StrokeNeuroLymphoNCT05889169
Stroke-induced Immunodepression in Neurorehabilitation
An observational study of Stroke and Lymphopenia, run by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The close interconnection between nervous system and the immune system is well known. Brain injuries lead to homeostasis disruption. On the one hand they result in increased brain inflammation contributing to tissue repair, at the expense of a possible extension of tissue damage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Lymphopenia, Immunosuppression
- What is being tested?
- Neurorehabilitation
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 30 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 95 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants were selected from a single centre cohort admitted for stroke rehabilitation at the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation (Pavia, Italy).
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of first episode of ischemic stroke or primary spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (both confirmed by proper neuroimaging)
- admission to the Neurorehabilitation ward within 30 days from the index event
Who cannot join
- medical history of immunodeficiency or immunoproliferative disease
- immunosuppressive or immunomodulating therapy in the year before the index event
- systemic steroids in the six months before the index event
- Glasgow Coma Scale < 8 at hospital admission
- other diagnosis of neurological diseases
- missing clinical/demographic data
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Stroke-induced Immunodepression: Role in the Neurorehabilitation Setting
The close interconnection between nervous system and the immune system is well known. Brain injuries lead to homeostasis disruption. On the one hand they result in increased brain inflammation contributing to tissue repair, at the expense of a possible extension of tissue damage. On the other hand, they lead to systemic down-regulation of innate and adaptive immunity, determining higher vulnerability to infections, responsible of death and comorbidities in the acute and subacute setting.
Aim of the study was to evaluate the role of immunosuppression in the neurorehabilitation pathway in patients with stroke.
Read the detailed description
The perfect balance between nervous and immune system could be severely impaired after brain injuries, such as strokes.
In the acute phase, inflammatory mediators are responsible of central nervous system inflammation, associated to tissue repair at the expense of possible secondary brain injury or damage expansions.
In the mean time, activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system determine downregulation of innate and adaptive immunity, with decreased circulating T cell count and reduced lymphocytic response. The degree of these changes is linked to the severity of brain damage and inevitably lead to higher vulnerability to infections, representing a negative prognostic factor in the acute phase.
Association between immunosuppression and functional outcome in the neurorehabilitation setting are missing.
Aim of this study was to evaluate the role of immunosuppression in the neurorehabilitation journey in patients with stroke.
We analyzed the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a useful tool to investigate alterations in both the innate and adaptive immune systems. We correlated it to clinical and neurorehabilitation scales, investigating disability, functional status, as well as gait analysis and occurrence of infectious complications. All outcomes were measured on admission in Neurorehabilitation setting and at hospital discharge.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Lymphopenia, Immunosuppression
- Being tested
- Neurorehabilitation
- Keywords
- Ischemic stroke, Intracerebral hemorrage, Neurological rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation, Cerebrovascular disorders, Immunodepression
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Lymphopenia, Ischemic Stroke, Cerebrovascular Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NeurorehabilitationOther
Four to eight weeks motor rehabilitation (500 minutes per week across 6 day per week)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients with immunosuppression | Patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >= 5 at hospital admission Receives: Other: Neurorehabilitation | |
| Stroke patients without immunosuppression | Patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio < 5 at hospital admission Receives: Other: Neurorehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in FIM score (Functional Independence Measure) after rehabilitation
To evaluate if stroke-induced immunosuppression is a predictor of functional independence at the end of neurorehabilitation as measured by FIM score.
Measured: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Secondary outcomes (5)
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in NIHSS score (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) after rehabilitation
To evaluate if stroke-induced immunosuppression is a predictor of neurological function at the end of neurorehabilitation as measured by NIHSS score.
Measured: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in Barthel Index after rehabilitation
To evaluate if stroke-induced immunosuppression is a predictor of performances in activities of daily living at the end of neurorehabilitation as measured by Barthel Index
Measured: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in Tinetti score after rehabilitation
To evaluate if stroke-induced immunosuppression is a predictor of motor performances at the end of neurorehabilitation as measured by Tinetti score
Measured: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in Hauser Ambulation Index score after rehabilitation
To evaluate if stroke-induced immunosuppression is a predictor of motor performances at the end of neurorehabilitation as measured by Hauser Ambulatory Index
Measured: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in infectious complication during rehabilitation
To evaluate if stroke-induced immunosuppression is a predictor of infectious complications during neurorehabilitation, namely: pneumonia (diagnosed in subjects with typical symptoms of respiratory infection, confirmed by chest X-ray abnormalities), urinary tract infections (diagnosed with a positive urine culture without evidence of contamination), sepsis (defined as acute organ dysfunction with evidence of a clear source of infection and isolation of specific pathogens on blood cultures without evidence of contamination) and other infectious complications (as gastrointestinal and skin infections)
Measured: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2023
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion30 May 2022
- Study completion30 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05889169
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NeuroLympho
- Acronym
- NeuroLympho
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Raw data will be uploaded in the online Zenodo platform and available to other Researches upon reasonable request.
Publications
Meisel C, Schwab JM, Prass K, Meisel A, Dirnagl U. Central nervous system injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):775-86. doi: 10.1038/nrn1765.
PubMed 16163382Shi K, Wood K, Shi FD, Wang X, Liu Q. Stroke-induced immunosuppression and poststroke infection. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Jan 12;3(1):34-41. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000123. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PubMed 29600006Chamorro A, Meisel A, Planas AM, Urra X, van de Beek D, Veltkamp R. The immunology of acute stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Jun 5;8(7):401-10. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.98.
PubMed 22664787Morotti A, Marini S, Jessel MJ, Schwab K, Kourkoulis C, Ayres AM, Gurol ME, Viswanathan A, Greenberg SM, Anderson CD, Goldstein JN, Rosand J. Lymphopenia, Infectious Complications, and Outcome in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2017 Apr;26(2):160-166. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0367-2.
PubMed 28004330Wartenberg KE, Stoll A, Funk A, Meyer A, Schmidt JM, Berrouschot J. Infection after acute ischemic stroke: risk factors, biomarkers, and outcome. Stroke Res Treat. 2011;2011:830614. doi: 10.4061/2011/830614. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
PubMed 21789273Vaghi G, Morotti A, Piella EM, Avenali M, Martinelli D, Cristina S, Allena M, Grillo V, Corrado M, Bighiani F, Cammarota F, Antoniazzi A, Ferrari F, Mazzacane F, Cavallini A, Pichiecchio A, Rognone E, Martinis L, Correale L, Castiglia SF, Trabassi D, Serrao M, Tassorelli C, De Icco R. The role of stroke-induced immunosuppression as a predictor of functional outcome in the neurorehabilitation setting. Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58562-1.
PubMed 38594322
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stroke-induced Immunodepression: Role in the Neurorehabilitation Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05889169
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NeuroLympho / NeuroLympho
- Conditions
- Stroke, Lymphopenia, Immunosuppression
- Keywords
- Ischemic stroke, Intracerebral hemorrage, Neurological rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation, Cerebrovascular disorders, Immunodepression
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The close interconnection between nervous system and the immune system is well known. Brain injuries lead to homeostasis disruption. On the one hand they result in increased brain inflammation contributing to tissue repair, at the expense of a possible extension of tissue damage. On the other hand, they lead to systemic down-regulation of innate and adaptive immunity, determining higher vulnerability to infections, responsible of death and comorbidities in the acute and subacute setting.
Aim of the study was to evaluate the role of immunosuppression in the neurorehabilitation pathway in patients with stroke.
Detailed description
The perfect balance between nervous and immune system could be severely impaired after brain injuries, such as strokes.
In the acute phase, inflammatory mediators are responsible of central nervous system inflammation, associated to tissue repair at the expense of possible secondary brain injury or damage expansions.
In the mean time, activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the autonomic nervous system determine downregulation of innate and adaptive immunity, with decreased circulating T cell count and reduced lymphocytic response. The degree of these changes is linked to the severity of brain damage and inevitably lead to higher vulnerability to infections, representing a negative prognostic factor in the acute phase.
Association between immunosuppression and functional outcome in the neurorehabilitation setting are missing.
Aim of this study was to evaluate the role of immunosuppression in the neurorehabilitation journey in patients with stroke.
We analyzed the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a useful tool to investigate alterations in both the innate and adaptive immune systems. We correlated it to clinical and neurorehabilitation scales, investigating disability, functional status, as well as gait analysis and occurrence of infectious complications. All outcomes were measured on admission in Neurorehabilitation setting and at hospital discharge.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients with immunosuppression | – | Other: NeurorehabilitationPatients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >= 5 at hospital admission |
| Stroke patients without immunosuppression | – | Other: NeurorehabilitationPatients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio < 5 at hospital admission |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants were selected from a single centre cohort admitted for stroke rehabilitation at the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the IRCCS Mondino Foundation (Pavia, Italy).
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- diagnosis of first episode of ischemic stroke or primary spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (both confirmed by proper neuroimaging)
- admission to the Neurorehabilitation ward within 30 days from the index event
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- medical history of immunodeficiency or immunoproliferative disease
- immunosuppressive or immunomodulating therapy in the year before the index event
- systemic steroids in the six months before the index event
- Glasgow Coma Scale < 8 at hospital admission
- other diagnosis of neurological diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NeurorehabilitationFour to eight weeks motor rehabilitation (500 minutes per week across 6 day per week) | Other | Stroke patients with immunosuppression, Stroke patients without immunosuppression |
Primary outcome
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in FIM score (Functional Independence Measure) after rehabilitation
Time frame: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
To evaluate if stroke-induced immunosuppression is a predictor of functional independence at the end of neurorehabilitation as measured by FIM score.
5 secondary outcomes
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in NIHSS score (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) after rehabilitation
Time frame: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in Barthel Index after rehabilitation
Time frame: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in Tinetti score after rehabilitation
Time frame: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in Hauser Ambulation Index score after rehabilitation
Time frame: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in infectious complication during rehabilitation
Time frame: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 16163382Meisel C, Schwab JM, Prass K, Meisel A, Dirnagl U. Central nervous system injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):775-86. doi: 10.1038/nrn1765.
- Results publication: PubMed 29600006Shi K, Wood K, Shi FD, Wang X, Liu Q. Stroke-induced immunosuppression and poststroke infection. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Jan 12;3(1):34-41. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000123. eCollection 2018 Mar.
- Results publication: PubMed 22664787Chamorro A, Meisel A, Planas AM, Urra X, van de Beek D, Veltkamp R. The immunology of acute stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Jun 5;8(7):401-10. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.98.
- Results publication: PubMed 28004330Morotti A, Marini S, Jessel MJ, Schwab K, Kourkoulis C, Ayres AM, Gurol ME, Viswanathan A, Greenberg SM, Anderson CD, Goldstein JN, Rosand J. Lymphopenia, Infectious Complications, and Outcome in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2017 Apr;26(2):160-166. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0367-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 21789273Wartenberg KE, Stoll A, Funk A, Meyer A, Schmidt JM, Berrouschot J. Infection after acute ischemic stroke: risk factors, biomarkers, and outcome. Stroke Res Treat. 2011;2011:830614. doi: 10.4061/2011/830614. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38594322Vaghi G, Morotti A, Piella EM, Avenali M, Martinelli D, Cristina S, Allena M, Grillo V, Corrado M, Bighiani F, Cammarota F, Antoniazzi A, Ferrari F, Mazzacane F, Cavallini A, Pichiecchio A, Rognone E, Martinis L, Correale L, Castiglia SF, Trabassi D, Serrao M, Tassorelli C, De Icco R. The role of stroke-induced immunosuppression as a predictor of functional outcome in the neurorehabilitation setting. Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58562-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Raw data will be uploaded in the online Zenodo platform and available to other Researches upon reasonable request.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke and Lymphopenia, run by IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundation at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference between group 1 and group 2 in FIM score (Functional Independence Measure) after rehabilitation (time frame: After four to eight weeks from NRB admission). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05889169, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2023.