Breast Cancer FemalePAC-WOMANNCT05860621
Promoting Physical Activity in Breast Cancer Survivors on Aromatase Inhibitors
A study testing Brief Physical Activity Counselling and Structured Exercise Program in people with Breast Cancer Female and Hormone-receptor-positive Breast Cancer, run by Grupo Lusófona at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are frequently used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, but they have multiple adverse effects (eg, arthralgia), resulting in premature therapy discontinuation/switch. Physical activity (PA) can attenuate these negative effects and improve quality of life (QoL). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Female, Hormone-receptor-positive Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Brief Physical Activity Counselling and Structured Exercise Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2022to Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- post-menopausal women, below 70 years old;
- histologically confirmed hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (stage I, II, III);
- having initiated aromatase inhibitor hormonal therapy following the primary treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, etc.), at least 1 month before being enrolled;
- ECOG-Performance Status 0-1.
Who cannot join
- evidence of stage IV cancer or synchronous tumors;
- uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac or pulmonary disease;
- contraindications to exercise training according to the assistant doctor;
- inability to provide informed consent;
- expected inability to fulfill the proposed schedule.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Portugal1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universidade Lusófona, Campo Grande 376
Lisbon, 1749-024
Eliana V. Carraça, PhD, +351912154907, p4890@ulusofona.pt
Flávio Jerónimo, MSc, +351964562662, pacwoman@ulusofona.pt
About this study
Official title: Promoting Physical Activity Through Supervised vs Motivational Behavior Change Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivors on Aromatase Inhibitors (PAC-WOMAN): A 3-arm Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are frequently used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, but they have multiple adverse effects (eg, arthralgia), resulting in premature therapy discontinuation/switch. Physical activity (PA) can attenuate these negative effects and improve quality of life (QoL). However, most cancer survivors fail to perform/sustain adequate PA levels, especially in the long-term. Theory-based interventions, using evidence-based behavior change techniques, aimed at promoting long-term behavior change in breast cancer survivors are effective, but remain scarce and fail to promote self-regulatory skills and better-quality motivations associated with sustained PA adoption.
PAC-WOMAN will test the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two state of the art, group-based interventions encouraging sustained changes in PA, sedentary behavior, and QoL. Additional aims include examining the impact of both interventions on secondary outcomes (eg, body composition, physical function), and key moderators/mediators of short and long-term changes in primary outcomes. A 3-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial, involving a 4-month intervention and a 12-month follow-up, will be implemented, in a real exercise setting, to compare: 1) brief PA counseling/motivational intervention; 2) structured exercise program vs. waiting-list control group. Study recruitment goal is 122 hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer survivors (stage I-III), on AI therapy (post-primary treatment completion) ≥1 month, performance status 0-1. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline, 4 months (i.e., post-intervention), 10 and 16 months. Process evaluation, analyzing implementation determinants, will also be conducted.
PAC-WOMAN is expected to have a relevant impact on participants PA and QoL, and on the improvement of interventions designed to promote sustained adherence to active lifestyle behaviors, facilitating its translation to community settings.
Read the detailed description
Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are frequently used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, but they have multiple adverse effects (eg, osteoporosis, arthralgia), resulting in premature therapy discontinuation/switch. Physical activity (PA) is safe and should be an integral and continuous part of care for all individuals diagnosed with cancer. There is compelling evidence suggesting that PA plays an important role in improving longevity among cancer survivors. PA effectively ameliorates short- and long-term adverse effects of cancer therapies (eg, comorbid conditions, improves physical fitness and function, attenuates cancer-related fatigue, enhances body image and quality of life (QoL), and decreases cancer recurrence and mortality. PA also allows women to benefit from endocrine therapy while being protected against the related risk of osteoporosis, fracture, and ultimately cancer recurrence or death. Thus, PA in breast cancer survivors, and specifically among women on AIs, is paramount to improve health outcomes, QoL, and prevent therapy discontinuation. However, most cancer survivors fail to meet established guidelines for PA.
Theory-based interventions, using evidence-based behavior change techniques, aimed at promoting long-term health behavior change in breast cancer survivors are effective, but remain scarce and predominantly focused on short-term adherence/outcomes. Also, most interventions fail to provide validated self-regulatory tools or explore meaningful links between PA and patients' values and life aspirations to foster lasting behavior changes. Prior research has shown that internal (better quality) forms of motivation play an important role in PA and behavior sustainability, suggesting that self-determination theory (SDT) can be a valid framework to promote sustained adherence to PA. A need-supportive intervention climate enhances people's wellbeing and their ability to self-regulate and sustain behavior changes. Finally, skills such as self-monitoring, goal setting or action planning have also been identified as important mediators of long-term PA and as core features of effective behavior change/maintenance interventions in breast cancer survivors.
In sum, although regular PA is a promising and safe way of helping cancer survivors navigate their disease, alleviating the growing pressure on the health care system, most cancer survivors do not meet the recommended PA doses. It is a goal of this project to overcome the abovementioned shortcomings, by testing an intervention model informed by solid evidence and a robust theoretical rationale (SDT), provided by qualified exercise professionals, which appear to add value to the treatment process, improving the therapeutic effect and safety of the exercise practice.
PAC-WOMAN will test the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two 4-month group-based interventions aimed at promoting sustained changes in PA, sedentary behavior, and QoL. Additional aims include examining the impact of both interventions on secondary outcomes (eg, body composition, physical function), and key moderators and mediators of short and long-term changes in primary outcomes. A 3-arm randomized controlled trial, involving a 4-month intervention period and a 12-month follow-up, will be implemented to compare: 1) a brief PA counseling intervention; 2) a structured exercise program; and 3) a. waiting-list control group. Study recruitment goal is 122 breast cancer survivors with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (stage I-III), on AI therapy (post-primary treatment completion) for at least 1 month, ECOG performance status 0-1. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline, 4 months (i.e., post-intervention), 10 and 16 months. Process evaluation, analyzing implementation determinants, will also be conducted.
PAC-WOMAN is expected to have a relevant impact on the improvement of interventions designed to promote sustained adherence to active lifestyle behaviors and facilitate its translation to community settings.
- Being tested
- Brief Physical Activity Counselling, Structured Exercise Program
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brief Physical Activity CounsellingBehavioural
The brief physical activity counselling program will comprise 8 sessions (120 minutes each), every fifteen days, addressing the following themes: reasons to change, an introduction to the PAC-WOMAN program and principles, types of physical activity and their benefits, strategies on how to become more active and less sedentary, how to safely practice exercise at home, the importance of social support for doing more physical activity, barriers and facilitators for becoming more active, development of coping plans and strategies to overcome those barriers, establishing SMART goals, self-monitoring, medical aspects related to symptom management in breast cancer survivors, body image and self-acceptance, sharing experiences with role models, and re-evaluating action plans. It will be delivered in a need-supportive interpersonal climate, according to Self-Determination Theory principles.
Structured Exercise ProgramBehavioural
The structured exercise program was informed by the most recent guidelines for exercise prescription and safe practice in cancer populations. A supervised program of 32 sessions (over 4 months), lasting 90 min each, and taking place twice a week, was developed. The program combines aerobic, strength and mobility exercises, and is organized in four mesocycles, with progressive intensity, always adapted according to participants' initial assessments and evolution throughout the weeks. Once every 15 days, a thematic group class will be offered to participants, so that they can experiment and discover new physical activities, and more easily maintain regular practice in the future.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Physical Activity Counselling | Experimental | The brief physical activity counselling (PAC) group will receive a group-based, light-touch, motivational counselling program to promote physical activity. Receives: Behavioral: Brief Physical Activity Counselling |
| Structured Exercise Program | Experimental | The structured exercise group will receive a group-based supervised multi-component exercise program, with progressive intensity. Receives: Behavioral: Structured Exercise Program |
| Waitlist control | No intervention | Patients allocated to the control group (i.e., waiting list) will keep daily routines and standard medical care. At the end of the study, the control group will be offered the structured exercise program. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in Physical activity on Actigraph GT9X accelerometers at 16 months
Accelerometers Actigraph GT9X will be worn in the wrist for 7 days to assess the amount of activity expressed as minutes per day spent in different intensities (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous).
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in Physical activity on Actigraph GT9X accelerometers at 4 months
Accelerometers Actigraph GT9X will be worn in the wrist for 7 days to assess the amount of activity expressed as minutes per day spent in different intensities (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous).
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in Physical activity on Actigraph GT9X accelerometers at 10 months
Accelerometers Actigraph GT9X will be worn in the wrist for 7 days to assess the amount of activity expressed as minutes per day spent in different intensities (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous).
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity on International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-sf) at 16 months
The 9-item IPAQ-sf measures the weekly frequency and duration of PA across three specific intensities (i.e., light, moderate, and vigorous), and time spent sitting during week and weekend days. Scores for weekly minutes of total physical activity, and discriminated by intensity, will be obtained. Total minutes of sitting time will be also obtained.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity on International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-sf) at 4 months
The 9-item IPAQ-sf measures the weekly frequency and duration of PA across three specific intensities (i.e., light, moderate, and vigorous), and time spent sitting during week and weekend days. Scores for weekly minutes of total physical activity, and discriminated by intensity, will be obtained. Total minutes of sitting time will be also obtained.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity on International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-sf) at 10 months
The 9-item IPAQ-sf measures the weekly frequency and duration of PA across three specific intensities (i.e., light, moderate, and vigorous), and time spent sitting during week and weekend days. Scores for weekly minutes of total physical activity, and discriminated by intensity, will be obtained. Total minutes of sitting time will be also obtained.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in cancer-related quality of fife on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC-BR23) at 16 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Five items specifically related to joint, bone, and muscle pain/discomfort, derived from the new EORTC QLQ-BR45, were added provided the specificity of aromatase inhibitors' side effects. Scores generally range from 1 to 4. Higher scores generally reflect worse quality of life.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in cancer-related quality of fife on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC-BR23) at 4 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Five items specifically related to joint, bone, and muscle pain/discomfort, derived from the new EORTC QLQ-BR45, were added provided the specificity of aromatase inhibitors' side effects. Scores generally range from 1 to 4. Higher scores generally reflect worse quality of life.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in cancer-related quality of fife on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC-BR23) at 10 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Five items specifically related to joint, bone, and muscle pain/discomfort, derived from the new EORTC QLQ-BR45, were added provided the specificity of aromatase inhibitors' side effects. Scores generally range from 1 to 4. Higher scores generally reflect worse quality of life.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Healthcare Use
Healthcare use will be assessed by phone interview 6 months after ending the intervention period. Data will be collected on healthcare resources use during the study period, namely number and type of consultations, drugs, medical tests and exams, in-patient stays and day care sessions. Absenteeism will be assessed using participants' reports of their number of absence days or percentage of normal working hours worked, valued at patients' hourly wage. These resources will then be valued using usual official sources.
Measured: 6-month after the end of the intervention
Secondary outcomes (59)
Change from baseline in body composition on bioelectrical impedance at 16 months
Body composition will be assessed using Bioelectrical Impedance, under standardized conditions, by experienced technicians and oversaw by the research team.
Measured: baseline, 4 months (intervention's end), 10 and 16 months
Change from baseline in body composition on bioelectrical impedance at 4 months
Body composition will be assessed using Bioelectrical Impedance, under standardized conditions, by experienced technicians and oversaw by the research team.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in body composition on bioelectrical impedance at 10 months
Body composition will be assessed using Bioelectrical Impedance, under standardized conditions, by experienced technicians and oversaw by the research team.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) at 16 months
Body mass index (BMI in kilograms per square meter) will be calculated from weight (kg; measured with a digital SECA scale) and height (m; measured with a balance-mounted stadiometer). BMI = weight/(height*height).
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) at 4 months
Body mass index (BMI in kilograms per square meter) will be calculated from weight (kg; measured with a digital SECA scale) and height (m; measured with a balance-mounted stadiometer). BMI = weight/(height*height).
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) at 10 months
Body mass index (BMI in kilograms per square meter) will be calculated from weight (kg; measured with a digital SECA scale) and height (m; measured with a balance-mounted stadiometer). BMI = weight/(height*height).
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in cardio-respiratory fitness at 16 months
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed with a submaximal, 8-min, single-stage walking test on a treadmill, involving a 4-min warming up at a self-selected speed, at 50-70% of the individual's age-predicted maximum heart rate, and 4 additional minutes at a 5%-increased workload. The steady-state heart rate at this workload and the treadmill speed, together with participants' age and gender, will be used to estimate VO2max.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in cardio-respiratory fitness at 4 months
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed with a submaximal, 8-min, single-stage walking test on a treadmill, involving a 4-min warming up at a self-selected speed, at 50-70% of the individual's age-predicted maximum heart rate, and 4 additional minutes at a 5%-increased workload. The steady-state heart rate at this workload and the treadmill speed, together with participants' age and gender, will be used to estimate VO2max.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in cardio-respiratory fitness at 10 months
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed with a submaximal, 8-min, single-stage walking test on a treadmill, involving a 4-min warming up at a self-selected speed, at 50-70% of the individual's age-predicted maximum heart rate, and 4 additional minutes at a 5%-increased workload. The steady-state heart rate at this workload and the treadmill speed, together with participants' age and gender, will be used to estimate VO2max.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in strength at 16 months
Handgrip strength will be measured with a handgrip dynamometer. Participants will be instructed to hold the handgrip with their maximal strength. Dynamic muscle strength will be determined for chest press, seated row and leg press, using a 10-repetition maximum (10 RM) test. After a standardized warm-up, gradual load increases will be made until the maximum weight lifted through a full range of motion will be recorded as 10 RM.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in strength at 4 months
Handgrip strength will be measured with a handgrip dynamometer. Participants will be instructed to hold the handgrip with their maximal strength. Dynamic muscle strength will be determined for chest press, seated row and leg press, using a 10-repetition maximum (10 RM) test. After a standardized warm-up, gradual load increases will be made until the maximum weight lifted through a full range of motion will be recorded as 10 RM.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in strength at 10 months
Handgrip strength will be measured with a handgrip dynamometer. Participants will be instructed to hold the handgrip with their maximal strength. Dynamic muscle strength will be determined for chest press, seated row and leg press, using a 10-repetition maximum (10 RM) test. After a standardized warm-up, gradual load increases will be made until the maximum weight lifted through a full range of motion will be recorded as 10 RM.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Stand on one foot Test at 16 months
In the Stand on one foot test, participants are instructed to stand on one foot with their eyes open (both sides are tested) for a maximum of 20 seconds and have their time recorded.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Stand on one foot Test at 4 months
In the Stand on one foot test, participants are instructed to stand on one foot with their eyes open (both sides are tested) for a maximum of 20 seconds and have their time recorded.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Stand on one foot Test at 10 months
In the Stand on one foot test, participants are instructed to stand on one foot with their eyes open (both sides are tested) for a maximum of 20 seconds and have their time recorded.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Sit to Stand Test at 16 months
The Sit to Stand Test consists of standing and seating in a chair as many times as possible with arms crossed over the chest in 30 seconds.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Sit to Stand Test at 4 months
The Sit to Stand Test consists of standing and seating in a chair as many times as possible with arms crossed over the chest in 30 seconds.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Sit to Stand Test at 10 months
The Sit to Stand Test consists of standing and seating in a chair as many times as possible with arms crossed over the chest in 30 seconds.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Timed up and go Test at 16 months
The Time Up and Go Test is used to assess mobility by measuring the time a person takes to rise from a chair, walk 2.44 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Timed up and go Test at 4 months
The Time Up and Go Test is used to assess mobility by measuring the time a person takes to rise from a chair, walk 2.44 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Timed up and go Test at 10 months
The Time Up and Go Test is used to assess mobility by measuring the time a person takes to rise from a chair, walk 2.44 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using angular measures at 16 months
Angular measures of shoulder flexion and abduction will be measured on both sides using a goniometer.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using angular measures at 4 months
Angular measures of shoulder flexion and abduction will be measured on both sides using a goniometer.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using angular measures at 10 months
Angular measures of shoulder flexion and abduction will be measured on both sides using a goniometer.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using linear measures at 16 months
Linear measures will be measured using the Back Scratch protocol on both shoulders with a SECA measuring tape.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using linear measures at 4 months
Linear measures will be measured using the Back Scratch protocol on both shoulders with a SECA measuring tape.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using linear measures at 10 months
Linear measures will be measured using the Back Scratch protocol on both shoulders with a SECA measuring tape.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in pain severity on the Brief Pain Inventory at 16 months
Single items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain severity "on average" and "right now". Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain ever). Higher scores reflect higher pain severity.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in pain severity on the Brief Pain Inventory at 4 months
Single items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain severity "on average" and "right now". Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain ever). Higher scores reflect higher pain severity.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in pain severity on the Brief Pain Inventory at 10 months
Single items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain severity "on average" and "right now". Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain ever). Higher scores reflect higher pain severity.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in pain interference on the Pain Disability Index at 16 months
The 7-item Pain Disability Index (PDI) will be used to evaluate the impact and interference of pain on participants' daily activities and functioning (i.e., family and home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities). Scores range from 0 (no incapacity) to 10 (total incapacity). Higher scores reflect higher pain interference with daily activities.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in pain interference on the Pain Disability Index at 4 months
The 7-item Pain Disability Index (PDI) will be used to evaluate the impact and interference of pain on participants' daily activities and functioning (i.e., family and home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities). Scores range from 0 (no incapacity) to 10 (total incapacity). Higher scores reflect higher pain interference with daily activities.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in pain interference on the Pain Disability Index at 10 months
The 7-item Pain Disability Index (PDI) will be used to evaluate the impact and interference of pain on participants' daily activities and functioning (i.e., family and home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities). Scores range from 0 (no incapacity) to 10 (total incapacity). Higher scores reflect higher pain interference with daily activities.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in sleep quality on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 16 months
The 19-item Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) will be used to measure sleep duration (total hours of sleep) and sleep disturbance components of sleep quality (scores range from 0 (no problems to sleep) to 3 (problems > 3 days/week). Higher scores represent poorer sleep quality (less problems) in general. Overall sleep quality is scores from 1 (very bad) to 4 (very good). Higher scores reflect greater sleep quality.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in sleep quality on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 4 months
The 19-item Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) will be used to measure sleep duration (total hours of sleep) and sleep disturbance components of sleep quality (scores range from 0 (no problems to sleep) to 3 (problems > 3 days/week). Higher scores represent poorer sleep quality (less problems) in general. Overall sleep quality is scores from 1 (very bad) to 4 (very good). Higher scores reflect greater sleep quality.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in sleep quality on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 10 months
The 19-item Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) will be used to measure sleep duration (total hours of sleep) and sleep disturbance components of sleep quality (scores range from 0 (no problems to sleep) to 3 (problems > 3 days/week). Higher scores represent poorer sleep quality (less problems) in general. Overall sleep quality is scores from 1 (very bad) to 4 (very good). Higher scores reflect greater sleep quality.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in Body Image on the Body Image Scale at 16 months
The 10-item Body Image Scale (BIS) will be used to assess participants' affective (e.g., feeling self-conscious), behavioral (e.g., difficulty at looking at the naked body), and cognitive (e.g., satisfaction with appearance) dimensions of body image. Scores range from 1 (nothing at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores reflect poorer body image.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in Body Image on the Body Image Scale at 4 months
The 10-item Body Image Scale (BIS) will be used to assess participants' affective (e.g., feeling self-conscious), behavioral (e.g., difficulty at looking at the naked body), and cognitive (e.g., satisfaction with appearance) dimensions of body image. Scores range from 1 (nothing at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores reflect poorer body image.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in Body Image on the Body Image Scale at 10 months
The 10-item Body Image Scale (BIS) will be used to assess participants' affective (e.g., feeling self-conscious), behavioral (e.g., difficulty at looking at the naked body), and cognitive (e.g., satisfaction with appearance) dimensions of body image. Scores range from 1 (nothing at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores reflect poorer body image.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 16 months
The 7-item depression subscale from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure depression. Scores range from 1 (no time at all) to 4 (most of the time). Higher scores reflect greater depressive symptoms.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 4 months
The 7-item depression subscale from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure depression. Scores range from 1 (no time at all) to 4 (most of the time). Higher scores reflect greater depressive symptoms.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 10 months
The 7-item depression subscale from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure depression. Scores range from 1 (no time at all) to 4 (most of the time). Higher scores reflect greater depressive symptoms.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in psychological well-being at 16 months
The various dimensions of psychological well-being will be assessed using 4 items, asking participants to rate their overall satisfaction with life, optimism, and purpose of life and daily activities. Scores range from 1 (not at all) to 10 (completely). Higher scores mean greater psychological well-being and life satisfaction.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in psychological well-being at 4 months
The various dimensions of psychological well-being will be assessed using 4 items, asking participants to rate their overall satisfaction with life, optimism, and purpose of life and daily activities. Scores range from 1 (not at all) to 10 (completely). Higher scores mean greater psychological well-being and life satisfaction.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in psychological well-being at 10 months
The various dimensions of psychological well-being will be assessed using 4 items, asking participants to rate their overall satisfaction with life, optimism, and purpose of life and daily activities. Scores range from 1 (not at all) to 10 (completely). Higher scores mean greater psychological well-being and life satisfaction.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in exercise motivations on the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 at 16 months
The 24-item Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3) will be used to measure the six forms of motivation proposed by self-determination theory - amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation. Scores range from 1 ("Strongly Disagree) to 4 ("Strongly Agree"). Higher scores reflect greater levels of the respective form of motivation.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in exercise motivations on the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 at 4 months
The 24-item Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3) will be used to measure the six forms of motivation proposed by self-determination theory - amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation. Scores range from 1 ("Strongly Disagree) to 4 ("Strongly Agree"). Higher scores reflect greater levels of the respective form of motivation.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in exercise motivations on the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 at 10 months
The 24-item Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3) will be used to measure the six forms of motivation proposed by self-determination theory - amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation. Scores range from 1 ("Strongly Disagree) to 4 ("Strongly Agree"). Higher scores reflect greater levels of the respective form of motivation.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in Exercise Needs Satisfaction and Frustration at 16 months
The 24-item Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) will be used to assess satisfaction/frustration of the three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) for exercise. Scores range from one ("Totally disagree") to five ("Totally agree"). Higher scores mean higher levels of satisfaction/frustration in the respective subscales.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in Exercise Needs Satisfaction and Frustration at 4 months
The 24-item Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) will be used to assess satisfaction/frustration of the three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) for exercise. Scores range from one ("Totally disagree") to five ("Totally agree"). Higher scores mean higher levels of satisfaction/frustration in the respective subscales.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in Exercise Needs Satisfaction and Frustration at 10 months
The 24-item Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS) will be used to assess satisfaction/frustration of the three basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) for exercise. Scores range from one ("Totally disagree") to five ("Totally agree"). Higher scores mean higher levels of satisfaction/frustration in the respective subscales.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in Affective Response to Exercise at 16 months
The Feeling Scale (FS) is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ("Very bad") to +5 ("Very good"), which assesses the affective valence of exercise.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in Affective Response to Exercise at 4 months
The Feeling Scale (FS) is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ("Very bad") to +5 ("Very good"), which assesses the affective valence of exercise.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in Affective Response to Exercise at 10 months
The Feeling Scale (FS) is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ("Very bad") to +5 ("Very good"), which assesses the affective valence of exercise.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in Exercise Self-Efficacy at 16 months
The 9-item Modified Bandura's Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale will be used to measure how certain participants are/were that they would practice exercise under different conditions or restrictions. Scores range from 1 ("Very sure") to 4 ("Not at all sure"). Higher scores reflect lower exercise self-efficacy.
Measured: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in Exercise Self-Efficacy at 4 months
The 9-item Modified Bandura's Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale will be used to measure how certain participants are/were that they would practice exercise under different conditions or restrictions. Scores range from 1 ("Very sure") to 4 ("Not at all sure"). Higher scores reflect lower exercise self-efficacy.
Measured: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in Exercise Self-Efficacy at 10 months
The 9-item Modified Bandura's Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale will be used to measure how certain participants are/were that they would practice exercise under different conditions or restrictions. Scores range from 1 ("Very sure") to 4 ("Not at all sure"). Higher scores reflect lower exercise self-efficacy.
Measured: baseline and 10 months
Self-regulation skills
Action planning (i.e., when, where, what to do, and how often exercise) and coping planning (i.e., how to cope with setbacks and what to do to act according to one's intentions to exercise) will be assessed the Action Planning and the Coping Planning scales, comprising 5 items each. Action control will be measured with 6 items addressing its different facets, (i.e., self-monitoring, awareness of standards, and self-regulatory effort). Scores range from 1 ("Completely disagree") to 4 ("Totally agree"). Higher scores reflect greater self-regulation skills.
Measured: 4 months (intervention's end), 10 and 16 months
Perceived intervention climate
Participants perception of the facilitators interpersonal behaviors will be measured with the Interpersonal Behaviors Questionnaire (IBQ), a 24-item instrument including three support subscales - perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness support - and three thwarting subscales - perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness thwarting. Scores range from 1 ("do not agree at all") to 7 ("completely agree"). Higher scores reflect greater support/thwarting in the respective subscales.
Measured: 4 months (intervention's end)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2023
- Study start5 Jan 2022
- Primary completionFeb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A 3-arm randomized controlled trial, involving a 4-month intervention period and a 12-month follow-up, will be implemented to compare: 1) a brief PA counseling intervention; 2) a structured exercise program; and 3) a waiting-list control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo Lusófona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eliana V. Carraça, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidade Lusófona, Faculdade de Educação Física e Desporto, Lisboa, Portugal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05860621
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PAC-WOMAN
- Other IDs
- PTDC/SAU-DES/2865/2020
- Acronym
- PAC-WOMAN
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 16 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Franco S, Carraca EV, Nobre I, Rodrigues B, Silva CS, Silva MN. Implementing physical activity counselling versus structured exercise for breast cancer survivors in the PAC-WOMAN trial: mapping TICD-based determinants to the behaviour change wheel. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 Jul 31;26(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-15143-4.
PubMed 42968066Franco S, Carraca EV, Nobre I, Rodrigues B, Ilharco V, Kahlert L, Silva MN. Developing and testing the feasibility of a theory-based brief counseling intervention to promote physical activity in breast cancer survivors enrolled in the PAC-WOMAN trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jan 11;11(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01587-0.
PubMed 39799368Carraca EV, Rodrigues B, Franco S, Nobre I, Jeronimo F, Ilharco V, Gabriel F, Ribeiro L, Palmeira AL, Silva MN. Promoting physical activity through supervised vs motivational behavior change interventions in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors (PAC-WOMAN): protocol for a 3-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11137-1.
PubMed 37407950
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Promoting Physical Activity Through Supervised vs Motivational Behavior Change Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivors on Aromatase Inhibitors (PAC-WOMAN): A 3-arm Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05860621
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAC-WOMAN / PAC-WOMAN
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo LusófonaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are frequently used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, but they have multiple adverse effects (eg, arthralgia), resulting in premature therapy discontinuation/switch. Physical activity (PA) can attenuate these negative effects and improve quality of life (QoL). However, most cancer survivors fail to perform/sustain adequate PA levels, especially in the long-term. Theory-based interventions, using evidence-based behavior change techniques, aimed at promoting long-term behavior change in breast cancer survivors are effective, but remain scarce and fail to promote self-regulatory skills and better-quality motivations associated with sustained PA adoption.
PAC-WOMAN will test the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two state of the art, group-based interventions encouraging sustained changes in PA, sedentary behavior, and QoL. Additional aims include examining the impact of both interventions on secondary outcomes (eg, body composition, physical function), and key moderators/mediators of short and long-term changes in primary outcomes. A 3-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial, involving a 4-month intervention and a 12-month follow-up, will be implemented, in a real exercise setting, to compare: 1) brief PA counseling/motivational intervention; 2) structured exercise program vs. waiting-list control group. Study recruitment goal is 122 hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer survivors (stage I-III), on AI therapy (post-primary treatment completion) ≥1 month, performance status 0-1. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline, 4 months (i.e., post-intervention), 10 and 16 months. Process evaluation, analyzing implementation determinants, will also be conducted.
PAC-WOMAN is expected to have a relevant impact on participants PA and QoL, and on the improvement of interventions designed to promote sustained adherence to active lifestyle behaviors, facilitating its translation to community settings.
Detailed description
Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are frequently used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, but they have multiple adverse effects (eg, osteoporosis, arthralgia), resulting in premature therapy discontinuation/switch. Physical activity (PA) is safe and should be an integral and continuous part of care for all individuals diagnosed with cancer. There is compelling evidence suggesting that PA plays an important role in improving longevity among cancer survivors. PA effectively ameliorates short- and long-term adverse effects of cancer therapies (eg, comorbid conditions, improves physical fitness and function, attenuates cancer-related fatigue, enhances body image and quality of life (QoL), and decreases cancer recurrence and mortality. PA also allows women to benefit from endocrine therapy while being protected against the related risk of osteoporosis, fracture, and ultimately cancer recurrence or death. Thus, PA in breast cancer survivors, and specifically among women on AIs, is paramount to improve health outcomes, QoL, and prevent therapy discontinuation. However, most cancer survivors fail to meet established guidelines for PA.
Theory-based interventions, using evidence-based behavior change techniques, aimed at promoting long-term health behavior change in breast cancer survivors are effective, but remain scarce and predominantly focused on short-term adherence/outcomes. Also, most interventions fail to provide validated self-regulatory tools or explore meaningful links between PA and patients' values and life aspirations to foster lasting behavior changes. Prior research has shown that internal (better quality) forms of motivation play an important role in PA and behavior sustainability, suggesting that self-determination theory (SDT) can be a valid framework to promote sustained adherence to PA. A need-supportive intervention climate enhances people's wellbeing and their ability to self-regulate and sustain behavior changes. Finally, skills such as self-monitoring, goal setting or action planning have also been identified as important mediators of long-term PA and as core features of effective behavior change/maintenance interventions in breast cancer survivors.
In sum, although regular PA is a promising and safe way of helping cancer survivors navigate their disease, alleviating the growing pressure on the health care system, most cancer survivors do not meet the recommended PA doses. It is a goal of this project to overcome the abovementioned shortcomings, by testing an intervention model informed by solid evidence and a robust theoretical rationale (SDT), provided by qualified exercise professionals, which appear to add value to the treatment process, improving the therapeutic effect and safety of the exercise practice.
PAC-WOMAN will test the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two 4-month group-based interventions aimed at promoting sustained changes in PA, sedentary behavior, and QoL. Additional aims include examining the impact of both interventions on secondary outcomes (eg, body composition, physical function), and key moderators and mediators of short and long-term changes in primary outcomes. A 3-arm randomized controlled trial, involving a 4-month intervention period and a 12-month follow-up, will be implemented to compare: 1) a brief PA counseling intervention; 2) a structured exercise program; and 3) a. waiting-list control group. Study recruitment goal is 122 breast cancer survivors with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (stage I-III), on AI therapy (post-primary treatment completion) for at least 1 month, ECOG performance status 0-1. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline, 4 months (i.e., post-intervention), 10 and 16 months. Process evaluation, analyzing implementation determinants, will also be conducted.
PAC-WOMAN is expected to have a relevant impact on the improvement of interventions designed to promote sustained adherence to active lifestyle behaviors and facilitate its translation to community settings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- A 3-arm randomized controlled trial, involving a 4-month intervention period and a 12-month follow-up, will be implemented to compare: 1) a brief PA counseling intervention; 2) a structured exercise program; and 3) a waiting-list control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Physical Activity Counselling | Experimental | Behavioral: Brief Physical Activity CounsellingThe brief physical activity counselling (PAC) group will receive a group-based, light-touch, motivational counselling program to promote physical activity. |
| Structured Exercise Program | Experimental | Behavioral: Structured Exercise ProgramThe structured exercise group will receive a group-based supervised multi-component exercise program, with progressive intensity. |
| Waitlist control | No intervention | –Patients allocated to the control group (i.e., waiting list) will keep daily routines and standard medical care. At the end of the study, the control group will be offered the structured exercise program. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- post-menopausal women, below 70 years old;
- histologically confirmed hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (stage I, II, III);
- having initiated aromatase inhibitor hormonal therapy following the primary treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, etc.), at least 1 month before being enrolled;
- ECOG-Performance Status 0-1.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- evidence of stage IV cancer or synchronous tumors;
- uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac or pulmonary disease;
- contraindications to exercise training according to the assistant doctor;
- inability to provide informed consent;
- expected inability to fulfill the proposed schedule.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Physical Activity CounsellingThe brief physical activity counselling program will comprise 8 sessions (120 minutes each), every fifteen days, addressing the following themes: reasons to change, an introduction to the PAC-WOMAN program and principles, types of physical activity and their benefits, strategies on how to become more active and less sedentary, how to safely practice exercise at home, the importance of social support for doing more physical activity, barriers and facilitators for becoming more active, development of coping plans and strategies to overcome those barriers, establishing SMART goals, self-monitoring, medical aspects related to symptom management in breast cancer survivors, body image and self-acceptance, sharing experiences with role models, and re-evaluating action plans. It will be delivered in a need-supportive interpersonal climate, according to Self-Determination Theory principles. | Behavioural | Brief Physical Activity Counselling |
| Structured Exercise ProgramThe structured exercise program was informed by the most recent guidelines for exercise prescription and safe practice in cancer populations. A supervised program of 32 sessions (over 4 months), lasting 90 min each, and taking place twice a week, was developed. The program combines aerobic, strength and mobility exercises, and is organized in four mesocycles, with progressive intensity, always adapted according to participants' initial assessments and evolution throughout the weeks. Once every 15 days, a thematic group class will be offered to participants, so that they can experiment and discover new physical activities, and more easily maintain regular practice in the future. | Behavioural | Structured Exercise Program |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in Physical activity on Actigraph GT9X accelerometers at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Accelerometers Actigraph GT9X will be worn in the wrist for 7 days to assess the amount of activity expressed as minutes per day spent in different intensities (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous).
Change from baseline in Physical activity on Actigraph GT9X accelerometers at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Accelerometers Actigraph GT9X will be worn in the wrist for 7 days to assess the amount of activity expressed as minutes per day spent in different intensities (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous).
Change from baseline in Physical activity on Actigraph GT9X accelerometers at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Accelerometers Actigraph GT9X will be worn in the wrist for 7 days to assess the amount of activity expressed as minutes per day spent in different intensities (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous).
Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity on International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-sf) at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
The 9-item IPAQ-sf measures the weekly frequency and duration of PA across three specific intensities (i.e., light, moderate, and vigorous), and time spent sitting during week and weekend days. Scores for weekly minutes of total physical activity, and discriminated by intensity, will be obtained. Total minutes of sitting time will be also obtained.
Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity on International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-sf) at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
The 9-item IPAQ-sf measures the weekly frequency and duration of PA across three specific intensities (i.e., light, moderate, and vigorous), and time spent sitting during week and weekend days. Scores for weekly minutes of total physical activity, and discriminated by intensity, will be obtained. Total minutes of sitting time will be also obtained.
Change from baseline in self-reported physical activity on International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-sf) at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
The 9-item IPAQ-sf measures the weekly frequency and duration of PA across three specific intensities (i.e., light, moderate, and vigorous), and time spent sitting during week and weekend days. Scores for weekly minutes of total physical activity, and discriminated by intensity, will be obtained. Total minutes of sitting time will be also obtained.
Change from baseline in cancer-related quality of fife on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC-BR23) at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Five items specifically related to joint, bone, and muscle pain/discomfort, derived from the new EORTC QLQ-BR45, were added provided the specificity of aromatase inhibitors' side effects. Scores generally range from 1 to 4. Higher scores generally reflect worse quality of life.
Change from baseline in cancer-related quality of fife on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC-BR23) at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Five items specifically related to joint, bone, and muscle pain/discomfort, derived from the new EORTC QLQ-BR45, were added provided the specificity of aromatase inhibitors' side effects. Scores generally range from 1 to 4. Higher scores generally reflect worse quality of life.
Change from baseline in cancer-related quality of fife on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC-BR23) at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Five items specifically related to joint, bone, and muscle pain/discomfort, derived from the new EORTC QLQ-BR45, were added provided the specificity of aromatase inhibitors' side effects. Scores generally range from 1 to 4. Higher scores generally reflect worse quality of life.
Healthcare Use
Time frame: 6-month after the end of the intervention
Healthcare use will be assessed by phone interview 6 months after ending the intervention period. Data will be collected on healthcare resources use during the study period, namely number and type of consultations, drugs, medical tests and exams, in-patient stays and day care sessions. Absenteeism will be assessed using participants' reports of their number of absence days or percentage of normal working hours worked, valued at patients' hourly wage. These resources will then be valued using usual official sources.
59 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in body composition on bioelectrical impedance at 16 months
Time frame: baseline, 4 months (intervention's end), 10 and 16 months
Change from baseline in body composition on bioelectrical impedance at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in body composition on bioelectrical impedance at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in cardio-respiratory fitness at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in cardio-respiratory fitness at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in cardio-respiratory fitness at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in strength at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in strength at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in strength at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Stand on one foot Test at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Stand on one foot Test at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Stand on one foot Test at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Sit to Stand Test at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Sit to Stand Test at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Sit to Stand Test at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Timed up and go Test at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Timed up and go Test at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in physical function on the Timed up and go Test at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using angular measures at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using angular measures at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using angular measures at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using linear measures at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using linear measures at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in flexibility using linear measures at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in pain severity on the Brief Pain Inventory at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in pain severity on the Brief Pain Inventory at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in pain severity on the Brief Pain Inventory at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in pain interference on the Pain Disability Index at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in pain interference on the Pain Disability Index at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in pain interference on the Pain Disability Index at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in sleep quality on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in sleep quality on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in sleep quality on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in Body Image on the Body Image Scale at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Change from baseline in Body Image on the Body Image Scale at 4 months
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Change from baseline in Body Image on the Body Image Scale at 10 months
Time frame: baseline and 10 months
Change from baseline in depressive symptoms on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 16 months
Time frame: baseline and 16 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42968066Franco S, Carraca EV, Nobre I, Rodrigues B, Silva CS, Silva MN. Implementing physical activity counselling versus structured exercise for breast cancer survivors in the PAC-WOMAN trial: mapping TICD-based determinants to the behaviour change wheel. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 Jul 31;26(1):1501. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-15143-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39799368Franco S, Carraca EV, Nobre I, Rodrigues B, Ilharco V, Kahlert L, Silva MN. Developing and testing the feasibility of a theory-based brief counseling intervention to promote physical activity in breast cancer survivors enrolled in the PAC-WOMAN trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jan 11;11(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01587-0.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37407950Carraca EV, Rodrigues B, Franco S, Nobre I, Jeronimo F, Ilharco V, Gabriel F, Ribeiro L, Palmeira AL, Silva MN. Promoting physical activity through supervised vs motivational behavior change interventions in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors (PAC-WOMAN): protocol for a 3-arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11137-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer Female
Recruiting
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of XL309 (ISM3091) Alone and in Combination in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of CG-7321 Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eliana V. Carraça, PhD principal investigator
Universidade Lusófona, Faculdade de Educação Física e Desporto, Lisboa, Portugal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Brief Physical Activity Counselling and Structured Exercise Program in people with Breast Cancer Female and Hormone-receptor-positive Breast Cancer, run by Grupo Lusófona at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eliana V. Carraça, PhD (+315912154907, p4890@ulusofona.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in Physical activity on Actigraph GT9X accelerometers at 16 months (time frame: baseline and 16 months). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05860621, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2023.