AzTrials
AzTrials

Holistic Care Competencies of Occupational Therapy StudentsNCT05868096

Improving Occupational Therapy Students' Holistic Care Competencies Through a Structured Holistic Thinking Curriculum: a Mixed Design

A study testing Structured holistic thinking course(2 hr) and Clinical practice training in people with Holistic Care Competencies of Occupational Therapy Students, run by Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Occupational therapy emphasizes the holistic approach, but occupational therapy students are unable to use holistic thinking to design holistic solutions for cases immediately during their internship due to their lack of clinical experience, which requires extensive guidance from clinical occupational… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Structured holistic thinking course(2 hr) and Clinical practice training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
17 Jul 2023to 30 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • occupational therapy students who were interns at the Shuanghe Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare
  • students who could read, write, and communicate in Chinese
  • students who were 20 years of age or older.

Who cannot join

  • those who could not attend the entire course
  • those who could not complete the 12-week internship.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hanyun Hsiao, master contact

+88622490088 ext. 1624

10252@s.tmu.edu.tw

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Shuang Ho Hospital

    New Taipei City, 235

    Hanyun Hsiao, master, +88622490088 ext. 1624, 10252@s.tmu.edu.tw

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Background: Occupational therapy emphasizes the holistic approach, but occupational therapy students are unable to use holistic thinking to design holistic solutions for cases immediately during their internship due to their lack of clinical experience, which requires extensive guidance from clinical occupational therapist.

Study Aim: To improve the holistic care competencies of occupational therapy students using a structured holistic thinking curriculum.

Read more

Methods: The study population was occupational therapy interns from a northern teaching hospital. The holistic thinking curriculum was designed as a structured program using mind maps, case-based discussions, and clinical observations to integrate physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects. The experimental group took a pre-test after a case report in weeks 4 and 5, a first post-test and course satisfaction after the first structured holistic thinking course, and a second structured holistic thinking course with a second post-test and course satisfaction in weeks 11 and 12; the control group had no course but had a guided version of the holistic thinking case study form for independent study, and the control and experimental groups were tested pre and post using the holistic thinking case study form and the personal learning self-efficacy scale.

Data analysis: Quantitative data for the holistic thinking case study form were determined by three occupational therapists with at least 5 years of teaching experience through consensus conferences to determine the degree of compliance of the case study form with holistic care, and differences between the holistic thinking case study form and the personal learning self-efficacy scale were determined by Kruskal-Wallis with a p-value of 0.05. Qualitative data for the holistic thinking case study form were determined by three occupational therapists with at least 5 years of teaching experience to determine the degree of compliance of the case study form with holistic care and regular meetings were held to achieve consistency in coding.

Being tested
Structured holistic thinking course(2 hr), Clinical practice training
Keywords
Holistic health care, occupational therapy student, mind map

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Structured holistic thinking course(2 hr)Other

    The holistic thinking curriculum was designed as a structured program using mind maps, case-based discussions, and clinical observations to integrate physical, psychological, social, and spiritual aspects.

  • Clinical practice trainingOther

    there is no holistic thinking curriculum.Using the holistic thinking case study form - introductory version self-study

Study groups in NCT05868096
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupExperimentalDuring the 12 weeks of the internship, the experimental group took a pre-test after a case report-1 in weeks 4-5, which included completing the holistic thinking case analysis form and the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire, followed by a 2-hour structured holistic thinking course. At the end of the session, subjects took the first post-test, revised the case analysis form completed in the pre-test based on the case report-1 observed in the pre-test, and completed the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire and the satisfaction questionnaire again. During weeks 6-11 of the internship, participants continue to receive clinical practice training in assessment, intervention planning, and patient intervention skills. In weeks 11-12 of the internship, subjects took a second post-test after reading case report-2, which included completing the holistic thinking case analysis form and again completing the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire.
Receives: Other: Structured holistic thinking course(2 hr)
Control groupActive comparatorDuring the 12 weeks of the internship, the control group had no structured holistic thinking course. During weeks 4-5 of the internship, after viewing case report-1, a pretest consisting of completing the holistic thinking case analysis form and the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire was completed and a holistic thinking case analysis form - introductory version was given. Subjects will revise the holistic thinking case analysis form completed in the pretest and complete the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire again. During weeks 6-11 of the internship, participants continue to receive clinical practice training in assessment, intervention planning, and patient intervention skills. In weeks 11-12 of the internship, subjects received the post-test, viewed the case report-2, and were given the holistic thinking case analysis form - introductory version and completed the holistic thinking case analysis form and the personal learning self-efficacy questionnaire.
Receives: Other: Clinical practice training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The quantitative data of the Holistic Thinking Case Analysis Form

    The Holistic Thinking Case Analysis Form: Taken from cases (caregivers) to see if subjects can analyze holistic abilities/problems based on physical, mental, social and spiritual aspects. Higher scores indicate better analysis of the problem and are quantitative data. The holistic occupational therapy intervention plan extract looks at whether the subject can present an occupational therapy intervention plan with the concept of holistic care, which is qualitative. The higher the score, the more appropriate it is, which is quantitative data. The above information was coded and analyzed by three occupational therapists with more than five years of teaching experience, and quantitative information was determined through consensus conferences.

    Measured: Change from baseline after immediate intervention/Change from baseline at week 12

  2. MSLQ:Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire

    Measuring subjects' learning self-efficacy

    Measured: Change from baseline after immediate intervention/Change from baseline at week 12

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Course Satisfaction Questionnaire

    The purpose of the questionnaire was to understand the subjects' satisfaction, usefulness, and suggestions regarding the course content and to increase the subjects' connection to the holistic care curriculum, clinical experience, and skills knowledge through course reflection.

    Measured: After each training session(week 4-5/week 11-12)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2023
  2. Study start17 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05868096
Sponsor's protocol ID
N202212038
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
2 May 2023
Last updated
15 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Profetto-McGrath J. Critical thinking and evidence-based practice. J Prof Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.002.

    PubMed 16311232
  • Girot EA. Graduate nurses: critical thinkers or better decision makers? J Adv Nurs. 2000 Feb;31(2):288-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01298.x.

    PubMed 10672085
  • Holden RJ. Lean Thinking in emergency departments: a critical review. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):265-78. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

    PubMed 21035904
  • McCombie RP, Antanavage ME. Transitioning From Occupational Therapy Student To Practicing Occupational Therapist: First Year of Employment. Occup Ther Health Care. 2017 Apr;31(2):126-142. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2017.1307480. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

    PubMed 28436709
  • Chen SL, Liang T, Lee ML, Liao IC. Effects of concept map teaching on students' critical thinking and approach to learning and studying. J Nurs Educ. 2011 Aug;50(8):466-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110415-06. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

    PubMed 21524017
  • D'Antoni AV, Zipp GP, Olson VG, Cahill TF. Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students? BMC Med Educ. 2010 Sep 16;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-61.

    PubMed 20846442
  • Jenicek M, Croskerry P, Hitchcock DL. Evidence and its uses in health care and research: the role of critical thinking. Med Sci Monit. 2011 Jan;17(1):RA12-7. doi: 10.12659/msm.881321.

    PubMed 21169920
  • Wu HZ, Wu QT. Impact of mind mapping on the critical thinking ability of clinical nursing students and teaching application. J Int Med Res. 2020 Mar;48(3):300060519893225. doi: 10.1177/0300060519893225.

    PubMed 32212879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Structured holistic thinking course(2 hr) and Clinical practice training in people with Holistic Care Competencies of Occupational Therapy Students, run by Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hanyun Hsiao, master (+88622490088 ext. 1624, 10252@s.tmu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The quantitative data of the Holistic Thinking Case Analysis Form (time frame: Change from baseline after immediate intervention/Change from baseline at week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05868096, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in