AzTrials
AzTrials

Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaNCT05898932

Enhanced Clinical Decisions for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using Patient-Reported Outcomes

An observational study of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this project is to use newly developed patient-reported outcomes to improve the clinical care of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The use of new patient-centered tools will improve evaluation and clinical decision-making by including symptoms not commonly measured in men, such as urinary… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
What is being tested?
Medical Management and Surgical Management
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2023to Apr 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Who may be able to join

  • Male sex
  • Age 50 years or older
  • Diagnosed by physician with BPH
  • Able and willing to complete questionnaires
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Ability to read, write, and speak in English
  • No plans to move from study area in next 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Female sex or intersex
  • Younger than 50 years of age
  • Being a prisoner or detainee
  • Gross hematuria
  • Interstitial cystitis
  • Pelvic or endoscopic genitourinary surgery within the preceding 6 months (not including diagnostic cystoscopy)
Show all 12Show fewer
  • History of cystitis caused by tuberculosis, radiation therapy, or Cytoxan/cyclophosphamide therapy
  • Ongoing symptomatic urethral stricture
  • Current chemotherapy or other cancer therapy
  • History of lower urinary tract or pelvic malignancy
  • Severe neurological of psychiatric disorder that would prevent study participation (e.g., bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, Alzheimer's Disease)
  • Current moderate or severe substance use disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Endeavor Health

    Glenview, Illinois, 60026

    Dacey Maglaque, 847-503-4278, dacey.maglaque@endeavorhealth.org

    Pooja Talaty, 847-503-4280, pooja.talaty@endeavorhealth.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this project is to use newly developed patient-reported outcomes to improve the clinical care of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The use of new patient-centered tools will improve evaluation and clinical decision-making by including symptoms not commonly measured in men, such as urinary incontinence, and allow for more frequent assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms through remote surveillance. Through the use of care-coordination checklists, clinicians can be more responsive to post-treatment symptom changes, resulting in reduced bother from lower urinary tract symptoms and higher quality of life in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Read the detailed description

The American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) has been the primary patient-reported outcome (PRO) used in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for decades. New symptom indices - the LURN SI-10 and LURN SI-29 - have been developed by the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) to provide a general-use multidimensional symptom assessment in the urology clinic. These tools are relatively new and have yet to be validated in specific disease populations. The overarching goal of this project is to use these new questionnaires to enhance clinical decision-making in men with BPH. This will be achieved by (1) integration of PRO assessments into the evaluation and management of patients with BPH; (2) determination of clinical meaningful differences in LURN symptom indices in men with BPH receiving known effective treatment; and (3) creation of data visualization tools and care-coordination recommendations to facilitate the matching of evidence-based treatments to patients with persistent symptoms using PROs. PROs provide a cost-effective remote management strategy that, combined with advances in electronic medical health record technology, can improve patient care by allowing for more real-time surveillance and intervention, and the monitoring of common comorbid symptoms such as sleep disturbance and depression, in addition to core urologic symptoms of BPH.

In Aim 1, the investigators will use sophisticated statistical methods to predict changes in urological symptoms and assess associations between lower urinary tract symptoms and measures of sleep, depression, and pain, among others. In Aim 2, the investigators will assess test-retest reliability and other psychometric properties of the LURN symptom indices, using a triangulation of methods to determine minimally important differences. Finally in Aim 3, the investigators will engage stakeholders, including patients and clinicians, and use qualitative methods to create visualization tools and care coordination checklists to improve counseling and follow up for patients undergoing treatment. Aim 3 will also enhance the recovery and routine monitoring of men with BPH after surgery, who can experience distressing side effects and complications such as urinary leakage and pain.

Being tested
Medical Management, Surgical Management
Keywords
PROs, Questionnaires, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, BPH, LUTS, Patient reported outcome measures
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Hyperplasia, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medical ManagementOther

    Participants will be managing condition with medication

  • Surgical ManagementOther

    Participants will be managing condition with a surgery

Study groups in NCT05898932
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Medical ManagementParticipants will be managing condition with medication
Receives: Other: Medical Management
Surgical ManagementParticipants will be managing condition with a surgery
Receives: Other: Surgical Management

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient rating of global change

    This is a single item that captures how much better or worse the person's bladder condition is relative to when they began treatment for BPH. The Patient Global Rating of Change (PGRC) scale ranges from "Very much worse" (1) to "Very much improved" (7), with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

    Measured: Through study completion, from week 4 to week 24

  2. LURN SYMPTOM INDEX-29 (LURN SI-29)

    This is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses different lower urinary tract symptoms as well as single item about global bother.

    Measured: The past 7 days

  3. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Profile v2.1

    The PROMIS-29 Profile-a 29-item instrument-combines short assessments of eight core constructs of health-related quality of life (HRQoL): physical function (PF), sleep disturbance (SD), pain interference (PI) and pain intensity (PIN), fatigue (FA), anxiety (AN), depression (DE) and ability to participate in social roles and activities (SRAA). PROMIS employs a T-score, which is constructed such that 50 is the mean of the general population, and the standard deviation is 10 by definition. Most scores falling between 20 and 80, which is +/- 3 SDs around the mean. Higher scores represent more of a domain. Therefore, for physical function, higher scores represent better health whereas for anxiety, higher scores represent poorer health.

    Measured: The past 7 days

  4. AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (AUS) SYMPTOM SCORE

    This is a 7-item self-report measure used to assess urinary urgency, frequency, and voiding symptoms. ranges from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating more severe urinary symptoms.

    Measured: The past 30 days

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) Questionnaire

    This is an instrument widely used measure of erectile function consisting of 5 questions. The severity of erectile dysfunction score is from 1 to 25, with 1 being the most severe and 25 being healthy.

    Measured: The past 6 months

  2. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.0 - Gastrointestinal Diarrhea 6a

    This contains items focused on capturing the frequency, form, bothersomeness, impact, controllability, and predictability of bowel urgency during the past 7 days. PROMIS employs a T-score, which ranges from 0 to 100, with most scores falling between 20 and 80.Higher scores represent more of a domain

    Measured: In the past 7 days

  3. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.0 - Gastrointestinal Constipation 9a

    This assesses the frequency and intensity of incomplete evacuation, rectal pain, straining, and hard stools, as well as the need for manual extraction of stool. PROMIS employs a T-score, which ranges from 0 to 100, with most scores falling between 20 and 80. Higher scores represent more of a domain.

    Measured: In the past 7 days

  4. Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD)

    A 4-item validated questionnaire used to assess ejaculatory dysfunction. Three questions relate to ejaculatory function items and 1 relates to ejaculation bother item. Ejaculatory function score is the sum of questions 1 to 3 and scores range from 1 to 15, with lower scores indicating more severe ejaculatory complaints. Bother score range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater bother

    Measured: In the past month.

  5. The snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high BP, BMI, age, neck circumference, and male gender (STOP-Bang) questionnaire

    The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a scoring model consisting of eight easily administered questions starting with the acronym STOP-Bang (Appendix) and is scored based on Yes/No answers (score: 1/0). Thus, the scores range from a value of 0 to 8. Higher score indicating worse outcome.

    Measured: Not Applicable (NA)

  6. 3-Day Voiding Diary

    The diary records the patient's daily fluid intake, frequency of urination throughout the day and night, instances of leakage, and the quantity of lost urine. Analyzing these findings against the standard criteria for regular bladder function could reveal potential issues and help confirm a diagnosis. The definition of normal benchmarks takes into account factors like age, gender, as well as various internal and external variables including fluid consumption and its nature.

    Measured: Recorded on three separate days

  7. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Quick Food Scan

    National Cancer Institute Quick Food Scan estimates fat intake as a percentage of total energy. Participants rate their frequency of consuming 15 food groups and reduced-fat butter or margarine over the last 12 months ranging 1 = never to 8 = more than once per day. Reduced-fat margarine usage as a replacement for butter is rated separately. Scoring is based on weighted least-squares estimates of regression coefficients for data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals. The algorithm accounts for food frequency with age- and sex-specific portion sizes. The final score is expressed as total estimated percentage of dietary energy from fat.

    Measured: in the past 12 months

  8. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Cognitive Function- Short Form 4a

    The PROMIS® v2.0 Cognitive Function short forms measure participants' subjectively experienced cognitive functioning. Individuals may select one of five options in response: "5-never," "4-rarely (once)," "3-sometimes (2-3 times)," "2-often (about once a day)," and "1-very often (several times a day)." PROMIS scales are expressed on a T score, where 50 is the mean of the general population, with a standard deviation of 10 by definition. Most scores fall between 20 and 80, +/- 3 SDs around the mean. Higher scores represent more of a domain. Lower raw scores and lower T scores on this measure indicate greater subjective cognitive difficulty.

    Measured: In the past 7 days

  9. The Patient Feedback Survey

    The Patient Feedback Survey is a brief six-item PRO measure that captures how the patient perceives PROMs administered in terms of burdensomeness. A composite score is calculated to create a weighted representative index of concern, comfort, and well-being relative to time to completion for a range of 0 to 72, with higher scores indicative of elevated endorsed response burden.

    Measured: Immediate - This questionnaire is about survey burden in regard to the study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05898932
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00217126
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
16 May 2023
Last updated
24 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: De-identified data may be shared with other researchers.

Publications

  • Glaser AP, Smith AR, Maglaque D, Helfand BT, Mohamed R, An H, Marquez M, Talaty P, Carolan P, Geller AM, Farina FR, Jensen SE, Griffith JW. Enhanced clinical decisions for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia using patient-reported outcomes: protocol for a prospective observational study. BMC Urol. 2024 May 21;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01500-0.

    PubMed 38773430
  • Glaser AP, Smith AR, Maglaque D, Helfand BT, Mohamed R, An H, Marquez M, Talaty P, Carolan P, Geller AM, Farina FR, Jensen SE, Griffith JW. Enhanced Clinical Decisions for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia using Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 May 6:rs.3.rs-4308293. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4308293/v1.

    PubMed 38766034

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dacey Maglaque (847-503-4278, dacey.maglaque@endeavorhealth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient rating of global change (time frame: Through study completion, from week 4 to week 24). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05898932, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in