AzTrials
AzTrials

Functional Movement DisorderNCT05861882

ASSESSMENT OF THE HANDBALL PLAYERS

An observational study of Functional Movement Disorder and Sport Injury, run by Kırıkkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

''This study aims to determine the relationship between functional movement screen (FMS), core stabilization and Y balance test. The study will include evaluations on 30 handball players and 30 sedentary individuals.'' Functional movement analysis is a biomechanical screening and evaluation system to identify… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 22 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Functional Movement Disorder, Sport Injury
What is being tested?
functional movement screen, survey application and Y balance test
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Sep 2021to 5 Aug 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 22 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: 30 young people licensed by the Turkish Handball Federation handball players and 30 sedentary young volunteers participated.

Who may be able to join

  • Being a licensed handball athlete
  • Not having undergone a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months
  • Not having any obstacle to perform the tests to be performed within the study
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Feeling any discomfort during the tests
  • Not wanting to continue working

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Süleyman Demirel University

    Isparta

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: THE CORRELATİON BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS AND CORE STABILISATION AND Y BALANCE TEST IN HANDBALL PLAYERS

''This study aims to determine the relationship between functional movement screen (FMS), core stabilization and Y balance test. The study will include evaluations on 30 handball players and 30 sedentary individuals.'' Functional movement analysis is a biomechanical screening and evaluation system to identify limitations and asymmetries in 7 basic movements. This system reveals the kinetic chain interaction between mobility and stability required for basic performance. Unlike conventional assessment methods, FHA focuses on the efficiency and quality of the movement pattern, not on the number of repetitions or weight lifted.

The main aim of the study was to reveal the relationship between functional movement screen and core endurance and Y balance test evaluations in handball players with objective data. Functional movement is the general name of the activities performed by individuals for function and the movements performed by individuals for function are examined with analysis methods. In an effective analysis, if people do not have appropriate stability and mobility, it is determined from which muscle-muscle group or joint the problem originates. Analyses play a role in determining which of the stabilization, mobilization and flexibility factors are problematic at which stage of the function. In addition, these methods are effective in preventing possible injuries while helping to improve balance, strength and power characteristics of individuals. Core stabilization problems cause significant posture and stabilization problems. These problems are reflected in functional movements. Core stabilization problems are thought to have negative effects on functional movement analysis scores. Active athletes with this problem will be more affected. This study also aimed to observe the differences between athletes and sedentary individuals.

Read more

Studies defined the core as the part of the body in the musculoskeletal system consisting of the proximal lower extremities, abdominal structures, hips, pelvis and spine and stated that the core muscles are composed of the trunk and pelvis muscles. It is argued that trunk and pelvis stabilization is essential for all movements of the extremities. The transversus abdominis and multifidus work in cocontraction and control excessive anterior pelvic tilt, which is known to be associated with femoral internal rotation and adduction. The musculature of the core is referred to as the muscular corset over the trunk and spine that stabilizes the body with or without limb movement. The strength and stabilization of the core affects the fitness and physical fitness of athletes. Core exercises should be included in exercise programs planned to improve athletic performance. Core endurance tests have been defined to reveal the relationship between core stabilization and performance. Lateral bridge test and trunk flexor test are the preferred core endurance tests in this study. The Y balance test is a dynamic test that requires strength, flexibility, core control and proprioception in a single-legged stance. Functional movement analysis, core stabilization tests and Y balance test are assessment scales that provide objective data on stabilization, postural alignment and spinal alignment. It is envisaged that these three assessment parameters will support each other after the study.

Functional movements are widely used during both daily and sports activities. Core stabilization and dynamic balance are the factors that determine the quality of functional movements. These movements become more important for athletes as they affect their sporting success. Athletes need a good evaluation to ensure and maintain success. Since handball is defined as a sport that requires a lot of effort, the risks increase and it becomes clear that the evaluation should be done with a holistic approach.Injuries in handball develop due to multifactors.Biomechanical, kinesthetic and functional losses in players should be determined to prevent injuries.Functional movement analysis, core stabilization, Y balance test will give us detailed information about posture, limb alignment and asymmetry, spinal smoothness, dynamic balance and will give us the chance to analyze whether there is a correlation between these tests.

Read the detailed description

In this study, it will be questioned whether functional movement analysis can be considered as a part of core stabilization assessment in sedentary and athletes. The effects of dynamic balance on functional activity will be observed. It is aimed to evaluate the relationship between the test results and injury risks in the individuals participating in the study and what the most accurate exercises can be according to the evaluation parameters of the person to prevent injuries.

This study includes the first evaluations of fms in a young age group. It will be a pilot study in the literature.

Being tested
functional movement screen, survey application, Y balance test, Core stabilization assessment
Keywords
functional movement screen, balance, core stabilization, sport injury
Medical subject headings
Conversion Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • functional movement screenOther

    FMS consists of seven test component which are used to evaluate various main movement models.Individuals completed one by one deep squat, high stepping, single line lunge, shoulder mobility, straight leg raises, trunk stability push-ups, rotation stability which are component tests. Subcomponent tests assess asymmetry by measuring the individual bilaterally. Each component test was scored on an ordinal scale (0 to 3 points), with a maximum score of 3, based on the quality of the movement. Less than 3 points indicated that the individual performed some form of compensation or was unable to complete the entire movement.While individuals were doing these tests, they were recorded in the video , the final scoring was done by evaluating the images. The scores of the component tests were summed, resulting in a composite score between 0 and 21 points, with a maximum score of 21

  • survey applicationOther

    Participants are evaluated with kasari physical activity survey. According to the FIT score, physical activity level is commented as sedentary between 0-20, poor between 21-40, normal between 41-60, good between 61-80 and perfect between 81-100

  • Y balance testOther

    YBT, which is performed in the standing position on one leg , is dynamic a test. Participants stood on the footplate in the centre of the Y Balance Test area and then, it was given instruction them that they should maintain a single leg stance while reaching as far as possible with the opposite leg and return to the starting position on the centre platform without losing balance.In the test, individuals were asked to reach the maximum distance in 3 directions (anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral), allowing 3 trials for each leg. The maximum reach distance was recorded for each consecutive trial

  • Core stabilization assessmentOther

    The flexor muscle endurance test is initiated with the subject in a sitting position, with the back leaning against an apparatus angled 60 degrees from the floor. Both knees and hips are flexed to 90 degrees and the support apparatus is withdrawn and the time the person maintains the position is recorded The extensor muscle endurance test is performed with the upper trunk extended towards the end of the bed on which the test is performed and the pelvis, knees and hips fixed. The time the upper trunk maintains its level is recorded The lateral bridge test was performed with the individual lying in the full side bridge position (left and right side separately). Individuals supported themselves on one elbow and their feet while lifting their hips off the floor to form a straight line from head to toe. The test was terminated when the individual lost the straight back posture and/or their hips touched the floor.

Study groups in NCT05861882
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
handball player* To be a licensed handball athlete * Not having undergone a surgical operation involving the musculoskeletal system in the last six months * Not having any obstacle to perform the tests to be performed within the study * Volunteering to participate in the study
Receives: Other: functional movement screen; Other: survey application; Other: Y balance test; Other: Core stabilization assessment
sedantary young people-being a volunteer
Receives: Other: functional movement screen; Other: survey application; Other: Y balance test; Other: Core stabilization assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. FUNCTİONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN

    FMS consists of seven test component which are used to evaluate various main movement models.Individuals completed one by one deep squat, high stepping, single line lunge, shoulder mobility, straight leg raises, trunk stability push-ups, rotation stability which are component tests. Subcomponent tests assess asymmetry by measuring the individual bilaterally. Each component test was scored on an ordinal scale (0 to 3 points), with a maximum score of 3, based on the quality of the movement. Less than 3 points indicated that the individual performed some form of compensation or was unable to complete the entire movement.While individuals were doing these tests, they were recorded in the video , the final scoring was done by evaluating the images. The scores of the component tests were summed, resulting in a composite score between 0 and 21 points, with a maximum score of 21

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Y BALANCE TEST

    YBT, which is performed in the standing position on one leg , is dynamic a test. Participants stood on the footplate in the centre of the Y Balance Test area and then, it was given instruction them that they should maintain a single leg stance while reaching as far as possible with the opposite leg and return to the starting position on the centre platform without losing balance.In the test, individuals were asked to reach the maximum distance in 3 directions (anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral), allowing 3 trials for each leg. The maximum reach distance was recorded for each consecutive trial

    Measured: 1 day

  2. CORE STABİLİZATİON ASSESMENT

    The flexor muscle endurance test is initiated with the subject in a sitting position, with the back leaning against an apparatus angled 60 degrees from the floor. Both knees and hips are flexed to 90 degrees and the support apparatus is withdrawn and the time the person maintains the position is recorded.

    The extensor muscle endurance test is performed with the upper trunk extended towards the end of the bed on which the test is performed and the pelvis, knees and hips fixed. The time the upper trunk maintains its level is recorded.

    The lateral bridge test was performed with the individual lying in the full side bridge position (left and right side separately). Individuals supported themselves on one elbow and their feet while lifting their hips off the floor to form a straight line from head to toe. The test was terminated when the individual lost the straight back posture and/or their hips touched the floor.

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2023
  2. Study start1 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion5 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05861882
Sponsor's protocol ID
Gurbuz01
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
7 May 2023
Last updated
17 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Functional Movement Disorder and Sport Injury, run by Kırıkkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

FUNCTİONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in