Lung CancerLungI-ACTNCT05888584
Improving Access and Recruitment to Clinical Trials for Lung Cancer Patients
A study testing Research readiness tool in people with Lung Cancer, run by Oxford Brookes University at 9 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
There are ~85,000 lung cancer patients (LCPs) in the UK; yet only around 8% were recruited into clinical trials in 2021/22. LCPs need opportunities to take part in clinical trials to access new treatments, increasing their quality of life, treatment choices and life expectancy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Research readiness tool
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 109 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2023to 30 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Actively involved in the clinical care pathways of lung cancer patients
- Working at one of the six participating NHS trusts
- Age between 18-65 years of age
- Must have a current diagnosis of lung cancer (any stage) or be the named carer of a person with a lung cancer diagnosis
- Under the care of (or caring for) one of the participating NHS Trusts lung cancer teams
- Aged 18 or over
Show all 14Show fewer
- Registered nurse with Nursing and Midwifery Council
- Actively involved in the clinical care pathways of lung cancer patients
- Working at one of the six participating NHS trusts
- Age between 18-65 years of age
- Current diagnosis of lung cancer (any stage) or be the named carer of a person with a lung cancer diagnosis
- Aged 18 or over
- Consented to (or carer of someone who has consented to) a clinical trial since start of pilot study
- Receiving care (or carer for someone receiving care) in one of the four NHS sites piloting the research readiness tool
Who cannot join
- Not actively involved in frontline clinical care
- Not involved in caring for lung cancer patients for at least 30% of their
- Patients/carers:
- Mesothelioma diagnosis or caring for someone with a mesothelioma diagnosis
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Phase 4 Healthcare professionals
Show all 12Show fewer
- Not actively involved in frontline clinical care
- Not involved in caring for lung cancer patients for at least 30% of their role
- Employed as a lung cancer research delivery nurse
- Patients/carers:
- Mesothelioma diagnosis or caring for someone with a mesothelioma diagnosis
- Unable to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom9 sites
Derby and Burton NHS
Derby, Derbyshire
Lanarkshire NHS
Glasgow
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, Surrey
St Bartholomews Hospital NHS
London, Greater London
The Royal Marsden NHS
London, Greater London
The Christie NHS
Manchester, Greater Manchester
Sherwood Forest NHS
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire
Oxford University Hospitals
Oxford, Oxfordshire
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS
Sheffield, Yorkshire
About this study
There are ~85,000 lung cancer patients (LCPs) in the UK; yet only around 8% were recruited into clinical trials in 2021/22. LCPs need opportunities to take part in clinical trials to access new treatments, increasing their quality of life, treatment choices and life expectancy.
Discussions with nurses can help patients make better treatment decisions, improving experiences of care. However, research has shown that lung cancer nurses (LCNs) often feel unable to discuss participation in trials with patients due to lack of knowledge, confidence, time and training.
Read more
This study aims to develop and test a research recruitment tool for LCNs, to support LCPs to enter clinical trials.
Objectives include to:
- Explore reasons for low uptake of LCPs into clinical trials
- Develop a tool for LCNs to talk to patients about clinical trials
- Test whether the tool improves the number and quality of discussions nurses have with LCPs about clinical trials
The study has four phases:
Phase 1: A literature review will identify problems that make clinical trial uptake difficult for LCPs, carers and clinicians
Phase 2: Six group discussions with LCNs, patients and carers will explore issues that create potential barriers for patients taking part in clinical trials. The groups will take place online, last approximately one hour and be recorded.
Phase 3: Part 1\&2 findings will help us develop a LCN research recruitment tool. The tool will contain information on how nurses obtain information about LC clinical trials, research teams, communication issues, practical issues and how to reach LCPs.
Phase 4: The research recruitment tool will be tested in four UK NHS hospitals. A survey will identify any changes in nurses' clinical trials awareness and confidence before and after using the tool. Interviews with LCNs, patients and carers will explore their views on the tool, clinical trials participation and experiences of care.
Read the detailed description
Background: Patients who discuss taking part in research and those that go on to participate have better outcomes and experiences. Reported trial benefits for patients include greater access to new drugs; disease control; improved survival; enhanced quality of life; more intensive follow up and monitoring; better symptom management; enhanced care and support; and patient empowerment. In cancer care, the rate at which targeted treatments are translated into clinical practice for use by LCPs is reliant on accessible clinical trial opportunities; however, trial uptake remains low. Recruitment to research within the UK National Health Service (NHS) is challenging and COVID-19 saw a 59% reduction in cancer patients entering clinical trials in England, from 67,057 in 2017/18 to 27,734 in 2020/2021 [7,8]. Resultingly, the Institute of Cancer have recommended that trial information is made accessible and understandable to patients and that clinical staff have conversations about trials early in the treatment pathway.
Being assigned a LC clinical nurse specialist is associated with better experiences of care and studies have found that discussions nurses have with patients about clinical trial enrolment play a key role in decision-making and recruitment. However, LCNs often feel unable to discuss clinical trials with patients due to a lack of knowledge and confidence, time, expertise and training. Key barriers to trial recruitment include screening complexities; lack of resources, staff, skills and equipment; time; limited clinician awareness; perceived administrative burdens, concerns over trial suitability; inadequate information communicated to patients and clinicians and complex trial terminology. It is recommended that clinical trials are more closely integrated into clinical practice and that staff are adequately trained to support clinical research.
Study design: This mixed methods study consists of the following phases:
Phase 1: A systematic review of the best scientific literature will identify challenges and barriers to clinical trial recruitment amongst LCPs, carers and clinicians. PRISMA reporting guidelines will be followed.
Phase 2: Six qualitative focus groups with lung cancer patients, carers, lung cancer nurses and other members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) will explore challenges and facilitators to LCPs' clinical trial entry. Focus group participants will be recruited through the participating sites lung cancer nursing teams.
Eligible clinician participants (nurses and other MDT staff) will be contacted through lead LCNs at participating sites (see phase 4), who will share invitation letters and participant information leaflets with their teams. If they are happy to proceed a researcher will organise a time, date and place with participants to proceed with the focus group. Participants will also be recruited through LCNUK and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Local Clinical Research Networks.
Patients and carers will be recruited through the NCRI consumer forum and other cancer patient/carer networks, including RCLCF and Mesothelioma UK. LCNs at participating NHS sites will also share invitation letters and information leaflets with LCPs, inviting them to take part. If they are happy to proceed the researcher will organise a time, date and place with participants to proceed with the focus group. The study will also be promoted via social media channels such as Twitter, Healthcare Unlocked and closed Facebook groups. We intend to recruit ~48 participants to focus groups (eight per group); three focus groups will be with LCNs, research nurses and multidisciplinary team members from district general hospitals (DGHs) and tertiary centres, and two with LCPs and carers. A final group will include clinicians from the Christie and Royal Marsden cancer centres, where recruitment to trials is higher than in DGHs and tertiary centres, to identify transferable elements of best practice. Focus groups will be held remotely, via the online Zoom platform.
Focus groups facilitated by two researchers, will last one hour, and will be recorded and transcribed. Data will be thematically analysed using the Framework Method, to enable comparisons across groups to be identified and themes generated.
Phase 3: Phase 1\&2 findings will inform development of the LCN research recruitment tool. The tool, available in paper and online formats, will include information on finding out about LC clinical trials, the role of research teams, embedding research into multidisciplinary team meetings and health needs assessments, communication pathways, signposting LCPs, practical considerations and reaching underrepresented groups. Tool development will be guided by the Trial Steering Group (TSG), with representation from LC patient and public involvement (PPI) members, LCNs, multidisciplinary research and clinical teams. The tool will be tested for face and content validity by ~10 LCNs who participated in Phase 2, and ~4 PPI representatives. Relevant feedback will be used to make modifications to the tool.
Phase 4 pilot: Participants in the pilot study will pilot the research recruitment tool for proof of concept across four UK NHS sites, including tertiary centres and DGHs: Oxford, Derby\&Burton, Lanarkshire, Nottinghamshire. An additional two NHS sites, Surrey and Birmingham, will act as controls.
Each site's LCNs (n=36) will be invited to participate through their senior nurse manager who will provide eligible nurses with an online invitation letter and participant information sheet (PIS). If they are happy to proceed the researcher will organise a time, date and place with participants for the pilot phase of the study. Nurse participants will then have a briefing session, where the pilot study purpose will be explained. LCNs at the pilot sites (n=24) will be provided with a training session on using the tool, before implementing it in their teams for six months.
Survey data will be collected from each LCN (n=36) at baseline, three and six months and LCN's will reconsent electronically, via the Qualtrics survey platform, prior to completing each online survey. The survey will collect information on the following: 1) Items from the validated General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale will measure LCNs' self-efficacy (primary outcome measure) in relation to their research roles 2) The number of LCPs each LCN has approached to discuss clinical trial opportunities will be recorded 3) Likert style survey data on LCNs' knowledge, confidence and awareness of clinical trials will be collected. These questions will be developed from phase 1\&2 findings and tested for reliability and validity by TSG members. The repeated tests measure ANOVA will compare survey responses between baseline, three and six months. Between groups ANOVA will compare differences in scores between pilot and control sites. No formal sample size calculation is required as this is a pilot study; however, all LCNs across the six sites will be invited to take part (n~36).
Towards the end of the pilot, eight LCNs who have been taken part in the pilot will be invited, via an invitation letter and participant information sheet provided by the research team, to attend a 30-minute interview, via the online Zoom platform, or via telephone, to explore the tool's acceptability, in terms of ease of use and impact on recruitment.
Eight patients/carers who have joined clinical trials at the pilot sites will also be interviewed remotely, via the online Zoom platform or by telephone to explore their clinical trial experience and its impact on quality of life, care satisfaction, self-efficacy and symptom control will be explored. This will provide valuable information on the tool's impact on LCP experience.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Research readiness tool
- Keywords
- lung cancer, nurses, research, clinical trials, recruitment, access
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Research readiness toolOther
Online/paper based tool for use by nurses to aid discussions with lung cancer patients about clinical trials opportunities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention tool | Experimental | A research recruitment tool will be available in paper and online formats and will include information on finding out about LC clinical trials, the role of research teams, embedding research into multidisciplinary team meetings and health needs assessments, communication pathways, signposting LCPs, practical considerations and reaching underrepresented groups. The tool will be used by lung cancer nurses in their daily practice as an aid to support their discussions with lung cancer patients about clinical trial opportunities. They will be asked to complete a survey at three time-points (baseline, three and six months) to measure their self-efficacy, knowledge, confidence and awareness in talking to lung cancer patients about clinical trials. Receives: Other: Research readiness tool |
| Control | No intervention | Lung cancer nurses will undertake usual care. They will be asked to complete a survey at three time-points (baseline, three and six months) to measure their self-efficacy, knowledge, confidence and awareness in talking to lung cancer patients about clinical trials. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
self-efficacy
Data will be collected from each lung cancer nurse (n=36) at baseline, three and six months. Items from the validated General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) will measure LCNs' self-efficacy in relation to their research.
The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the all items. For the GSE, the total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
Measured: six months
Secondary outcomes (4)
research contacts with lung cancer patients
Data will be collected from each LCN (n=36) at baseline, three and six months on the number of lung cancer patients each lung cancer nurse has approached to discuss clinical trial opportunities
Measured: six months
lung cancer nurses' clinical trials knowledge
Data will be collected from each lung cancer nurse (n=36) at baseline, three and six months on their knowledge of clinical trials. Data will be collected via a non-validated Likert style survey with five options ranging from 'strongly agree' to 'strongly disagree'.
Measured: six months
lung cancer nurses' clinical trials confidence
Data will be collected from each lung cancer nurse (n=36) at baseline, three and six months on their confidence in talking to lung cancer patients about clinical trials. Data will be collected via a non-validated Likert style survey with five options ranging from 'strongly agree' to 'strongly disagree'.
Measured: six months
lung cancer nurses' clinical trials awareness
Data will be collected from each lung cancer nurse (n=36) at baseline, three and six months on their awareness of lung cancer clinical trials opportunities. Data will be collected via a non-validated Likert style survey with five options ranging from 'strongly agree' to 'strongly disagree'.
Measured: six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2023
- Study start1 Jul 2023
- Primary completion30 Mar 2025
- Study completion30 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 109 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford Brookes University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- De Montfort University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Cathy Henshall, Oxford Brookes University
- Investigators
- Catherine Henshall, PhD, Principal investigator, Oxford Brookes University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05888584
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRAS project ID: 325757
- Acronym
- LungI-ACT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 12 May 2023
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will not be shared with researchers outside of the study team.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Access and Recruitment to Clinical Trials for Lung Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05888584
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LungI-ACT / IRAS project ID: 325757
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- lung cancer, nurses, research, clinical trials, recruitment, access
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 109 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford Brookes UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- De Montfort University
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are ~85,000 lung cancer patients (LCPs) in the UK; yet only around 8% were recruited into clinical trials in 2021/22. LCPs need opportunities to take part in clinical trials to access new treatments, increasing their quality of life, treatment choices and life expectancy.
Discussions with nurses can help patients make better treatment decisions, improving experiences of care. However, research has shown that lung cancer nurses (LCNs) often feel unable to discuss participation in trials with patients due to lack of knowledge, confidence, time and training.
This study aims to develop and test a research recruitment tool for LCNs, to support LCPs to enter clinical trials.
Objectives include to:
- Explore reasons for low uptake of LCPs into clinical trials
- Develop a tool for LCNs to talk to patients about clinical trials
- Test whether the tool improves the number and quality of discussions nurses have with LCPs about clinical trials
The study has four phases:
Phase 1: A literature review will identify problems that make clinical trial uptake difficult for LCPs, carers and clinicians
Phase 2: Six group discussions with LCNs, patients and carers will explore issues that create potential barriers for patients taking part in clinical trials. The groups will take place online, last approximately one hour and be recorded.
Phase 3: Part 1\&2 findings will help us develop a LCN research recruitment tool. The tool will contain information on how nurses obtain information about LC clinical trials, research teams, communication issues, practical issues and how to reach LCPs.
Phase 4: The research recruitment tool will be tested in four UK NHS hospitals. A survey will identify any changes in nurses' clinical trials awareness and confidence before and after using the tool. Interviews with LCNs, patients and carers will explore their views on the tool, clinical trials participation and experiences of care.
Detailed description
Background: Patients who discuss taking part in research and those that go on to participate have better outcomes and experiences. Reported trial benefits for patients include greater access to new drugs; disease control; improved survival; enhanced quality of life; more intensive follow up and monitoring; better symptom management; enhanced care and support; and patient empowerment. In cancer care, the rate at which targeted treatments are translated into clinical practice for use by LCPs is reliant on accessible clinical trial opportunities; however, trial uptake remains low. Recruitment to research within the UK National Health Service (NHS) is challenging and COVID-19 saw a 59% reduction in cancer patients entering clinical trials in England, from 67,057 in 2017/18 to 27,734 in 2020/2021 [7,8]. Resultingly, the Institute of Cancer have recommended that trial information is made accessible and understandable to patients and that clinical staff have conversations about trials early in the treatment pathway.
Being assigned a LC clinical nurse specialist is associated with better experiences of care and studies have found that discussions nurses have with patients about clinical trial enrolment play a key role in decision-making and recruitment. However, LCNs often feel unable to discuss clinical trials with patients due to a lack of knowledge and confidence, time, expertise and training. Key barriers to trial recruitment include screening complexities; lack of resources, staff, skills and equipment; time; limited clinician awareness; perceived administrative burdens, concerns over trial suitability; inadequate information communicated to patients and clinicians and complex trial terminology. It is recommended that clinical trials are more closely integrated into clinical practice and that staff are adequately trained to support clinical research.
Study design: This mixed methods study consists of the following phases:
Phase 1: A systematic review of the best scientific literature will identify challenges and barriers to clinical trial recruitment amongst LCPs, carers and clinicians. PRISMA reporting guidelines will be followed.
Phase 2: Six qualitative focus groups with lung cancer patients, carers, lung cancer nurses and other members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) will explore challenges and facilitators to LCPs' clinical trial entry. Focus group participants will be recruited through the participating sites lung cancer nursing teams.
Eligible clinician participants (nurses and other MDT staff) will be contacted through lead LCNs at participating sites (see phase 4), who will share invitation letters and participant information leaflets with their teams. If they are happy to proceed a researcher will organise a time, date and place with participants to proceed with the focus group. Participants will also be recruited through LCNUK and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Local Clinical Research Networks.
Patients and carers will be recruited through the NCRI consumer forum and other cancer patient/carer networks, including RCLCF and Mesothelioma UK. LCNs at participating NHS sites will also share invitation letters and information leaflets with LCPs, inviting them to take part. If they are happy to proceed the researcher will organise a time, date and place with participants to proceed with the focus group. The study will also be promoted via social media channels such as Twitter, Healthcare Unlocked and closed Facebook groups. We intend to recruit ~48 participants to focus groups (eight per group); three focus groups will be with LCNs, research nurses and multidisciplinary team members from district general hospitals (DGHs) and tertiary centres, and two with LCPs and carers. A final group will include clinicians from the Christie and Royal Marsden cancer centres, where recruitment to trials is higher than in DGHs and tertiary centres, to identify transferable elements of best practice. Focus groups will be held remotely, via the online Zoom platform.
Focus groups facilitated by two researchers, will last one hour, and will be recorded and transcribed. Data will be thematically analysed using the Framework Method, to enable comparisons across groups to be identified and themes generated.
Phase 3: Phase 1\&2 findings will inform development of the LCN research recruitment tool. The tool, available in paper and online formats, will include information on finding out about LC clinical trials, the role of research teams, embedding research into multidisciplinary team meetings and health needs assessments, communication pathways, signposting LCPs, practical considerations and reaching underrepresented groups. Tool development will be guided by the Trial Steering Group (TSG), with representation from LC patient and public involvement (PPI) members, LCNs, multidisciplinary research and clinical teams. The tool will be tested for face and content validity by ~10 LCNs who participated in Phase 2, and ~4 PPI representatives. Relevant feedback will be used to make modifications to the tool.
Phase 4 pilot: Participants in the pilot study will pilot the research recruitment tool for proof of concept across four UK NHS sites, including tertiary centres and DGHs: Oxford, Derby\&Burton, Lanarkshire, Nottinghamshire. An additional two NHS sites, Surrey and Birmingham, will act as controls.
Each site's LCNs (n=36) will be invited to participate through their senior nurse manager who will provide eligible nurses with an online invitation letter and participant information sheet (PIS). If they are happy to proceed the researcher will organise a time, date and place with participants for the pilot phase of the study. Nurse participants will then have a briefing session, where the pilot study purpose will be explained. LCNs at the pilot sites (n=24) will be provided with a training session on using the tool, before implementing it in their teams for six months.
Survey data will be collected from each LCN (n=36) at baseline, three and six months and LCN's will reconsent electronically, via the Qualtrics survey platform, prior to completing each online survey. The survey will collect information on the following: 1) Items from the validated General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale will measure LCNs' self-efficacy (primary outcome measure) in relation to their research roles 2) The number of LCPs each LCN has approached to discuss clinical trial opportunities will be recorded 3) Likert style survey data on LCNs' knowledge, confidence and awareness of clinical trials will be collected. These questions will be developed from phase 1\&2 findings and tested for reliability and validity by TSG members. The repeated tests measure ANOVA will compare survey responses between baseline, three and six months. Between groups ANOVA will compare differences in scores between pilot and control sites. No formal sample size calculation is required as this is a pilot study; however, all LCNs across the six sites will be invited to take part (n~36).
Towards the end of the pilot, eight LCNs who have been taken part in the pilot will be invited, via an invitation letter and participant information sheet provided by the research team, to attend a 30-minute interview, via the online Zoom platform, or via telephone, to explore the tool's acceptability, in terms of ease of use and impact on recruitment.
Eight patients/carers who have joined clinical trials at the pilot sites will also be interviewed remotely, via the online Zoom platform or by telephone to explore their clinical trial experience and its impact on quality of life, care satisfaction, self-efficacy and symptom control will be explored. This will provide valuable information on the tool's impact on LCP experience.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention tool | Experimental | Other: Research readiness toolA research recruitment tool will be available in paper and online formats and will include information on finding out about LC clinical trials, the role of research teams, embedding research into multidisciplinary team meetings and health needs assessments, communication pathways, signposting LCPs, practical considerations and reaching underrepresented groups. The tool will be used by lung cancer nurses in their daily practice as an aid to support their discussions with lung cancer patients about clinical trial opportunities. They will be asked to complete a survey at three time-points (baseline, three and six months) to measure their self-efficacy, knowledge, confidence and awareness in talking to lung cancer patients about clinical trials. |
| Control | No intervention | –Lung cancer nurses will undertake usual care. They will be asked to complete a survey at three time-points (baseline, three and six months) to measure their self-efficacy, knowledge, confidence and awareness in talking to lung cancer patients about clinical trials. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Actively involved in the clinical care pathways of lung cancer patients
- Working at one of the six participating NHS trusts
- Age between 18-65 years of age
- Must have a current diagnosis of lung cancer (any stage) or be the named carer of a person with a lung cancer diagnosis
- Under the care of (or caring for) one of the participating NHS Trusts lung cancer teams
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Not actively involved in frontline clinical care
- Not involved in caring for lung cancer patients for at least 30% of their
- Mesothelioma diagnosis or caring for someone with a mesothelioma diagnosis
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Phase 4 Healthcare professionals
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Research readiness toolOnline/paper based tool for use by nurses to aid discussions with lung cancer patients about clinical trials opportunities. | Other | Intervention tool |
Primary outcome
self-efficacy
Time frame: six months
Data will be collected from each lung cancer nurse (n=36) at baseline, three and six months. Items from the validated General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) will measure LCNs' self-efficacy in relation to their research. The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the all items. For the GSE, the total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
4 secondary outcomes
research contacts with lung cancer patients
Time frame: six months
lung cancer nurses' clinical trials knowledge
Time frame: six months
lung cancer nurses' clinical trials confidence
Time frame: six months
lung cancer nurses' clinical trials awareness
Time frame: six months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will not be shared with researchers outside of the study team.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine Henshall, PhD principal investigator
Oxford Brookes University
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Research readiness tool in people with Lung Cancer, run by Oxford Brookes University at 9 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
self-efficacy (time frame: six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2026.