AzTrials
AzTrials

Behcet's UveitisPhase 2UVBNCT05874505

"Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab to That of Tocilizumab in Severe Uveitis of Behçet's Disease"

A Phase 2 study testing Adalimumab and Tocilizumab in people with Behcet's Uveitis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

UVB, is the first randomized prospective, head to head study, comparing Adalimumab to Tocilizumab in sight threatening uveitis of Behçet's Disease (BD). Anti-TNFα has been used for BD uveitis for 15 years. The incidence of blindness in BD has been dramatically reduced in the recent years with the use of biologics. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Behcet's Uveitis
What is being tested?
Adalimumab and Tocilizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2023to Jul 2027
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >= 18 at Inclusion
  • Provide written, informed consent prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures
  • Diagnosis of Behçet's disease according to the International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ICBD) or history of aphthosis.
  • Diagnosis of non-infectious intermediate, posterior-, or pan-uveitis in at least one eye fulfilling the International Study Group Classification Criteria (Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature [SUN] criteria) of posterior, or pan- uveitis
  • Sight threatening uveitis defined according to the validated international definition as 2 lines of drop in visual acuity on a 10/10 scale, and/or retinal inflammation (macular oedema and/or retinal vasculitis).
  • Chest X-ray (postero-anterior and lateral) or CT-scanner results within 12 weeks prior to Inclusion with no evidence of active Tuberculosis, active infection, or malignancy
Show all 27Show fewer
  • For female subjects of childbearing potential (premenopausal female capable of becoming pregnant) , a negative serum pregnancy test (plasmatic or urinary)
  • For subjects with reproductive potential, a willingness to use contraceptive measures adequate to prevent the subject or the subject's partner from becoming pregnant during the study and 3 and 5 months after stopping therapy for tocilizumab and adalimumab, respectively. Birth control methods which may be considered as highly effective methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly are considered as highly effective birth control methods (according to CTFG recommendations). Such methods include:
  • combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:
  • oral
  • intravaginal
  • transdermal
  • progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation:
  • oral
  • injectable
  • implantable
  • intrauterine device (IUD)
  • intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
  • bilateral tubal occlusion
  • vasectomised partner
  • sexual abstinence (In the context of this guidance sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject).
  • For male subjects :
  • use of a condom
  • vasectomy (with documentation of azoospermia)
  • sexual abstinence
  • A potential subject with a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) (e.g., QuantiFERON®-TB Gold or T-spot TB® Test) obtained within 6 months prior to inclusion is eligible if her/his chest X-ray does not show evidence suggestive of active TB disease and there are no clinical signs and symptoms of pulmonary and/or extra-pulmonary TB disease. These subjects with a latent TB infection who have not already received a prophylactic TB treatment must agree in advance to complete such a treatment course. The treatment should be started at the latest at inclusion.
  • Affiliation to a social security system. Patients affiliated to universal medical coverage (CMU) are eligible for the study

Who cannot join

  • Infectious uveitis, masquerade syndromes, or uveitis due to causes other than BD uveitis
  • Active tuberculosis or history of untreated tuberculosis and/or severe infection
  • Positive HIV antibody and/or positive hepatitis B surface antigen and/or positive hepatitis C RNA, results obtained within 1 month prior to inclusion
  • History of malignancy within 5 years prior to Inclusion other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated, non-metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibodies
  • History of multiple sclerosis and/or demyelinating disorder
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or an excipient of the Investigational Medicinal Product or the auxiliary medicine
  • Active or suspected ocular infection
  • Active or suspected systemic infection
  • History of intestinal ulceration or diverticulitis
  • Known porphyria
  • Laboratory values assessed during Inclusion:
  • Neutrophil < 1.0 x 10^3 /mm3
  • Platelet count < 80 x 10^3 /mm3
  • ASAT or ALAT > 5 ULN
  • Treatment with anti-TNF and/or Tocilizumab therapy within 1 month prior to inclusion
  • if on azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or methotrexate at the time of inclusion, these drugs must be withdrawn prior to receiving the tocilizumab or adalimumab dose on Day 0
  • Stage III and IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac insufficiency
  • Severe renal (Glomerular filtration rates (GFR) <30ml/min) or liver insufficiency (prothrombin <50% without other causes)
  • Any live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Breastfeeding or pregnant women

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Bahram BODAGHI, Pr contact

+33 1 42 16 37 28

bahram.bodaghi@aphp.fr

Matthieu RESCHE-RIGON, Pr contact

+33 1 42 49 97 42

matthieu.resche-rigon@u-paris.fr

About this study

Official title: "Multicenter, Randomized, Prospective Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab to That of Tocilizumab in Severe Uveitis of Behçet's Disease" (UVB) : Treatment of UVeitis in Behçet's Diseases With Biologics

UVB, is the first randomized prospective, head to head study, comparing Adalimumab to Tocilizumab in sight threatening uveitis of Behçet's Disease (BD). Anti-TNFα has been used for BD uveitis for 15 years. The incidence of blindness in BD has been dramatically reduced in the recent years with the use of biologics. There is no firm evidence or randomized controlled trials directly addressing the best induction therapy in severe BD uveitis. BD uveitis is considered as the most devastating inflammatory ocular disease. Risk of visual loss reaches 25% at 5 years and 80% of patients have a bilateral involvement. Contrasting with immunosuppressors or interferon-alpha, biotherapies act rapidly and are highly effective in steroid's sparing thus preventing occurrence of cataract and/or glaucoma. However, anti-TNFα failed to demonstrate sustainable complete remission over 50 % of severe sight threatening uveitis. There is little published information on use of biologics other than anti-TNFα for severe BD uveitis. Tocilizumab has been used with success in severe and/or resistant cases and is one of the most promising biologics in BD. IL-6 expression correlates with BD activity and other immunological data provide a strong rationale for targeting BD with tocilizumab. Despite a strong rationale, these compounds are not yet approved in BD, which guarantees the innovative nature of this study that aims selecting or dropping any arm when evidence of efficacy already exists. The objective of the study is to assess the benefit of tocilizumab comparatively to that of adalimumab in sight-threatening Behçet's disease uveitis at week 16

Being tested
Adalimumab, Tocilizumab
Keywords
Biologics, Adalimumab, Tocilizumab

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AdalimumabDrug

    Adalimumab 80 mg at Day 0 then 40 mg subcutaneous at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15

  • TocilizumabDrug

    Tocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous each week for 15 weeks

Study groups in NCT05874505
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AdalimumabExperimentalAdalimumab 80 mg at Day 0 then 40 mg subcutaneous at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15
Receives: Drug: Adalimumab
TocilizumabExperimentalTocilizumab 162 mg subcutaneous each week for 15 weeks
Receives: Drug: Tocilizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients with complete remission of ocular involvement (Efficacy)

    Efficacy will be defined by a complete remission of ocular involvement with prednisone lower or equal to 5 mg/day . Ocular involvement response to treatment will be evaluated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Workgroup criteria.

    Measured: At week 16 after randomization

Secondary outcomes (85)
  1. Percent of patients meeting the corticosteroid sparing targets

    lower than 0.1 mg/day/kg of prednisone

    Measured: At week 16 after randomization

  2. Mean dose of corticosteroids

    Measured: At week 16 after randomization

  3. Cumulative dose of corticosteroids

    Measured: At week 16 after randomization

  4. Time to response onset

    Measured: Up to week 48

  5. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Measured: At week 4

  6. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Measured: At week 8

  7. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Measured: At week 12

  8. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Measured: At week 16

  9. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Measured: At week 24

  10. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Measured: At week 36

  11. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Measured: At week 48

  12. C-reactive protein rate

    Measured: At week 4

  13. C-reactive protein rate

    Measured: At week 8

  14. C-reactive protein rate

    Measured: At week 12

  15. C-reactive protein rate

    Measured: At week 16

  16. C-reactive protein rate

    Measured: At week 24

  17. C-reactive protein rate

    Measured: At week 36

  18. C-reactive protein rate

    Measured: At week 48

  19. Rate of relapses

    Relapse will be defined as the reappearance of clinical and/or paraclinical features of active disease or by the occurrence of new lesions or progression of preexisting lesions

    Measured: up to 48 weeks

  20. Time to occurrence of relapse or worsening of uveitis

    Relapse will be defined as the reappearance of clinical and/or paraclinical features of active disease or by the occurrence of new lesions or progression of preexisting lesions

    Measured: up to 48 weeks

  21. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity

    Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity.

    Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

    Measured: At week 8

  22. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity

    Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity.

    Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

    Measured: At week 16

  23. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Disease Current Activity

    Changes in Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form 2006 The score varies between 0 and 12, the higher the score the higher the disease activity.

    Lawton G, Bhakta BB, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. The Behcet's disease activity index. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):73-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg453. Epub 2003 Jul 30. PMID: 12890862.

    Measured: At week 24

  24. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score

    Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score. It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity.

    Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

    Measured: At week 8

  25. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score

    Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score. It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity.

    Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

    Measured: At week 16

  26. Disease activity assessed by Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score

    Changes in Behcet's Syndrome Activity Score It is a 10 items score. The score varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the higher the disease activity.

    Forbees C, Swearingen C, Yazici Y. Behcet's syndrome activity score (BSAS): a new disease activity assessment tool, composed of patient-derived measures only, is strongly correlated with the Behcet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(Suppl 9):S854-S855.

    Measured: week 24

  27. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Measured: At week 4

  28. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Measured: At week 8

  29. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Measured: At week 12

  30. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Measured: At week 16

  31. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Measured: At week 24

  32. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Measured: At week 36

  33. Changes in the number of other organs involved by Behcet Disease (BD)

    Measured: At week 48

  34. Quality of Life assessed by Behcet's Disease Quality of Life Measure

    It is a score composed of 30 items and the result varies between 0 and 30. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life.

    1. Gilworth, MA Chamberlain, B. Bhakta, A. Silman, D. Haskard and A. Tennant. (2004), The Development of the BD-Qol: A Quality of Life Instrument Specific to Behçet's Disease., J Rheum, 31, 931-7

    Measured: At week 16

  35. Quality of Life assessed by Behcet's Disease Quality of Life Measure

    It is a score composed of 30 items and the result varies between 0 and 30. The higher the score, the lower the quality of life.

    1. Gilworth, MA Chamberlain, B. Bhakta, A. Silman, D. Haskard and A. Tennant. (2004), The Development of the BD-Qol: A Quality of Life Instrument Specific to Behçet's Disease., J Rheum, 31, 931-7

    Measured: At week 24

  36. Changes in Short Form (36) Health Survey for quality of life

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

    Measured: At week 16

  37. Changes in Short Form (36) Health Survey for quality of life

    The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item measure if health status. The score obtained varies between 0 and 100. The higher the score the less disability.

    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

    Measured: At week 24

  38. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Measured: at week 4

  39. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Measured: at week 8

  40. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Measured: at week 12

  41. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Measured: at week 16

  42. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Measured: at week 24

  43. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Measured: at week 36

  44. Proportion of patients with adverse clinical events

    Measured: at week 48

  45. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Measured: At week 4

  46. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death. death.

    Measured: At week 8

  47. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Measured: At week 12

  48. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Measured: At week 16

  49. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Measured: At week 24

  50. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Measured: At week 36

  51. Severity of adverse clinical events

    It is determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The grade varies from 1 to 5. Grade 1 corresponds to mild severity and grade 5 to death.

    Measured: At week 48

  52. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Measured: At week 8

  53. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterio chamber.

    Measured: At week 16

  54. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Measured: At week 24

  55. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Measured: At week 36

  56. Changes in Tyndall score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to grade 4+. The higher the grade the higher the number of cells in the anterior chamber.

    Measured: At week 48

  57. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 8

  58. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 16

  59. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 24

  60. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 36

  61. Changes in flare score

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies from grade 0 to 4+. The higher the score, the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 48

  62. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 8

  63. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 16

  64. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 24

  65. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 36

  66. Changes of Vitreous Haze

    The score is calculated according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). It varies between 0 and 4. The higher the score the higher the inflammation.

    Measured: At week 48

  67. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity.

    ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Measured: At week 8

  68. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

    ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Measured: At week 16

  69. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

    ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Measured: At week 24

  70. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

    ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Measured: At week 36

  71. Changes in Best corrected visual acuity

    Evaluated by ETDRS letters score. The total score varies between 0 and 100. The higher score the better the visual acuity

    ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7., Ophthalmology. 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):741-756

    Measured: At week 48

  72. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Measured: At week 8

  73. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Measured: At week 16

  74. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Measured: At week 24

  75. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Measured: At week 36

  76. Changes in central retinal thickness

    Changes in central retinal thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Measured: At week 48

  77. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Measured: At week 8

  78. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Measured: At week 16

  79. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Measured: At week 24

  80. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Measured: At week 36

  81. Percentage of patients with central retinal thickness <300 microns

    Measured: At week 48

  82. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Measured: At week 16

  83. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Measured: At week 24

  84. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Measured: At week 36

  85. Percentage of patients without retinal vessel leakage on retinal angiography

    in case of retinal vasculitis

    Measured: At week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2023
  2. Study startJul 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05874505
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP200007
Acronym
UVB
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
14 Apr 2023
Last updated
25 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Adalimumab and Tocilizumab in people with Behcet's Uveitis, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 27 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Bahram BODAGHI, Pr (+33 1 42 16 37 28, bahram.bodaghi@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients with complete remission of ocular involvement (Efficacy) (time frame: At week 16 after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in