AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical DysplasiaMEDIATORNCT05870787

iMproving thE DIagnostics And Treatment Of ceRvical Precancer

An observational study of Cervical Dysplasia and Cervical Disease, run by University of Aarhus at 7 sites in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cervical cancer screening is important as it enables identification of women at increased risk of the disease, but high-quality diagnostics of screen-positive women and effective treatment of those with precancer are critical in preventing progression to cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 23 to 99 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Swede score colposcopy
How many people
929 participants
Where
7 sitesDenmark
Study dates
1 Mar 2023to 13 Dec 2024
How long will I take part?
6 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 23 to 99 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Women with abnormal smear (HPV-genotype and cytology) referred to colposcopy, visibel transformation zone (type 1 or 2) and where cervical biopsies has been sent to pathology examination.

Who may be able to join

  • Women referred to colposcopy due to abnormal smear (HPV-genotype and cytology) in Central Denmark Region or Southern Denmark Region.

Who cannot join

  • Allergic to iodine.
  • Tranformationzone not visible (type 3).
  • Atrophy of cervical epithelium.
  • Women referred to colposcopy with no cervical biopsies taken or invalid cervical biopsies.
  • Women with previous hysterectomy or without a cervix due to cervical cancer will be excluded.
  • Pregnant women.

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

Denmark7 sites
  • Guldberg Kvindeklinik

    Fredericia, Fredericia, 7000

  • Gødstrup Regional Hospital

    Herning, Herning, 7400

  • Horsens Gynækologisk Klinik

    Horsens, Horsens, 8700

  • Horsens Regional Hospital

    Horsens, Horsens, 8700

  • Odense Univeristy Hospital

    Odense, Odense, 5000

  • Randers Regional Hospital

    Randers, Randers, 8900

  • Viborg Regional Hospital

    Viborg, Viborg, 8800

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Cervical cancer screening is important as it enables identification of women at increased risk of the disease, but high-quality diagnostics of screen-positive women and effective treatment of those with precancer are critical in preventing progression to cancer. With the current transition from cytology-based to primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-screening and a growing proportion of HPV-vaccinated women, diagnostics of screen-positive women will become more challenging in the decades to come. Thus, there is a need to explore how to improve diagnostics while ensuring a low number of unnecessary procedures such as colposcopy and the collection of multiple cervical biopsies.

The overall purposes are:

Read more

Purpose 1: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of cervical precancer when using a colposcopic scoring system in the diagnostic work-up of screen-positive women.

Purpose 2: To investigate the performance of a colposcopic scoring system to identify women without cervical precancer in whom collection of biopsies can be safely omitted.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Every year, 375 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer in Denmark, and approximately 90 women die from the disease. Cervical cancer is caused by the sexually transmitted virus, human papillomavirus (HPV). When infected about 85-90 % clear the virus within a year or two. The remaining women develop a persistent HPV infection, which is associated with an increased risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which may progress to cancer if left untreated. Cervical cancer can be prevented through prophylactic HPV vaccination and screening. In Denmark, women aged 23 - 64 years are invited to the screening program. Women who do not participate in regular screening have an increased risk of cervical cancer, however up to 55% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in women who have attended screening. Hence, the performance of diagnostics is crucial.

Diagnostics Women with abnormal screening results may undergo repeat testing or be referred for colposcopy. Colposcopy allows the colposcopist to magnify and visualize the cervix with the transformation zone, where cervical cancer and cervical lesions typically arise. The aim is to make a colposcopic diagnosis and select the most severe area for biopsies, which undergo histopathological examination. Studies have shown considerable inter- and intra-observer variability even among experienced colposcopists, and a variable sensitivity of colposcopy as low as 55-57%. These findings suggest a need to improve the detection rate of CIN2+. A validated colposcopic scoring system, the Swede score, has been designed to improve the detection of high-grade cervical lesions, specified as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) by providing an systematic approach to the colposcopy examination. The Swede score includes five variables (degree of 1) acetowhitening, 2) margins and surface, 3) vessels, 4) lesion size, and 5) iodine staining by using Lugols iodine) with a score from 0 - 2. Conventional colposcopy only utilizes acetic acid. In the original study, the Swede score had a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+), with an area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of 0.87. Even so, the Swede score is endorsed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO) and by the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC), it has not yet been implemented in Denmark. As previous studies have mostly evaluated the use of the Swede score among expert colposcopists, it is important to assess whether the score may be a valuable tool among non-experts. In Denmark, colposcopy is mostly performed by non-experts gynecologists. As a result of the low performance of colposcopy, and because several studies have shown that the CIN2+ detection rate increases with the number of biopsies collected, the Danish national guidelines recommend that all women should have a minimum of 4 biopsies collected. Biopsies should be collected from abnormal areas of the cervix and, if no lesion is detected, random biopsies should be taken. Our neighboring Scandinavian countries, for example Sweden and Finland, do not recommend collection of random biopsies. If biopsies could be omitted without increasing the risk of missing disease and reducing the harms with pain, bleeding and discomfort, this would benefit the women.

Aim

The project aims to explore whether the implementation of a systematic colposcopic scoring system, the Swede score, can:

Pupose 1: Improve diagnostic accuracy of cervical lesions with detection of CIN2+ in a Danish clinical setting.

Purpose 2: Evaluate whether the Swede score can be used to assess cervical lesions with <CIN1, so random biopsies can be safely omitted.

Data Characteristics of the women will be collected from medical records (previous gynecological historic, parity, smoking status, HPV-vaccination status, hormone use or immunosuppressive treatment). From the Danish Pathology Databank, we will collect data on previous screening history, result of the referral screening test, result of current and subsequent cervical biopsies and/or cervical excision.

Being tested
Swede score colposcopy
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Diseases, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Swede score colposcopyDiagnostic test

    New colposcopy method: with application of acetic acid, supplemented with a systematic scoringsystem (Swede score) including Lugols iodine, and collection of cervical biopsies.

Study groups in NCT05870787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Swede score colposcopySwede score colposcopy: includes application with acetic acid, supplemented with a systematic scoring system (the Swede score) including Lugols iodine, and collection of cervical biopsies.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Swede score colposcopy
Conventional colposcopyConventional colposcopy: includes application with acetic acid and collection of cervical biopsies.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Purpose 1: Diagnosis of collected targeted cervical biopsies

    The number of women diagnosed with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) diagnosed in cervical biopsies

    Measured: When the histological report is available - typically within 12 weeks after the biopsy was taken

  2. Purpose 2: Diagnosis of collected random cervical biopsies

    The number of women diagnosed with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 1 or less (<CIN1) vs. (CIN2+) diagnosed in random cervical biopsies.

    The clinical perspectives will be the absolute risk of CIN2+ in random biopsies.

    Measured: When the histological report is available - typically within 12 weeks after the biopsy was taken

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 May 2023
  2. Study start1 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion6 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion13 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
929 participants (actual)
Target duration
6 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05870787
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-0367531-3031
Acronym
MEDIATOR
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
12 May 2023
Last updated
10 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Knudsen AS, Gustafson LW, Booth BB, Randrup TH, Kesmodel US, Strander B, Trope A, Nieminen P, Hammer A; SWEDESCORE Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of a systematic approach using Swedescore versus conventional colposcopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse: A multicenter, non-randomized clinical study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2026 Nov 3:10.1111/aogs.70375. doi: 10.1111/aogs.70375. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42978127
  • Knudsen AS, Randrup TH, Kesmodel US, Booth B, Gustafson L, Trope A, Strander B, Nieminen P, Hammer A. Assessment of a colposcopic scoring system (Swedescore) to reduce the number of cervical biopsies: a protocol for a clinical multicentre non-randomised intervention study in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e085382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085382.

    PubMed 39675832

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cervical Dysplasia and Cervical Disease, run by University of Aarhus at 7 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Purpose 1: Diagnosis of collected targeted cervical biopsies (time frame: When the histological report is available - typically within 12 weeks after the biopsy was taken). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05870787, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in