AzTrials
AzTrials

Intraoperative BleedingPhase 4NCT05867342

Effects of Adrenaline Infiltration on Surgical Field of View in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000 and Saline in people with Intraoperative Bleeding, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In endoscopic sinus surgery a clear surgical field of view is a very important aspect for good surgical outcome. This study is to evaluate the preoperative preparation to acquire best surgical field of view by comparing between the use of topical adrenaline and the use of combination of topical adrenaline with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Intraoperative Bleeding
What is being tested?
Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000 and Saline
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
12 May 2017to 22 Aug 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis recalcitrant to medical treatment and scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have asymetrical disease on the two sides (Lund Mackay score difference more than 2)
  • Patients who have endoscopic sinus surgery for treatment of tumor or disease other than sinusitis
  • Patients with underlying uncontrolled hypertension
  • Patients with bleeding disorder or are unable to discontinue antiplatelet or anticoagulant before the surgery
  • Patients who are allergic to adrenaline or to xylocaine

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Stanford

    Stanford, California, 94304

Other trials in United States

About this study

In endoscopic sinus surgery a clear surgical field of view is a very important aspect for good surgical outcome. This study is to evaluate the preoperative preparation to acquire best surgical field of view by comparing between the use of topical adrenaline and the use of combination of topical adrenaline with infiltration of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline in patients scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery for rhinosinusitis.

Being tested
Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000, Saline
Medical subject headings
Blood Loss, Surgical

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EpinephrinDrug

    Also called Adrenaline

    Topical application of 2 pieces of Epinephrin (1:1,000)-soaked cottonoid in nasal cavity

  • 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000Drug

    4 ml intranasal infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) at 2 sites (2 ml infiltration at each site)

  • SalineDrug

    4 ml intranasal infiltration of saline at 2 sites (2 ml infiltration at each site)

Study groups in NCT05867342
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Endoscopic sinus surgeryExperimentalParticipants receive topical 1:1000 epinephrine plus saline in one nostril, and topical 1:1000 epinephrine plus infiltration of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the other nostril, during endoscopic visualization while undergoing Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).
Receives: Drug: Epinephrin; Drug: 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000; Drug: Saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Surgical Field Grading Score

    The video recording of the endoscopic sinus surgery of the participant was graded by another otolaryngology specialist postoperatively and graded according to Wormald Surgical Field Grading Scale. Scores range from 0 (no bleeding) to 10 (severe bleeding with nasal cavity filling rapidly).

    Measured: postoperatively (approximately 20 minutes to assess)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Duration of Surgery

    Measured: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)

  2. Number of Extra Pledgets Used

    A pledget is a small wad of absorbent material used to stop bleeding.

    Measured: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)

  3. Estimated Blood Loss During Surgery

    Measured: intraoperatively (up to 3 hours)

  4. Postoperative Bloody Discharge Grading Score

    Grading of postoperative bloody discharge postoperatively assessed by patient using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (continuous heavy bleeding necessitating medical care).

    Measured: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)

  5. Number of Days With Postoperative Bloody Nasal Discharge

    Participants indicated number of days with bloody nasal discharge postoperatively using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire.

    Measured: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)

  6. Number of Nostrils With Continuous Fresh Bleeding

    Number of nostrils with excessive fresh bleeding postoperatively using the 1-week postoperative bleeding questionnaire. Continuous fresh bleeding was defined as bleeding for over 15 minutes.

    Measured: 1 week after the surgery (up to 2 minutes to complete assessment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2023
  2. Study start12 May 2017
  3. Primary completion22 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion22 Aug 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05867342
Sponsor's protocol ID
40274
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
22 Nov 2018
Last updated
10 Jul 2023
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Saif AM, Farboud A, Delfosse E, Pope L, Adke M. Assessing the safety and efficacy of drugs used in preparing the nose for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Oct;41(5):546-63. doi: 10.1111/coa.12563. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

    PubMed 26452438
  • Yang JJ, Zheng J, Liu HJ, Liu YX, Shen JC, Zhou ZQ. Epinephrine infiltration on nasal field causes significant hemodynamic changes: hypotension episode monitored by impedance-cardiography under general anesthesia. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2006;9(2):190-7.

    PubMed 16959188
  • Yang JJ, Li WY, Jil Q, Wang ZY, Sun J, Wang QP, Li ZQ, Xu JG. Local anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery employing small volumes of epinephrine-containing solutions of lidocaine produces profound hypotension. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1471-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00869.x.

    PubMed 16223392
  • Moshaver A, Lin D, Pinto R, Witterick IJ. The hemostatic and hemodynamic effects of epinephrine during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;135(10):1005-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.144.

    PubMed 19841339
  • Khosla AJ, Pernas FG, Maeso PA. Meta-analysis and literature review of techniques to achieve hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Jun;3(6):482-7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21126. Epub 2012 Dec 16.

    PubMed 23255493
  • Cohen-Kerem R, Brown S, Villasenor LV, Witterick I. Epinephrine/Lidocaine injection vs. saline during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2008 Jul;118(7):1275-81. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816dd2d9.

    PubMed 18438267
  • Tangbumrungtham N, Hwang PH, Maul X, Borchard NA, Dholakia SS, Patel ZM, Nayak JV, Choby G. The effect of topical epinephrine 1:1000 with and without infiltration of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 on endoscopic surgical field visualization: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Feb;10(2):147-152. doi: 10.1002/alr.22468. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

    PubMed 31671251

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Epinephrin, 1% lidocaine with epinephrin 1:100,000 and Saline in people with Intraoperative Bleeding, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Surgical Field Grading Score (time frame: postoperatively (approximately 20 minutes to assess)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05867342, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in