Esophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaPhase 2PPIO-004-EC001NCT05880082
PPIO-004 Clinical Application of Efficacy Prediction Model Based on Epigenomics Sequencing Technology in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Tislelizumab in people with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about in potential operable esophageal cancer patients (cT1-2N + M0 and cT3NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Objective response rate, Major pathological response rate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Tislelizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 118 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2023to 18 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥18 years old;
- Pathology (histology) confirmed potentially resectable stage cT1-2N + M0 and stage cT3NanyM0 ESCC (AJCC 8th edition); 3. Received tirelizumab combined with chemotherapy before surgery; 4.ECOG score: 0 or 1; 5. R0 radical excision can be performed; 6. Measurable or evaluable lesions assessed by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1; 7. With my consent and signed informed consent, I shall comply with the planned visit, research treatment, laboratory examination and other test procedures.
Who cannot join
- Patients with other malignant tumors;
- Prior treatment for ESCC, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or prior antibody or drug therapy against PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, or any other specific T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathway;
- They are not eligible to receive platinum-containing double-drug chemotherapy regimen, chemoradiotherapy or surgery;
- Patients with a history of fistulas caused by primary tumor infiltration, patients assessed by the investigator as being at high risk of fistulas or showing signs of perforation, and severe malnutrition;
- Poorly controlled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion or ascites requiring frequent drainage (recurrence within 2 weeks after intervention)
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing history or known acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS);
Show all 14Show fewer
- A history of interstitial lung disease, non-infectious pneumonia or poorly controlled lung disease (including pulmonary fibrosis, acute lung disease, etc.);
- Any positive test result for hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus indicating the presence of a virus, such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg, Australian antigen) positive or hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) positive (except HCV-RNA negative);
- Those who have a history of drug abuse and cannot abstain or have mental disorders;
- Known history of allogeneic organ transplantation or allohematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
- Patients who are participating in other clinical trials or participating in other clinical trials with less than 4 weeks to end;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients with a BMI < 18.5mg/m2 or a weight loss greater than 10% before screening;
- Other conditions that the researchers believe will affect the progress of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Army Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042
About this study
Official title: Clinical Application of Efficacy Prediction Model Based on Epigenomics Sequencing Technology in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
The goal of this observational study is to learn about in potential operable esophageal cancer patients (cT1-2N + M0 and cT3NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Objective response rate, Major pathological response rate. Participants will receive two to four cycles of tislelizumab plus albuminpaclitaxel and platinum-based therapy
Read the detailed description
Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer in the world (934,870 new cases) and the sixth most common cause of cancer death (287,270 new cases). The incidence, prevalence and histological type of esophageal cancer vary by region. About 75% of cases occur in Asia, with China accounting for the highest proportion, accounting for about 50% of the total number of cases and cancer-specific deaths. According to China's National Bureau of Statistics in 2022, there were 252,500 cases of esophageal cancer and 193,900 deaths in China in 2016, making esophageal cancer the sixth most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in the country. The etiologies of the two most common histological subtypes (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC] and adenocarcinoma) vary widely. In the West, heavy drinking and smoking and their synergies are major risk factors for ESCC [3]. However, in low-income countries, such as parts of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the major risk factors for ESCC (which typically accounts for more than 90% of all esophageal cancer cases) have not been elucidated.
For subjects with locally advanced ESCC, international treatment guidelines recommend esophagectomy followed by preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
However, in the clinical practice, many subjects with locally advanced ESCC receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy rather than neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, due to safety concerns regarding the use of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy and difficulties in cross-clinical collaboration, and may not receive the best benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. For the preoperative treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, preoperative chemotherapy also has a better survival benefit than surgery alone. In the Medical Research Council OEO2 study, median survival was 16.8 months in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 13.3 months in the surgery alone group, with 2-year survival rates of 43% and 34%, respectively. Long-term follow-up confirmed that preoperative chemotherapy had a survival benefit, with 5-year survival rates of 23% in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 17.1% in the surgery alone group. And data on other immune checkpoint inhibitors suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy improves clinical outcomes.
PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated significant benefits as second-line and first-line therapy for ESCC and in combination with chemotherapy for many other solid tumors. Preclinical studies have shown that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis can be activated early in solid tumors, and the preoperative induction of immune response may have a lasting protective effect. Preoperative immunotherapy is likely to be more effective given that the tumor antigen drops sharply after surgical resection and the removal of intact blood vessels and lymph nodes that deliver the drug may affect immunotherapy efficacy. Several Phase 1/2 and 2 studies have shown a controllable safety profile and preliminary demonstration of efficacy when adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to perioperative treatment in resectable EC subjects. PD-1 inhibitors have shown significant benefits in both second-line and first-line treatment. Given the evidence of antitumor activity of immunotherapy in patients with ESCC and the continuing need to improve survival and reduce recurrence rates of resectable esophageal cancer, several studies exploring the antitumor activity of immunotherapy in the treatment of resectable disease have tentatively shown promising prospects as a neoadjuvant therapy.
tislelizumab, as an innovative PD-1 inhibitor, has shown similar benefits to other PD-1 inhibitors in a variety of tumor types. Bb-a317-205 also showed preliminary antitumor activity in ESCC subjects, with a confirmed ORR of 46.7%, DCR of 80%, and DOR of 12.8 months. The median OS was 14.31 months. In addition, three pivotal Phase 3 studies in the ESCC field are underway (studies BGB-A317-302, BGB-A317-306, BGB-A317-311, and BGB-A317-213).
Therefore, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tislelizumab may be a potential treatment option to improve the benefit of potentially resectable locally advanced ESCC subjects.
Cancer survival rates are often low, most likely due to advanced stage of diagnosis and limited access to timely and reasonable treatment. Early and accurate detection of cancer is important for clinical diagnosis, effective toxicity monitoring, and ultimately successful treatment of cancer. In the context of the current "precision medicine" concept, disease assessment should selectively obtain and extract key biological information from clinical phenotypes, pathological characteristics and molecular information of diseases, and carry out qualitative, positioning, quantitative and periodic accurate analysis of these information, laying the foundation for disease classification, clinical decision-making and prognosis. Based on accurate analysis of patients' biological information, treatment principles, rules and guidelines based on empirical evidence, combined with patients' unique physiological, psychological, social characteristics and personal will, effective treatment methods are wisely selected and integrated to form the best treatment plan that fits patients' unique characteristics.
In the context of the current "precision medicine" concept, disease assessment should selectively obtain and extract key biological information from clinical phenotypes, pathological characteristics and molecular information of diseases, and carry out qualitative, positioning, quantitative and periodic accurate analysis of these information, laying the foundation for disease classification, clinical decision-making and prognosis. At present, several prediction models for evaluating the efficacy and prognosis of patients have been developed by using public databases at home and abroad. However, due to the small sample size, less information included in the models and lack of clinical practice, the reliability is weak.
Therefore, new biomarkers need to be developed to better select patients, and the development of strong biomarkers and improved patient selection will be key to combination immunotherapy.
Objective response rate, major pathological response rate, pathological complete response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, R0 removal rate, adverse events, and potential predictive biomarkers were evaluated in patients undergoing surgery after tirelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Explore potential Cancer biomarkers in patients undergoing surgery after receiving tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy
- Conditions
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Tislelizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TislelizumabDrug
Also called Carboplatin, cisplatin, Nedaplatin
Tislelizumab 200mg, Q3W, 2-4 cycles Albumin paclitaxel 240 mg/m², adjusted according to the patient Carboplatin: AUC=5 Q3W, d1 or cisplatin: 20mg/m² iv, D1-3 Q3W or Nedaplatin: 70mg d1 Q3W
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tislelizumab, Q3W with TP regimen | Experimental | Tislelizumab 200mg, Q3W, 2-4 cycles Albumin paclitaxel 240 mg/m², adjusted according to the patient Carboplatin: AUC=5 Q3W, d1 or cisplatin: 20mg/m² iv, D1-3 Q3W or Nedaplatin: 70mg d1 Q3W Receives: Drug: Tislelizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective response rate
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Measured: Up to approximately 6 months
Major pathological response rate
Pathological results were obtained after surgery
Measured: At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment
Secondary outcomes (3)
Pathological complete response rate
Pathological results were obtained after surgery
Measured: At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment
Overall survival
From enrollment to death
Measured: Up to 24 months
Progression-free survival
From enrollment to Progression
Measured: Up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2023
- Study start13 Jan 2023
- Primary completion18 Aug 2025
- Study completion18 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Esophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, WEI GUO, Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05880082
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WGUO
- Acronym
- PPIO-004-EC001
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 17 May 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Application of Efficacy Prediction Model Based on Epigenomics Sequencing Technology in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05880082
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PPIO-004-EC001 / WGUO
- Conditions
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about in potential operable esophageal cancer patients (cT1-2N + M0 and cT3NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: Objective response rate, Major pathological response rate. Participants will receive two to four cycles of tislelizumab plus albuminpaclitaxel and platinum-based therapy
Detailed description
Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer in the world (934,870 new cases) and the sixth most common cause of cancer death (287,270 new cases). The incidence, prevalence and histological type of esophageal cancer vary by region. About 75% of cases occur in Asia, with China accounting for the highest proportion, accounting for about 50% of the total number of cases and cancer-specific deaths. According to China's National Bureau of Statistics in 2022, there were 252,500 cases of esophageal cancer and 193,900 deaths in China in 2016, making esophageal cancer the sixth most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in the country. The etiologies of the two most common histological subtypes (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC] and adenocarcinoma) vary widely. In the West, heavy drinking and smoking and their synergies are major risk factors for ESCC [3]. However, in low-income countries, such as parts of Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, the major risk factors for ESCC (which typically accounts for more than 90% of all esophageal cancer cases) have not been elucidated.
For subjects with locally advanced ESCC, international treatment guidelines recommend esophagectomy followed by preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
However, in the clinical practice, many subjects with locally advanced ESCC receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy rather than neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, due to safety concerns regarding the use of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy and difficulties in cross-clinical collaboration, and may not receive the best benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. For the preoperative treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, preoperative chemotherapy also has a better survival benefit than surgery alone. In the Medical Research Council OEO2 study, median survival was 16.8 months in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 13.3 months in the surgery alone group, with 2-year survival rates of 43% and 34%, respectively. Long-term follow-up confirmed that preoperative chemotherapy had a survival benefit, with 5-year survival rates of 23% in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 17.1% in the surgery alone group. And data on other immune checkpoint inhibitors suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy improves clinical outcomes.
PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated significant benefits as second-line and first-line therapy for ESCC and in combination with chemotherapy for many other solid tumors. Preclinical studies have shown that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis can be activated early in solid tumors, and the preoperative induction of immune response may have a lasting protective effect. Preoperative immunotherapy is likely to be more effective given that the tumor antigen drops sharply after surgical resection and the removal of intact blood vessels and lymph nodes that deliver the drug may affect immunotherapy efficacy. Several Phase 1/2 and 2 studies have shown a controllable safety profile and preliminary demonstration of efficacy when adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to perioperative treatment in resectable EC subjects. PD-1 inhibitors have shown significant benefits in both second-line and first-line treatment. Given the evidence of antitumor activity of immunotherapy in patients with ESCC and the continuing need to improve survival and reduce recurrence rates of resectable esophageal cancer, several studies exploring the antitumor activity of immunotherapy in the treatment of resectable disease have tentatively shown promising prospects as a neoadjuvant therapy.
tislelizumab, as an innovative PD-1 inhibitor, has shown similar benefits to other PD-1 inhibitors in a variety of tumor types. Bb-a317-205 also showed preliminary antitumor activity in ESCC subjects, with a confirmed ORR of 46.7%, DCR of 80%, and DOR of 12.8 months. The median OS was 14.31 months. In addition, three pivotal Phase 3 studies in the ESCC field are underway (studies BGB-A317-302, BGB-A317-306, BGB-A317-311, and BGB-A317-213).
Therefore, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tislelizumab may be a potential treatment option to improve the benefit of potentially resectable locally advanced ESCC subjects.
Cancer survival rates are often low, most likely due to advanced stage of diagnosis and limited access to timely and reasonable treatment. Early and accurate detection of cancer is important for clinical diagnosis, effective toxicity monitoring, and ultimately successful treatment of cancer. In the context of the current "precision medicine" concept, disease assessment should selectively obtain and extract key biological information from clinical phenotypes, pathological characteristics and molecular information of diseases, and carry out qualitative, positioning, quantitative and periodic accurate analysis of these information, laying the foundation for disease classification, clinical decision-making and prognosis. Based on accurate analysis of patients' biological information, treatment principles, rules and guidelines based on empirical evidence, combined with patients' unique physiological, psychological, social characteristics and personal will, effective treatment methods are wisely selected and integrated to form the best treatment plan that fits patients' unique characteristics.
In the context of the current "precision medicine" concept, disease assessment should selectively obtain and extract key biological information from clinical phenotypes, pathological characteristics and molecular information of diseases, and carry out qualitative, positioning, quantitative and periodic accurate analysis of these information, laying the foundation for disease classification, clinical decision-making and prognosis. At present, several prediction models for evaluating the efficacy and prognosis of patients have been developed by using public databases at home and abroad. However, due to the small sample size, less information included in the models and lack of clinical practice, the reliability is weak.
Therefore, new biomarkers need to be developed to better select patients, and the development of strong biomarkers and improved patient selection will be key to combination immunotherapy.
Objective response rate, major pathological response rate, pathological complete response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response, R0 removal rate, adverse events, and potential predictive biomarkers were evaluated in patients undergoing surgery after tirelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. Explore potential Cancer biomarkers in patients undergoing surgery after receiving tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tislelizumab, Q3W with TP regimen | Experimental | Drug: TislelizumabTislelizumab 200mg, Q3W, 2-4 cycles Albumin paclitaxel 240 mg/m², adjusted according to the patient Carboplatin: AUC=5 Q3W, d1 or cisplatin: 20mg/m² iv, D1-3 Q3W or Nedaplatin: 70mg d1 Q3W |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ≥18 years old;
- Pathology (histology) confirmed potentially resectable stage cT1-2N + M0 and stage cT3NanyM0 ESCC (AJCC 8th edition); 3. Received tirelizumab combined with chemotherapy before surgery; 4.ECOG score: 0 or 1; 5. R0 radical excision can be performed; 6. Measurable or evaluable lesions assessed by the investigator according to RECIST version 1.1; 7. With my consent and signed informed consent, I shall comply with the planned visit, research treatment, laboratory examination and other test procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patients with other malignant tumors;
- Prior treatment for ESCC, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or prior antibody or drug therapy against PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, or any other specific T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathway;
- They are not eligible to receive platinum-containing double-drug chemotherapy regimen, chemoradiotherapy or surgery;
- Patients with a history of fistulas caused by primary tumor infiltration, patients assessed by the investigator as being at high risk of fistulas or showing signs of perforation, and severe malnutrition;
- Poorly controlled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion or ascites requiring frequent drainage (recurrence within 2 weeks after intervention)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TislelizumabAlso: Carboplatin, cisplatin, NedaplatinTislelizumab 200mg, Q3W, 2-4 cycles Albumin paclitaxel 240 mg/m², adjusted according to the patient Carboplatin: AUC=5 Q3W, d1 or cisplatin: 20mg/m² iv, D1-3 Q3W or Nedaplatin: 70mg d1 Q3W | Drug | tislelizumab, Q3W with TP regimen |
Primary outcome
Objective response rate
Time frame: Up to approximately 6 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Major pathological response rate
Time frame: At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment
Pathological results were obtained after surgery
3 secondary outcomes
Pathological complete response rate
Time frame: At Surgery approximately 4weeks after last treatment
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Progression-free survival
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Recruiting
Individually Tailored, Supervised, Remote Exercise Intervention to Improve Physical Function for Stage I-III Gastroesophageal Cancer Survivors, PRECISE Trial
Clinical Stage I Esophageal Adenocarcinoma American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8, Clinical Stage I Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma AJCC v8
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Standardized Management of Esophageal Fistula in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), Esophageal Fistula
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tislelizumab in people with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective response rate (time frame: Up to approximately 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2025.