Nerve InjuryPHINESTNCT05884125
Promoting Healing of Injured Nerves With Electrical Stimulation Therapy
A study testing Checkpoint BEST System in people with Nerve Injury and Peripheral Nerve Injuries, run by Checkpoint Surgical Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is evaluating a new therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing and improve functional recovery following surgical intervention for peripheral nerve injury in arm. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Nerve Injury, Peripheral Nerve Injuries, Peripheral Nerve Injury Upper Limb
- What is being tested?
- Checkpoint BEST System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2023to 13 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Upper extremity mixed or motor nerve injury from the brachial plexus to the wrist crease.
- Candidate for surgical intervention.
- Indicated for surgical repair by nerve transfer, primary repair, or nerve grafting.
- Are age 18-80 years.
- Signed and dated informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Severe comorbid condition, such as arrhythmia or congestive heart failure, preventing surgery.
- Primary repair requiring graft >6cm.
- Nerve reconstruction occurring >12 months post injury.
- Age less than 18 or greater than 80 years.
- All contraindications to included/required surgical procedure, including but not limited to language barriers, mental status barriers, inability to consent, and pregnancy/lactation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The Ohio State Univeristy - Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
About this study
This study is evaluating a new therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing and improve functional recovery following surgical intervention for peripheral nerve injury in arm. Participants will be randomized into one of two groups, treatment or control, with all participants receiving standard of care treatment for the nerve injury. The treatment group will also receive a single dose of the therapeutic stimulation during the surgical intervention for their nerve injury.
Read the detailed description
Preliminary research has shown that delivering a brief period of electrical stimulation following nerve repair promotes nerve healing and functional recovery. This pilot study is investigating the use of a single dose of therapeutic electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing. The therapy is delivered as part of the surgical intervention to address peripheral nerve injury in the arm.
- Being tested
- Checkpoint BEST System
- Keywords
- Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation, Brief Electrical Stimulation, Nerve Regeneration, Nerve Injury, Nerve Healing, Nerve Repair
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Nerve Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Checkpoint BEST SystemDevice
Also called Brief Electrical Stimulation (BES) Therapy
Single use medical device, consisting of electric stimulator and intraoperative lead. Therapy consists of single, 10 minute dose delivered proximal to site of decompression/repair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Electrical Stimulation Therapy | Experimental | Single, 10 minute dose of electrical stimulation delivered to the injured nerve during surgical intervention. Receives: Device: Checkpoint BEST System |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | Surgical intervention for repair of peripheral nerve injury. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Motor Recovery assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading
Grading of muscle strength on 0 to 5 scale, with higher score representing greater function.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Grip Strength
Maximum grip strength.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Lateral Pinch Strength
Maximum lateral pinch.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
2-point discrimination
Evaluation of sensory function, measuring tactile discrimination.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing
Evaluation of sensory function, measuring pressure detection threshold.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function
Questionnaire providing patient reported estimate of upper extremity function on a 0-100 scale with >50 representing greater normal function.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Pain Interference
Questionnaire providing patient reported estimate of interference of pain on daily activities on a 0-100 scale with >50 representing greater than normal pain interference on daily activities.
Measured: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
quick Disabilities of thee Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Questionnaire providing patient reported estimate upper extremity function. The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Measured: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Electromyography (EMG)
Measurement of the electrical activity in a muscle.
Measured: 4 months, 6 months, and 8 months
Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE)
Estimate of the number of motor units within the muscle based on recorded electrical activity.
Measured: 4 months, 6 months, and 8 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2023
- Study start12 Jun 2023
- Primary completion13 May 2026
- Study completion13 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nerve InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Checkpoint Surgical Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amy M Moore, MD, Principal investigator, Ohio State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05884125
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0153-CSP-002
- Other IDs
- W81XWH1920065
- Acronym
- PHINEST
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 19 May 2023
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Jo S, Pan D, Halevi AE, Roh J, Schellhardt L, Hunter Ra DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Comparing electrical stimulation and tacrolimus (FK506) to enhance treating nerve injuries. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):629-636. doi: 10.1002/mus.26659. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
PubMed 31397919Sayanagi J, Acevedo-Cintron JA, Pan D, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):e80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01965.
PubMed 34668879Roh J, Schellhardt L, Keane GC, Hunter DA, Moore AM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Short-Duration, Pulsatile, Electrical Stimulation Therapy Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Recovery following Tibial Nerve Injury and Repair in Rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):681e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008924.
PubMed 35139047Wong JN, Olson JL, Morhart MJ, Chan KM. Electrical stimulation enhances sensory recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2015 Jun;77(6):996-1006. doi: 10.1002/ana.24397. Epub 2015 May 4.
PubMed 25727139Juckett L, Saffari TM, Ormseth B, Senger JL, Moore AM. The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Nerve Regeneration Following Peripheral Nerve Injury. Biomolecules. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):1856. doi: 10.3390/biom12121856.
PubMed 36551285Keane GC, Pan D, Roh J, Larson EL, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. The Effects of Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation on Regeneration and Recovery After Nerve Isograft Repair in a Rat Model. Hand (N Y). 2022 May;17(3):540-548. doi: 10.1177/1558944720939200. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
PubMed 32666827
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Promoting Healing of Injured Nerves With Electrical Stimulation Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05884125
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PHINEST / 0153-CSP-002
- Keywords
- Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation, Brief Electrical Stimulation, Nerve Regeneration, Nerve Injury, Nerve Healing, Nerve Repair
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Checkpoint Surgical Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is evaluating a new therapeutic use of electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing and improve functional recovery following surgical intervention for peripheral nerve injury in arm. Participants will be randomized into one of two groups, treatment or control, with all participants receiving standard of care treatment for the nerve injury. The treatment group will also receive a single dose of the therapeutic stimulation during the surgical intervention for their nerve injury.
Detailed description
Preliminary research has shown that delivering a brief period of electrical stimulation following nerve repair promotes nerve healing and functional recovery. This pilot study is investigating the use of a single dose of therapeutic electrical stimulation to promote nerve healing. The therapy is delivered as part of the surgical intervention to address peripheral nerve injury in the arm.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Electrical Stimulation Therapy | Experimental | Device: Checkpoint BEST SystemSingle, 10 minute dose of electrical stimulation delivered to the injured nerve during surgical intervention. |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | –Surgical intervention for repair of peripheral nerve injury. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Upper extremity mixed or motor nerve injury from the brachial plexus to the wrist crease.
- Candidate for surgical intervention.
- Indicated for surgical repair by nerve transfer, primary repair, or nerve grafting.
- Are age 18-80 years.
- Signed and dated informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Severe comorbid condition, such as arrhythmia or congestive heart failure, preventing surgery.
- Primary repair requiring graft >6cm.
- Nerve reconstruction occurring >12 months post injury.
- Age less than 18 or greater than 80 years.
- All contraindications to included/required surgical procedure, including but not limited to language barriers, mental status barriers, inability to consent, and pregnancy/lactation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Checkpoint BEST SystemAlso: Brief Electrical Stimulation (BES) TherapySingle use medical device, consisting of electric stimulator and intraoperative lead. Therapy consists of single, 10 minute dose delivered proximal to site of decompression/repair | Device | Brief Electrical Stimulation Therapy |
Primary outcome
Change in Motor Recovery assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Grading of muscle strength on 0 to 5 scale, with higher score representing greater function.
9 secondary outcomes
Grip Strength
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Lateral Pinch Strength
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
2-point discrimination
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Pain Interference
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
quick Disabilities of thee Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Time frame: Pre-surgery, 10 days, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months
Electromyography (EMG)
Time frame: 4 months, 6 months, and 8 months
Motor Unit Number Estimation (MUNE)
Time frame: 4 months, 6 months, and 8 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 31397919Jo S, Pan D, Halevi AE, Roh J, Schellhardt L, Hunter Ra DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Comparing electrical stimulation and tacrolimus (FK506) to enhance treating nerve injuries. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):629-636. doi: 10.1002/mus.26659. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 34668879Sayanagi J, Acevedo-Cintron JA, Pan D, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):e80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01965.
- Background: PubMed 35139047Roh J, Schellhardt L, Keane GC, Hunter DA, Moore AM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Short-Duration, Pulsatile, Electrical Stimulation Therapy Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Recovery following Tibial Nerve Injury and Repair in Rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):681e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008924.
- Background: PubMed 25727139Wong JN, Olson JL, Morhart MJ, Chan KM. Electrical stimulation enhances sensory recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2015 Jun;77(6):996-1006. doi: 10.1002/ana.24397. Epub 2015 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 36551285Juckett L, Saffari TM, Ormseth B, Senger JL, Moore AM. The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Nerve Regeneration Following Peripheral Nerve Injury. Biomolecules. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):1856. doi: 10.3390/biom12121856.
- Background: PubMed 32666827Keane GC, Pan D, Roh J, Larson EL, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. The Effects of Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation on Regeneration and Recovery After Nerve Isograft Repair in a Rat Model. Hand (N Y). 2022 May;17(3):540-548. doi: 10.1177/1558944720939200. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
Related trials for Nerve Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG With LFCB vs. ESP Blocks for Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Disease, Hip Dysplasia
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy M Moore, MD principal investigator
Ohio State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Checkpoint BEST System in people with Nerve Injury and Peripheral Nerve Injuries, run by Checkpoint Surgical Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Motor Recovery assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading (time frame: Pre-surgery, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, 10 months, 12 months, 15 months, and 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05884125, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2026.