AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental Health Wellness 1NCT05855564

Implementing a School-based Mindfulness Curriculum

A study testing mindfulness matters in people with Mental Health Wellness 1, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 2 sites in Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The outcomes and implementation processes of the school based mindfulness program, as a universal prevention program in classroom as and support group programs for students with special education needs will be investigated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mental Health Wellness 1
What is being tested?
mindfulness matters
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
800 participants
Where
2 sitesHong Kong
Study dates
1 Oct 2022to 15 Oct 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 8 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • students in participating schools
  • students with parent's consent

Who cannot join

  • student without parent's consent

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Hong Kong2 sites
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Hong Kong, 852

  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Implementing a School-based Mindfulness Program in Primary School Curriculum

The outcomes and implementation processes of the school based mindfulness program, as a universal prevention program in classroom as and support group programs for students with special education needs will be investigated. The study of classroom program will apply quasi-experimental design, comparing the pretest and posttest of seven primary schools with implementation of mindfulness programs with three schools with ordinary school activities only. A total of 800 students will be recruited to receive an eight session mindfulness program in classroom as a universal prevention program. Ten support group for students with special education needs will apply mindfulness programs, and its outcome will be evaluated using repeated time measures.

Being tested
mindfulness matters
Keywords
student mental health, school-based mindfulness training, students with special needs

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • mindfulness mattersBehavioural

    Classroom program will be provided to primary one students in eight primary schools and they will receive an 8 session mindfulness matters program, developed by Eline Snel, delivered by their teachers. Each session lasts for 30 minutes. The program includes mindfulness exercises, psychoeducation, discussion and sharing activities. For students with special needs, same programs will be delivered by teachers or social workers in small groups and each groups has 4 to 7 students. Program content is consistent with the classroom program.

Study groups in NCT05855564
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
School-based Mindfulness programExperimentalEight session of mindfulness-based program based on Mindfulness Matters developed by Eline Snel
Receives: Behavioral: mindfulness matters

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. positive self-perception

    measured by Self-Evaluation Scale for Children. Values from 0 to 80. The higher the score, the stronger the positive self-perception

    Measured: immediately before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. peer relationship

    measured by Assessment Programme for Affective and Social Outcomes (2nd Version). Values from 6 to 24. The higher the score, the better the peer relationship

    Measured: before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention

  2. attitude towards school

    measured by Assessment Programme for Affective and Social Outcomes (2nd Version). Values from 6 to 24. The higher the score, the stronger the positive attitude towards school.

    Measured: before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention

  3. organized, nondisruptive, and nonimpulsive behaviors

    measured by Self-Evaluation Scale for Children. Values from 0 to 70. The higher the score, the higher the severity of problem behaviors

    Measured: before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention

  4. executive functioning

    measured by ratings of parent and teacher of Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, second edition. The scale includes subscales in inhibit, self-monitor, behavior regulation, emotion regulation, cognitive regulation. The higher the score, the stronger the functioning.

    Measured: before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention

  5. creativity

    measured by the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production. The completed drawings are scored according to the following 10 criteria : (1) continuations, (2) completion, (3) new element, (4 ) connections made with a (5) connections made to produce a theme, (6) boundary breaking that is fragment dependent, (7) boundary breaking that is fragment independent, (8) perspective, (9) humour and affective, (10) unconventionality. The scores for all the criteria except unconventionality range d from 0 to 6. Each unconventionality criterion was score d either 0 or 3. The maximum score is 60. The higher the score, the higher the creativity.

    Measured: before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention.

  6. self-regulation

    measured by The Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders (HTKS) task

    Measured: before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention

  7. cortisol

    measured by salivary cortisol (this measure is administered for students with special needs only)

    Measured: before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2023
  2. Study start1 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion15 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
800 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05855564
Sponsor's protocol ID
School
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
3 Apr 2023
Last updated
5 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The funder decided not to share the data.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing mindfulness matters in people with Mental Health Wellness 1, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 2 sites in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

positive self-perception (time frame: immediately before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in