AzTrials
AzTrials

AV BlockDANVERSNCT05856799

Danish Randomized Trial on Leadless vs Transvenous Pacing

A study testing Leadless Micra AV Transcatheter Pacing System and Transvenous Azure XT DR dual chamber pacemaker in people with AV Block, run by University of Aarhus at 2 sites in Denmark.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of life, patient acceptance and exercise capacity with leadless compared to transvenous pacing in elderly patients with new-onset high-grade atrioventricular block. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 75 years and older
Conditions the study is for
AV Block
What is being tested?
Leadless Micra AV Transcatheter Pacing System and Transvenous Azure XT DR dual chamber pacemaker
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
2 sitesDenmark
Study dates
1 Sep 2023to Nov 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 75 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • First time pacemaker implantation on class I or II ESC recommendations for AVB with an expected amount of right ventricular pacing >80% of the time,
  • Age 75 years or older
  • Intact sinus node function
  • Expected survival more than 12 months based on clinical evaluation
  • Able to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Persistent or previous cardiac implantable electronic device i.e., pacemaker, ICD, or CRT.
  • Persistent, or chronic atrial fibrillation
  • Reversible AVB
  • Transient AVB due to ongoing ischemia
  • Heart failure NYHA class III-IV
  • Heart failure with branch block and indication for CRT implantation, irrespective of NYHA class
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Indication for primary or secondary prophylactic ICD implantation
  • Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 3 months
  • Severe chronic pulmonary disease with pulmonal hypertension limiting exercise capacity
  • Expected survival < 12 months based on clinical evaluation
  • Performing high intensity sport
  • Participation in another trial with experimental treatment
  • Contraindication against device implantation (e.g., concurrent infection)
  • Failure to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Denmark2 sites
  • Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus, Region Midt, 8200

  • Department of Cardiology Odense University Hospital

    Odense, Region Syd, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Danish Randomized Trial on VDD Leadless Atrial Tracking With MicraTM AV Transcatheter Pacing System vs Transvenous DDD Pacing in Elderly Patients With AV-block

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of life, patient acceptance and exercise capacity with leadless compared to transvenous pacing in elderly patients with new-onset high-grade atrioventricular block. Consecutive patients with high-grade atrioventricular black and preserved sinus node function with indication for permanent pacemaker implantation according to the latest european guidelines, are included in a prospective, partly patient and accessor blinded and partly open label, 1:1 randomized combined parallel and cross-over trial to implantation with 1) a Micra AV Transcathter Pacing System or 2) an Azure XT DR dual chamber pacemaker.

Conditions
AV Block
Being tested
Leadless Micra AV Transcatheter Pacing System, Transvenous Azure XT DR dual chamber pacemaker
Keywords
Leadless Pacing, Cardiac Pacemaker, Cardiac Arrythmia, Heart Disease
Medical subject headings
Atrioventricular Block, Heart Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Leadless Micra AV Transcatheter Pacing SystemDevice

    Patients are implanted with a leadless Micra AV TPS

  • Transvenous Azure XT DR dual chamber pacemakerDevice

    Patients are implanted with a transvenous Azure XT DR pacemaker

Study groups in NCT05856799
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Leadless PacemakerActive comparatorImplantation with a leadless pacemaker
Receives: Device: Leadless Micra AV Transcatheter Pacing System
Transvenous pacemakerActive comparatorImplantation with a transvenous pacemaker
Receives: Device: Transvenous Azure XT DR dual chamber pacemaker

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Life by SF36

    Self-reported health-related quality of life as measured by Short-Form 36 quality of life questionnaire. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. 0 denotes minimal quality of life and 100 denotes maximum quality of life.

    Measured: 7 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient Acceptance by FPAS

    Self-reported patient acceptance as measured by Florida Patient Acceptance Scale. The scale ranges from 0-100. 0 denotes minimal device acceptance and 100 denotes maximal device acceptance.

    Measured: 7 months

  2. Exercise capacity by 6MWT

    Exercise capacity as measured by 6-minute walk test

    Measured: 7 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Combined parallel and crossover randomized trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05856799
Sponsor's protocol ID
DANVERS2303101
Acronym
DANVERS
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
3 May 2023
Last updated
29 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: In accordance with Danish and European data protection law

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Leadless Micra AV Transcatheter Pacing System and Transvenous Azure XT DR dual chamber pacemaker in people with AV Block, run by University of Aarhus at 2 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Life by SF36 (time frame: 7 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in