.
Measured: Baseline
Verbal Fluency Animal Category
Scores of verbal fluency will count up the total number of animals that the individual is able to produce within 60 seconds. A score of under 17 indicates concern, although some practitioners use 14 as a cutoff for abnormal.
Measured: Baseline
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Scores
The BDI is a widely used 21-item standardized self-report questionnaire measuring depression on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. Scores are interpreted as follows: 1-9, minimal depression; 10-16, mild depression; 17-29, moderate depression; 30-63, severe depression. BDI-II scores will be compared between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Scores
The BAI is a 21-item self-report scale typically surveys features of anxiety. In using the BAI, patients rate the severity of each symptom on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely - I could barely stand it). A total score ranging from 0 to 63 is calculated by summing the severity ratings for all 21 items. BAI scores will be compared between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Apathy Evaluation Scales (AES)
AES was built based on the definition of apathy: syndrome of loss of motivation as reflected by acquired changes in affect (mood), behavior, and cognition. The AES is a four-point Likert-Scale response measure (0 = not at all true/characteristic to 3 = very much true/characteristic), composed of 18 items that assess and quantify emotional, behavioral, and cognitive aspects of apathy. We will evaluate AES in both participants and informants.
Measured: Baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10
The possible score ranges from 0 to 20 points in each case. 0 points represent the patient's most severe physical and/or mental impairment, while 20 points represent the best possible state of health.
Measured: Baseline
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores
The SF-36 was used to assess the generic quality of life (QoL). It is a self-report measure with established reliability and validity across a wide range of clinical populations. Scores of SF-36 in each sub-scale will be compared between groups - SF-36 scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Measured: Baseline
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Short Form Scores
The short-form BPI is designed to measure the interference pain has on the patient's daily activities. These scales were selected based on their validity, simplicity, ability to detect the change in pain with treatment, patient relevance, reliability, test-retest scores, and their previous use in pain studies of the myotonic dystrophy population. BDI scores will be compared between groups - Worst Pain Score: 1 - 4 = Mild Pain. Worst Pain Score: 5 - 6 = Moderate Pain. Worst Pain Score: 7 - 10 = Severe Pain.
Measured: Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Scores
PSQI is a self-reported questionnaire that measures seven components of sleep over a 1-month time interval: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. PSQI scores will be collected and compared between groups - The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality.
Measured: Baseline
Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) - Fatigue Scores
The CIS-fatigue severity sub-scale contains eight items scored on a 7-point Likert scale. Scores can range between 8 and 56 with higher scores indicating higher levels of fatigue and scores of 35 or more are considered to indicate severe fatigue. Fatigue scores will be compared between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Plasma Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE)
The N4PE assay simultaneously measures four biomarkers in plasma. The targets are Abeta 40 (Aβ40), Abeta 42 (Aβ42), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP™), and Neurofilament light (Nf-L).
Measured: Baseline
Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE)
The N4PE assay simultaneously measures four biomarkers in CSF. The targets are Abeta 40 (Aβ40), Abeta 42 (Aβ42), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP™), and Neurofilament light (Nf-L).
Measured: Baseline
Plasma phosphorylated tau (P-tau) 181
Plasma P-tau 181 will be measured in DM2 and control groups. Relationships between plasma and CSF biomarkers will also be determined within the DM2 group. Plasma p-tau181 is categorized into three categories: low < 12.03 pg/ml, medium 12.04-19.63 pg/ml, and high > 19.65 pg/ml. High level of plasma P-tau 181 is correlated with neurodegenerative diseases.
Measured: Baseline
CSF P-tau 181
The P-tau-181 assay will be measured in CSF samples. A maximum concentration of CSF P-tau of 60 pg/ml or lower is considered normal.
Measured: Baseline
6-minute walk test (6MWT) Times (minutes)
Among the tools that assess walking ability in muscular dystrophies, the 6MWT offers a good combination of reliability, sensitivity, clinical significance, and feasibility for multi-center trials. We will compared 6MWT between groups.
Measured: Baseline
10-meter walk test times (seconds)
Subjects will be instructed to walk at maximum speed in a long corridor with an even surface over 10 meters with a still-standing start and a "flying" finish. Time to complete 10-meter will be measured between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Scores
The SPPB measures physical function using three components: usual gait speed over 4-meters time to complete five chair rises, and standing balance with a progressively narrow base of support. Each component is scored on a 0-4 scale and summed for an overall score range of 0-12. SPPB scores will be compared between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Step Test - Number of Steps
Participants will be instructed to make as many "full steps" as possible in 15 seconds. Both legs will be tested, one foot at the time. The number of the step will be compared between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Grip and Pinch Strength (kg)
Handgrip dynamometer will be used to test grip strength. The subject will also perform quantitative pinch strength testing with a pinch gauge. Average grip and pinch strength (kg) will be measured and compared between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Nine-Hole Peg Test Times (9HPT)
The test will evaluate upper extremity function, specifically fine dexterity, and coordination. We will test each subject twice, starting with a dominant hand first, then a non-dominant hand. One practice trial (per hand) should be provided before timing the test. Average time to complete the 9HPT will be compared between groups.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2023
- Study start26 Apr 2023
- Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Araya Puwanant, MD, MS, Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05854433
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00065459
- Other IDs
- K23NS125110-01A1
- Acronym
- BraCE-DM2
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Brain Structure and Clinical Endpoints in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 (BraCE-DM2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05854433
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BraCE-DM2 / IRB00065459
- Keywords
- myotonic dystrophy, muscular dystrophy, cognitive dysfunction, memory, brain, central nervous system, MRI, biomarkers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- 26 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Nearly two-third of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) report that impaired cognition is among the most disabling symptoms and deeply affects their quality of life. Yet, relatively little is known about how DM2 affects brain structure and cognitive function as brain imaging studies in DM2 are extremely limited. This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of brain structure and function on cognitive and motor performance in patients with DM2 \& DM1 compared to healthy controls. All participants will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate brain structure and white matter integrity, a comprehensive battery of cognitive and motor measures, self-reported questionnaires, and blood collection for brain-based biomarker analysis. A subset of participants will undergo lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection for additional biomarker analysis and validation. This work is critical to inform the development of rigorous clinical trial designs and plan for a longitudinal study to evaluate MRI measures as imaging biomarkers of disease progression and therapeutic response in DM2 \& DM1.
Detailed description
Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), autosomal dominant muscular dystrophy, is characterized by late-onset proximal muscle weakness, myotonia, and multisystem features. Although muscle weakness is the key symptom, almost 70% of patients with DM2 report that impaired cognition is among the most disabling symptoms and affects their quality of life. This condition causes severe disability and impaired quality of life similar to those in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).Small literature describes cognitive deficits and cerebral white matter involvement in those with DM2, compared to controls. However, the mechanisms that lead to cognitive dysfunction are poorly understood.
As the momentum of therapeutic development is outpacing our understanding of the central nervous system (CNS) manifestations in myotonic dystrophy, there is an urgent need to identify measures of brain imaging, cognitive function, and biomarkers of CNS pathology that are disease-specific and clinically relevant, and establish relationships of these measures to inform future clinical trial designs in DM2. This study will carry out a comprehensive baseline characterization of 50 adults with DM2 and 50 age and gender-matched controls identified from clinical populations across the US and through the national myotonic dystrophy registry. A subset of DM1 cohort (n=20), aged over 40 years and without contraindications to MRI, will be invited to participate in the full study protocol similar to the DM2 group. All participants will undergo 3 Tesla (3T)-brain MRI to obtain voxel-based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences, a comprehensive Clinical Assessment Battery (CAB) of cognitive and motor measures, patient-reported outcomes, and blood collection for analysis of CNS biomarkers at their baseline visits. A subset of 20 participants will undergo lumbar punctures to collect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens for additional biomarker analysis and validation. Measures of MRI, CAB, and fluid biomarkers will be compared between DM2, DM1 and controls.
Relationships between MRI measures, cognitive and motor endpoints, and biofluid (plasma and CSF) biomarkers will be analyzed within the DM2 \& DM1 group. Validation of plasma and CSF biomarkers will also be determined.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 | – | Other: Non-interventional studyAdults with myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. To be assessed at the baseline visit: Medical history and a focused neurological examination, brain MRI, a comprehensive Clinical Assessment Battery (CAB) of cognitive and motor measures, self-reported questionnaires, strength and motor function evaluation, and blood drawn for biomarker analysis. A subset of the participants who agree to have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection for additional biomarker analysis will undergo lumbar puncture procedure. |
| Controls | – | Other: Non-interventional studyHealthy individuals who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria for healthy controls. To be assessed at the baseline visit: Medical history and a focused neurological examination, brain MRI, a comprehensive Clinical Assessment Battery (CAB) of cognitive and motor measures, self-reported questionnaires, strength and motor function evaluation, and blood drawn for biomarker analysis. A subset of the participants who agree to have cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection for additional biomarker analysis will undergo lumbar puncture procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Myotonic dystrophy is a rare disease with an estimated prevalence rate of 12.5/100,000 in both myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and DM2. There are no expected gender differences. Both men and women will be selected for this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Non-interventional studyNo intervention will be administered as part of this study. | Other | Controls, Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 |
Primary outcome
Measures of voxel-based brain morphometry
Time frame: Baseline
Measures of brain volume will be expressed as a ratio (0 to 1) to intracranial volume to create proportional values of brain volume.
Fractional Anisotropy (FA)
Time frame: Baseline
FA is an index of non-uniform movement of water molecules ranging from 0 to 1. Higher values of FA indicate healthy, dense, and well-organized white matter fibers. Lower values of FA indicate less healthy white matter track.
Radial Diffusivity (RD)
Time frame: Baseline
The value of apparent water diffusion coefficient in the direction perpendicular to the axonal fibers. The higher RD value indicates high dispersion of water and poorly-organized white matter fibers.
Axial Diffusivity (AD)
Time frame: Baseline
The value of apparent water diffusion coefficient in the direction lying along with the axonal fibers. The higher AD value indicates greater extracellular water content consecutively to the impaired white-matter fibers health, and to alterations of axonal water content
30 secondary outcomes
NIH-Toolbox (TB) Cognitive Measures: Executive Function Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline
NIH-TB: Executive Function/Attention Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline
NIH-TB: Processing Speed Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline
NIH-TB: Language Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline
NIH-TB: Working Memory Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline
NIH-TB: Episodic Memory Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) for executive function domain
Time frame: Baseline
Digit Span Scores for attention domain
Time frame: Baseline
Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) for processing speed.
Time frame: Baseline
Memory Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA)
Time frame: Baseline
Verbal Fluency Animal Category
Time frame: Baseline
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Apathy Evaluation Scales (AES)
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10
Time frame: Baseline
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Short Form Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) - Fatigue Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Plasma Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE)
Time frame: Baseline
Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE)
Time frame: Baseline
Plasma phosphorylated tau (P-tau) 181
Time frame: Baseline
CSF P-tau 181
Time frame: Baseline
6-minute walk test (6MWT) Times (minutes)
Time frame: Baseline
10-meter walk test times (seconds)
Time frame: Baseline
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Scores
Time frame: Baseline
Step Test - Number of Steps
Time frame: Baseline
Grip and Pinch Strength (kg)
Time frame: Baseline
Nine-Hole Peg Test Times (9HPT)
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2
Recruiting
Investigating Exercise in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 (DM2)
Myotonic Dystrophy 2
RecruitingObservational study
The United Kingdom National Registry for Myotonic Dystrophy
Myotonic Dystrophy
RecruitingPhase 3
The Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Mexiletine PR in Patients With Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 and Type 2
Myotonic Dystrophy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SAR446268, an Adeno-associated Viral Vector-mediated Gene Therapy in Participants Aged 10 to 55 Years of Age With Non-congenital Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1
Myotonic Dystrophy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hair Changes in Females With Type 2 Diabetes Clinical and Trichoscopic Examination
Diabete Mellitus, Female Androgenetic Alopecia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Araya Puwanant, MD, MS principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 and Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measures of voxel-based brain morphometry (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2026.