Cesarean Section ComplicationsNCT05873114
Comparison of MET vs Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery
A study testing Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique (MET) in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by Superior University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Effectiveness Comparison of Effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) vs Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section Complications
- What is being tested?
- Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique (MET)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2023to 31 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with age group 20 to 40 year.
- low back pain and disability after normal vaginal delivery or c-section delivery will be included.
Who cannot join
- Subjects who had neurological deficit.
- spinal tumors, scoliosis
- underwent spinal surgery
- prolapsed intervertebral disc with or without radiculopathy will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Chaudary Muhammad Akram Teaching Hospital, Azra Naheed Medical College, Superior University
Lahore, Punjab Province
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) vs Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery
Effectiveness Comparison of Effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) vs Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Being tested
- Mobilization, Muscle Energy Technique (MET)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MobilizationDiagnostic test
Effects of Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery
Muscle Energy Technique (MET)Diagnostic test
Effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Muscle Energy Technique (MET) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Muscle Energy Technique (MET) |
| Mobilization | Other | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Mobilization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
NPSR
Numeric pain rating scale
Measured: 6 Months
Owestry
Owestry low back pain disability questionnaire
Measured: 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 May 2023
- Study start1 Apr 2023
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cesarean Section ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Superior UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Superior University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05873114
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DPT/Batch-Fall18/540
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 24 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) vs Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05873114
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DPT/Batch-Fall18/540
- Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Superior UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Effectiveness Comparison of Effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) vs Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Muscle Energy Technique (MET) | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Muscle Energy Technique (MET) |
| Mobilization | Other | Diagnostic Test: Mobilization |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects with age group 20 to 40 year.
- low back pain and disability after normal vaginal delivery or c-section delivery will be included.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects who had neurological deficit.
- spinal tumors, scoliosis
- underwent spinal surgery
- prolapsed intervertebral disc with or without radiculopathy will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MobilizationEffects of Mobilization in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery | Diagnostic test | Mobilization |
| Muscle Energy Technique (MET)Effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) in Management of Post-partum Backache in Females With Normal Vaginal Delivery (NVD) and Cesarean Section Delivery | Diagnostic test | Muscle Energy Technique (MET) |
Primary outcome
NPSR
Time frame: 6 Months
Numeric pain rating scale
Owestry
Time frame: 6 Months
Owestry low back pain disability questionnaire
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cesarean Section Complications
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Ketamine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Postpartum Depression and Pain After Cesarean Delivery
Pain, Postpartum Depression
Recruiting
Clinical Impact of Uterine Repair During Cesarean Section With Barbed Suture on the Incidence of Isthmocele
Isthmocele, Cesarean Scar Defect
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobilization and Muscle Energy Technique (MET) in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by Superior University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sidra Razzaq, DPT (+923077967289, srazzaq207@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
NPSR (time frame: 6 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2023.