Elbow InjuryNCT05870345
Pocket Sized Ultrasound (PsUS) and Pediatric Elbow Fractures
A study testing Butterfly IQ in people with Elbow Injury and Elbow Fracture, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this project is to investigate the accuracy of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures. The primary research objective is to determine the test performance characteristics of PSUS performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians compared to radiography for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Elbow Injury, Elbow Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Butterfly IQ
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Jan 2022to 7 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 16 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- For Feasibility phase: children between the ages of 1-16 years olds
- For Active phase: children between the ages of 1-16 years olds with isolated, acute (less than 48 hrs) elbow pain in the setting of adequate history of trauma
Who cannot join
- Both phases:
- Children <1 or >16 years old
- Those with open fractures, gross deformities, multiple traumatic injuries, distal neurovascular compromise, unstable vital signs or hemodynamic instability, altered mental status, history of skeletal abnormalities, or past elbow fracture as well as wards of the state or those unable to provide consent
- Patients who have a confirmed diagnosis of fracture at an outside institutions prior to arrival to the ED will also be excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Chicago/Comer Children's Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
About this study
Official title: The Diagnostic Accuracy of Pocket Size Ultrasound (PsUS) in the Detection of Pediatric Elbow Fractures
The main purpose of this project is to investigate the accuracy of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures. The primary research objective is to determine the test performance characteristics of PSUS performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians compared to radiography for the detection of pediatric elbow fractures. The project will consist of two parts, first involving a feasibility study and followed by an active study. The feasibility study will aim to answer if providers can perform an adequate elbow ultrasound exam after a brief study training. The active study will investigate the initial accuracy of the PsUS. Participants will be asked in either the feasibility or the active phases of the study to undergo a brief pocket-sized ultrasound elbow exam of both elbows. Patient will continue to receive their previously determined clinical ED management. In the active phase of the study, participant's elbow X-rays or if patient underwent bedside nursemaid reduction will be the comparison to pocket-sized ultrasound images.
Read the detailed description
The main purpose of this project is to investigate the accuracy of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures. The primary research objective is to determine the test performance characteristics of PSUS performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians compared to radiography for the detection of pediatric elbow fractures. The project will consist of two parts, first involving a feasibility study and followed by an active study.
This project will consist of two parts, involving first a brief feasibility phase followed by a pilot study conducted in an urban pediatric emergency department (Comer Children's Hospital in Chicago, IL). For the feasibility phase, the purpose is to demonstrate that novice PsUS users are able to obtain accurate and adequate imaging for interpretation. This phase will initially involve the study providers receiving the elbow PsUS exam training. Once trained, each study provider will obtain 3 elbow exams of participants between the ages of 1-16 years old. Providers will use the standardized views reviewed in the ultrasound training to perform the exam, with verbal consent obtained from each participant's parent for inclusion in the feasibility study. These images will be reviewed by study staff to ensure US examiners are obtaining the correct standardized views.
Once the feasibility exams are completed, the study providers are able to begin active study recruitment which will involve recruiting children between the ages of 1-16 years old with isolated acute elbow pain. Parents will initially be approached in the emergency department (ED), with written consent obtained if interested and eligible. Once consented, patients will undergo bilaterally standardized elbow exams using the pocket-sized ultrasound. All images will be stored on a password protected, cloud-based imaging database with all identifying information removed. After the exam, a basic assessment of the images will be made by the bedside ultrasound provider, as positive, negative or equivocal for signs of elbow fracture, but before reviewing any radiographic imaging. A positive PsUS will be defined as the presence of signs of elbow fracture, either as direct signs including cortical discontinuities or indirect signs including posterior fat pad with or without lipohemarthrosis on ultrasound exam. Following the ultrasound exam, patients will undergo standard clinical care for acute elbow injury per primary ED team which may consist of Xray or possible bedside nursemaid reduction. When applicable, study investigators will review the final blinded radiology readings of the initial or subsequent x-ray images after the patient encounter. Additionally, research staff will also attempt to follow up with participants after their ED visit for their elbow injury to determine if any additional radiographic imaging or care was obtained and if subsequent occult fractures were discovered on later imaging that may have been missed on the initial evaluation.
The primary aim of the feasibility portion of the study is to determine acceptability of the PsUS study training to obtain adequate elbow images. The primary aim of the active study is to compare the initial test performance characteristics of PSUS performed by bedside physicians compared to standard radiography in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures.
- Conditions
- Elbow Injury, Elbow Fracture
- Being tested
- Butterfly IQ
- Keywords
- Pocket sized ultrasound, Pediatric elbow injury, Pediatric elbow fracture
- Medical subject headings
- Elbow Injuries, Elbow Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Butterfly IQDevice
Butterfly IQ is a pocket sized ultrasound device. Each participant will undergo a ultrasound exam of both elbows using a pocket sized ultrasound device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Exam | Other | The Study consists of two parts, a feasibility part and an active part.
Participants in the feasibility part of the study only undergo a pocket-sized ultrasound exam and are distinct (unique) group with no overlap or involvement with the active part.
Participants in the active part of the study undergo a pocket-sized ultrasound exam and continue with normal clinically indicated medical care in the ED. The comparison to the ultrasound images is either a X-ray if fracture is suspected or bedside nursemaid reduction if subluxation is suspected (participants will act as their own comparison based on their routine ED clinical management). There is no participation overlap with the feasibility part. Receives: Device: Butterfly IQ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pocket Sized Ultrasound Elbow Exam Interpretation of Fracture
FOR THE ACTIVE STUDY ONLY: Pocket-size ultrasound exam for each participant were interpreted as positive, negative or equivocal for signs of fracture. The feasibility study was not assessing for the presence or absence of fracture.
Measured: 1ED visit (1 day)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Ultrasound Exam Image Quality
Each participant in both the feasibility and active parts of the study underwent a pocket sized ultrasound exam. 10 ultrasound images were obtained of each elbow and both elbows were imaged. Images will deemed adequate or inadequate for interpretation.
Measured: Time period to complete since ultrasound exam per participant, approximately < 15 min
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2023
- Study start18 Jan 2022
- Primary completion5 May 2023
- Study completion7 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Elbow InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Each participant receives the study intervention which is a pocket-sized ultrasound exam.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Holly Benjamin, MD, Principal investigator, University of Chicago/Comer Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05870345
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB21-0678
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: This study does not plan to share information with other researchers
Publications
Tsou PY, Ma YK, Wang YH, Gillon JT, Rafael J, Deanehan JK. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for upper extremity fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:383-394. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.071. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
PubMed 32507477Lee SH, Yun SJ. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Detection of Pediatric Elbow Fracture: A Meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;74(4):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 May 9.
PubMed 31080032Ackermann O, Liedgens P, Eckert K, Chelangattucherry E, Ruelander C, Emmanouilidis I, Ruchholtz S. Ultrasound diagnosis of juvenile forearm fractures. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2010 Jul;37(3):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s10396-010-0263-x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
PubMed 27278011Ackermann O, Simanowski J, Eckert K. Fracture Ultrasound of the Extremities. Ultraschall Med. 2020 Feb;41(1):12-28. doi: 10.1055/a-1023-1782. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
PubMed 32023628Eckert K, Ackermann O, Schweiger B, Radeloff E, Liedgens P. Ultrasound evaluation of elbow fractures in children. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2013 Oct;40(4):443-51. doi: 10.1007/s10396-013-0446-3. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
PubMed 27277459Rabiner JE, Khine H, Avner JR, Friedman LM, Tsung JW. Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of elbow fractures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.112. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
PubMed 23142008McNeil CR, McManus J, Mehta S. The accuracy of portable ultrasonography to diagnose fractures in an austere environment. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):50-2. doi: 10.1080/10903120802474513.
PubMed 19145524Lau BC, Robertson A, Motamedi D, Lee N. The Validity and Reliability of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound to Diagnose Distal Radius Fracture and Assess Quality of Closed Reduction. J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Jun;42(6):420-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
PubMed 28460717Burnier M, Buisson G, Ricard A, Cunin V, Pracros JP, Chotel F. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in elbow trauma in children: Prospective study of 34 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):839-843. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
PubMed 27697406Rennie L, Court-Brown CM, Mok JY, Beattie TF. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury. 2007 Aug;38(8):913-22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.036. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
PubMed 17628559Poonai N, Myslik F, Joubert G, Fan J, Misir A, Istasy V, Columbus M, Soegtrop R, Goldfarb A, Thompson D, Dubrovsky AS. Point-of-care Ultrasound for Nonangulated Distal Forearm Fractures in Children: Test Performance Characteristics and Patient-centered Outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):607-616. doi: 10.1111/acem.13146. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
PubMed 27976448Lee A, Colen DL, Fox JP, Chang B, Lin IC. Pediatric Hand and Upper Extremity Injuries Presenting to Emergency Departments in the United States: Epidemiology and Health Care-Associated Costs. Hand (N Y). 2021 Jul;16(4):519-527. doi: 10.1177/1558944719866884. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
PubMed 31441332Naranje SM, Erali RA, Warner WC Jr, Sawyer JR, Kelly DM. Epidemiology of Pediatric Fractures Presenting to Emergency Departments in the United States. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Jun;36(4):e45-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000595.
PubMed 26177059Bellavia MA, Cambise C, Coraci D, Maccauro G, Valassina A, Padua L. Ultrasound is a useful tool to evaluate nerve involvement in children with supracondylar humerus fractures. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Sep;56(3):E18-E20. doi: 10.1002/mus.25636. Epub 2017 Jun 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 28249353Chaar-Alvarez FM, Warkentine F, Cross K, Herr S, Paul RI. Bedside ultrasound diagnosis of nonangulated distal forearm fractures in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1027-32. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235e228.
PubMed 22068062
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Diagnostic Accuracy of Pocket Size Ultrasound (PsUS) in the Detection of Pediatric Elbow Fractures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05870345
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB21-0678
- Conditions
- Elbow Injury, Elbow Fracture
- Keywords
- Pocket sized ultrasound, Pediatric elbow injury, Pediatric elbow fracture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this project is to investigate the accuracy of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures. The primary research objective is to determine the test performance characteristics of PSUS performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians compared to radiography for the detection of pediatric elbow fractures. The project will consist of two parts, first involving a feasibility study and followed by an active study. The feasibility study will aim to answer if providers can perform an adequate elbow ultrasound exam after a brief study training. The active study will investigate the initial accuracy of the PsUS. Participants will be asked in either the feasibility or the active phases of the study to undergo a brief pocket-sized ultrasound elbow exam of both elbows. Patient will continue to receive their previously determined clinical ED management. In the active phase of the study, participant's elbow X-rays or if patient underwent bedside nursemaid reduction will be the comparison to pocket-sized ultrasound images.
Detailed description
The main purpose of this project is to investigate the accuracy of pocket-sized ultrasound (PsUS) in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures. The primary research objective is to determine the test performance characteristics of PSUS performed by pediatric emergency medicine physicians compared to radiography for the detection of pediatric elbow fractures. The project will consist of two parts, first involving a feasibility study and followed by an active study.
This project will consist of two parts, involving first a brief feasibility phase followed by a pilot study conducted in an urban pediatric emergency department (Comer Children's Hospital in Chicago, IL). For the feasibility phase, the purpose is to demonstrate that novice PsUS users are able to obtain accurate and adequate imaging for interpretation. This phase will initially involve the study providers receiving the elbow PsUS exam training. Once trained, each study provider will obtain 3 elbow exams of participants between the ages of 1-16 years old. Providers will use the standardized views reviewed in the ultrasound training to perform the exam, with verbal consent obtained from each participant's parent for inclusion in the feasibility study. These images will be reviewed by study staff to ensure US examiners are obtaining the correct standardized views.
Once the feasibility exams are completed, the study providers are able to begin active study recruitment which will involve recruiting children between the ages of 1-16 years old with isolated acute elbow pain. Parents will initially be approached in the emergency department (ED), with written consent obtained if interested and eligible. Once consented, patients will undergo bilaterally standardized elbow exams using the pocket-sized ultrasound. All images will be stored on a password protected, cloud-based imaging database with all identifying information removed. After the exam, a basic assessment of the images will be made by the bedside ultrasound provider, as positive, negative or equivocal for signs of elbow fracture, but before reviewing any radiographic imaging. A positive PsUS will be defined as the presence of signs of elbow fracture, either as direct signs including cortical discontinuities or indirect signs including posterior fat pad with or without lipohemarthrosis on ultrasound exam. Following the ultrasound exam, patients will undergo standard clinical care for acute elbow injury per primary ED team which may consist of Xray or possible bedside nursemaid reduction. When applicable, study investigators will review the final blinded radiology readings of the initial or subsequent x-ray images after the patient encounter. Additionally, research staff will also attempt to follow up with participants after their ED visit for their elbow injury to determine if any additional radiographic imaging or care was obtained and if subsequent occult fractures were discovered on later imaging that may have been missed on the initial evaluation.
The primary aim of the feasibility portion of the study is to determine acceptability of the PsUS study training to obtain adequate elbow images. The primary aim of the active study is to compare the initial test performance characteristics of PSUS performed by bedside physicians compared to standard radiography in the diagnosis of pediatric elbow fractures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Each participant receives the study intervention which is a pocket-sized ultrasound exam.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Exam | Other | Device: Butterfly IQThe Study consists of two parts, a feasibility part and an active part. Participants in the feasibility part of the study only undergo a pocket-sized ultrasound exam and are distinct (unique) group with no overlap or involvement with the active part. Participants in the active part of the study undergo a pocket-sized ultrasound exam and continue with normal clinically indicated medical care in the ED. The comparison to the ultrasound images is either a X-ray if fracture is suspected or bedside nursemaid reduction if subluxation is suspected (participants will act as their own comparison based on their routine ED clinical management). There is no participation overlap with the feasibility part. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- For Feasibility phase: children between the ages of 1-16 years olds
- For Active phase: children between the ages of 1-16 years olds with isolated, acute (less than 48 hrs) elbow pain in the setting of adequate history of trauma
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children <1 or >16 years old
- Those with open fractures, gross deformities, multiple traumatic injuries, distal neurovascular compromise, unstable vital signs or hemodynamic instability, altered mental status, history of skeletal abnormalities, or past elbow fracture as well as wards of the state or those unable to provide consent
- Patients who have a confirmed diagnosis of fracture at an outside institutions prior to arrival to the ED will also be excluded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Butterfly IQButterfly IQ is a pocket sized ultrasound device. Each participant will undergo a ultrasound exam of both elbows using a pocket sized ultrasound device. | Device | Ultrasound Exam |
Primary outcome
Pocket Sized Ultrasound Elbow Exam Interpretation of Fracture
Time frame: 1ED visit (1 day)
FOR THE ACTIVE STUDY ONLY: Pocket-size ultrasound exam for each participant were interpreted as positive, negative or equivocal for signs of fracture. The feasibility study was not assessing for the presence or absence of fracture.
1 secondary outcome
Ultrasound Exam Image Quality
Time frame: Time period to complete since ultrasound exam per participant, approximately < 15 min
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 32507477Tsou PY, Ma YK, Wang YH, Gillon JT, Rafael J, Deanehan JK. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for upper extremity fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:383-394. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.071. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 31080032Lee SH, Yun SJ. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Detection of Pediatric Elbow Fracture: A Meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;74(4):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 May 9.
- Background: PubMed 27278011Ackermann O, Liedgens P, Eckert K, Chelangattucherry E, Ruelander C, Emmanouilidis I, Ruchholtz S. Ultrasound diagnosis of juvenile forearm fractures. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2010 Jul;37(3):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s10396-010-0263-x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
- Background: PubMed 32023628Ackermann O, Simanowski J, Eckert K. Fracture Ultrasound of the Extremities. Ultraschall Med. 2020 Feb;41(1):12-28. doi: 10.1055/a-1023-1782. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
- Background: PubMed 27277459Eckert K, Ackermann O, Schweiger B, Radeloff E, Liedgens P. Ultrasound evaluation of elbow fractures in children. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2013 Oct;40(4):443-51. doi: 10.1007/s10396-013-0446-3. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 23142008Rabiner JE, Khine H, Avner JR, Friedman LM, Tsung JW. Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosis of elbow fractures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.112. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 19145524McNeil CR, McManus J, Mehta S. The accuracy of portable ultrasonography to diagnose fractures in an austere environment. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):50-2. doi: 10.1080/10903120802474513.
- Background: PubMed 28460717Lau BC, Robertson A, Motamedi D, Lee N. The Validity and Reliability of a Pocket-Sized Ultrasound to Diagnose Distal Radius Fracture and Assess Quality of Closed Reduction. J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Jun;42(6):420-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
- Background: PubMed 27697406Burnier M, Buisson G, Ricard A, Cunin V, Pracros JP, Chotel F. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in elbow trauma in children: Prospective study of 34 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Nov;102(7):839-843. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 17628559Rennie L, Court-Brown CM, Mok JY, Beattie TF. The epidemiology of fractures in children. Injury. 2007 Aug;38(8):913-22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.036. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 27976448Poonai N, Myslik F, Joubert G, Fan J, Misir A, Istasy V, Columbus M, Soegtrop R, Goldfarb A, Thompson D, Dubrovsky AS. Point-of-care Ultrasound for Nonangulated Distal Forearm Fractures in Children: Test Performance Characteristics and Patient-centered Outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):607-616. doi: 10.1111/acem.13146. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 31441332Lee A, Colen DL, Fox JP, Chang B, Lin IC. Pediatric Hand and Upper Extremity Injuries Presenting to Emergency Departments in the United States: Epidemiology and Health Care-Associated Costs. Hand (N Y). 2021 Jul;16(4):519-527. doi: 10.1177/1558944719866884. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. This study does not plan to share information with other researchers
Related trials for Elbow Injury
Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Olecranon Fractures in the Elderly
Olecranon Fracture
Recruiting
Vibratory Anesthesia on Pain Following Corticosteroid Injections
Bilateral Arthritis of Wrist, Tendinopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of GMI, PNF, and Standard Care for Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness Rehabilitation in Adults
Elbow Stiffess, Rehabilitation Treatment
Recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Combining ESWT With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Holly Benjamin, MD principal investigator
University of Chicago/Comer Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Butterfly IQ in people with Elbow Injury and Elbow Fracture, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pocket Sized Ultrasound Elbow Exam Interpretation of Fracture (time frame: 1ED visit (1 day)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05870345, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2024.