Neuroendocrine TumorsEarly Phase 1TECANTNCT05871320
Novel 99mTc-labeled Somatostatin Antaginosts in the Diagnostic Algotithm of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
A Early Phase 1 study testing [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in people with Neuroendocrine Tumors, run by Jagiellonian University at 3 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The main goal of the study is to expand cancer preclinical research results on the usefulness of SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in clinical practice. Detection of NEN and monitoring of response to therapy is still challenging due to their cellular heterogeneity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuroendocrine Tumors
- What is being tested?
- [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Dec 2022to 30 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Understanding and provision of signed and dated written informed consent by the patient or legally acceptable representative prior to any study-specific procedures.
- Age ≥ 21 years
- Male and female patients with cytologically/histologically confirmed NEN (G1 - G2) with SSTR positivity in molecular imaging (SPECT/PET - within 2 months before inclusion)
- Karnofsky performance status ≥60%
- Life expectancy of more than 6 months
- Participating men must use a single barrier method for contraception for at least 6 months after completion of the trial starting at the day of application of [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Women of childbearing age must use two highly effective methods of contraception during the trial and 6 months after application of investigational product if not in menopause or after hysterectomy.
- The following contraceptive methods with a Pearl Index lower than 1% are regarded as highly effective:
- Oral hormonal contraception ("pill") (as far as its efficacy is not expected to be impaired during the trial, e.g. with IMPs that cause vomiting and diarrhoea, adequate safety cannot be assumed)
- Dermal hormonal contraception
- Vaginal hormonal contraception (NuvaRing®)
- Contraceptive plaster
- Long-acting injectable contraceptives
- Implants that release progesterone (Implanon®)
- Tubal ligation (female sterilisation)
- Double barrier methods This means that the following are not regarded as safe: condom plus spermicide, simple barrier methods (vaginal pessaries, condom, female condoms), copper spirals, the rhythm method, basal temperature method, and the withdrawal method (coitus interruptus).
- The regulations for contraception are derived from Guideline ICH E8 Chapter 3.2.2.1 Selection of subjects together with ICH M3 note 4.
Who cannot join
- Renal insufficiency with an eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or intolerance to any constituents of intravenous CT-contrast agents
- Higher than grade 2 hematotoxicity (CTC >2)
- Co-existing malignancies (except non-melanoma skin carcinoma and uterine cervix carcinoma -in-situ unless without evidence of recurrence for 5 years)
- Patients with concurrent illnesses/history of somatic/psychiatric disease that might preclude study completion or interfere with study results
- Patients with bladder outflow obstruction or unmanageable urinary incontinence
- Illness/clinically relevant trauma within 2 weeks before study entry
Show all 14Show fewer
- Pregnancy; breast-feeding; females planning to bear a child recently or with childbearing potential, unless a commonly accepted effective means of contraception is used
- Prior administration of a radiopharmaceutical for SPECT-imaging within a period corresponding to 8 half-lives of the radionuclide used on such radiopharmaceutical.
- Participation in any other investigational trial within 30 days of study entry with potential interactions regarding the study drugs or the underlying disease.
- Known or expected hypersensitivity to somatostatin analogues or to any excipient of the study drug
- History of somatic or psychiatric disease/condition that may interfere with the objectives and assessments of the study.
- Clinically significant illness or clinically relevant trauma within 2 weeks before the administration of the investigational product.
- Subjects with any kind of dependency on the investigator or is employed by the sponsor or investigator
- Subjects held in an institution by legal or official order
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 3 countries.
3 sites in 3 countries
Austria1 site
Innsbruck Medical University Department of Nuclear Medicine
Innsbruck
Poland1 site
Department of Endocrinology, Jagiellonian University Medical College
Krakow, 30-688
Slovenia1 site
University Medical Centre Ljubljana Department of Nuclear Medicine
Ljubljana
About this study
Official title: Novel 99mTc-labeled Somatostatin Antaginosts in the Diagnostic Algotithm of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms - a Feasibility Study
The main goal of the study is to expand cancer preclinical research results on the usefulness of SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in clinical practice. Detection of NEN and monitoring of response to therapy is still challenging due to their cellular heterogeneity. Initial preclinical studies suggest that NEN imaging with the use of SSTR2-Antagonist may be advantageous in comparison to the widely used SSTR2-Agonists.
Recently, novel radiopharmaceuticals, based on SSTR2-Antagonists, were shown to provide superior SSTR2 visualisation than currently used agonists. The need for molecular imaging of NEN is expected to grow significantly in the near future due to their increasing incidence and prevalence. Although a persistent trend to shift the molecular imaging of NEN from conventional SPECT/CT gamma cameras to PET/CT has been observed in the last decade, labelling the compound with Tc-99m offers significant advantages by its extremely wide availability, low cost and low radiation exposure to patients. Effective and accessible molecular imaging methods as an integral part of personalised patient management are needed to optimise selection and follow-up of available therapeutic modalities. The Tc-99m-labeled SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 is expected to be an effective, widely available compound for quantitative assessment of SSTR2 NEN status, allowing a personalised therapeutic approach.
Read the detailed description
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that arise from various endocrine glands, endocrine cells within non-endocrine tissue and diffuse endocrine cells of the gastrointestinal, respiratory and genitourinary tract. Detection of NEN and monitoring of their response to therapy is challenging due to their varied location (often-unknown primary focus) and cellular heterogeneity. NEN exhibit a wide range of histological appearances and biological behaviors, and may all potentially behave in an aggressive manner, irrespective of the initial diagnosis. Consequently, the prediction of clinical outcomes in an individual patient is often difficult and inaccurate. According to some national registries, the incidence of NEN increased more than 6-fold and the prevalence more than 8-fold between 1973 and 2012, making NEN the second most prevalent diagnosis in gastrointestinal malignancies, thus representing a growing challenge. The rise in the incidence can be partly attributed to increased awareness of the disease and better detection methods. Diagnostic imaging is an integral part of the management of patients with NEN by localising the primary or recurrence site, determining the extent of the disease and evaluating response to therapy. Nuclear medicine with single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) is a branch of molecular imaging: in contrast to anatomical imaging, it depicts functional changes and biological characteristics of target tissues, providing a unique insight into the biology of malignant disease, and has established itself as an excellent tool in personalized medicine. The characteristic feature of NEN is an overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on cell membranes. Molecular imaging techniques utilise the ability of SST analogues labelled with radioactive (single-photon or positron emitting) nuclides to bind to the SSTR. A combination of molecular and anatomical imaging (hybrid imaging, SPECT/CT and PET/CT) is currently the most sensitive approach to visualisation of SSTR-positive tumours. In NEN patients the prognosis depends on the grade and stage of the tumour. However, SSTR expression determines not only efficacy of staging using molecular imaging methods, but also efficacy of antiproliferative therapy with SST analogues both not radiolabelled ("cold") and labelled with a therapeutic radionuclide thus enabling Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) as the main approach to personalised NEN patients' management. Traditionally, radiolabelled SST analogues were constructed aiming at their agonistic behaviour, based on their internalisation after SSTR activation and consequent retention within the tumour cells, believed to be crucial for efficient molecular imaging and therapy. Recently, it has been shown that novel molecular probes, SSTR antagonists, recognise more binding sites and hence improve diagnostic efficacy, especially when the density of SSTR is low. Accumulating preclinical and clinical data using both SPECT and PET tracers shows that high-affinity SSTR antagonists can provide better SSTR visualisation than agonists. Preclinical data and subsequent clinical evaluation demonstrated higher tumour uptake of an In-111-labelled antagonist [111In]In-DOTA-sst2-ANT ([111In]In-DOTA-BASS) compared to the agonist [111In]In-DTPA0-octreotide or [111In]In -DTPA0-octreotate, as well as superior tumour-to-background ratios. One of the first reports describing the SSTR2 antagonist LM3 indicates the high potential of gallium-68 (Ga-68) and copper-64 (Cu-64) radiolabelled LM3 in PET/CT. The authors demonstrated strong dependence of the affinity and pharmacokinetics of the SST-based radiolabelled antagonists on the chelator and radiometal, also confirmed using another SSTR antagonist, namely JR11. The Superiority of the SSTR antagonist was demonstrated in the Phase I/II clinical study using a positron emitter, [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and in a pilot study conducted with beta-emitting, therapeutic radionuclide (lutetium-177, Lu-177) labelled SSTR antagonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. As a result, research in the field is currently strongly focused on SSTR antagonists. Ga-68-labelled SST analogues have already established PET as a unique tool for personalising treatment of NEN. Nevertheless, single-photon emitting radiopharmaceuticals still represent the cornerstone of molecular imaging, particularly those based on Technetium-99m (Tc-99m). Its physical properties (half-life of 6 hours, optimal energy of 140 keV for imaging and lowest radiation exposure), widest on-site availability and cost-effectiveness are of major importance for routine clinical applications. Medical diagnostic imaging techniques using Tc-99m account for approximately 80% of all nuclear medicine procedures, representing 30-40 million examinations worldwide every year; even in developed countries, the number of gamma cameras in use exceeds by far the number of PET systems. Considering the above-mentioned characteristics Tc-99m is perfect for research with new radiotracers and is still recognised as the workhorse of diagnostic nuclear medicine. Quantifiable uptake of the radiopharmaceutical in target tissue using standardised methods and metrics such as standardised uptake value (SUV) is currently a unique feature of PET allowing highly personalized approaches to patient management and is part of clinical routine. It was shown also in NEN that the quantitative approach is able to adequately predict and evaluate the response to various treatments available, including "cold" and radiolabelled somatostatin analogues (PRRT). However, single-photon quantitative imaging has developed significantly and is also entering clinical routine. Identical quantitative metrics are becoming available with the use of SPECT/CT systems (SPECT SUV) with comparable accuracy and clinical applicability. The development of a quantitative SPECT imaging approach in NEN, in combination with improved, widely available radiopharmaceuticals, would therefore represent a highly significant improvement in management, tailored to the needs of each individual patient.
- Conditions
- Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Being tested
- [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1
- Keywords
- Somatostatin receptors, neuroendocrine neoplasms, Positron emission tomography, Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy, Single-photon emission computed tomography, SSTR2 antagonist, 99mTc, NEN tumour, Tc-99m-labeled SSTR2-Antagonist
- Medical subject headings
- Neuroendocrine Tumors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
[99mTc]Tc-TECANT1Drug
only one arm - the administration of [99mTC]-Tc-TECANT1 in all patients included
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 | Experimental | The injection volume will be up to 5 mL over 20 seconds with an activity of 10 MBq/kg body weight (range between min. 500 and max. 800 MBq). To ensure application of the complete activity additionally 10 mL of 0.9% saline will be infused via the same system. Receives: Drug: [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety and Tolerability assessment - incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of iv administration of TECANT1 radiolabeled with 740±10% MBq of 99mTc
The number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v.5.0 (time frame: 2 weeks after administration)CTCAE v.5.0 (time frame: 2 weeks after administration)
Measured: 14 days
Dosimetry assessment - effective dose absorbed in critical organs
Effective dose counted based on absorbed dose (energy deposited per unit mass) adjusted for radiation type and relative organ sensitivity measured in sievert (Sv)
Measured: 2 days
Assessment of ionization radiation related to injection of TECANT1
Assessment of effective absorbed dose per injected activity [mSv/MBq] for critical organs (bone marrow, kidneys, bladder wall) and neoplastic lesions
Measured: 2days
Analysis of human pharmacokinetics of TECANT1
- Calculation of biological half-life of Tc-99m -SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in blood (min) (based on time-activity curves)
- Assessment of the biological half-life of Tc-99m-SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 (min) in normal organs, tumour lesions (based on time-activity curves)
Measured: 2 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Evaluation of [99mTc]Tc-TECANT01 uptake in tumour lesions.
Diagnostic accuracy assessed as the number of neoplastic lesions detected with [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in comparison to the number of lesions detected with ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT)
Measured: 14 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2023
- Study start23 Dec 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2023
- Study completion30 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuroendocrine TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Multi-center, Phase 0/I study, prospective single-arm, open-label study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jagiellonian University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical University Innsbruck, NCBJ Polatom: Narodowe Centrum Badań Jądrowych Polatom, University of Ljubljana, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Jagiellonian University
- Investigators
- Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Prof., Principal investigator, Endocrinology Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05871320
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TECANT
- Other IDs
- 2019-003379-20, 2019
- Acronym
- TECANT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Decristoforo C, Mikolajczak R, Kolenc P, Opalinska M, Garnuszek P, Skorkiewicz K, Glowa B, Trofimiuk-Muldner M, Studen A, Simoncic U, Rangger C, di Santo G, Fani M, Virgolini I, Lezaic L. Improving the Somatostatin Receptor Status Assessment for Personalized and Precise Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with the Use of a 99mTc-Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonist: The Final Results of the ERA PerMed TECANT Clinical Trial. J Nucl Med. 2026 Jun 1;67(6):895-902. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.125.270347.
PubMed 41887731
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Novel 99mTc-labeled Somatostatin Antaginosts in the Diagnostic Algotithm of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms - a Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05871320
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TECANT / TECANT
- Conditions
- Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Keywords
- Somatostatin receptors, neuroendocrine neoplasms, Positron emission tomography, Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy, Single-photon emission computed tomography, SSTR2 antagonist, 99mTc, NEN tumour
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jagiellonian UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medical University Innsbruck, NCBJ Polatom: Narodowe Centrum Badań Jądrowych Polatom, University of Ljubljana, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
- Study start
- 23 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main goal of the study is to expand cancer preclinical research results on the usefulness of SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in clinical practice. Detection of NEN and monitoring of response to therapy is still challenging due to their cellular heterogeneity. Initial preclinical studies suggest that NEN imaging with the use of SSTR2-Antagonist may be advantageous in comparison to the widely used SSTR2-Agonists.
Recently, novel radiopharmaceuticals, based on SSTR2-Antagonists, were shown to provide superior SSTR2 visualisation than currently used agonists. The need for molecular imaging of NEN is expected to grow significantly in the near future due to their increasing incidence and prevalence. Although a persistent trend to shift the molecular imaging of NEN from conventional SPECT/CT gamma cameras to PET/CT has been observed in the last decade, labelling the compound with Tc-99m offers significant advantages by its extremely wide availability, low cost and low radiation exposure to patients. Effective and accessible molecular imaging methods as an integral part of personalised patient management are needed to optimise selection and follow-up of available therapeutic modalities. The Tc-99m-labeled SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 is expected to be an effective, widely available compound for quantitative assessment of SSTR2 NEN status, allowing a personalised therapeutic approach.
Detailed description
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that arise from various endocrine glands, endocrine cells within non-endocrine tissue and diffuse endocrine cells of the gastrointestinal, respiratory and genitourinary tract. Detection of NEN and monitoring of their response to therapy is challenging due to their varied location (often-unknown primary focus) and cellular heterogeneity. NEN exhibit a wide range of histological appearances and biological behaviors, and may all potentially behave in an aggressive manner, irrespective of the initial diagnosis. Consequently, the prediction of clinical outcomes in an individual patient is often difficult and inaccurate. According to some national registries, the incidence of NEN increased more than 6-fold and the prevalence more than 8-fold between 1973 and 2012, making NEN the second most prevalent diagnosis in gastrointestinal malignancies, thus representing a growing challenge. The rise in the incidence can be partly attributed to increased awareness of the disease and better detection methods. Diagnostic imaging is an integral part of the management of patients with NEN by localising the primary or recurrence site, determining the extent of the disease and evaluating response to therapy. Nuclear medicine with single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) is a branch of molecular imaging: in contrast to anatomical imaging, it depicts functional changes and biological characteristics of target tissues, providing a unique insight into the biology of malignant disease, and has established itself as an excellent tool in personalized medicine. The characteristic feature of NEN is an overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on cell membranes. Molecular imaging techniques utilise the ability of SST analogues labelled with radioactive (single-photon or positron emitting) nuclides to bind to the SSTR. A combination of molecular and anatomical imaging (hybrid imaging, SPECT/CT and PET/CT) is currently the most sensitive approach to visualisation of SSTR-positive tumours. In NEN patients the prognosis depends on the grade and stage of the tumour. However, SSTR expression determines not only efficacy of staging using molecular imaging methods, but also efficacy of antiproliferative therapy with SST analogues both not radiolabelled ("cold") and labelled with a therapeutic radionuclide thus enabling Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) as the main approach to personalised NEN patients' management. Traditionally, radiolabelled SST analogues were constructed aiming at their agonistic behaviour, based on their internalisation after SSTR activation and consequent retention within the tumour cells, believed to be crucial for efficient molecular imaging and therapy. Recently, it has been shown that novel molecular probes, SSTR antagonists, recognise more binding sites and hence improve diagnostic efficacy, especially when the density of SSTR is low. Accumulating preclinical and clinical data using both SPECT and PET tracers shows that high-affinity SSTR antagonists can provide better SSTR visualisation than agonists. Preclinical data and subsequent clinical evaluation demonstrated higher tumour uptake of an In-111-labelled antagonist [111In]In-DOTA-sst2-ANT ([111In]In-DOTA-BASS) compared to the agonist [111In]In-DTPA0-octreotide or [111In]In -DTPA0-octreotate, as well as superior tumour-to-background ratios. One of the first reports describing the SSTR2 antagonist LM3 indicates the high potential of gallium-68 (Ga-68) and copper-64 (Cu-64) radiolabelled LM3 in PET/CT. The authors demonstrated strong dependence of the affinity and pharmacokinetics of the SST-based radiolabelled antagonists on the chelator and radiometal, also confirmed using another SSTR antagonist, namely JR11. The Superiority of the SSTR antagonist was demonstrated in the Phase I/II clinical study using a positron emitter, [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-JR11 and in a pilot study conducted with beta-emitting, therapeutic radionuclide (lutetium-177, Lu-177) labelled SSTR antagonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. As a result, research in the field is currently strongly focused on SSTR antagonists. Ga-68-labelled SST analogues have already established PET as a unique tool for personalising treatment of NEN. Nevertheless, single-photon emitting radiopharmaceuticals still represent the cornerstone of molecular imaging, particularly those based on Technetium-99m (Tc-99m). Its physical properties (half-life of 6 hours, optimal energy of 140 keV for imaging and lowest radiation exposure), widest on-site availability and cost-effectiveness are of major importance for routine clinical applications. Medical diagnostic imaging techniques using Tc-99m account for approximately 80% of all nuclear medicine procedures, representing 30-40 million examinations worldwide every year; even in developed countries, the number of gamma cameras in use exceeds by far the number of PET systems. Considering the above-mentioned characteristics Tc-99m is perfect for research with new radiotracers and is still recognised as the workhorse of diagnostic nuclear medicine. Quantifiable uptake of the radiopharmaceutical in target tissue using standardised methods and metrics such as standardised uptake value (SUV) is currently a unique feature of PET allowing highly personalized approaches to patient management and is part of clinical routine. It was shown also in NEN that the quantitative approach is able to adequately predict and evaluate the response to various treatments available, including "cold" and radiolabelled somatostatin analogues (PRRT). However, single-photon quantitative imaging has developed significantly and is also entering clinical routine. Identical quantitative metrics are becoming available with the use of SPECT/CT systems (SPECT SUV) with comparable accuracy and clinical applicability. The development of a quantitative SPECT imaging approach in NEN, in combination with improved, widely available radiopharmaceuticals, would therefore represent a highly significant improvement in management, tailored to the needs of each individual patient.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Multi-center, Phase 0/I study, prospective single-arm, open-label study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 | Experimental | Drug: [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1The injection volume will be up to 5 mL over 20 seconds with an activity of 10 MBq/kg body weight (range between min. 500 and max. 800 MBq). To ensure application of the complete activity additionally 10 mL of 0.9% saline will be infused via the same system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Understanding and provision of signed and dated written informed consent by the patient or legally acceptable representative prior to any study-specific procedures.
- Age ≥ 21 years
- Male and female patients with cytologically/histologically confirmed NEN (G1 - G2) with SSTR positivity in molecular imaging (SPECT/PET - within 2 months before inclusion)
- Karnofsky performance status ≥60%
- Life expectancy of more than 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Renal insufficiency with an eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 or intolerance to any constituents of intravenous CT-contrast agents
- Higher than grade 2 hematotoxicity (CTC >2)
- Co-existing malignancies (except non-melanoma skin carcinoma and uterine cervix carcinoma -in-situ unless without evidence of recurrence for 5 years)
- Patients with concurrent illnesses/history of somatic/psychiatric disease that might preclude study completion or interfere with study results
- Patients with bladder outflow obstruction or unmanageable urinary incontinence
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1only one arm - the administration of [99mTC]-Tc-TECANT1 in all patients included | Drug | [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 |
Primary outcome
Safety and Tolerability assessment - incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of iv administration of TECANT1 radiolabeled with 740±10% MBq of 99mTc
Time frame: 14 days
The number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v.5.0 (time frame: 2 weeks after administration)CTCAE v.5.0 (time frame: 2 weeks after administration)
Dosimetry assessment - effective dose absorbed in critical organs
Time frame: 2 days
Effective dose counted based on absorbed dose (energy deposited per unit mass) adjusted for radiation type and relative organ sensitivity measured in sievert (Sv)
Assessment of ionization radiation related to injection of TECANT1
Time frame: 2days
Assessment of effective absorbed dose per injected activity [mSv/MBq] for critical organs (bone marrow, kidneys, bladder wall) and neoplastic lesions
Analysis of human pharmacokinetics of TECANT1
Time frame: 2 days
1. Calculation of biological half-life of Tc-99m -SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in blood (min) (based on time-activity curves) 2. Assessment of the biological half-life of Tc-99m-SSTR2-Antagonist [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 (min) in normal organs, tumour lesions (based on time-activity curves)
1 secondary outcome
Evaluation of [99mTc]Tc-TECANT01 uptake in tumour lesions.
Time frame: 14 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41887731Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Decristoforo C, Mikolajczak R, Kolenc P, Opalinska M, Garnuszek P, Skorkiewicz K, Glowa B, Trofimiuk-Muldner M, Studen A, Simoncic U, Rangger C, di Santo G, Fani M, Virgolini I, Lezaic L. Improving the Somatostatin Receptor Status Assessment for Personalized and Precise Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with the Use of a 99mTc-Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonist: The Final Results of the ERA PerMed TECANT Clinical Trial. J Nucl Med. 2026 Jun 1;67(6):895-902. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.125.270347.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neuroendocrine Tumors
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Evaluating the Addition of the Immunotherapy Drug Atezolizumab to Standard Chemotherapy Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas That Originate Outside the Lung
Advanced Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, Metastatic Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Directed Study of Belinostat Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Tumor, Neuroendocrine
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Prof. principal investigator
Endocrinology Clinic
3 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing [99mTc]Tc-TECANT1 in people with Neuroendocrine Tumors, run by Jagiellonian University at 3 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Austria, Poland, Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety and Tolerability assessment - incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of iv administration of TECANT1 radiolabeled with 740±10% MBq of 99mTc (time frame: 14 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05871320, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.