Anatomy EducationAAENCT05868031
Improving Undergraduate Students' Self-efficacy and Attitude by Art Work
A study testing alternative teaching methods in people with Anatomy Education, run by Sakarya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Artworking learning approaches in improving undergraduate students' attitudes and self-efficacy about anatomy courses. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anatomy Education
- What is being tested?
- alternative teaching methods
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 4 Oct 2022to 30 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being a first-year student enrolled in Health Sciences at Sakarya University.
- Not having taken an anatomy course before.
- Being willing to participate in the research.
Who cannot join
- Not to volunteer to participate in the research.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Artwork in Anatomy Education: A Way to Improve Undergraduate Students' Self-efficacy and Attitude
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Artworking learning approaches in improving undergraduate students' attitudes and self-efficacy about anatomy courses.
Read the detailed description
Anatomy is one of the prominent and essential disciplines in healthcare and medical education, and study the shape and structure of the body, the systems and organs that make up the body, and the relationships between these systems and organs. In health care fields, it is necessary for students to have a strong foundation in this area. However, learning anatomy can be challenging and complicated due to the complexity of the concepts and terminologies involved; it plays a crucial role in preparing future healthcare providers. (Banovac et al., 2023). Healthcare students and medical professionals need to be adequately knowledgeable about anatomy and understand the functions and spatial context of organs before performing any invasive procedures on patients (Roxburgh \& Evans, 2021). Studies have shown that students without basic anatomy knowledge and skills encounter serious difficulties in advanced classes (Ghosh, 2017).
Traditional anatomy education is based predominantly on passive learning methods, such as lecture-based instruction, which may not effectively promote active student participation and knowledge retention (Ma et al., 2016). Nowadays, a revised teaching-learning approach known as active learning is implemented to ensure the curriculum remains relevant to the constantly connected and resource-rich world. It involves learners actively participating in the learning process through cooperative or hands-on tasks. Critical thinking and problem-solving skills are emphasized in this method and can improve student learning in numerous subjects (Bonatto-Costa et al., 2021). Students studying healthcare in the first year may experience challenges with the complexity and volume of anatomy subjects. However, many innovative learning tools, such as three-dimensional models, cadaver dissection, and artistic activities, such as drawing and body painting, have been conducted to enhance active learning and improve the quality of education in colleges (Rekhari \& Sinnayah, 2018). Nurses and midwives rely heavily on anatomy knowledge to perform procedures such as injection sites, monitoring vital signs, administering first aid, and performing childbirth and episiotomies. A strong foundation in anatomy can facilitate professional development in these specialized areas and advanced nursing and midwifery education. Moreover, possessing a comprehensive understanding of anatomy can enhance students' self-esteem and confidence when practicing in clinical settings (Satoh et al., 2023).
Attitude refers to a student's overall evaluation of the subject, and Studies show that healthcare students have positive attitudes about anatomy during their education period. It has been believed that along with Self-efficacy, students' perspectives and attitudes toward basic science subjects, such as anatomy, can significantly affect education outcomes (Plaisant et al., 2014).
Studies show that possessing a positive attitude towards anatomy, coupled with self-efficacy, can significantly impact students' academic performance and professional development in nursing and midwifery. This underscores the importance of acquiring a strong foundation in anatomy and cultivating a positive perspective and belief in one's ability to succeed in the subject (Acar et al., 2017).
Self-efficacy is the belief in one's capability to manage and take the actions needed to succeed in learning a subject (Woolcock et al., 2016). Self-efficacy has been a leading and also reliable predictor of university student progress for years and is significantly correlated with students' grade point averages and their motivation to learn (Bartimote-Aufflick et al., 2016). Academic self-efficacy determines how well students perceive their capacity to organize and carry out courses of action related to their studies (Tembo \& Ngwira, 2016).
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Art working learning approaches in improving undergraduate students' attitudes and self-efficacy about anatomy courses.
Method:
This study was conducted on two groups of first-year nursing and midwifery students to compare the effectiveness of teaching anatomy using the active learning method of artwork versus anatomy atlases-based education. Questionnaires were distributed to both groups immediately after the first session of the anatomy course and 14 weeks later. The researcher responsible for distributing and collecting the questionnaires did not participate in teaching anatomy to the students. The students were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire that included information regarding their age, grade, sex, and field of study. In addition, both sets of students were also required to complete the Anatomy self-efficacy scale and Anatomy attitude scale.
- Conditions
- Anatomy Education
- Being tested
- alternative teaching methods
- Keywords
- Anatomy, Education, nursing, Active learning, Artwork, Self-efficacy, Attitude
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
alternative teaching methodsOther
This study aimed to explore the potential benefits of alternative teaching methods in anatomy education, as well as to investigate the effectiveness of traditional lecture-based education in comparison. By examining the outcomes of these different approaches, we hope to understand better how students can best learn and retain knowledge in this field.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Art work | Experimental | The artwork group was tasked with preparing anatomical models by hand. This hands-on approach was designed to engage the students in a more active and creative manner, allowing them to develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter. By visualizing and creating the anatomical structures themselves, the students were able to retain the information better and apply it in a practical context. Receives: Other: alternative teaching methods |
| Atlas groups | Experimental | The atlas group was provided with a selection of anatomical pictures from atlases and encouraged to use them as a resource to aid their learning throughout the semester. This approach focused on visual learning and aimed to provide the students with a comprehensive and detailed understanding of the anatomical structures and how they interact with one another. Receives: Other: alternative teaching methods |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effectiveness of Artwork Learning Approaches in Improving Students' Attitudes and Self-Efficacy in Anatomy Education
The outcome measure includes the assessment of anatomy self-efficacy and attitudes among the participating nursing and midwifery students. Additionally, a self-report questionnaire was administered to collect demographic information such as age, grade, sex, and field of study.
The Anatomy Self-Efficacy Scale is a validated measurement tool that assesses students' perceived confidence in their ability to understand and apply anatomical knowledge. The Anatomy Attitude Scale is another validated measurement tool used to assess students' attitudes and beliefs toward the study of anatomy. It includes statements related to the interest, value, and enjoyment of learning anatomy.
The data collected from the self-report questionnaire, Anatomy Self-Efficacy Scale, and Anatomy Attitude Scale will be aggregated and analyzed to evaluate the impact of different educational approaches on students' self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards anatomy.
Measured: 14 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2023
- Study start4 Oct 2022
- Primary completion6 Jan 2023
- Study completion30 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Anatomy EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sakarya UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sakarya University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Kevser Ozdemir, Sakarya University
- Investigators
- kevser İlçioğlu, Dr, Principal investigator, sakarya university, Faculty of health science, Department of nursing
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05868031
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SAU-FHS-KI-01
- Acronym
- AAE
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 22 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Artwork in Anatomy Education: A Way to Improve Undergraduate Students' Self-efficacy and Attitude
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05868031
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AAE / SAU-FHS-KI-01
- Conditions
- Anatomy Education
- Keywords
- Anatomy, Education, nursing, Active learning, Artwork, Self-efficacy, Attitude
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sakarya UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Artworking learning approaches in improving undergraduate students' attitudes and self-efficacy about anatomy courses.
Detailed description
Anatomy is one of the prominent and essential disciplines in healthcare and medical education, and study the shape and structure of the body, the systems and organs that make up the body, and the relationships between these systems and organs. In health care fields, it is necessary for students to have a strong foundation in this area. However, learning anatomy can be challenging and complicated due to the complexity of the concepts and terminologies involved; it plays a crucial role in preparing future healthcare providers. (Banovac et al., 2023). Healthcare students and medical professionals need to be adequately knowledgeable about anatomy and understand the functions and spatial context of organs before performing any invasive procedures on patients (Roxburgh \& Evans, 2021). Studies have shown that students without basic anatomy knowledge and skills encounter serious difficulties in advanced classes (Ghosh, 2017).
Traditional anatomy education is based predominantly on passive learning methods, such as lecture-based instruction, which may not effectively promote active student participation and knowledge retention (Ma et al., 2016). Nowadays, a revised teaching-learning approach known as active learning is implemented to ensure the curriculum remains relevant to the constantly connected and resource-rich world. It involves learners actively participating in the learning process through cooperative or hands-on tasks. Critical thinking and problem-solving skills are emphasized in this method and can improve student learning in numerous subjects (Bonatto-Costa et al., 2021). Students studying healthcare in the first year may experience challenges with the complexity and volume of anatomy subjects. However, many innovative learning tools, such as three-dimensional models, cadaver dissection, and artistic activities, such as drawing and body painting, have been conducted to enhance active learning and improve the quality of education in colleges (Rekhari \& Sinnayah, 2018). Nurses and midwives rely heavily on anatomy knowledge to perform procedures such as injection sites, monitoring vital signs, administering first aid, and performing childbirth and episiotomies. A strong foundation in anatomy can facilitate professional development in these specialized areas and advanced nursing and midwifery education. Moreover, possessing a comprehensive understanding of anatomy can enhance students' self-esteem and confidence when practicing in clinical settings (Satoh et al., 2023).
Attitude refers to a student's overall evaluation of the subject, and Studies show that healthcare students have positive attitudes about anatomy during their education period. It has been believed that along with Self-efficacy, students' perspectives and attitudes toward basic science subjects, such as anatomy, can significantly affect education outcomes (Plaisant et al., 2014).
Studies show that possessing a positive attitude towards anatomy, coupled with self-efficacy, can significantly impact students' academic performance and professional development in nursing and midwifery. This underscores the importance of acquiring a strong foundation in anatomy and cultivating a positive perspective and belief in one's ability to succeed in the subject (Acar et al., 2017).
Self-efficacy is the belief in one's capability to manage and take the actions needed to succeed in learning a subject (Woolcock et al., 2016). Self-efficacy has been a leading and also reliable predictor of university student progress for years and is significantly correlated with students' grade point averages and their motivation to learn (Bartimote-Aufflick et al., 2016). Academic self-efficacy determines how well students perceive their capacity to organize and carry out courses of action related to their studies (Tembo \& Ngwira, 2016).
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Art working learning approaches in improving undergraduate students' attitudes and self-efficacy about anatomy courses.
Method:
This study was conducted on two groups of first-year nursing and midwifery students to compare the effectiveness of teaching anatomy using the active learning method of artwork versus anatomy atlases-based education. Questionnaires were distributed to both groups immediately after the first session of the anatomy course and 14 weeks later. The researcher responsible for distributing and collecting the questionnaires did not participate in teaching anatomy to the students. The students were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire that included information regarding their age, grade, sex, and field of study. In addition, both sets of students were also required to complete the Anatomy self-efficacy scale and Anatomy attitude scale.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Art work | Experimental | Other: alternative teaching methodsThe artwork group was tasked with preparing anatomical models by hand. This hands-on approach was designed to engage the students in a more active and creative manner, allowing them to develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter. By visualizing and creating the anatomical structures themselves, the students were able to retain the information better and apply it in a practical context. |
| Atlas groups | Experimental | Other: alternative teaching methodsThe atlas group was provided with a selection of anatomical pictures from atlases and encouraged to use them as a resource to aid their learning throughout the semester. This approach focused on visual learning and aimed to provide the students with a comprehensive and detailed understanding of the anatomical structures and how they interact with one another. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Being a first-year student enrolled in Health Sciences at Sakarya University.
- Not having taken an anatomy course before.
- Being willing to participate in the research.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not to volunteer to participate in the research.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| alternative teaching methodsThis study aimed to explore the potential benefits of alternative teaching methods in anatomy education, as well as to investigate the effectiveness of traditional lecture-based education in comparison. By examining the outcomes of these different approaches, we hope to understand better how students can best learn and retain knowledge in this field. | Other | Art work, Atlas groups |
Primary outcome
Effectiveness of Artwork Learning Approaches in Improving Students' Attitudes and Self-Efficacy in Anatomy Education
Time frame: 14 weeks
The outcome measure includes the assessment of anatomy self-efficacy and attitudes among the participating nursing and midwifery students. Additionally, a self-report questionnaire was administered to collect demographic information such as age, grade, sex, and field of study. The Anatomy Self-Efficacy Scale is a validated measurement tool that assesses students' perceived confidence in their ability to understand and apply anatomical knowledge. The Anatomy Attitude Scale is another validated measurement tool used to assess students' attitudes and beliefs toward the study of anatomy. It includes statements related to the interest, value, and enjoyment of learning anatomy. The data collected from the self-report questionnaire, Anatomy Self-Efficacy Scale, and Anatomy Attitude Scale will be aggregated and analyzed to evaluate the impact of different educational approaches on students' self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards anatomy.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anatomy Education
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Immersive VR, Non-Immersive VR, and 3D-Printed Models on Anatomy Learning and Cognitive Load
Healthy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Not yet recruiting
Application of a Responsive Web-Based Sinus CT Scan Interpretation Training System in Clinical Education
Education, Diagnostic Imaging
Recruiting
VR vs Classical Anatomy Teaching
Medical Education, Anatomy Education
Not yet recruiting
RA Anatomy - VRvST Study
Virtual Reality Simulation, Virtual Reality
RecruitingObservational study
Research on Identifying Critical Surgical Anatomy in Cholecystectomy Videos Based on Deep Learning
Cholecystectomy, Surgical Video Identification
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
kevser İlçioğlu, Dr principal investigator
sakarya university, Faculty of health science, Department of nursing
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing alternative teaching methods in people with Anatomy Education, run by Sakarya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effectiveness of Artwork Learning Approaches in Improving Students' Attitudes and Self-Efficacy in Anatomy Education (time frame: 14 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2023.