AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuraxial UltrasonographyNCT05874609

Teaching Neuraxial Ultrasonography With a Virtual Reality Simulator of Spine

A study testing Teaching with VR spine simulator and Traditional didactic teaching in people with Neuraxial Ultrasonography, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

As one of the most extensively practiced regional block, neuraxial anesthesia is the basic skill for anesthesiologist to acquire. Recently, virtual reality (VR) has been proposed as a new simulation training method to enhance medical education. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Neuraxial Ultrasonography
What is being tested?
Teaching with VR spine simulator and Traditional didactic teaching
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Jun 2023to 30 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • anesthesia residents in our department

Who cannot join

  • having previous experience of spine ultrasonography training
  • having previous experience of spine ultrasound scan.

About this study

Official title: Teaching Neuraxial Ultrasonography With a Virtual Reality Simulator of Spine: a Randomized Controlled Trial

As one of the most extensively practiced regional block, neuraxial anesthesia is the basic skill for anesthesiologist to acquire. Recently, virtual reality (VR) has been proposed as a new simulation training method to enhance medical education. The aim of our study is to evaluate the practical skills of ultrasound scan and the satisfaction of students who undergo training using VR versus traditional didactic lecture.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized control trial to evaluate the performance of spine ultrasound scan after different training methods. Participants were randomly divided into two groups receiving different training methods: VR spine simulator or traditional didactic teaching. After the training, participants were required to perform a preprocedural spine ultrasound scan on healthy volunteers using the stepwise technique taught in the didactic teaching session. The participants needed to acquire three key ultrasound views during the scan and recognize the anatomic structures in three ultrasound views.

Being tested
Teaching with VR spine simulator, Traditional didactic teaching
Keywords
ultrasound-guided, neuraxial anesthesia, virtual reality

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Teaching with VR spine simulatorOther

    The participants spent 30 minutes with the VR spine simulator after receiving the didactic teaching session. The learning objective with the VR simulator is to review the 3D lumbar spine anatomic model,learn the sonoanatomy presented by a dynamic ultrasound scan of the sagittal and transverse plane, and practice a preprocedural ultrasound scan.

  • Traditional didactic teachingOther

    A 30-min traditional didactic teaching session of spine ultrasonography. This session was consisted of general spine anatomy, sonographic technique and sonoanatomy, description of five key spine ultrasonographic views (transverse spinous process view, transverse interlaminar view, parasagittal oblique interlaminar view, parasagittal articular process view, parasagittal transverse process view), and a stepwise technique of preprocedural lumbar spine scan

Study groups in NCT05874609
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VR groupExperimentalIn the VR group, the participants spent 30 minutes with the VR spine simulator after receiving the didactic teaching session.
Receives: Other: Teaching with VR spine simulator
Control groupActive comparatorIn the control group, the participants received a 30-min traditional didactic teaching session of spine ultrasonography.
Receives: Other: Traditional didactic teaching

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite learning score

    Evaluating the self-assessed theoretical knowledge (10 points), self-assessed practical skills (20 points), self-assessed satisfaction (10 points) and willingness to applicate the technique in future practice (10 points).

    Measured: Up to 12 hours after ultrasound scan is finished

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Time of scan

    Defined as the time from the probe contacting the skin to acquiring the three key ultrasound views

    Measured: Up to 1 hour after ultrasound scan begins

  2. Rate of anatomic structures recognition

    The correct rate of recognition among 12 anatomic structures (posterior complex, anterior complex, lamina and erector spinae in the parasagittal oblique interlaminar view, spinous process, lamina and erector spinae transverse spinous view, articular process, transverse process, posterior complex, anterior complex and spinal canal in the transverse interlaminar view)

    Measured: Up to 12 hours after ultrasound scan is finished

  3. Accuracy of depth measurement to the posterior complex

    The measurement was deemed correct if the error was less than 0.5cm

    Measured: Up to 12 hours after ultrasound scan is finished

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2023
  2. Study start15 Jun 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
46 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05874609
Sponsor's protocol ID
VR teaching
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
5 May 2023
Last updated
25 May 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Teaching with VR spine simulator and Traditional didactic teaching in people with Neuraxial Ultrasonography, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite learning score (time frame: Up to 12 hours after ultrasound scan is finished). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in