AzTrials
AzTrials

FrailtyHMBNCT05877846

Precision Medicine and Physical Function

A study testing Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement, Vitamin D supplement and Matching Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement without Vitamin D in people with Frailty and Weakness, Muscle, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators aim to conduct a 12-week, single-arm, pre/post-intervention of b-hydroxy-methylbutyrate in persons aged 65 to 85 years to assess feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures, secondary outcomes of physical function and changes in multi-omics patterns, and exploratory… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement, Vitamin D supplement and Matching Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement without Vitamin D
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2023to 1 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English-speaking older adults aged 65 to 85 years (of all genders and sexes, race or ethnicity)
  • A University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Geriatrics Medicine clinic patient;
  • Chronic medical conditions -these are based on the 21 Medicare multiple chronic conditions (e.g., alcohol abuse, arthritis (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid), asthma, atrial fibrillation, autism spectrum disorders, cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, prostate), chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, drug/substance abuse, heart failure, hepatitis, HIV/AIDS, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, osteoporosis, schizophrenia/other psychotic disorders, stroke);

Who cannot join

  • Age <65 years and >85 years old
  • A medical diagnosis of dementia
  • Those without a negative subjective weakness screener (<1)
  • Individuals with life-threatening or untreated psychiatric diagnosis that would interfere with study participation and require significant modification to meet their needs such as untreated major depressive disorder, substance abuse, suicidal ideation or untreated severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder)
  • Life-threatening illness including those receiving palliative care or hospice services
  • Individuals unwilling/unable to provide consent
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Inability to complete the protocol procedures
  • Elective surgery in the next four months
  • Medications - antiobesity (weight loss agents) medications that lead to weight loss
  • Hospitalization for heart failure in past 6 months, advanced non-skin cancer (Stage III or IV) on treatment; Advanced liver failure; Chronic renal insufficiency on hemodialysis; advanced Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that would prevent engagement
  • Vitamin D >80 ng/dL:
  • At baseline, the investigators will check Vit D levels - recognize that processing is highly dependent on the McLendon lab and may take up to 7+ days to come back.
  • Concurrently, the investigators will consider continuing consent, enrollment, study procedures.
  • Provide at Visit 2 the beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate/Vitamin D supplement
  • Once the results have been received and reviewed - if the levels exceed 80 ng/dL, then the participant will be informed.
  • At that point, the investigators will either exclude the participant or, if available, see whether the company is willing to provide formulations of just beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate (HMB)and provide this to the participant
  • These guidelines account for the fact that Vit D is not recommended by American Geriatrics Society to check routinely, and that levels <80 (or even 120 ng/mL) rarely lead to toxicity.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Danae C Gross, MS contact

(919)445-6776

dcgross@unc.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

    Danae C Gross, MS, 919-445-6776, dcgross@unc.edu

    June Weston, jweston9@email.unc.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Precision Nutrition Approach to Enhancing Physical Function in Older Adults: A Pilot, Feasibility Study

The investigators aim to conduct a 12-week, single-arm, pre/post-intervention of b-hydroxy-methylbutyrate in persons aged 65 to 85 years to assess feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures, secondary outcomes of physical function and changes in multi-omics patterns, and exploratory outcomes that will allow the team to describe physical function phenotype. The investigators' primary outcomes are the: feasibility of the study procedures (including safety), feasibility of the intervention delivery, and acceptability of study procedures and measures. Secondary outcomes include: Objective and subjective physical function measures that predict disability including the 30-second sit-to-stand, knee strength, isokinetic strength, grip strength, gait speed, 400-m walk test, Pittsburgh Fatiguability, PROMIS global health-10, social support, anthropometry, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cognitive toolbox, Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment (ASA-24), Community Healthy Activities Model Programs (CHAMPS), Ultrasound Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Changes in untargeted metabolomic profile data based on qualitative or semiquantitative analysis of the most probable detectable metabolites in laboratory samples , Discover potential metabolites that explain changes in physical function using a discovery science, precision medicine approach (discovery science approach that is exploratory)

Being tested
Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement, Vitamin D supplement, Matching Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement without Vitamin D
Medical subject headings
Frailty, Muscle Weakness, Multiple Chronic Conditions

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplementDietary supplement

    Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate (750 mg) - Vitamin D3 (200 IU) capsules. The formulation is 750 mg of Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate with 200 IU of vitamin D3 per capsule. Frequency is 2 capsules twice daily (morning, evening)

  • Vitamin D supplementDietary supplement

    Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate (750 mg) - Vitamin D3 (200 IU) capsules. The formulation is 750 mg of Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate with 200 IU of vitamin D3 per capsule. Frequency is 2 capsules twice daily (morning, evening)

  • Matching Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement without Vitamin DDietary supplement

    Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate (750 mg) capsules. The formulation is 750 mg of Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate per capsule. Frequency is 2 capsules twice daily (morning, evening)

Study groups in NCT05877846
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Participants with WeaknessExperimentalParticipants will take beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate (HMB) with vitamin D3 for 12 weeks. Those participants with vitamin D3 levels > 80 ng/dL will be provided intervention capsules without vitamin D3.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement; Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D supplement; Dietary Supplement: Matching Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement without Vitamin D

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Enrolled

    Feasibility of study procedures is measured by the percentage of enrolled participants that were screened (percent participants enrolled = number of participants enrolled/number of participants screened x 100). There are no cut-off scores for interpretation but, higher scores indicate greater feasibility of the study.

    Measured: at 12-weeks

  2. Number of Participants Screened

    Feasibility of study procedures as measured by the number of participants that were screened.

    Measured: Through the end of the study period (~1 year) based on data collected on each participant at the conclusion of the study intervention (12-weeks).

  3. Percentage of participants consented

    The percent of participants that consented in the study is defined as the number of participants that were consented divided by the # of participants screened multiplied by 100. There are no cut-off scores for interpretation but, higher scores indicate greater feasibility of the study.

    Measured: Through the end of the study period (~1 year) based on data collected on each participant at the conclusion of the study intervention (12-weeks).

  4. Percent attendance

    Feasibility of study procedures measured as the mean attendance rate of all participants. Participant attendance rate = (total # of visits attended / total # of visits scheduled) x 100. There are no cut-off scores for interpretation. Higher scores indicate higher feasibility

    Measured: Through the end of the study period (~1 year) based on data collected on each participant at the conclusion of the study intervention (12-weeks).

  5. Percent of Interviews completed

    Feasibility of study procedures measures as interview completion rate. Percent of completed interviews = (# of completed interviews / # of participants completing the intervention) x 100. There are no cut-off scores for interpretation. Higher rates are indicative of higher feasibility.

    Measured: Through the end of the study period (~1 year) based on data collected on each participant at the conclusion of the study intervention (12-weeks).

  6. Percentage of study measures collected

    Rate of the percent of study measures collected, defined as the # of study procedures collected divided by the total # of proposed study procedures x 100. A higher number is characteristic of increased feasibility of collecting study measures.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline visit

  7. Percent of participants conducted MRI measure

    Rate of participants who conducted two MRI measures, defined as the total number of MRI measures collected divided by the total expected number of MRI measures. A higher number indicates feasibility of obtaining MRI measures.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline visit

  8. Percent of participants conducted ultrasound measure

    Rate of participants who conducted three ultrasound measures, defined as the total number of MRI measures collected divided by the total expected number of ultrasound measures. A higher number indicates feasibility of obtaining ultrasound measures.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline visit

  9. Acceptability of study intervention

    Measured through an end of study satisfaction survey, acceptability is measured on a 10 point Likert scale conducted on all participants at 12-weeks. This is rated on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree) survey.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline visit

  10. Percent of Participants Rating the Intervention as Acceptable

    Conducted on all participants using a 1-5 Likert scale to assess appropriateness of the study intervention measures using the following: completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree. Acceptability is reported as Agree or Completely Agree responses. Rate is calculated as total number of participants rating as agree or complete agree divided by the number of total participants.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline visit

  11. Percent of participants rating the intervention as appropriate

    Conducted on all participants using a 1-5 Likert scale to assess appropriateness of the study intervention measures using the following: completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree. Intervention appropriateness is reported as Agree or Completely Agree responses. Rate is calculated as total number of participants rating as agree or complete agree divided by the number of total participants.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline visit

  12. Percent of participants rating the intervention as feasible

    Conducted on all participants using a 1-5 Likert scale to assess feasibility of the study intervention measures using the following: completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree. Intervention feasibility is reported as Agree or Completely Agree responses. Rate is calculated as total number of participants rating as agree or complete agree divided by the number of total participants.

    Measured: 12 weeks after baseline visit

Secondary outcomes (43)
  1. Change in weight from baseline

    Absolute change in weight in kilograms (kg) over time from baseline to 12-weeks. Weight will be objectively measured on a digital scale. A negative number will indicate weight loss.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  2. Change in waist circumference from baseline

    Absolute change in waist circumference in centimeters (cm) over time from baseline to 12-weeks. Waist circumference will be measured objectively using a tape measure. A negative number will indicate a loss in waist circumference

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  3. Change in hip circumference from baseline

    Absolute change in hip circumference in centimeters (cm) over time from baseline to 12-weeks. Hip circumference will be measured objectively using a tape measure. A negative number will indicate a loss of hip circumference

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  4. Change in arm circumference from baseline

    Change in arm circumference in centimeters (cm) over time from baseline to 12-weeks. Arm circumference will be measured objectively using a tape measure. A negative number will indicate a loss in arm circumference.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  5. Change in calf circumference from baseline

    Change in calf circumference in centimeters (cm) over time from baseline to 12-weeks. Calf circumference will be measured objectively using a tape measure. A negative number will indicate a loss in calf circumference

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  6. Change in Language using the Picture Vocabulary Test

    Part of the NIH Cognitive Toolbox, Language will be measured with respondents selecting the picture that closely matches the meaning of the word. A set of mental processes that translate thought into symbols (words, gestures) that can be shared among individuals for purposes of communication. A change will be measured. This takes 4 minutes to administer. The number of items presented depends on age and performance; for most, it will contain ~25 items. The computer will administer each item one by one, in an untimed fashion, until the test is completed. The test uses age (for participants younger than 18) and education (for participants 18 and older) to determine which items it initially presents. Item Response Theory (IRT) is used to score the Picture Vocabulary Test (TPVT) which is then converted to a standardized score. Fully Corrected Score for which the normative mean is 50 and the standard deviation (SD) is 10.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  7. Change in Executive function using the Dimensional Change Card Sort Test

    Executive Function measures the capacity to plan, organize, and monitor the execution of behaviors that are strategically directed in a goal-oriented manner. Set shifting, or the capacity for switching among multiple aspects of a strategy or task. A change will be measured. This takes 4 minutes. Two target pictures are presented that vary along two dimensions (e.g., shape and color). Participants are asked to match a series of bivalent test pictures (e.g., yellow balls and blue trucks) to the target pictures, first according to one dimension (e.g., color) and then, after a number of trials, according to the other dimension (e.g., shape). There are a maximum of 8 items. Unadjusted score ranges 0-40. Fully Corrected Score for which the normative mean is 50 and the standard deviation (SD) is 10. Higher scores are better cognition. A positive change is improvement in function

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  8. Change in Episodic memory using the Picture sequence memory test

    Episodic memory are cognitive processes involved in acquiring, storing, and retrieving new information. A change will be measured. This takes 7 minutes. In this measure , sequences of pictured objects and activities are presented in a particular order. The participants are asked to reproduce the sequence of pictures that is shown on the screen. Participants are given credit for each adjacent pair of pictures they correctly place (i.e., if pictures in locations 7 and 8 are placed in that order and adjacent to each other anywhere, such as slots 1 and 2, one point is awarded), up to the maximum value for the sequence, which is one less than the sequence length. (That is, if 18 pictures are in the sequence, the maximum score on that trial is 17 - the number of adjacent pairs of pictures that exist). A Fully Corrected Score for which the normative mean is 50 and the standard deviation (SD) is 10.Higher scores are better cognition. A positive change is improvement in function

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  9. Change in Working memory using the List Sorting Test

    Working Memory is an ability to store data until the amount stored exceeds one's capacity to hold it. A change will be measured using the List sorting test. This takes 7 minutes. This task requires the participant to recall and sequence different visually and orally presented stimuli. Pictures of different foods and animals are displayed with both an accompanying audio recording and written text that name the item. The participant is asked to say the items back to the examiner in size order from smallest to largest. There are two lists - with unadjusted scores ranging from 0-26. A Fully Corrected Score for which the normative mean is 50 and the standard deviation (SD) is 10.Higher scores are better cognition. A positive change is improvement in function

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  10. Change in Processing speed using the Pattern Comparison Test

    Processing speed (Pattern Comparison): the amount of data that can be processed within a certain unit of time. It is a measure that reflects mental efficiency. A change will be measured using the Picture Sequence memory test. The test itself takes less than 90 seconds and requires participants to discern whether two side-by-side pictures are the same or not. The test consists of ~130 items or lasts 85 seconds, whichever comes first. Unadjusted scores range from 0-130. A Fully Corrected Score for which the normative mean is 50 and the standard deviation (SD) is 10. Higher Scores are consistent with higher processing speed. Higher scores are better cognition. A positive change is improvement in function

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  11. Change in caloric intake

    Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment, we will measure caloric intake per day. Change measured in the difference between calories per day at baseline to follow-up assessment. This is an automated food recall that assess caloric intake. A change in caloric intake will be reported in kcal per day. Reduction in caloric input suggests reduced calorie intake.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  12. Changes in total cholesterol blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in total cholesterol from baseline as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for total cholesterol is less than 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Cholesterol is a lipid that is synthesized in most tissues and actively absorbed from the diet. There is a strong association between serum cholesterol concentrations and cardiovascular disease. A reduction will represent an improvement in total cholesterol

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  13. Changes in low density lipoprotein blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in low density lipoprotein from baseline as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for low density lipoprotein is less than 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Lipoprotein cholesterol measurements are essential in managing risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). A reduction will represent an improvement in low density lipoprotein cholesterol

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  14. Changes in triglycerides blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in triglycerides from baseline as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for triglycerides is less than 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Elevated triglycerides are often associated with reduced HDL-C, insulin resistance, hypertension, fatty liver disease, and increased waist circumference. A reduction will represent an improvement in triglycerides

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  15. Change in high density lipoprotein blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in high density lipoprotein from baseline as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for high density lipoprotein is greater than or equal to 40 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) in males and 50 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for females. Lipoprotein cholesterol measurements are essential in managing risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). A reduction will represent a worsening in high density lipoprotein cholesterol

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  16. Change in C-reactive protein blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in C-reactive protein from baseline as milligrams per liter (mg/L). The Mayo Clinic reference range for C-reactive protein is less than 5 milligrams per liter (mg/L). Measuring changes in the concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) provides useful diagnostic information about the level of acuity and severity of a disease. It also allows judgments about the disease genesis. A reduction will represent an improvement in c-reactive protein and inflammation

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  17. Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor- alpha (TNF-a) blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in TNF-a from baseline as picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for TNF-a is less than 5.6 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Results are used to understand the pathophysiology of immune, infectious, or inflammatory disorders, or may be used for research purposes. A reduction will represent an improvement in tumor necrosis factor alpha and inflammation

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  18. Change in Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1-beta) blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in IL-1 beta from baseline as picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for IL-1 beta is less than 6.7 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Results are used to understand the pathophysiology of immune, infectious, or inflammatory disorders, or may be used for research purposes. A reduction will represent an improvement in IL-1 beta and inflammation

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  19. Change in Interleukin 6 (IL6) blood levels from baseline

    Measures the change in IL6 from baseline as picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for IL6 is less than 6.4 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Results are used to understand the pathophysiology of immune, infectious, or inflammatory disorders, or may be used for research purposes. A reduction will represent an improvement in IL-6 and inflammation

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  20. Change in stool alpha-diversity levels from baseline

    Change in alpha-diversity from stool collection at baseline. stool 16S Ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequence data processing will yield measures of alpha-diversity and abundances (counts) of distinct taxa (to the genus level). A positive (increase) represents an increase in diversity

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  21. Change in serum sample from baseline

    Characterization of response phenotypes to the intervention and the factors associated with inter-individual variability in those responses using bioinformatic identification, and characterization of interactions for future predictive studies. The team will collect a blood sample at baseline (0-weeks) and follow up (12-weeks) to conduct an untargeted metabolomic analysis to demonstrate potential peaks of protein within the blood reported in mg/dL. An untargeted analysis is a process of discovery science where a priori there are no prespecified metabolites but are discovered based on the results of the study.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  22. Change in 30-second sit-to-stand from baseline

    The 30-second sit-to-stand test is administered using a folding chair without arms and involves recording the number of stands from a seated position a person can complete in 30 seconds. Change in 30-s sit-to-stand in repetitions over time will be reported from baseline to 12-weeks. An improvement in repetitions will represent an improvement of physical function. Minimal clinically significant change is 2.3 repetitions.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  23. Change in grip strength from baseline

    Using a Jamar dynamometer, change in participant's maximal grip strength measurement in kilograms from baseline. Absolute change in grip strength in kilograms over time will be reported from baseline to 12-weeks. An increase in kilograms represented on the device will represent an improvement of physical function. Scale: healthy women aged 70-79 years is 1.13 meters per second (m/s) and for men 1.26 m/s. For women and men aged 80-99 the values are 0.94 meters per second (m/s) and 0.97 meters per second (m/s), respectively.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  24. Change in gait speed from baseline

    Gait speed (measured in meters/second or m/s) measures how long it takes a person to travel a given distance. Gait Speed is measured using the time in seconds it takes a participant to complete a 4 meter course while walking at a usual pace. Gait speed is measured as distance (meters) ÷ time (seconds). An absolute change in gait speed will be the difference from follow-up measures and baseline. An improvement in gait speed represents an improvement in physical function. Units are meters/second. Scale: healthy women aged 70-79 years is 1.13 meters per second (m/s) and for men 1.26 m/s. For women and men aged 80-99 the values are 0.94 meters per second (m/s) and 0.97 meters per second (m/s), respectively.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  25. Change in 400-meter walk time from baseline

    The 400-meter walk test, measured as time (in seconds) to complete the test. The 400-meter walk will be used to measure cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) during which individuals will be asked to walk continuously for 400 meters on a flat, indoor surface around cones (separated by at least 20 feet). An absolute change in 400-meter walk time will be the difference from follow-up measures and baseline. An improvement in 400-m walk represents an improvement in aerobic function. Units are meters. A clinically important differences is 34m.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  26. Change in Fat Mass

    An MRI-based measure of body composition consisting of fat mass. This will be measured as volume in mL based on fat mass (adipose) volume of the entire body. A change in Fat Mass over time from baseline to 12-weeks. A reduction in fat mass volume is suggestive of improvements in health related outcomes.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  27. Change in Fractional Percentage of Fat Mass

    An MRI-based measure of body composition. Fat Mass (Fractional Percentage) will be measured as volume in % based on fat mass (adipose) volume of the entire body in relation to the total mass. A change in Fat Mass (fractional percentage) over time from baseline to 12-weeks. A reduction in fat mass percentage is suggestive of improvements in health related outcomes.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  28. Change in Fractional Percentage of Lean Mass

    An MRI-based measure of body composition. Lean Mass (Fractional Percentage) will be measured as volume in % based on lean mass (muscle) volume of the entire body in relation to the total mass. A reduction in lean mass percentage is suggestive of worsening of health related outcomes.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  29. Change in Lean Mass Volume

    An MRI-based measure lean mass (muscle) volume of the entire body. A change in Lean Mass over time from baseline to 12-weeks. A reduction in lean mass volume is suggestive of improvements in health related outcomes.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  30. Change in Fractional Percentage Visceral Mass

    An MRI-based measure of body composition consisting of fat mass. This will be measured as volume in mL based on fat mass (adipose) volume of the entire body. A change in Fat Mass (fractional percentage) over time from baseline to 12-weeks. A reduction in fat mass volume is suggestive of improvements in health related outcomes.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  31. Change in Ultrasound Imaging Intensity

    An ultrasound-based measure of body composition. This will be measured as echointensity (no units) based on muscle/fat intensity of the quadricep muscle. A change in echointensity over time from baseline to 12-weeks. A reduction in intensity is suggestive of improvements in health related outcomes.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  32. Change in Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale

    The 15-item Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale measures perceived fatigue of sedentary, social, lifestyle and physical activities (light-high intensity, 0-50 scale). Cutoff of ≥15 and ≥13 indicate higher physical and mental fatigue that may lead to reduced performance or restricted activity. Higher scores indicate greater perceived physical or mental fatigability. A reduction in the absolute change in score suggests improvements in fatigue.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  33. Change in Patient reported outcomes measurement information systems (PROMIS) General Health

    PROMIS General Health gauges physical, mental, and social aspects of health (5-point scale) to record changes in global health at each time point. A mean standardized score for the population is 50; 10 points indicate one standard deviation. Higher scores indicate better health.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  34. Change in Rates of Physical Activity Type

    Physical activity will be assessed using the validated 41-item Community Healthy Activities Model Programs (CHAMPS) questionnaire for older adults. The Community Healthy Activities Model Programs (CHAMPS) assesses usual weekly amounts activity levels and types (activity frequency) and their change. Physical activity is classified as type of activity - low, moderate, vigorous. The change in rates of each type of activity will be presented between baseline and 12-weeks.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  35. Change in Metabolic equivalents

    The 41-item Community Healthy Activities Model Programs (CHAMPS) will assess metabolic equivalents per week and their changes; scoring is classified as the number of metabolic equivalents. The change in rates of each type of activity will be presented between baseline and 12-weeks. An increase in metabolic equivalents (METS) suggests improvements in physical function and cardiac function.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  36. Change in Caloric Expenditure with Exercise

    The 41-item Community Healthy Activities Model Programs (CHAMPS) will assess weekly caloric expenditure and their changes; scoring is classified as the number of calories expended during exercise. The change in rates of each type of activity will be presented between baseline and 12-weeks. Changes in caloric expenditure of activity (light, moderate, vigorous) will be evaluated. Higher changes in caloric expenditure suggests increased activity.

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  37. Change in Social Support for Diet

    A validated scale (Sallis et al) that assesses friends/family support for engaging in dietary changes. Higher scores indicate higher social support. Each are scored for family and friends separately (range 0-100).

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  38. Change in Social support for exercise

    A validated scale (Sallis et al) that assesses friends/family support for engaging in dietary exercises. Higher scores indicate higher social support. Each are scored for family and friends separately (range 0-60).

    Measured: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

  39. Compliance Rate of b-hydroxymethylbutyrate

    Participants will complete a weekly paper or electronic diary to document taking their supplement. Compliance will be calculated as a percent (# of pills taken divided by total # of pills that should have been taken) x 100.

    Measured: Weekly up to 12 weeks

  40. Change in hemoglobin A1C blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in hemoglobin a1c from baseline as a percentage. The Mayo Clinic reference range for hemoglobin a1c is less than 5.7%. The A1C test measures what percentage of hemoglobin proteins in your blood are coated with sugar (glycated). There is a strong association between high hemoglobin a1c blood levels and increased risk of diabetes complications. A reduction will represent an improvement in hemoglobin a1c.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  41. Change in very low density lipoprotein blood levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in very low density lipoprotein from baseline as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). Mayo Clinic states that an elevated VLDL cholesterol level is more than 30 milligrams per deciliter. A reduction will represent an improvement in very low density lipoprotein cholesterol.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  42. Change in interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor serum levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in IL-2 receptor levels from baseline as picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for IL-2 receptor levels is between 175.3 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) and 858.2 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Results are used to understand the pathophysiology of immune, infectious, or inflammatory disorders.

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

  43. Change in interferon gamma serum levels from baseline

    Measures the absolute change in interferon gamma serum from baseline as picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). The Mayo Clinic reference range for interferon gamma serum is less than 8.6 picograms per milliliter (pg/mL).

    Measured: At baseline and 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2023
  2. Study start1 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This pilot study is a 12-week, single arm, pre/post intervention of β-hydroxymethyl butyrate (HMB) in n=18 older adults at risk for sarcopenia. There will be no randomization.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05877846
Sponsor's protocol ID
23-0141
Acronym
HMB
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
10 May 2023
Last updated
17 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement, Vitamin D supplement and Matching Beta-hydroxymethyl butyrate supplement without Vitamin D in people with Frailty and Weakness, Muscle, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Danae C Gross, MS ((919)445-6776, dcgross@unc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Enrolled (time frame: at 12-weeks). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in