Knee Arthroplasty, TotalNCT05877261
Cementless Triathlon 5YR Follow-Up
An observational study of Knee Arthroplasty, Total and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
All artificial joint implants need to be solidly held (fixed) within the bone. Cementless fixation has become a popular method to achieve fixation for total knee replacements where the bone grows directly onto the implanted device instead of using bone cement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Knee Osteoarthritis, Radiostereometric Analysis
- What is being tested?
- Cementless Total Knee Replacement
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 25 May 2023to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who received a cementless total knee replacement in 2017-2018 and participated in a previous study measuring the first year of implant migration.
Who may be able to join
- Were in the originally investigated cohort
- Had successful imaging at 1-year post-operation
- Minimum of 5 years post-operation
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Unable to follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: 5 Year Follow-Up of Migration of a Cementless Total Knee Replacement
All artificial joint implants need to be solidly held (fixed) within the bone. Cementless fixation has become a popular method to achieve fixation for total knee replacements where the bone grows directly onto the implanted device instead of using bone cement. The primary purpose of this study is to assess long-term implant survivorship and clinical outcomes of a previous study cohort that received a cementless knee replacement. As this study cohort approaches 5 years post-operation, the investigators will re-examine the stability of participant implants using specialized x-rays, called "radiostereometric analysis". The study will use weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) to measure bone density and texture features and correlate that with implant stability. The investigators will collect stool samples to assess participant gut microbiomes for biomarkers of poor bone quality that could correlate to implant stability. All 33 participants from the original study cohort will be invited to participate in this study.
- Being tested
- Cementless Total Knee Replacement
- Keywords
- Osteoarthritis, Cementless Fixation, Gut Microbiome, Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cementless Total Knee ReplacementDevice
Artificial knee implant inserted by cementless fixation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prior Cementless Knee Replacement Cohort | Patients who received a cementless knee replacement in 2017-2018 and participated in a prior study measuring the first year of implant migration. Receives: Device: Cementless Total Knee Replacement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Implant Migration (tibial component)
Implant movement will be measured with model-based Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) by registering the location of the tibial component during supine exams. Potential tibial component migration between 1 and 5 years post-operation will be measured in millimeters with the use of tibial bone markers.
Measured: 5 year follow-up
Secondary outcomes (6)
Implant Migration (femoral component)
Implant movement will be measured with model-based Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) by registering the location of the femoral component during supine exams. Potential femoral component migration between 1 and 5 years post-operation will be measured in millimeters with the use of femoral bone markers.
Measured: 5 year follow-up
Inducible Displacement (RSA-based)
Model-based Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) will be used to register the location of the tibial and femoral components during supine and standing exams. Change in implant position will be measured in millimeters as maximum total point motion (MTPM) between the standing and supine RSA exams.
Measured: 5 year follow-up
Inducible Displacement (CT-based)
Weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) will be used to register the location of the tibial and femoral components during seated and standing exams. Change in implant position will be measured in millimeters as maximum total point motion (MTPM) between the seated and standing CT exams.
Measured: 5 year follow-up
Bone Density
Weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) scans will be used to measure bone density as Hounsfield units in standardized volumes of interest below the pegs and keel of the tibial component.
Measured: 5 year follow-up
Texture Features
Weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) texture analysis will be performed in standardized volumes of interest below the pegs and keel of the tibial component.
Measured: 5 year follow-up
Microbial Diversity
Participants will provide a stool sample. Microbial DNA will be extracted from the stool samples for 16s rRNA sequencing. Taxonomy will be assigned and functional annotation will be determined.
Measured: 5 year follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2023
- Study start25 May 2023
- Primary completion1 Apr 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee Arthroplasty, TotalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brent Lanting, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- Brent Lanting, MD MSc FRCSC, Principal investigator, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05877261
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12925
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Siddiqi A, Levine BR, Springer BD. Highlights of the 2021 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jan 29;13:205-207. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.01.020. eCollection 2022 Feb. No abstract available.
PubMed 35128013Cherian JJ, Banerjee S, Kapadia BH, Jauregui JJ, Harwin SF, Mont MA. Cementless total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg. 2014 Jun;27(3):193-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1374811. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
PubMed 24764231Nam D, Lawrie CM, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 3;101(13):1185-1192. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01162.
PubMed 31274720Nam D, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Mahoney OM, Dunbar MJ, Barrack RL. Mid-Term Performance of the First Mass-Produced Three-Dimensional Printed Cementless Tibia in the United States as Reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan;38(1):85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
PubMed 35934187Valstar ER, Nelissen RG, Reiber JH, Rozing PM. The use of Roentgen stereophotogrammetry to study micromotion of orthopaedic implants. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing 2002;56(5):376-89.
Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada: CJRR Annual Statistics Summary, 2018-2019.; 2019.
Pijls BG, Plevier JWM, Nelissen RGHH. RSA migration of total knee replacements. Acta Orthop. 2018 Jun;89(3):320-328. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
PubMed 29508661Williams HA, Broberg JS, Howard JL, Lanting BA, Teeter MG. Effect of gap balancing and measured resection techniques on implant migration and contact kinematics of a cementless total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2021 Aug;31:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
PubMed 34119998Broden C, Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Skoldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):419-423. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
PubMed 33821746Das M, Cronin O, Keohane DM, Cormac EM, Nugent H, Nugent M, Molloy C, O'Toole PW, Shanahan F, Molloy MG, Jeffery IB. Gut microbiota alterations associated with reduced bone mineral density in older adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(12):2295-2304. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez302.
PubMed 31378815Ma R, Wu M, Li Y, Wang J, Yang P, Chen Y, Wang W, Song J, Wang K. The use of bone turnover markers for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal females undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 17;16(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02343-3.
PubMed 33731168Al KF, Bisanz JE, Gloor GB, Reid G, Burton JP. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method. J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jan;144:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
PubMed 29155236
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 5 Year Follow-Up of Migration of a Cementless Total Knee Replacement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05877261
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12925
- Keywords
- Osteoarthritis, Cementless Fixation, Gut Microbiome, Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry
- Study start
- 25 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
All artificial joint implants need to be solidly held (fixed) within the bone. Cementless fixation has become a popular method to achieve fixation for total knee replacements where the bone grows directly onto the implanted device instead of using bone cement. The primary purpose of this study is to assess long-term implant survivorship and clinical outcomes of a previous study cohort that received a cementless knee replacement. As this study cohort approaches 5 years post-operation, the investigators will re-examine the stability of participant implants using specialized x-rays, called "radiostereometric analysis". The study will use weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) to measure bone density and texture features and correlate that with implant stability. The investigators will collect stool samples to assess participant gut microbiomes for biomarkers of poor bone quality that could correlate to implant stability. All 33 participants from the original study cohort will be invited to participate in this study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prior Cementless Knee Replacement Cohort | – | Device: Cementless Total Knee ReplacementPatients who received a cementless knee replacement in 2017-2018 and participated in a prior study measuring the first year of implant migration. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who received a cementless total knee replacement in 2017-2018 and participated in a previous study measuring the first year of implant migration.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Were in the originally investigated cohort
- Had successful imaging at 1-year post-operation
- Minimum of 5 years post-operation
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Unable to follow-up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cementless Total Knee ReplacementArtificial knee implant inserted by cementless fixation. | Device | Prior Cementless Knee Replacement Cohort |
Primary outcome
Implant Migration (tibial component)
Time frame: 5 year follow-up
Implant movement will be measured with model-based Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) by registering the location of the tibial component during supine exams. Potential tibial component migration between 1 and 5 years post-operation will be measured in millimeters with the use of tibial bone markers.
6 secondary outcomes
Implant Migration (femoral component)
Time frame: 5 year follow-up
Inducible Displacement (RSA-based)
Time frame: 5 year follow-up
Inducible Displacement (CT-based)
Time frame: 5 year follow-up
Bone Density
Time frame: 5 year follow-up
Texture Features
Time frame: 5 year follow-up
Microbial Diversity
Time frame: 5 year follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 35128013Siddiqi A, Levine BR, Springer BD. Highlights of the 2021 American Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jan 29;13:205-207. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.01.020. eCollection 2022 Feb. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24764231Cherian JJ, Banerjee S, Kapadia BH, Jauregui JJ, Harwin SF, Mont MA. Cementless total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg. 2014 Jun;27(3):193-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1374811. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 31274720Nam D, Lawrie CM, Salih R, Nahhas CR, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 3;101(13):1185-1192. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01162.
- Background: PubMed 35934187Nam D, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Mahoney OM, Dunbar MJ, Barrack RL. Mid-Term Performance of the First Mass-Produced Three-Dimensional Printed Cementless Tibia in the United States as Reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan;38(1):85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
- BackgroundValstar ER, Nelissen RG, Reiber JH, Rozing PM. The use of Roentgen stereophotogrammetry to study micromotion of orthopaedic implants. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing 2002;56(5):376-89.
- BackgroundCanadian Joint Replacement Registry. Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada: CJRR Annual Statistics Summary, 2018-2019.; 2019.
- Background: PubMed 29508661Pijls BG, Plevier JWM, Nelissen RGHH. RSA migration of total knee replacements. Acta Orthop. 2018 Jun;89(3):320-328. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 34119998Williams HA, Broberg JS, Howard JL, Lanting BA, Teeter MG. Effect of gap balancing and measured resection techniques on implant migration and contact kinematics of a cementless total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2021 Aug;31:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 33821746Broden C, Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Skoldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):419-423. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 31378815Das M, Cronin O, Keohane DM, Cormac EM, Nugent H, Nugent M, Molloy C, O'Toole PW, Shanahan F, Molloy MG, Jeffery IB. Gut microbiota alterations associated with reduced bone mineral density in older adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(12):2295-2304. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez302.
- Background: PubMed 33731168Ma R, Wu M, Li Y, Wang J, Yang P, Chen Y, Wang W, Song J, Wang K. The use of bone turnover markers for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal females undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 17;16(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02343-3.
- Background: PubMed 29155236Al KF, Bisanz JE, Gloor GB, Reid G, Burton JP. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method. J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jan;144:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Arthroplasty, Total
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Not yet recruiting
Total Hip Replacement: an Investigation of Robotic-assisted Versus conVentional Surgery and Patient-centred outcomEs
Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip
Recruiting
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Post-knee Arthroplasty Chronic Pain.
Chronic Post-surgical Pain, Chronic Post Operative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Bispectral Index Target Depths on Early Postoperative Recovery Quality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty, Postoperative Recovery
Enrolling by invitation
Early Outcome of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Replacement With and Without Tourniquet
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Blood Loss, Surgical
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brent Lanting, MD MSc FRCSC principal investigator
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Knee Arthroplasty, Total and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Implant Migration (tibial component) (time frame: 5 year follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05877261, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.