Intraoperative BleedingPhase 4NCT05867342
Effects of Adrenaline Infiltration on Surgical Field of View in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
A Phase 4 study testing Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000 and Saline in people with Intraoperative Bleeding, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In endoscopic sinus surgery a clear surgical field of view is a very important aspect for good surgical outcome. This study is to evaluate the preoperative preparation to acquire best surgical field of view by comparing between the use of topical adrenaline and the use of combination of topical adrenaline with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Intraoperative Bleeding
- What is being tested?
- Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000 and Saline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 May 2017to 22 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis recalcitrant to medical treatment and scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery
Who cannot join
- Patients who have asymetrical disease on the two sides (Lund Mackay score difference more than 2)
- Patients who have endoscopic sinus surgery for treatment of tumor or disease other than sinusitis
- Patients with underlying uncontrolled hypertension
- Patients with bleeding disorder or are unable to discontinue antiplatelet or anticoagulant before the surgery
- Patients who are allergic to adrenaline or to xylocaine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
In endoscopic sinus surgery a clear surgical field of view is a very important aspect for good surgical outcome. This study is to evaluate the preoperative preparation to acquire best surgical field of view by comparing between the use of topical adrenaline and the use of combination of topical adrenaline with infiltration of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline in patients scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery for rhinosinusitis.
- Conditions
- Intraoperative Bleeding
- Being tested
- Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000, Saline
- Medical subject headings
- Blood Loss, Surgical
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EpinephrinDrug
Also called Adrenaline
Topical application of 2 pieces of Epinephrin (1:1,000)-soaked cottonoid in nasal cavity
1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000Drug
4 ml intranasal infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) at 2 sites (2 ml infiltration at each site)
SalineDrug
4 ml intranasal infiltration of saline at 2 sites (2 ml infiltration at each site)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic sinus surgery | Experimental | Participants receive topical 1:1000 epinephrine plus saline in one nostril, and topical 1:1000 epinephrine plus infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the other nostril, during endoscopic visualization while undergoing Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Receives: Drug: Epinephrin; Drug: 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000; Drug: Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical Field Grading Score
The video recording of the endoscopic sinus surgery of the participant was graded by another otolaryngology specialist postoperatively and graded according to Wormald Surgical Field Grading Scale. Scores range from 0 (no bleeding) to 10 (severe bleeding with nasal cavity filling rapidly).
Measured: postoperatively (approximately 20 minutes to assess)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Duration of Surgery
Measured: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)
Number of Extra Pledgets Used
A pledget is a small wad of absorbent material used to stop bleeding.
Measured: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)
Estimated Blood Loss During Surgery
Measured: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)
Postoperative Bloody Discharge Grading Score
Grading of postoperative bloody discharge postoperatively assessed by patient using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (continuous heavy bleeding necessitating medical care).
Measured: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)
Number of Days With Postoperative Bloody Nasal Discharge
Participants indicated number of days with bloody nasal discharge postoperatively using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire.
Measured: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)
Number of Nostrils With Continuous Fresh Bleeding
Number of nostrils with excessive fresh bleeding postoperatively using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire. Continuous fresh bleeding was defined as bleeding for over 15 minutes.
Measured: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2023
- Study start12 May 2017
- Primary completion22 Aug 2018
- Study completion22 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Intraoperative BleedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter Hwang, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Peter H Hwang, MD, Study director, Stanford UniversityNavarat Tangbumrungtham, MD, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05867342
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 40274
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Saif AM, Farboud A, Delfosse E, Pope L, Adke M. Assessing the safety and efficacy of drugs used in preparing the nose for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Oct;41(5):546-63. doi: 10.1111/coa.12563. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
PubMed 26452438Yang JJ, Zheng J, Liu HJ, Liu YX, Shen JC, Zhou ZQ. Epinephrine infiltration on nasal field causes significant hemodynamic changes: hypotension episode monitored by impedance-cardiography under general anesthesia. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2006;9(2):190-7.
PubMed 16959188Yang JJ, Li WY, Jil Q, Wang ZY, Sun J, Wang QP, Li ZQ, Xu JG. Local anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery employing small volumes of epinephrine-containing solutions of lidocaine produces profound hypotension. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1471-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00869.x.
PubMed 16223392Moshaver A, Lin D, Pinto R, Witterick IJ. The hemostatic and hemodynamic effects of epinephrine during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;135(10):1005-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.144.
PubMed 19841339Khosla AJ, Pernas FG, Maeso PA. Meta-analysis and literature review of techniques to achieve hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Jun;3(6):482-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21126. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
PubMed 23255493Cohen-Kerem R, Brown S, Villasenor LV, Witterick I. Epinephrine/Lidocaine injection vs. saline during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2008 Jul;118(7):1275-81. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816dd2d9.
PubMed 18438267Tangbumrungtham N, Hwang PH, Maul X, Borchard NA, Dholakia SS, Patel ZM, Nayak JV, Choby G. The effect of topical epinephrine 1:1000 with and without infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 on endoscopic surgical field visualization: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Feb;10(2):147-152. doi: 10.1002/alr.22468. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
PubMed 31671251
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Adrenaline Infiltration on Surgical Field of View in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05867342
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 40274
- Conditions
- Intraoperative Bleeding
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jul 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In endoscopic sinus surgery a clear surgical field of view is a very important aspect for good surgical outcome. This study is to evaluate the preoperative preparation to acquire best surgical field of view by comparing between the use of topical adrenaline and the use of combination of topical adrenaline with infiltration of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline in patients scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery for rhinosinusitis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic sinus surgery | Experimental | Drug: Epinephrin, Drug: 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000, Drug: SalineParticipants receive topical 1:1000 epinephrine plus saline in one nostril, and topical 1:1000 epinephrine plus infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the other nostril, during endoscopic visualization while undergoing Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Diagnosed with recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis recalcitrant to medical treatment and scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients who have asymetrical disease on the two sides (Lund Mackay score difference more than 2)
- Patients who have endoscopic sinus surgery for treatment of tumor or disease other than sinusitis
- Patients with underlying uncontrolled hypertension
- Patients with bleeding disorder or are unable to discontinue antiplatelet or anticoagulant before the surgery
- Patients who are allergic to adrenaline or to xylocaine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EpinephrinAlso: AdrenalineTopical application of 2 pieces of Epinephrin (1:1,000)-soaked cottonoid in nasal cavity | Drug | Endoscopic sinus surgery |
| 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,0004 ml intranasal infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) at 2 sites (2 ml infiltration at each site) | Drug | Endoscopic sinus surgery |
| Saline4 ml intranasal infiltration of saline at 2 sites (2 ml infiltration at each site) | Drug | Endoscopic sinus surgery |
Primary outcome
Surgical Field Grading Score
Time frame: postoperatively (approximately 20 minutes to assess)
The video recording of the endoscopic sinus surgery of the participant was graded by another otolaryngology specialist postoperatively and graded according to Wormald Surgical Field Grading Scale. Scores range from 0 (no bleeding) to 10 (severe bleeding with nasal cavity filling rapidly).
6 secondary outcomes
Duration of Surgery
Time frame: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)
Number of Extra Pledgets Used
Time frame: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)
Estimated Blood Loss During Surgery
Time frame: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)
Postoperative Bloody Discharge Grading Score
Time frame: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)
Number of Days With Postoperative Bloody Nasal Discharge
Time frame: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)
Number of Nostrils With Continuous Fresh Bleeding
Time frame: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 26452438Saif AM, Farboud A, Delfosse E, Pope L, Adke M. Assessing the safety and efficacy of drugs used in preparing the nose for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Oct;41(5):546-63. doi: 10.1111/coa.12563. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
- Background: PubMed 16959188Yang JJ, Zheng J, Liu HJ, Liu YX, Shen JC, Zhou ZQ. Epinephrine infiltration on nasal field causes significant hemodynamic changes: hypotension episode monitored by impedance-cardiography under general anesthesia. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2006;9(2):190-7.
- Background: PubMed 16223392Yang JJ, Li WY, Jil Q, Wang ZY, Sun J, Wang QP, Li ZQ, Xu JG. Local anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery employing small volumes of epinephrine-containing solutions of lidocaine produces profound hypotension. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1471-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00869.x.
- Background: PubMed 19841339Moshaver A, Lin D, Pinto R, Witterick IJ. The hemostatic and hemodynamic effects of epinephrine during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;135(10):1005-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.144.
- Background: PubMed 23255493Khosla AJ, Pernas FG, Maeso PA. Meta-analysis and literature review of techniques to achieve hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Jun;3(6):482-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21126. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 18438267Cohen-Kerem R, Brown S, Villasenor LV, Witterick I. Epinephrine/Lidocaine injection vs. saline during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2008 Jul;118(7):1275-81. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816dd2d9.
- Results publication: PubMed 31671251Tangbumrungtham N, Hwang PH, Maul X, Borchard NA, Dholakia SS, Patel ZM, Nayak JV, Choby G. The effect of topical epinephrine 1:1000 with and without infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 on endoscopic surgical field visualization: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Feb;10(2):147-152. doi: 10.1002/alr.22468. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Intraoperative Bleeding
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Intraoperative Outcomes of Microdebrider-Assisted Versus Conventional Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With Sinonasal Polyposis
Nasal Polyps
Enrolling by invitation
Early Outcome of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement With and Without Tourniquet
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Blood Loss, Surgical
Recruiting
Hemocoll, Avitene, or Bone Wax for Cancellous Bone Bleeding After Single-Ray Amputation
Hemostasis, Surgical Blood Loss
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Safe and Timely Antithrombotic Removal (STAR) Registry
Hemorrhage, Surgical, Hemorrhage Postoperative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter H Hwang, MD study director
Stanford University
Navarat Tangbumrungtham, MD principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000 and Saline in people with Intraoperative Bleeding, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical Field Grading Score (time frame: postoperatively (approximately 20 minutes to assess)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05867342, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2023.