AzTrials
AzTrials

CBTNCT05893615

Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Quality of Life in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients

A study testing Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in people with CBT, run by Peking University People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was commonly impaired in atrial fibrillation patients. Depression, anxiety, and illness perception are psychological correlates of HRQoL. Our previous study had shown good effects of CBT on the quality of life in AF patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
CBT
What is being tested?
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Mar 2020to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The inclusion criteria for participation were: (a) age 18-75 years; (b) AF diagnosis, based on a 12-lead ECG and cardiologist-led examination following the 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation5 and (c) paroxysmal AF diagnosis given by a cardiologist according to the conversion back to the normal sinus rhythm occurs spontaneously within a week 18. (d) ability to read and write in Chinese.

Who cannot join

  • (a) severe complications such as unstable coronary artery disease, heart failure with severe systolic dysfunction(ejection fraction≤35%); (b)AF soon after thoracic surgery; (c) malignant disease with a 1-year survival rate or a terminal illness diagnosis; (d) a diagnosed psychiatric condition that interfered with participation (including severe depression, bipolar disorder, psychotic illness of any type, dementia, acute suicidality, severe personality disorder);(e) regular psychological therapy with a mental health condition; (f) participation in another study; (g) cognitive impairment interfering with their ability to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Minjie Zheng

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Anxiety, Depression, Illness Perception, and Quality of Life in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was commonly impaired in atrial fibrillation patients. Depression, anxiety, and illness perception are psychological correlates of HRQoL. Our previous study had shown good effects of CBT on the quality of life in AF patients. This study aimed to establish the long-term efficacy of CBT on both psychological distress and HRQoL. Method: The study was a prospective, open study, pseudo-randomization with a pretest-posttest design and a 6-month follow-up. A total of 102 patients with paroxysmal AF were enrolled, and 90 patients were assigned (1:1) to 10 weeks of CBT focused on anxiety symptoms or to treat as usual in the end. Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), GAD-7, PHQ-9, University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation (AFSS), and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) were measured as outcomes.

Conditions
CBT
Being tested
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive Behaviour TherapyBehavioural

    The CBT module was adjusted as follows: (1) Health education about paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; (2) Self-awareness training; (3) Exposure training; (4) Habitual reversal training;(5) Correcting cognitive distortion; (6) Behavioral activation (7) Specific training for anxiety; (8) Practice and feedback; (9) Relapse prevention; (10) Review.

Study groups in NCT05893615
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CBT groupActive comparatorPatients in the CBT intervention group, who received CBT focused on anxiety symptoms in addition to their usual treatment, including 10 one-hour sessions spread over 10 weeks, and weekly homework guided by the therapist.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Treatment as usual (TAU) groupNo interventionPatients in TAU group received optimal medical care according to the current clinical guidelines. Patients in the TAU group did not receive any psychotherapy.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline score of The 12-item Health Survey Short Form (SF-12) at 10 weeks and 6 months

    SF-12 is a 12-item, multipurpose short-form survey that is used to measure generic HRQoL (derived from the SF-36). The findings are weighted and summed to produce interpretable scales for a participant's physical and mental well-being. SF-12 is divided into two domains: the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS). Each domain scores from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health status

    Measured: Both groups were assessed the SF-12 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)

    The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) is a nine-item questionnaire that assesses how people feel about illnesses across nine categories. The individual nine domain scores were added together to create a composite BIPQ score. A higher BIPQ score suggests that the psychological burden of illness is greater (range: 0-80). The BIPQ assesses the following illness perception domains: identity (symptoms experienced); timeline-acute/chronic (perception of the length of disease); consequences (effect of disease on one's life); personal control (control over disease); treatment control (perception of treatment impact); emotional representations (emotional effect of the disease); illness coherence (understanding of disease); illness concern (concern about the disease); and cause (perceived cause of disease). The cause item is an open-ended question that asks patients to rank the top three factors they believe caused their disease

    Measured: Both groups were assessed the BIPQ three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later

  2. University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS)

    University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS)-a 14-item disease-specific scale consisting of three parts. Part 1 measures patients with atrial fibrillation overall life satisfaction and frequency, duration of atrial fibrillation attacks, and severity; Part 2 measures patient utilization rates; Part 3 is divided into symptom subscales, including 7 common symptoms of atrial fibrillation (heart palpitations, dyspnea at rest, dyspnea with activity, exercise intolerance, vertigo, fatigue at rest, and chest pain) and the corresponding frequency of attacks. In this study, the symptom part was selected as the AF symptoms measurement.

    Measured: Both groups were assessed the AFSS symptoms subscale three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later

  3. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD- 7) is a 7-item measure of anxiety symptoms, using a four-point Likert-type scale. The GAD-7 asks how often people have suffered from the seven core symptoms of GAD within the last two weeks with the response options being 'not at all', 'on some days', 'on more than half of the days', and 'almost every day' (scored 0-3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21). A sum score of≥10 indicates clinically relevant anxiety.

    Measured: Both groups were assessed the GAD-7 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later

  4. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a nine-item tool used to measure the severity of depression over the previous 2 weeks (range 0-27). he PHQ-9 was chosen above other depression screening measures because it is easy to administer and outperforms the structured clinical interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV as the standard criterion.

    Measured: Both groups were assessed the PHQ-9 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05893615
Sponsor's protocol ID
AF-CBT-HRQoL2020
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
26 May 2023
Last updated
8 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in people with CBT, run by Peking University People's Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline score of The 12-item Health Survey Short Form (SF-12) at 10 weeks and 6 months (time frame: Both groups were assessed the SF-12 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in