Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainPhase 2CYPRESSNCT05895552
A Study of RTA 901 (BIIB143) in Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
A Phase 2 study testing RTA 901 in people with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, run by Reata, a wholly owned subsidiary of Biogen at 75 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a 2-part, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of RTA 901 in qualified participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPNP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- RTA 901
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 209 participants
- Where
- 75 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Jul 2023to 15 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Run-in Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at least 1 year prior to Screening
- Clinical diagnosis of DPNP defined as symptomatic distal symmetric polyneuropathy (secondary to diabetes) in the lower extremities, which may include symptoms of pain that is burning, lancinating, tingling, or shooting (electric shock-like). Pain in the lower extremities may occur with paresthesia or dysesthesia (unpleasant sensations of burning). Neuropathic pain may be accompanied by an exaggerated response to painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) and pain evoked by light touch or contact, eg, with socks, shoes, and bedclothes (allodynia);
- NPRS pain intensity score ≥ 4 on an 11-point scale at Screening
- A score ≥ 2.5 on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) Part B
Run-in Exclusion Criteria:
- Has neuropathy from a cause other than T1DM or T2DM
- Has a condition other than DPNP that could confound the assessment of pain (eg, fibromyalgia or regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compression);
- Diabetic foot ulceration or infection within 90 days prior to Screening
- Prior participation in a study with RTA 901;
NOTE: Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
75 sites in 1 country.
75 sites in 1 country
United States75 sites
Agile Clinical Research Trials, LLC
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
Austin, Texas, 78731
REX Clinical Trials, LLC
Beaumont, Texas, 77701
Boston Clinical Trials, LLC
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Hope Clinical Research, Inc.
Canoga Park, California, 91303
East Coast Institute for Research, LLC
Canton, Georgia, 30114
Diabetes & Endocrinology Associates of Stark County, Inc.
Canton, Ohio, 44718
Notus Clinical Research
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414
WR-ClinSearch, LLC
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
Velocity Clinical Research, Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
StudyMetrix Research
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63303
Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Clinical Research of West Florida Inc
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Centricity Research Columbus Endocrinology
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Remington-Davis, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Zenos Clinical Research
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Meta Medical Research Institute
Dayton, Ohio, 45432
Velocity Clinical Research, Providence
East Greenwich, Rhode Island, 68510
Denver Endocrinology Diabetes and Thyroid Center PC
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Carolina Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28303
Care United Research, LLC
Forney, Texas, 75126
Diabetes and Thyroid Center of Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas, 76053
Valley Research - Trials
Fresno, California, 93720
Las Vegas Endocrinology
Henderson, Nevada, 89074
Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030
Biopharma Informatic, LLC
Houston, Texas, 77043
Endocrine IPS, PLLC
Houston, Texas, 77079
Amir A Hassan, MD, PA
Houston, Texas, 77089
East Coast Institute for Research, LLC
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204
Clinical Research Consultants, LLC
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
3 Sync LLC
Kingwood, Texas, 77339
Multi Specialty Research Associates, LLC
Lake City, Florida, 32055
3 Sync LLC
Lake Worth, Florida, 33460
Jubilee Clinical Research Inc
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Excel Clinical Research
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109
Epic Clinical Research
Lewisville, Texas, 75057
Velocity Clinical Research, Inc.
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Clinical Research Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90048
East Coast Institute for Research, LLC
Macon, Georgia, 31210
Tandem Clinical Research
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Centricity Research Phoenix Multispecialty
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
Tandem Clinical Research
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
ActivMed Practices & Research, LLC
Methuen, Massachusetts, 01844
Finlay Medical Research
Miami, Florida, 33126
New Horizon Research Center
Miami, Florida, 33165
Floridian Clinical Research
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016
Columbia University
New York, New York, 10032
Velocity Clinical Research, Inc.
Norfolk, Nebraska, 68510
Shadow Creek Medical Clinic
Pearland, Texas, 77584
Methodist Medical Center of Illinois
Peoria, Illinois, 61606
Arizona Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053
ActivMed Practices & Research, LLC
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Rainier Clinical Research Center
Renton, Washington, 98057
Diabetes & Glandular Disease Clinic, P.A.
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
VIP Trials
San Antonio, Texas, 78230
Acclaim Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92120
Optimus Medical Group
San Francisco, California, 94102
IMA Clinical Research, PC
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
Richmond Behavioral Associates
Staten Island, New York, 10314
Revival Research Institute, LLC.
Sterling Heights, Michigan, 48126
3 Sync LLC
Sunrise, Florida, 33013
Genesis Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Baycare Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33607
VICIS Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33615
Trinity Clinical Research LLC
Tullahoma, Tennessee, 37388
Integrated Clinical Trial Services, Inc.
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265
Velocity Clinical Research, Salt Lake City
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
Paradigm Clinical Research
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
PIH Health Whittier Hospital
Whittier, California, 90606
Clinical Site Partners, Orlando
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
Conquest Research, LLC
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of RTA 901 in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
This is a 2-part, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of RTA 901 in qualified participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPNP). Each study part will be randomized into 3 treatment arms; 2 different doses of RTA 901 and RTA 901-maching placebo. The doses of RTA 901 in Part 2 will be selected based on the Exposure-Response (E-R) analyses of data from Part 1.
The duration of each part of the study will be approximately 20 weeks, including a Screening period of up to 2 weeks, a Run-in-period of 2 weeks, a Treatment period of 12 weeks, and a Follow-up period of 4 weeks. All participants in Part 1 and Part 2 of the study will follow the same visit and assessment schedule. Eligibility will be assessed during the Screening and Run-in-periods.
Read the detailed description
Study Sponsor, originally Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., is now Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Biogen.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
- Being tested
- RTA 901, RTA 901-Matching Placebo
- Keywords
- RTA 901
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RTA 901Drug
Also called BIIB143, Cemdomespib
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
RTA 901-Matching PlaceboDrug
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 RTA 901 Dose 1 | Experimental | Participants will receive study drug, once daily (QD), during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. Receives: Drug: RTA 901 |
| Part 1 RTA 901 Dose 2 | Experimental | Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. Receives: Drug: RTA 901 |
| Part 1 RTA 901-Matching Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901-matching placebo, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. Receives: Drug: RTA 901-Matching Placebo |
| Part 2 RTA 901 Dose 1 | Experimental | Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. Receives: Drug: RTA 901 |
| Part 2 RTA 901 Dose 2 | Experimental | Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. Receives: Drug: RTA 901 |
| Part 2 RTA 901-Matching Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901-matching placebo, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. Receives: Drug: RTA 901-Matching Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Pain Intensity Assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at Week 12
The NPRS of pain intensity is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 (representing no pain at all) to 10 (representing the worst pain imaginable). The participants were asked to select a whole number (0 to 10) that best indicates the intensity of his/her neuropathic pain in the past 24 hours. The weekly average score of NPRS was defined as the sum of non-missing daily scores divided by the number of days with non-missing scores for that week. Negative change from baseline indicates decreased pain intensity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During and Following the Treatment Period
An adverse event (AE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including any CS abnormal laboratory test result), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of the study drug, whether or not it is considered to be study drug related. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of Investigator, placed participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. AEs that presented, or worsened in intensity or frequency, following the initiation of study treatment were categorized as TEAEs.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examinations
Clinically significant abnormalities in physical examinations were based on investigator discretion.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Potential Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Sign Parameters
Vital sign parameters included temperature, pulse rate systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate. As pre-specified in protocol, the criteria for determining potentially clinically relevant abnormalities in vital signs included: temperature < 36.0 and > 38.0 degrees Celsius (c), pulse rate < 60 and > 100 beats per minute (bpm), systolic blood pressure < 90, > 140 and > 160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure < 50, > 90 and > 100 mmHg, weight (7% or more increase from baseline, 7% or more decrease from baseline) and respiratory rate < 12 and > 20 breaths per minute. The categories with at least one participant with clinically significant vital sign abnormalities are reported.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Clinical significance of abnormalities in ECG was determined based on the investigator's discretion.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Hematology Parameters)
Hematology parameters included hematocrit, hemoglobin, erythrocytes, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, platelets, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline values. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Blood Chemistry Parameters)
Parameters included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), cholesterol, choriogonadotropin beta, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), ferritin, creatine kinase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, bilirubin(total and direct), alkaline phosphatase, amylase, lipase, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid, total protein, glucose, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, magnesium, chloride, bicarbonate, and gamma-glutamyl transferase. These parameters were flagged as low, normal or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by Investigator. Here, shift to low indicates values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high values postbaseline. Categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Urinalysis)
Urinalysis included assessments of bacteria, Bilirubin, Calcium Oxalate Crystals, Choriogonadotropin Beta, Color, Erythrocytes, Glucose, Granular Casts, Hyaline Casts, Ketones, Leukocyte Esterase, Leukocytes, Nitrite, Occult Blood, Protein, red blood cells (RBC) Casts, Renal Epithelial Cells, Specific Gravity, Specimen Appearance, Squamous Epithelial Cells, Transitional Epithelial Cells, Triple Phosphate Crystals, Uric Acid Crystals, white blood cells (WBC) Casts and pH. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by the Investigator. Here, shift to low indicates values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Coagulation Parameters)
Coagulation included assessments of prothrombin. The parameter was flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by the Investigator. Here, shift to low indicates values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Body Weight
Weight decrease was characterized by a decrease of ≥7% from baseline and weight increase was characterized by an increase of ≥7% from baseline.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a >=30% Decrease From Baseline in the Average NPRS Score at Week 12
Responders is defined as participants with at least >=30% reduction in neuropathic pain from baseline in the NPRS average neuropathic pain intensity at Week 12 and were analysed using a logistic regression. The NPRS of pain intensity is a numeric scale, ranging from 0 (representing no pain at all) to 10 (representing the worst pain imaginable). The participant was asked to select a whole number (0 to 10) that best indicates the intensity of his/her neuropathic pain in the past 24 hours. Lower scores indicate less pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a >=50% Decrease From Baseline in the Average NPRS Score at Week 12
Responder is defined as participants with at least >=50% reduction in neuropathic pain from baseline in the NPRS average neuropathic pain intensity at Week 12. The NPRS of pain intensity is a numeric scale, ranging from 0 (representing no pain at all) to 10 (representing the worst pain imaginable). The participant was asked to select a whole number (0 to 10) that best indicates the intensity of his/her neuropathic pain in the past 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medications During the Treatment Period
Rescue medication for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is in addition to standard of care medication (gabapentin, pregabalin or duloxetine) for DPNP. Rescue medication is intended to treat temporary elevations in a participant's DPNP and is intended to be used occasionally and not meant to be used for prolonged periods of time.
Measured: Up to Week 12
Amount of Rescue Medications Used During the Treatment Period
The amount of rescue medication used per day during the 12-week treatment period was calculated as the total dosage recorded divided by total days of study drug exposure during the treatment period.
Measured: Up to Week 12
Time to First Occurrence of Rescue Medication Use
Time to first occurrence of rescue medication use was defined as the time from first randomized dose to the first date of rescue medication use recorded in e-diary during the 12-week treatment period. If a participant withdraws from the study prior to week 12 and the participant did not take any rescue medication, then the participant will be censored on the last day in the study.
Measured: Up to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) Score at Week 12
DSIS is a participant reported outcome that was developed to quantify sleep interference due to pain. The DSIS was completed daily by participants upon waking, preferably in the morning, to accurately capture variability in sleep interference due to pain, thus minimizing recall bias. Using the e-diary, participants assessed how neuropathic pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. This score ranges from 0 to 10; 0 representing no interference with sleep to 10 representing complete inability to sleep, lower score indicating less pain interference during sleep. The weekly average score of DSIS was defined as the sum of non-missing daily scores divided by the number of days with non-missing scores for that week. A negative change from baseline indicates decreased interference in sleep due to pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2023
- Study start28 Jul 2023
- Primary completion15 Nov 2024
- Study completion15 Nov 2024
Why it stopped: Sponsor decision to close study early; not due to safety concerns.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 209 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Reata, a wholly owned subsidiary of Biogen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Biogen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05895552
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 297DP201
- Other IDs
- 901-C-2102
- Acronym
- CYPRESS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of RTA 901 in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05895552
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CYPRESS / 297DP201
- Conditions
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
- Keywords
- RTA 901
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Sponsor decision to close study early; not due to safety concerns.
- Enrolment
- 209 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Reata, a wholly owned subsidiary of BiogenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 2-part, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of RTA 901 in qualified participants with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPNP). Each study part will be randomized into 3 treatment arms; 2 different doses of RTA 901 and RTA 901-maching placebo. The doses of RTA 901 in Part 2 will be selected based on the Exposure-Response (E-R) analyses of data from Part 1.
The duration of each part of the study will be approximately 20 weeks, including a Screening period of up to 2 weeks, a Run-in-period of 2 weeks, a Treatment period of 12 weeks, and a Follow-up period of 4 weeks. All participants in Part 1 and Part 2 of the study will follow the same visit and assessment schedule. Eligibility will be assessed during the Screening and Run-in-periods.
Detailed description
Study Sponsor, originally Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., is now Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Biogen.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 RTA 901 Dose 1 | Experimental | Drug: RTA 901Participants will receive study drug, once daily (QD), during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. |
| Part 1 RTA 901 Dose 2 | Experimental | Drug: RTA 901Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. |
| Part 1 RTA 901-Matching Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: RTA 901-Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901-matching placebo, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. |
| Part 2 RTA 901 Dose 1 | Experimental | Drug: RTA 901Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. |
| Part 2 RTA 901 Dose 2 | Experimental | Drug: RTA 901Participants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. |
| Part 2 RTA 901-Matching Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: RTA 901-Matching PlaceboParticipants will receive study drug, QD, during the 2-week Run-in Period. Following randomization, the participants will receive a dose of RTA 901-matching placebo, QD, for a 12-week treatment duration. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RTA 901Also: BIIB143, CemdomespibAdministered as specified in the treatment arm. | Drug | Part 1 RTA 901 Dose 1, Part 1 RTA 901 Dose 2, Part 2 RTA 901 Dose 1, Part 2 RTA 901 Dose 2 |
| RTA 901-Matching PlaceboAdministered as specified in the treatment arm. | Drug | Part 1 RTA 901-Matching Placebo, Part 2 RTA 901-Matching Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Pain Intensity Assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
The NPRS of pain intensity is an 11-point numeric scale, ranging from 0 (representing no pain at all) to 10 (representing the worst pain imaginable). The participants were asked to select a whole number (0 to 10) that best indicates the intensity of his/her neuropathic pain in the past 24 hours. The weekly average score of NPRS was defined as the sum of non-missing daily scores divided by the number of days with non-missing scores for that week. Negative change from baseline indicates decreased pain intensity.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During and Following the Treatment Period
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
An adverse event (AE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including any CS abnormal laboratory test result), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of the study drug, whether or not it is considered to be study drug related. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of Investigator, placed participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. AEs that presented, or worsened in intensity or frequency, following the initiation of study treatment were categorized as TEAEs.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examinations
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Clinically significant abnormalities in physical examinations were based on investigator discretion.
Number of Participants With Potential Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Sign Parameters
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Vital sign parameters included temperature, pulse rate systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate. As pre-specified in protocol, the criteria for determining potentially clinically relevant abnormalities in vital signs included: temperature < 36.0 and > 38.0 degrees Celsius (c), pulse rate < 60 and > 100 beats per minute (bpm), systolic blood pressure < 90, > 140 and > 160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), diastolic blood pressure < 50, > 90 and > 100 mmHg, weight (7% or more increase from baseline, 7% or more decrease from baseline) and respiratory rate < 12 and > 20 breaths per minute. The categories with at least one participant with clinically significant vital sign abnormalities are reported.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Clinical significance of abnormalities in ECG was determined based on the investigator's discretion.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Hematology Parameters)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Hematology parameters included hematocrit, hemoglobin, erythrocytes, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, platelets, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline values. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Blood Chemistry Parameters)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Parameters included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), cholesterol, choriogonadotropin beta, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), ferritin, creatine kinase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, bilirubin(total and direct), alkaline phosphatase, amylase, lipase, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, uric acid, total protein, glucose, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, magnesium, chloride, bicarbonate, and gamma-glutamyl transferase. These parameters were flagged as low, normal or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by Investigator. Here, shift to low indicates values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high values postbaseline. Categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Urinalysis)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Urinalysis included assessments of bacteria, Bilirubin, Calcium Oxalate Crystals, Choriogonadotropin Beta, Color, Erythrocytes, Glucose, Granular Casts, Hyaline Casts, Ketones, Leukocyte Esterase, Leukocytes, Nitrite, Occult Blood, Protein, red blood cells (RBC) Casts, Renal Epithelial Cells, Specific Gravity, Specimen Appearance, Squamous Epithelial Cells, Transitional Epithelial Cells, Triple Phosphate Crystals, Uric Acid Crystals, white blood cells (WBC) Casts and pH. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by the Investigator. Here, shift to low indicates values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Measurement (Coagulation Parameters)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Coagulation included assessments of prothrombin. The parameter was flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by the Investigator. Here, shift to low indicates values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicates values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Body Weight
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to end of follow-up period (up to 16 weeks)
Weight decrease was characterized by a decrease of ≥7% from baseline and weight increase was characterized by an increase of ≥7% from baseline.
6 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a >=30% Decrease From Baseline in the Average NPRS Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a >=50% Decrease From Baseline in the Average NPRS Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medications During the Treatment Period
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Amount of Rescue Medications Used During the Treatment Period
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Time to First Occurrence of Rescue Medication Use
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Related trials for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Recruiting
Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Technique on Pain and Anxiety During Electromyography in Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY4065967 in Participants With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of tDCS and tACS on Pain, Dexterity, and Strength in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Suzetrigine (SUZ) in Participants With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Perineural Botulinum Toxin Injection Versus Oral Duloxetine in Relief of Foot Pain in Painful Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Biogen
75 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing RTA 901 in people with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, run by Reata, a wholly owned subsidiary of Biogen at 75 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 75 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Pain Intensity Assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2025.